Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming?
This was the questions the disciples asked Jesus in Matthew 24 and the parable of the ten virgins continues Jesus' answer to these questions.
Despite coming from different theological frameworks—particularly in the case of A.W. Pink—they universally agree that the "taken" in the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24:40-41) and the "gathered" tares in Matthew 13 refer to the exact same eschatological event: the taking away of the wicked for judgment.
They all vigorously reject the popular evangelical interpretation that Matthew 24's "one taken, one left" refers to the Pre-Tribulation Rapture of the Church. Instead, they tie Matthew 24 directly back to the parables of Matthew 13.
Here is how each scholar arrives at this conclusion:
1. Arnold Fruchtenbaum
Fruchtenbaum explicitly links the Dragnet and the Wheat and Tares to the Olivet Discourse. In his dispensational framework, this gathering happens at the end of the seven-year Tribulation (the Second Advent), right before the establishment of the Messianic Millennial Kingdom.
* The Exegesis: Fruchtenbaum points out that in the days of Noah, the ones who were "taken" were the wicked who drowned in the flood. Noah and his family were the ones "left" behind to inherit a cleansed earth.
* The Application: Therefore, the one "taken" in the field is the unbeliever who is gathered by the angels and cast into the fire (the tares). The one "left" in the field is the surviving Tribulation believer (the wheat) who is left alive to enter the physical Millennial Kingdom in their natural bodies.
2. John Walvoord
As a premier classical dispensationalist, Walvoord dedicated significant ink in his commentary Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come to correcting the "Rapture" misconception of Matthew 24.
* The Exegesis: Walvoord argues strictly from the immediate context of Matthew 24:39, where the flood "took them all away." He states that standard hermeneutics demands the "taking" in verses 40-41 must be of the same nature as the "taking" in verse 39.
* The Application: Walvoord teaches that at the Second Coming, angels will purge the earth of rebels. He directly connects this event to the Judgment of the Nations (the Sheep and the Goats in Matthew 25) and the harvest parables of Matthew 13. The wicked are taken to judgment; the righteous are left to populate the Millennium.
3. R.B. Thieme Jr.
Thieme, known for his highly structured and categorical dispensational vocabulary, taught this exact concatenation under what he termed the "Baptism of Fire."
* The Exegesis: Thieme taught that just as John the Baptist promised that the Messiah would baptize with the Holy Spirit (fulfilled at Pentecost) and with "fire," this fire refers exclusively to the judgment of unbelievers at the Second Advent.
* The Application: Thieme directly aligned Matthew 13's tares being bound for the fire with Matthew 24's "taken." In Thieme's system, at the end of the Tribulation, all living unbelievers are summarily executed and removed from the earth (the Baptism of Fire), leaving only believers alive to begin the Millennial reign of Christ.
4. A.W. Pink
Pink is the outlier in this group, as he was a Reformed Calvinist, not a dispensationalist. Yet, his rigorous adherence to textual exposition brought him to the exact same conclusion regarding this specific textual link.
* The Exegesis: In his Exposition of the Gospel of Matthew, Pink mocks the "rapture" interpretation of this passage as a violation of basic reading comprehension. He points out that the word "took" in verse 39 (airō) and "taken" in verse 40 (paralambanō) carry the thematic weight of divine wrath sweeping people away.
* The Application: Pink wrote that it is a profound error to make the "taken" the saints. He parallels it precisely with Matthew 13: the angels sever the wicked from the just. For Pink, the one "taken" is seized by divine judgment, and the one "left" is the one who has found grace in the eyes of the Lord, exactly like Noah.
Summary of Their Consensus
All four men utilize the exact same hermeneutical key to unlock the Olivet Discourse: The Analogy of Noah. Because the flood took the wicked, the angels at the Second Coming will take the wicked. Consequently, the sequence of Matthew 13 is perfectly maintained in Matthew 24: the tares/wicked are gathered out of the kingdom first, and the wheat/righteous are left in the barn/earth to enjoy the kingdom.