Andrew Wommack's Living Commentary
It would be reasonable to question Wommacks commentary because he already takes
a non-traditional view of scripture following an extreme dispensational view.
It is funny to read someone trying to defend this commentator who is not interested
in linguistical understanding but only his own theological bent.
And this is not slander or malice, it is just who he is.
It would be reasonable to question Wommacks commentary because he already takes
a non-traditional view of scripture following an extreme dispensational view.
It is funny to read someone trying to defend this commentator who is not interested
in linguistical understanding but only his own theological bent.
And this is not slander or malice, it is just who he is.