The Error is Baptism in Jesus name only for salvation

[BillG]

You may be right. How do you feel about onomatopoeia?

What about this one

Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch.

Its a genuine word and it's not a tongues.

 

[BillG]

So back up your words, show me how to be saved WITHOUT getting rid of our sins.

Prove JESUS wrong in John 3:5 and Peter in Acts 2:38.

Prove your case.
WE CANNOT GET RID OF OUR SINS

 

[BillG]

So back up your words, show me how to be saved WITHOUT getting rid of our sins.

Prove JESUS wrong in John 3:5 and Peter in Acts 2:38.

Prove your case.
Jesus in 3:5 did not say we should be baptised in his name only.
Show me a verse where VERBALLY he said bpatize in my name only.

 

[Ouch]

Are you willing to tell me I am not saved because I was not baptised in the name of Jesus and don't speak in tongues?

Some people don't like the truth, but it needs to be told.

I am willing to tell you that you can't be saved without getting rid of your sins!!!

And the only way to do that is being baptized in JESUS name. NOT MY RULES.

If you have a problem with HIS rules it's between YOU AND HIM.

In John 3:5 JESUS says we need both, and EVERY recorded acts of someone being filled with the Holy Ghost they spoke in tongues.

Acts 2:4, 8: how did they know whey didn't get it? Acts 10:45-46

what do you think of these two?

Mark 16:16-17
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;

 

[BillG]

Are you willing to tell me I am not saved because I was not baptised in the name of Jesus and don't speak in tongues?

@Ouch

Answer my question post 516.
Put up or shut up

 

[lrs68]

JESUS disciples knew to baptize "in the name of" the father the son and the Holy Ghost. Which as we can tell since they baptized in JESUS name. I agree just obey it's not hard.

It also appears that the majority of open minded looking for absolute truths scholars and theologians have done the same thing as the Disciples considering they have conglomerately decreed this is their belief from reading and studying the New Testament.

 

[Ouch]

Prove your case.
WE CANNOT GET RID OF OUR SINS

You have never seen these?

Acts 2:38-39
King James Version
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.

Acts 22:16
King James Version
16 And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.

 

[Lamar]

Then there is the rotten core that adds to saved by grace through faith in order to be saved.

I would not label obedience as rotten.

 

[BillG]

Some people don't like the truth, but it needs to be told.

I am willing to tell you that you can't be saved without getting rid of your sins!!!

And the only way to do that is being baptized in JESUS name. NOT MY RULES.

If you have a problem with HIS rules it's between YOU AND HIM.

In John 3:5 JESUS says we need both, and EVERY recorded acts of someone being filled with the Holy Ghost they spoke in tongues.

Acts 2:4, 8: how did they know whey didn't get it? Acts 10:45-46

what do you think of these two?

Mark 16:16-17
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;

Thing is you don't know the truth.
And you don't have to balls to be honest and answer my questions.

 

[Ouch]

Prove your case.
Jesus in 3:5 did not say we should be baptised in his name only.
Show me a verse where VERBALLY he said bpatize in my name only.

I don't think there is scripture where JESUS said to be baptized in his name only HIS DISCIPLES.

 

[Ouch]

@Ouch

Answer my question post 516.
Put up or shut up

Did I answer that one?

 

[BillG]

I would not label obedience as rotten.

Not me.
Go back read the thread
You accused saved by grace is rotten for those that believe that.
You obvily believe we are saved by works.

 

[Ouch]

Thing is you don't know the truth.
And you don't have to balls to be honest and answer my questions.

Maybe you should read my response again.

 

[BillG]

I don't think there is scripture where JESUS said to be baptized in his name only HIS DISCIPLES.

Therefore baptism in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is a valid mode of baptism?

Thank you for being honest.

 

[BillG]

Did I answer that one?

I can't see a response to the question.
Have a look again

 

[BillG]

Did I answer that one?

Here we go

Are you willing to tell me I am not saved because I was not baptised in the name of Jesus and don't speak in tongues?

You didn't answer that question.

Yes or no is suffice.

 

[Cameron143]

What about this one

Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch.

Its a genuine word and it's not a tongues.

I like the go go goch at the end.

 

[Lamar]

What did you have to do to be born?

I don't know, I was too young to remember.

But It seems that I had no choice in the matter. Same goes for my older sister, she was stillborn.

What is your point in this question?

 

[CS1]

Have parents that were male and female.

wow, two became one to make one. All are one yet three different distinct persons

 

[Ouch]

Therefore baptism in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is a valid mode of baptism?

Thank you for being honest.

Since no where in scripture no one was baptized that way only in JESUS name it is not valid. We are to do ALL in JESUS name. The father, the son and the Holy Ghost are not names.