That contradicts what the text clearly states.
Didn’t you say there’s a sequence? And the biblical definition of day is originated from this whatsoever.
That contradicts what the text clearly states.
Hey David,
Do you feel that there is a correlation between Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit? Why only Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? I've always wondered of the connection.
One pastor said on a podcast that this shows church is for all generations, not just grandmas and grandpas! Since it is mentioned somewhere that Israel is God’s firstborn, it also demonstrates the progression of God’s salvation for all mankind, from God to Abraham to Jesus and to all nations.
Yes, there is a sequence, yet Jesus was there at the start, at the very beginning, when the heavens and the earth were formed, which means He cannot have come into being when God said, "Let there be light", even if it were a millisecond later.Didn’t you say there’s a sequence? And the biblical definition of day is originated from this whatsoever.
Yes, there is a sequence, yet Jesus was there at the start, at the very beginning, when the heavens and the earth were formed, which means He cannot have come into being when God said, "Let there be light", even if it were a millisecond later.
One pastor said on a podcast that this shows church is for all generations, not just grandmas and grandpas! Since it is mentioned somewhere that Israel is God’s firstborn, it also demonstrates the progression of God’s salvation for all mankind, from God to Abraham to Jesus and to all nations.
You have just made an unsubstantiated assumption.God DIVIDED the light from darkness, so the light was in the beginning, it was just separated from the darkness later.
You have just made an unsubstantiated assumption.
Yes, God separated the light from the darkness, but that was after He said, "Let there be light". There is nothing in the text to indicate that light existed "at the beginning".
ishmael was abrahams first born also but never received the inheritance of Abraham
Again, you are making a claim that is completely unsupported by the text.That's the shekinah glory, the presence of God. As I said, it began to manifest itself later.
Again, you are making a claim that is completely unsupported by the text.
With respect, I must disagree with you, on the basis of John 1:3 (in context):
"All things were made through him [Jesus], and without him [Jesus] was not anything made that was made." (ESV)
In other words, God made everything through Jesus, and since God made the heavens and the earth in Genesis 1:1, Jesus must have existed at that time, which is prior to Genesis 1:3.
In Genesis 1:26, God (Elohim) said, "“Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness," I believe the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit we're talking among themselves.
Three, and yet one. "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is One." - Deuteronomy 6:4
It’s your thread; you are trying to make a point that the text doesn’t support.What's your point then?
It’s your thread; you are trying to make a point that the text doesn’t support.
You are conflating physical light with the Light of the world. I don’t believe that is warranted.The text is clear - God divided the light from the darkness, and those were the evening and the morning of the first day. You think God flipped a switch or something? "He was in the beginning with God," John 1:2.
You are conflating physical light with the Light of the world. I don’t believe that is warranted.
That linguistic similarity doesn’t work in Hebrew, so it is irrelevant.That is warranted. Those are one and the same. On Day one there was no S-U-N, the only source of light was the S-O-N!