L
Laodicea
Guest
This has not been fulfilled already, this is referring to the antichrist/man of sin in the last days, tribulation period.
What Bible texts do you have to show Daniel 9:27 is future and not fulfilled?
This has not been fulfilled already, this is referring to the antichrist/man of sin in the last days, tribulation period.
Galatians 3:17 KJV
(17) And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
Hebrews 2:3 KJV
(3) How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;
These verses show it was already confirmed, first by Christ during His 3.5 years of ministry, after by the apostles. Is is a coincidence that is was 3.5 years from the cross to the death of Stephen? After the death of Stephen the gospel goes to the Gentiles.
What Bible texts do you have to show Daniel 9:27 is future and not fulfilled?
That is false, Jesus total ministry only lasted 3 1/2 years not 7.
So the 7 year period in Daniel can not refer to Jesus, and as for saying this is just a protestant teaching of a future main antichrist figure, and false prophet is not just protestant. Baptist, evangelist, catholic, and pretty much every other denomination I have come across and/or visited teach this because it is biblical. There are multiple scriptures that point to one main figure in the end times, not just a religious or governmental system.
Jesus ministered for 3 and a half years and was crucified.
Then what happened?
So you are trying to say that the 7 years refers to when Christ started His ministry to when Steven died.
That really does not match, for it clearly says this person in Daniel 9:27 will bring an end to the daily sacrifices. This did not happen at Jesus crucifixion as Jews continued to sacrifice animals because they did not recognize Jesus as the Messiah. The sacrifices did not stop tell 70 A.D. which is well more then 7 years later, but yet this event in 70 A.D. does not match the 7 year period or the A.O.D. either for Titus did not go into the temple and claim to be God.
The 7 year period, A.O.D., man of sin, and 3 1/2 years of great tribulation all fall in the same time period. So you can not have one without the other.
It is called looking at all the scriptures combined that deal with the end times, and placing them together as most bible prophecy scholars do, and then look at world events to see if that prophecy fits in that place or not.
I see you offer no Bible texts? Doctrine is based on the Bible and the Bible interprets itself so since you teach Daniel 9:27 in the future then the Bible would have other texts on such an important event.
What Bible texts do you have to show Daniel 9:27 is future and not fulfilled?
I believe this verse not happen yet.
because the end of this first is the second coming of Jesus, when the antichrist terminated.
Now the man of sin is not even show up. It will show up in the great tribulation.
Daniel 9:27 - And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
international standard
He will confirm a covenant with many for one 'seven.' In the middle of the 'seven' he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And at the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him."
I will ask you the same question as another. What other Bible texts do you have to show Daniel 9:27 is future?
If this verse happen than:
1. the second coming happen. Because the end of this verse is desolation of the Antichrist and desolation of the Antichrist happen in the second coming.
2. no christian can buy or sale without taking the mark of the beast.
Jesus said This verse in the context of end time/future.
Matthew 24:15 - When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand![]()
It has not been fulfilled
Daniel 9:27 is not future, It simply can not be.
Dan 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
Notice that God gives them 490 years to do these things. then the next verse breaks down these 490 years
Dan 9:25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troubles times.
so this 490 years starts at the decree to restore and rebuild. not one or the other but both. this was done by the combined decrees of Cyrus, Darius and Artaxerxes.
Ezr 6:14 And the elders of the Jews builded, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they builded, and finished it, according to the commandment of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.
notice it was finished according to the command of all three not one. thus the time of the final one is the right time and the bible tells us when this was:
Ezr 7:7 And there went up some of the children of Israel, and of the priests, and the Levites, and the singers, and the porters, and the Nethinims, unto Jerusalem, in the seventh year of Artaxerxes the king.
in the 7th year of Artaxerxes this full command was given. to both rebuild but also restore autonomy to Israel and the worship of God.
This date is very solid in history as 457 BC leaving the middle of the last week square on the death of Jesus Christ who is the true sacrifice and thus put an end to sacrifices. Thus the early church did not sacrifice anymore. even though the Jews ceremoniously did. Thus the issues in colossians 2 and romans 14 where people were judging over feasts etc.
The point being that if you use the futurist view then you are taking away from the fact that God gave them a set time of 490 years which He clearly did give them. you can not separate the time.
By the way the futurist view is a Jesuit made view that was designed to destroy and trick protestants.
If this verse happen than:
1. the second coming happen. Because the end of this verse is desolation of the Antichrist and desolation of the Antichrist happen in the second coming.
2. no christian can buy or sale without taking the mark of the beast.
Jesus said This verse in the context of end time/future.
Matthew 24:15 - When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand![]()
Daniel 9:27 - And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
international standard
He will confirm a covenant with many for one 'seven.' In the middle of the 'seven' he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And at the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him."
Seem to me, Daniel 9:27 talking about what happen till the end/second coming of Christ.
And second coming is not happen yet.