I have no opinion no this matter.
It's a matter of opinion.
Well this Blond values your opinion....
But what if one's facts are based on opinion? (i.e., Pluto was accepted as a planet for decades and then in 2006 it was revealed that it is not actually a planet and was demoted.. now scientists are thinking of promoting it back to a planet again after much debate)Donkey, sorry, have to correct your definition on facts and opinions. An opinion can never be true or false. It is merely subjective. A fact can be proven true or false. Opinions are judgement, and facts are based on things that can be seen, heard, touched, tasted, smelled. In other words, facts are observed, and if they are true for one person, they will be true for another person, all the time, period.
And by the way, relative facts are not facts at all, but merely opinions that are masquerading as facts.
But what if one's facts are based on opinion? (i.e., Pluto was accepted as a planet for decades and then in 2006 it was revealed that it is not actually a planet and was demoted.. now scientists are thinking of promoting it back to a planet again after much debate)
"Every man is right in his own eyes".
Facts are either true or false. Does Pluto's size really change? No. Does the relative fact , based on judgement, (AKA Opinion) of the scientists change? Yes
Does this answer your question.
Actually, my point was that until 2006 it was an accepted science-proven fact that pluto was a planet.Facts are either true or false. Does Pluto's size really change? No. Does the relative fact , based on judgement, (AKA Opinion) of the scientists change? Yes
Does this answer your question.
Actually, my point was that until 2006 it was an accepted science-proven fact that pluto was a planet.
In 2006, scientists decided to change that fact based on their opinions of what the scientific definition of a planet really is (the fact changed based on opinions)
Now they are considering changing the fact again, making it officially a planet once more. (I think they may have already changed it back)
Moral of the story is - Facts are not the same as truths carved in stone. Many facts are actually based on opinion.
Aonther example:
One can say that being gay is 'in fact' a sin because its in the bible, but someone else can say that the bible is in fact just a man-made storybook and cannot be scientifically proven as being the word of God so being gay is 'in fact' just as normal as being straight.
OK maybe that wasn't such a good example, but I think it gets the point across.
With that said, what are your thoughts? Is every individual's opinion important? Is every individual's opinion needed? Does every individual's opinion matter? To what extent are they or are they not important or needed?