Was Cain the son of the LORD?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
CainHarmbank said:
There are rumors that this is the case.

And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"

It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.

Pretty simply put isn't it?

I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
Click to expand...
All it means is that eve gave birth to cain and "Glorified" God afterward,by naming cain according to how God "blessed her,there is no point in claiming that cain was son to the Lord for the truth is that the only son of God or as he is known many times as well as,The Lord,had only 1 son and that was Jesus Christ whom was born of his spirit and of mary magdalene.
 
CainHarmbank said:
Just wondering what people here think the LORD really is.
Do you not think the LORD is an individual person?
If the LORD is an individual person, and Adam impregnated Eve, then Eve got a son from Adam, not the LORD.
Click to expand...
Right you want what we "think" that explains everything,another egotistical person hoping to irritate others while gloating and goading others because you have no intention of "learning" since you believe you "already have the answers",we call such people "Trolls" here.
 
CainHarmbank said:
There are rumors that this is the case.

And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"

It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.

Pretty simply put isn't it?

I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
Click to expand...

Oh boy.........
 
Gabriel2020 said:
Cain and Abel was twins. At the time Adam laid with her(knew her) ,she bore Cain first,and then Abel followed behind him. It does not say Adam laid with her again and she concieved to have Abel. These two were born before the fall.
Click to expand...
Only one outstanding detail with that,after she bore Cain and declared her joy to God for receiving him what follows is the punctuation mark"." period
ending the verse,indicating that time most likely had passed before she gave birth to abel,twins are born at nearly seconds or minutes after the first child out of the two are born,so while your point is valid that they are possibly "close in age" according to the writing of the bible this is not the case,though I get your point in that it is not noted that Adam "knew" eve again and there are cases in which a man does not have to lay with his wife again to bare a child sometime after a birth.
 
That's all my input for now on this subject,everyone else,Have fun!
 
joefizz said:
All it means is that eve gave birth to cain and "Glorified" God afterward,by naming cain according to how God "blessed her,there is no point in claiming that cain was son to the Lord for the truth is that the only son of God or as he is known many times as well as,The Lord,had only 1 son and that was Jesus Christ whom was born of his spirit and of mary magdalene.
Click to expand...
Just one point of clarification ... Mary Magdalene was not the mother of Jesus.

Mary Magdalene was a woman healed by Jesus from devil spirit possession according to Luke 8:2 and Mark 16:9. Mary Magdalene was a follower of Jesus and loved Him very much. She was the first person who saw and spoke to Jesus after His resurrection from the dead (John 20:14-16).



John 19:25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene.

Here we see Mary the mother of Jesus, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. Three women named "Mary" identified here.

 
  • Like
Reactions: joefizz
garee said:

Begat is what is was. the context is there..."
and she conceived, and bare Cain".To conceive is to begat with the help of the Lord.​
Click to expand...

It is obvious you do not read the Bible much...The Bible does what you attempt to say it does not. There are many places where it speaks of an event and explains it later....(i.e. Genesis 1 explained in Genesis 2)
 
reneweddaybyday said:
Just one point of clarification ... Mary Magdalene was not the mother of Jesus.

Mary Magdalene was a woman healed by Jesus from devil spirit possession according to Luke 8:2 and Mark 16:9. Mary Magdalene was a follower of Jesus and loved Him very much. She was the first person who saw and spoke to Jesus after His resurrection from the dead (John 20:14-16).



John 19:25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene.

Here we see Mary the mother of Jesus, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. Three women named "Mary" identified here.
Click to expand...
(going to have to research this I was wrong about Joseph of arimathea so will check back)
 
joefizz said:
All it means is that eve gave birth to cain and "Glorified" God afterward,by naming cain according to how God "blessed her,there is no point in claiming that cain was son to the Lord for the truth is that the only son of God or as he is known many times as well as,The Lord,had only 1 son and that was Jesus Christ whom was born of his spirit and of mary magdalene.
Click to expand...
Renewed day by day is correct about my goof so I accept correction concerning mary magdalene but it makes sense my underlieing point only Jesus was the son of the Lord/God.
 
joefizz said:
Renewed day by day is correct about my goof so I accept correction concerning mary magdalene but it makes sense my underlieing point only Jesus was the son of the Lord/God.
Click to expand...

I admire that joe, no goof just more understanding, I see you enjoy to study that's a good thing bro... :)
 
LPT said:
I admire that joe, no goof just more understanding, I see you enjoy to study that's a good thing bro... :)
Click to expand...
Yeah though it's "tough" my surrounding living circumstance,religious beliefs,and ideals at where I live it's a constant struggle to keep my sanity and not to mention keep from letting "anger" take hold,thankfully I'll be moving in 3 months and then no more having to "endure" as much as I have for the last 20 years from "family" it's no wonder I have so many "outbursts" and "scatter brained" posts at times,ever since I was a toddler my mental and spiritual capacity has been under attack,by family and thankfully I found Jesus or well I might've ended up an even worse train wreck.
 
It's amazing how Fake News can take a life of its own. But Scripture is crystal clear:

And Adam knew Eve his wife; (knew = had sexual intercourse)

and she conceived, (which leads to conception)

and bare Cain, (which leads to birth)

and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. (this is said in recognition of the fact that children are a gift from the LORD)
 
  • Like
Reactions: joefizz
Nehemiah6 said:
It's amazing how Fake News can take a life of its own. But Scripture is crystal clear:

And Adam knew Eve his wife; (knew = had sexual intercourse)

and she conceived,(which leads to conception)

and bare Cain,(which leads to birth)

and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. (this is said in recognition of the fact that children are a gift from the LORD)
Click to expand...
It's more of the Op is "overanalyzing" the words and even viewing them in the "literal" sense both can lead someone to "miss" what the passage means "altogether".
 
CainHarmbank said:
There are rumors that this is the case.

And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"

It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.

Pretty simply put isn't it?

I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
Click to expand...

No... Cane was the son of Adam.. Adam was just thanking the LORD that He had caused Adam to have a son..

This is so simple.. It is sad that men can come up with these crazy theories by twisting what the Bible says to the most illogical extent..
 
CainHarmbank said:
There are rumors that this is the case.

And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"

It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.

Pretty simply put isn't it?

I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
Click to expand...

A. The language bears out that Eve believed Cain was the fulfillment of the promise in Genesis 3:15.....

B. Cain was lost

C. Cain refused to repent from killing Abel

D. Cain was a false teacher and pushed his works (see Jude)
 
CainHarmbank said:
The births of Cain and Abel, begat by the LORD, are also consistent with the Jesus story.
Click to expand...
Where do you come up with all this nonsense? Or are you just promoting Cain because you adopted that name?

Cain was a rebel, so you would be better off with "Abel".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back