Lynn, I sincerely respect you, and I disagree with you.Adam and Eve worked in the garden before the Fall. Adam had to name every single animal. That's work. I don't think they sweat though. And they really didn't have to pull weeds, harvest, or even plant, so no sweaty brows required.
And part of the curse was thorns and poisonous plants. That wasn't "you're going to get a tummy ache." That was God intentionally changing the scenery to something not-pleasant.
I've heard women giving birth. Definitely hurts. Would have been nice if it didn't. And the only ways childbirth hurts the man is that he watches his wife in that much pain, and might be just dumb enough to ask her to squeeze his hand. (Why do men offer that? Are you guys nuts? She's thinking it's your fault anyway, so sort of giving the opportunity to get both pain and anger out. lol)
I really do think God was punishing Man. Not "tummy ache." More, "You're grounded now."
So, I do agree it changes perspective on everything else we read, but I didn't quite think Jerry was that off, and I do think you are a bit off. Is that twisting scripture?
There you have it. When the Bible goes against what I believe then change the Bible to fit what I believe. Use other books and study materials that agree with my theology and then correct the Bible. With this perspective, we can make the Bible fit into any theology system we come up with.
What do you do with:
1 This is a true saying, if a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
3 Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous;
4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
6 Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.
7 Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.
These are guidelines for men pastors. Where are the guidelines for women pastors specified in Scripture? And please, I am not saying that women are not equal or women can't be used in a mighty way in the ministry within the church, but God has set this thing up with order.
Women are certainly equal to men in spiritual matters, however that is not the issue, we are dealing with GOD. Only males were allowed to be priest, does that not tell you something? The twelve apostles were all males, does that not tell you something? When God says through Paul that women are not to be in authority over men in the church then it is not a question open to debate, one either obeys God or disobeys God.
I've yet to hear a White chick give a sermon that rocked my world; I need a Black woman with soul. That said, I'd like to hear Angela and Kayla because I know they can deliver.
I've read all three of your post and agree with 99% of what you've written. The one and only problem I have with a woman pastor is this -- pastors are also counselors. How does a woman counsel a couple? It screws up the whole authority dynamic in that couple's relationship as well as how the couple interacts/participates/edifies the church. It is like saying women are to submit to men (and by that I mean men they trust because they are trustworthy, not every guy) except in counseling where they skip submitting to husband and, instead, submit to the pastor. And, likewise, the man is to let go of his authority and give himself over to the authority of a woman.
I've never seen any hint of the exception clause in the Bible.
You can sway me over on the teaching part. (I'm already to women teaching younger folk, so how hard can that be?) You can sway me over on evangelism. (Don't even have to for that, since I think women are just as likely to be evangelist as men.) I already believe in deaconess. I already believe in women visiting the sick or going to prisons. It's that one little sticking part that did me in -- I have no authority to tell a man what to do in his marriage. I don't even think most men have the authority there, but a pastor would, unless the pastor happens to be a woman. And I'm saying this even using your word "domineering." How can a husband get past he feels like he's being dominate over by a woman? And how can a women tell someone else's husband what he should do without it being domineering?
You asked,
Because you're trying to counsel that husband! You've got to get through to him in terms he will accept, or you don't get through. And isn't part of being a pastor is being a counselor?
First, let me guess. The fight-naked person was a single man? Because that guy doesn't get how angry angry can get. lol
As for pastors not counseling? How do you tend the flock without talking out problems with people who have problems?
(Hey, my denomination gets around that one by hiring two types of Elders -- Teaching Elders, who do just that, and Ruling Elders, who are charged with tending the flock. But most churches only have one pastor.)
I already dealt with this above! In fact, it is the KJV translators and other translators who have changed the Bible. And next time, kindly put up the reference for the verses you are posting. KJV changes it so radically, I really had to figure out what was being said! Google helped, before I realized it was what I had already written above!
Just for you, the Greek for the above verses! As I repeat before, at no place is the word "He" or autos ἀυτός (Gk) used in verses 1-7.
"Πιστὸς ὁ λόγος· εἴ τις ἐπισκοπῆς ὀρέγεται, καλοῦ ἔργου ἐπιθυμεῖ.2 δεῖ οὖν τὸν ἐπίσκοπον ἀνεπίλημπτον εἶναι, μιᾶς γυναικὸς ἄνδρα, νηφάλιον, σώφρονα, κόσμιον, φιλόξενον, διδακτικόν,3 μὴ πάροινον, μὴ πλήκτην, ἀλλὰ ἐπιεικῆ, ἄμαχον, ἀφιλάργυρον,4 τοῦ ἰδίου οἴκου καλῶς προϊστάμενον, τέκνα ἔχοντα ἐν ὑποταγῇ μετὰ πάσης σεμνότητος·5 (εἰ δέ τις τοῦ ἰδίου οἴκου προστῆναι οὐκ οἶδεν, πῶς ἐκκλησίας θεοῦ ἐπιμελήσεται6 μὴ νεόφυτον, ἵνα μὴ τυφωθεὶς εἰς κρίμα ἐμπέσῃ τοῦ διαβόλου.7 δεῖ δὲ καὶ μαρτυρίαν καλὴν ἔχειν ἀπὸ τῶν ἔξωθεν, ἵνα μὴ εἰς ὀνειδισμὸν ἐμπέσῃ καὶ παγίδα τοῦ διαβόλου." 1 Tom. 3:1-7
Verse 1
KJV says man, according to your bolded portion above. Man in Greek is aner ἀνέρ or andros ἀνδρός. The other word anthropos ἀνθρωπός, which really should be rendered "person, human being, humanity" was sometimes rendered as "man" in the older texts. As you can see below, verse 1 does not contain any of these words. In other words, MAN was added to the verse by the translator. Nor is "he" in the text which is the the word autos or ἀυτός in Greek. So two words down. The verse is mistranslated to reflect the opinion of King James, who was following in the shadow of the greatest monarch England ever had. Queen Elizabeth I. He did not want women to be in control, perhaps was even terrified of the incredible things Elizabeth did for England during her reign.
"Πιστὸς ὁ λόγος· εἴ τις ἐπισκοπῆς ὀρέγεται, καλοῦ ἔργου ἐπιθυμεῖ." 1 Tim. 3:1
Verse 2
The second verse rightly refers to men who want to be an overseer, who have more than one wife. The New Testament is clear, especially in verses like this, that men are not to be polygamous, but rather to have one wife. Why were the women not addressed in this verse? I can only suppose that they did not have more than one husband, as polyandry was rare in the Greek societies.
Verse 3 - no words pertaining to any gender, we can agree on that.
Verse 4
"One that ruleth "HIS" house well". There is simply no word for "his" which could be autou άυτοῦ. Τhis is the genitive possessive, and does not appear in the sentence below the first part of the verse reads: "of one's own house." No word "HIS" in verse 4 in the Greek. All neutral!
"4 τοῦ ἰδίου οἴκου καλῶς προϊστάμενον, τέκνα ἔχοντα ἐν ὑποταγῇ μετὰ πάσης σεμνότητος" 1 Tim. 3:4
Verse 5
KJV - A MAN does not.... HIS house. The verse in Greek.
"(εἰ δέ τις τοῦ ἰδίου οἴκου προστῆναι οὐκ οἶδεν, πῶς ἐκκλησίας θεοῦ ἐπιμελήσεται"
Notice, once again, the words for man does not appear in the verse above (aner or andros) Instead, the impersonal adjective tis, or τις appears. Tis is a neuter word, meaning "someone, anyone, a certain one." So the first part of verse 5 should read, "But if someone does not know to rule/manage one's own house."
The second half should read "How will "he, she or it" care for the church of God?" The "he, she or it," is the technical translation of the noun reference in word epimelesatai, which is third person singular. Of course, it would not mean "it," because people have gender, however, he or she are both correct. But you cannot pick he, and not acknowledge that she is just as valid a translation.
Verse 6 - no words which refer to gender.
Verse 7 - KJV says "Moreover HE" however, verse 7 again, does not contain the word autos in the Greek. It does not refer to ANY GENDER.
"δεῖ δὲ καὶ μαρτυρίαν καλὴν ἔχειν ἀπὸ τῶν ἔξωθεν, ἵνα μὴ εἰς ὀνειδισμὸν ἐμπέσῃ καὶ παγίδα τοῦ διαβόλου.""
"But it is necessary also to have a good witness/reputation among outsiders, so that he/she will not fall into reproach [which is] also the snare of the devil." 1 Tim. 3:7 (my literal translation) See also Mounce's Reverse-Interlinear NT. (Bible gateway.com) [] indicate added necessary English words, because the "is" or estin ἐστίν is understood in Greek.
This the literal translation. Since no mention has been made of a man being the person referred to in verses 1-6, it would not be good Greek to suddenly add a "he" when the entire passage has been neutral.
And as far as the qualifications for deacons, the passage in 1 Tim. 3 has also been very poorly translated. For one thing, the word "autos" (αὐτὸς) which is a close to the pronoun, HE, as you can get in Greek, does NOT appear at all in verses 1-7 nor man- aner ἀνέρor androsἀνδρός.. In addition, it talks about "deacons" in" verses like 1 Tim 3:8, 10, 12 and 13. The word in Greek is Διακόνους, or diakonous, which means servant in the plural. It is also inclusive, so it could well be talking about women and men deacons. Verse 11 is most telling. Τhe ESV translates it as thus:
"Their wives likewise must be dignified, not slanderers, but sober-minded, faithful in all things." 1 Tim. 3:11 ESV
But this is in no way true to the Greek. The word used is γυναίκας, or gunaikas which in the UBS interlinear, actually has the word "deaconnesses" next to it. There is no "THEIR" in the passage in Greek. It is not in any way the "wives of the deacons" or "their wives." So it does give the qualifications for a woman - the same as a man!
The NIV comes much closer with:
In the same way, the women(deaconesses?) are to be worthy of respect, not malicious talkers but temperate and trustworthy in everything." 1 Tim. 3:11 NIV
As for 1 Tim. 3:2 "husband of one wife" is an admonition to the men who want to help out in ministry to NOT have more than one wife. It is simply not a prohibition that only men are allowed to be deacons."
Finally, verse 1 Tim. 3:12
"διάκονοι ἔστωσαν μιᾶς γυναικὸς ἄνδρες, τέκνων καλῶς προϊστάμενοι καὶ τῶν ἰδίων οἴκων·" 1 Tim. 3:12
Estosan or ἔστωσαν is the εἰμί, third person plural, present imperative active. Thus, the men deacons are commanded to only have one wife. This seems to be a repeated theme with Paul. The only time he mentions gender, is when it concerns men who are deacons having more than one wife (verses 3 & 12). A definite admonishment to men who are deacons. And women obviously not needing such a warning, as I said before.
So, this entire passage does not contain one word saying men can be only deacons, although I can see how one would be fooled after reading a bad translation, which actually changes the Bible from being neutral with respect to gender where deacons are concerned, and constantly inserting words like "man" "he" and "his." I hope this helps you John, and the others who are confused by wrong translations of the Greek.
And if you don't believe me, feel free to find a Greek translator, and see what they say about the actual words written here. I assure you, I use all the usual Greek tools - Bauer (BDAG) Greek/English Lexicon, and various other tools to say nothing of my study of Greek.
I am completely familiar with how husbands are to love their wives as Christ loved the church from Ephesions 5, and I absolutely don't treat women as barbie dolls.
Does humanity still suffer from those original sins from Genesis?
Does the serpent still bound to his belly?
Do women still have pain during childbearing?
Does the land still bring forth thorns and thistles
do we still eat by "the sweat of your face"?
Those are all things that were brought about by those sins in Gen 3, I absolutely understand that under Christ we are forgiven all sin, but still our broken world still suffers because of it. Jesus himself referred back to the old testament at times, and we are given the old testament to study the history and to learn of Gods relationship with people throughout history, this is part of the history.
This is absolutely off topic, and I believe that the scriptures that I have posted are absolutely relevant to the topic. I will not argue another word from you or with you in any way, you can bring your attacks somewhere else.
Thanks again
You will answer to God and He has made it clear in scripture that He does not want a woman in a position of authority over men in the church. I cannot imagine a woman of God deciding to go against God in order to serve God...if you want to serve God do what He says, to obey is BETTER then to sacrifice. A desire to be over others is usually from the flesh.
Women are certainly equal to men in spiritual matters, however that is not the issue, we are dealing with GOD. Only males were allowed to be priest, does that not tell you something? The twelve apostles were all males, does that not tell you something? When God says through Paul that women are not to be in authority over men in the church then it is not a question open to debate, one either obeys God or disobeys God.
Believe it or not he was married. I have just found that pastors dont make good marriage counselors. Not according to what Ive seen with family and friends.
Agreed, it's not about my view, your view, Angela's view or anybody else's view...it's about what God has said.
You will answer to God and He has made it clear in scripture that He does not want a woman in a position of authority over men in the church. I cannot imagine a woman of God deciding to go against God in order to serve God...if you want to serve God do what He says, to obey is BETTER then to sacrifice. A desire to be over others is usually from the flesh.
An issue like this separates those who really believe the bible from those who partly believe the bible. We have a very clear place in scripture that runs contrary to what our culture has been led to accept. I used to wonder about Amy McPherson, and K. Khulman. They seemed to have so much power with God...but did they really? It is a scary thing to read something clear and in context in the word of God and decide to ignore it. God has said, let not a woman have authority over a man in the church. It could never be worth it for a woman to ignore what God has said. Can you disobey God in order to serve God better?
Hi Magenta: Adam most definitely sinned when he disobeyed God(I don't remember saying otherwise). However the sin of Adam(according to God) was that he listened to and did what his wife told him to do. Apparently God expected Adam to take charge of the situation and prevent his wife from following Satan, this is evident because the first person that God came to because of disobedience was Adam. God saw Adam as being in charge, not Eve. Another note, Phoebe was actually a "servant" that was not a title as was overseer. If Paul had used the word overseer that would make the point that women can be over men in the church even through it would contradict the other position of Paul about women not being in authority over men in the church. I love the story about Mary Magdalene because it demonstrates God's love for those who love Him, however God is a God of order and He has spoken through His apostle Paul that women are not to be over men in the church.