How do you derive my saying anything to the contrary?
Easy, but it's not worth getting into a debate over.
How do you derive my saying anything to the contrary?
I'll bite the bullet on this one!
I confess to being a Cessationist, that is, I believe the sign and revelational gifts ceased with the death of the Apostles.
I have not always held this view.
I spent 20 years in the Pentecostal Movement, 7 of those years as a pastor. I have seen and experienced it all!
I left in disgust around the time of the Toronto Blessing. I just could not reconcile people rolling around the floor laughing and barking like dogs as being a 'move of God'.
From a study of Scripture I came to see that New Testament Tongues were in fact Human Languages ( Acts 2) not what
was on offer in Pentecostal Churches. I had to examine my own experience of speaking in tongues and came to the realisation that it was not the NT gift but rather a psychological imitation.
So for better or worse, I am now a Cessationist.
Peace
Ya dont have to jump from one boat to the other to disagree with the things you witnessed. I am not a cessationist, but believe those people are dead wrong about the gifts. I dont believe babbling incoherantly is tongues, but that God can and does enable the ability to speak in other languages.I'll bite the bullet on this one!
I confess to being a Cessationist, that is, I believe the sign and revelational gifts ceased with the death of the Apostles.
I have not always held this view.
I spent 20 years in the Pentecostal Movement, 7 of those years as a pastor. I have seen and experienced it all!
I left in disgust around the time of the Toronto Blessing. I just could not reconcile people rolling around the floor laughing and barking like dogs as being a 'move of God'.
From a study of Scripture I came to see that New Testament Tongues were in fact Human Languages ( Acts 2) not what
was on offer in Pentecostal Churches. I had to examine my own experience of speaking in tongues and came to the realisation that it was not the NT gift but rather a psychological imitation.
So for better or worse, I am now a Cessationist.
Peace
I'll bite the bullet on this one!
I confess to being a Cessationist, that is, I believe the sign and revelational gifts ceased with the death of the Apostles.
I have not always held this view.
I spent 20 years in the Pentecostal Movement, 7 of those years as a pastor. I have seen and experienced it all!
I left in disgust around the time of the Toronto Blessing. I just could not reconcile people rolling around the floor laughing and barking like dogs as being a 'move of God'.
From a study of Scripture I came to see that New Testament Tongues were in fact Human Languages ( Acts 2) not what
was on offer in Pentecostal Churches. I had to examine my own experience of speaking in tongues and came to the realisation that it was not the NT gift but rather a psychological imitation.
So for better or worse, I am now a Cessationist.
Peace
It never hurts to straddle the fence.Both Cessationists and Charismatics are wrong.
We all know this verse. Is there a point?
He's just another "Cessationist" / "Pentehostile"Perhaps you'd care to unpack your position.
It never hurts to straddle the fence.![]()
That's hilarious!He's just another "Cessationist" / "Pentehostile"
That depends on the length of one's legs, and height of the fence.It never hurts to straddle the fence.![]()
Jesus is the narrow way. Every attempt to use this verse to separate one Christian from another is misguided at best.Truely denominationalism is a broadway and truely narrow is the way that leads to life.
By experience, I've found that to be true (ouch).That depends on the length of one's legs, and height of the fence.![]()
Jesus is the narrow way. Every attempt to use this verse to separate one Christian from another is misguided at best.
It never hurts to straddle the fence.![]()
Hi this made me laugh.. not you its what I think so many times here and different forums where just verses are posted and I'm like.. ok we know this whats the point? I know they were thinking something. Bless you
exactlyIt should also be noted that nowhere in Scripture -- whether on earth or in Heaven -- do angels speak in another language (which could be labeled as "the tongues of angels"). Whenever they spoke it was in a human language, and even when Paul was in the third heaven (in Paradise) he heard things which he could understand, but was forbidden to disclose them. So Paul was being hyperbolic to make a point. What we should always keep in mind is that he viewed prophecy as far more beneficial than tongues. He also ranks the spiritual gifts in the order of their importance.
Modern tongues do not even pretend to be other human languages. Therefore they have been converted into a "prayer language". In view of the fact that many genuine Christians are committed to this fallacy, it is better to let them do whatever they do and drop the subject. There is no point squabbling over this. People can choose either Charismatic or non-Charismatic churches by checking what they say about tongues.