Adam's fall and its consequences

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
You are offering two options that are both blasphemious.

1. God cannot lie. Period.
2. God cannot change, because He is already perfect. Period.

Bible is written for men, it has two layers - the layer of spiritual realities above all time, like Is 46:9 and the layer of what is seen from our, human, in-time perspective like Jer 18:5.
God dont need to change in order to "repent" of something? Read Jeremiah 18 as many times as you need to understand what its saying.

If God repents of judgment, that dont mean God changes. It just means God does and fulfills HIS PROMISE in Jeremiah 18. God does what He says. No need for a "change".

As John said, just let the scriptures speak no need for vain philosophy of two different layers of scriptures and all that. It says what it says and its simple.

Here is the bible in one sentence: Have faith, do good, reap eternal life.
 
Jul 23, 2017
879
31
0
i believe we should get our teachings from the bible but ima say this controversal statement dont get mad at me usos!!

i dont need a bible to tell me man is somehow inclined towards evil or original sin or what u wanna call it. just look around u its claer.
 
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
You are offering two options that are both blasphemious.

1. God cannot lie. Period.
2. God cannot change, because He is already perfect. Period.

Bible is written for men, it has two layers - the layer of spiritual realities above all time, like Is 46:9 and the layer of what is seen from our, human, in-time perspective like Jer 18:5.
He does not want God as Lord. It seeps through in many of his posts. The irony in this is his username. :rolleyes:

That’s why he’s on my ignore list.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
He does not want God as Lord. It seeps through in many of his posts. The irony in this is his username. :rolleyes:

That’s why he’s on my ignore list.
I feel bad for the dude, he is blinded. Joe would love the guy.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,671
3,541
113
He does not want God as Lord. It seeps through in many of his posts. The irony in this is his username. :rolleyes:

That’s why he’s on my ignore list.
You couldn't be further from the truth. I believe God at His word. I don't explain things away. If something goes against my belief system, I don't change the words of God, I change my belief system.

Let the word of God define who God is and let's go with that. If God changed His mind, then God changed His mind. Why did God change His mind? Because it is consistent of who He is. God is gracious and merciful. I was once an object of God's wrath. I repented and gave my life to Jesus. God changed His mind toward me and I am no longer an object of His wrath.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
So ya pick the verses that talk about evil people, or Israel in apostasy and apply them to all men? Typical calvinism, quoting romans 3:10 without reading whats being quoted, where the psalms contrast RIGHTEOUS with the WICKED all the time. As does the entire bible.

This nobody ever does anything good its all filthy rags is easily debunked by Acts 10, where Cornelius a man WITHOUT FAITH in Christ is still consider a devout man, and his prayers are heard, he gets a revelation and Peter is sent to preach the Gospel to him.
God accepted his works looked like it? Infact they was called a "memorial offering" before God!

1 John 3:7 says whosoever does what is right is righteous. That closes that case.

John 5:28-29 also contrasts the righteous with the wicked, this one is still in the bible for some reason, the bible pundits havent expunged it yet, maybe its coming after some "more reliable" and "older" manuscripts are found.


I already know from you quoting Matthew Henry that nothing can convince you, no amount of inconsistensies in your views, no amount of bible verses and no amount of explanation. What a weird quote, this guy Matthew Henry just made most of the bible null and void. Its pointless to ask for faith, holiness and love if God has to create it in us? Pointless communication, God can just give us the faith love and holiness and keep it moving, no reason to ask people to do something they cant do. Waste of breath. Or is there something more sinister behind this according to yall? Something to damn the predestinated to destruction even further? Dare I even ask.

Hi issachar92,

I'm very well aware of the NT's use of the OT. The wicked are condemned already (John 3:18). Cornelius was a devout man but not inChrist, but as to concerning the Jewish faith of that time ..remember the next part ' a God fearer'! When God called Cornelius He was effectively calling Him as he was sending Peter to Him to hear the good news about Jesus Christ. That is the means by which God uses His 'word'. What Cornelious knew of the old things that where passing away (the Mosaic Law), where not going to save Him.

The whole narrative concerning Cornelius is about the Mosaic Law becoming obsolete in redemptive His-story. So I am afraid your argument does not hold concerning your use of Cornelious. For it shows there is now something better than following the law for Salvation..Christ Jesus!

Romans 3:10 starts with 'as it is written'. We know what the following OT verses are quoted from from and Paul's writes with the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, and along with Romans Ch 1,2,3 shows no one is 'good', Interestingly I am sure you are aware of what he writes in the same discussion in ch3?


19 Now we know that whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God. 20 For by works of the law no human being[c] will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin.
The Righteousness of God Through Faith

21 But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— 22 the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. 26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.
27 Then what becomes of our boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? By a law of works? No, but by the law of faith.28 For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law. 29 Or is God the God of Jews only? Is he not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also,

From the time of the resurrection, the Law of Moses saved no one, in fact it never could it was always looking forward to Christ!

As for your last paragraph. It is not even worth answering as it is just a barrage of nonsense. Letting off steam where we?

I Cannot understand why you think I don't obey or suggest otherwise? This doesn't seem to fit into your neatly packaged caricature.





 
Last edited:

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,084
26,181
113
You couldn't be further from the truth. I believe God at His word. I don't explain things away. If something goes against my belief system, I don't change the words of God, I change my belief system.

Let the word of God define who God is and let's go with that. If God changed His mind, then God changed His mind. Why did God change His mind? Because it is consistent of who He is. God is gracious and merciful. I was once an object of God's wrath. I repented and gave my life to Jesus. God changed His mind toward me and I am no longer an object of His wrath.
God's plan was always to overlook your sins through the grace afforded through faith in the sacrificial work/cross of Christ. Since YOU changed your mind about how you view yourself in relation to God and in relation to sin, how is it that you see God as having changed His mind? Especially if you were chosen in Him before the foundation of the world???
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,671
3,541
113
God's plan was always to overlook your sins through the grace afforded through faith in the sacrificial work/cross of Christ. Since YOU changed your mind about how you view yourself in relation to God and in relation to sin, how is it that you see God as having changed His mind? Especially if you were chosen in Him before the foundation of the world???
First of all, I don't believe I was chosen in Him before the foundation of the world. Second, I was once the object of God's wrath. Read Ephesians 2.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
First of all, I don't believe I was chosen in Him before the foundation of the world.
Agreed, there is much of Scripture you do not believe by your own admittance and assertions.

Ephesians 1, ironically, is where we find the truth you reject above.

Second, I was once the object of God's wrath. Read Ephesians 2.
No, sorry, you were not.

You can't just insert yourself into Ephesians 2, when that passage is, in context, those referred to in chapter 1 of which you've opted yourself out of due to unbelief of the text. You don't just skip parts then jump in later, especially here.

Theology isn't like Burger King, i.e. Have it Your Way ®.

You don't get to abuse the Word of God and pick and choose yourself in and out of contexts as you do and still have integrity in handling the Word correctly. It is mishandling the Word, yet, this is what you do.

You need some 2 Timothy 2:15 refresher courses, or more likely 101.
 
Last edited:

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,533
12,977
113
Free will = I Am. Man can't get his head around the fact that he is not 'I Am' and he does not control God's eternal decree's.
That is a false characterization of free will. Free will does NOT mean that man becomes God, and no one who believes that men still exercise free will believe that. So that is just a straw man argument.

The real issue ( which is totally avoided by those who don't believe that men have free will) is that they IGNORE the Scriptures and follow the theologians. Let's take just one passage of Scripture and see if does not teach that men have free will:

Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. (Isaiah 55:6,7).

So let's ask ourselves a few questions:

1. Who is God addressing? SINNERS

2. Can sinners seek God if God tells them to seek Him? ABSOLUTELY

3. Are the wicked told to forsake their wicked ways? ABSOLUTELY

4. Are the unrighteous told to forsake their unrighteous thoughts? ABSOLUTELY

5. Can sinners return to the LORD? ABSOLUTELY

6. Could any of this be possible if sinners did not have free will? ABSOLUTELY NOT

7. Does that mean that those who deny free will reject Scripture? ABSOLUTELY
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,533
12,977
113
First of all, I don't believe I was chosen in Him before the foundation of the world.
Whether you believe this or not, it is a spiritual FACT. If you have been saved by grace and you are a child of God, you were chosen in Him. For what purpose? To be holy and blameless before Him in love. That is exactly what Scriptures says. Not chosen for salvation but chosen for spiritual and moral perfection.

According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love (Eph 1:4).

Just because Calvinists misrepresent election and predestination, does not mean that it is false. It simply needs to be understood as God has presented it (not man-man theology).
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
Hi issachar92,

I'm very well aware of the NT's use of the OT. The wicked are condemned already (John 3:18). Cornelius was a devout man but not inChrist, but as to concerning the Jewish faith of that time ..remember the next part ' a God fearer'! When God called Cornelius He was effectively calling Him as he was sending Peter to Him to hear the good news about Jesus Christ. That is the means by which God uses His 'word'. What Cornelious knew of the old things that where passing away (the Mosaic Law), where not going to save Him.

The whole narrative concerning Cornelius is about the Mosaic Law becoming obsolete in redemptive His-story. So I am afraid your argument does not hold concerning your use of Cornelious. For it shows there is now something better than following the law for Salvation..Christ Jesus!

Romans 3:10 starts with 'as it is written'. We know what the following OT verses are quoted from from and Paul's writes with the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, and along with Romans Ch 1,2,3 shows no one is 'good', Interestingly I am sure you are aware of what he writes in the same discussion in ch3?



Im aware of romans 3, but again, he says "works of the law", these would be tassels, dietary laws, and all the ceremonial dealings. These never justified man, the law was added 430 years afterwards.
Abraham had no law of moses to obey, nor did noah, they were righteous by faith.

The only way anyone has ever been saved is by faith working by love, purifying the heart.

Where me and mainstream churches differ is that when i read ephesians 2:8-9 i think acts 15:1, works of the law, the big controversy. Whereas the mainstream churches think ANY deeds, including baptism, obedience to the commandments of Christ, everything is merely "optional" since you are already saved. This is why James was called an epistle of straw, because James says its not by just mere acknowledgement and belief that man is saved, because faith without works is dead.

In romans 1 and 2 he does not say no one is righteous, he says the opposite. He says gentiles who dont got the law are a law unto themselves by obeying their conscience. Even in Romans 3:10 as yall erroneously claim, Paul aint saying every individual is living like the devil, PAUL HIMSELF SAYS HE KEPT THE LAW BLAMELESS! (and luke 1:6) What he did to christians was in ignorance. Romans 3:9 explaisn who is spoken of, "What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;" and after this he says it is written no one is righteous no not one. He is talking about groups of people. Yall make the same mistake in Romans 9, thinking its about individuals, all you gotta do is go read whats quoted, Esau became Edomites, Jacob became Israelites, its national. There were some edomites who JOINED Israel, so it wasnt every individual edomite who was gonna be wicked.

Paul says closely to what Jesus said in John 5:28-29 in
Romans 2:6-8
Who will render to every man according to his deeds:
To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:
But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,

You will never find any of this unsystematic theology from lets say, Mark. Its always Paul's writings, which Peter specifically warned us about that folks would twist em. There is no reason to make Paul contradict all of the rest of the bible.

And the reason why I keep bringing up disobedience is not to say you personally havent repented but because as we can CLEARLY see from the churches today, aint many coming outta their sins, its just picnicks and music festivals. And I believe a big part of why repentance is dead is because of the preaching of inability to obey, the original sin. Even some holiness preachers do it. I like tim conway, hes a calvinist and he has great sermons about repentance, but then he has to shoot that arrow of death to his message at the end where he coats it all with the calvinist garbage of nobody can actually do anything, God has to do it for you, even tho He commanded us to do it, we're all gonna slip up.
Another problem is: If you tell people God gotta give them repentance (even tho he tells us to do it... makes no sense...) and then people still mess up all the time, isnt that making God look really bad? Like He aint doing His job properly when people never succeed in anything? If God really did grant us everything He asked of us, free of charge, we would never sin, not even once. And thats a fact. We would all be like Jesus after conversion if God had His way, we'd all follow Him perfectly. So to say God grants repentance to folks and they still contiunously FAIL is just to pin it on God.

Its like theres something in the flesh you can see with a microscope like OH YEAH THATS IT, thats the sin, thats why i cant do nothing.
I just really wonder, how come all them saints in the bible obeyed so well in comparison to us today?

And yup, you are right im just ranting and raving like a madman on this forum. Its of no use i realize, dont know why i bother, maybe im predestined to just type on here while knowing its a waste? :D
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
That is a false characterization of free will. Free will does NOT mean that man becomes God, and no one who believes that men still exercise free will believe that. So that is just a straw man argument.

The real issue ( which is totally avoided by those who don't believe that men have free will) is that they IGNORE the Scriptures and follow the theologians. Let's take just one passage of Scripture and see if does not teach that men have free will:

Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. (Isaiah 55:6,7).

So let's ask ourselves a few questions:

1. Who is God addressing? SINNERS

2. Can sinners seek God if God tells them to seek Him? ABSOLUTELY

3. Are the wicked told to forsake their wicked ways? ABSOLUTELY

4. Are the unrighteous told to forsake their unrighteous thoughts? ABSOLUTELY

5. Can sinners return to the LORD? ABSOLUTELY

6. Could any of this be possible if sinners did not have free will? ABSOLUTELY NOT

7. Does that mean that those who deny free will reject Scripture? ABSOLUTELY


It's Hyperbolic. It's that man cannot get around the fact that he is not in control of redemptive His-story! The remnant of the 'I am' syndrome. Man's downfall!

I know what Arminians believe, and yes I count them as my brothers and sister's in Christ. I certainly believe they are wrong in How we are saved (how how that plays out in faith).

However, I would not agree at all with Pelagianism, which we see on here from time to time..that is, there is no 'sin nature' etc etc, Man is inherently good and so on. Thats not a Christian belief.

Concerning 'free will', what exactly do you mean by that? We all exercise our wills freely, with accordance to our nature. That nature means you are either Spiritually dead and in bondage to sin, or Spiritually alive in Christ and free'd from the bondage of sin and are now in bondage to Him. There is no third way, you will always choose freely by what your nature dictates.
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
The real issue ( which is totally avoided by those who don't believe that men have free will) is that they IGNORE the Scriptures and follow the theologians. Let's take just one passage of Scripture and see if does not teach that men have free will:

Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. (Isaiah 55:6,7).

So let's ask ourselves a few questions:

1. Who is God addressing? SINNERS

2. Can sinners seek God if God tells them to seek Him? ABSOLUTELY

3. Are the wicked told to forsake their wicked ways? ABSOLUTELY

4. Are the unrighteous told to forsake their unrighteous thoughts? ABSOLUTELY

5. Can sinners return to the LORD? ABSOLUTELY

6. Could any of this be possible if sinners did not have free will? ABSOLUTELY NOT

7. Does that mean that those who deny free will reject Scripture? ABSOLUTELY
I wish some calvinist would adress this post. Answer the questions now! WHY DOES GOD COMMAND TO SEEK THE LORD, AND LET THE WICKED FORSAKE HIS WAY IF WE CANNOT? Is there some sinister calvinist doctrine at play and thats why they refuse to answer these questions? Does God do it just to taunt us or harden us even more? Thats the only thing I can think of, some sinister calvinist taunt and hardening doctrine must be what it is. Why else would God ask the impossible? He will just give the elect the will to seek the Lord and power and will to forsake their wickedness anyway. So the command is null and void. This is what calvinism causes, majority of the bible is just useless exhortations and commands. Their bible is a couple of chapters from John and Paul's epistles.

What a joke that we have scholars and unviersity educated pundits believing this, dodging like crazy.

ANSWER ANSWER ANSWER someone
 
Last edited:

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
I wish some calvinist would adress this post. Answer the questions now! WHY DOES GOD COMMAND TO SEEK THE LORD, AND LET THE WICKED FORSAKE HIS WAY IF WE CANNOT? Is there some sinister calvinist doctrine at play and thats why they refuse to answer these questions? Does God do it just to taunt us or harden us even more?

What a joke that we have scholars and unviersity educated pundits believing this, dodging like crazy.

ANSWER ANSWER ANSWER someone

Hi Issachar92,

I will be very well pleased to answer. I believe God commands everyman/woman everywhere to believe. There :)

Oh and I'm Calvinist ;)
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
Hi Issachar92,

I will be very well pleased to answer. I believe God commands everyman/woman everywhere to believe. There :)

Oh and I'm Calvinist ;)
Thats the answer you dodgers give. Im about to vomit on my keyboard. Thats a direct contradiction to ask everyone to repent, but only those who God grants repentance will.

WHAT PURPOSE DOES THE COMMAND TO REPENT SERVE? I want a straight answer, im tired of the philosophical mind games, is there or is there not a sinister scheme whereby God commands everyone to repent just to further damn and harden people? Its a useless command if we arent able to respond, but God has to give it. As Nehemiah stated, that verse he quoted indicates man can respond to it, he asked questions.
 
Last edited:

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
Thats the answer you dodgers give. Im about to vomit on my keyboard. Thats a direct contradiction to ask everyone to repent, but only those who God grants repentance will.

WHAT PURPOSE DOES THE COMMAND TO REPENT SERVE? I want a straight answer, im tired of the philosophical mind games, is there or is there not a sinister scheme whereby God commands everyone to repent just to further damn and harden people? Its a useless command if we arent able to respond, but God has to give it. As Nehemiah stated, that verse he quoted indicates man can respond to it, he asked questions.

Hi Issachar92,

I think your posts show where your heart is. Commands all men to repent. No man will. He doesn't force anyone, But He does show mercy to some, by removing the blinkers from their ayes so that they can see, and removes the heart of stone so that an not only see but understand that which is Spiritual.

Now the view of Pelagianism that you espouse ..will what can I say.

It's not a useless command it is very important, and when one hears the good news of Jesus Christ, they can either stay in spirituall death or respond to the call in faith.. I responded to the call by Faith. I hope that helps you Issachar. And please calm down its not good for the heart.
 
Jan 21, 2017
647
28
0
Hi Issachar92,

I think your posts show where your heart is. Commands all men to repent. No man will. He doesn't force anyone, But He does show mercy to some, by removing the blinkers from their ayes so that they can see, and removes the heart of stone so that an not only see but understand that which is Spiritual.

Now the view of Pelagianism that you espouse ..will what can I say.

It's not a useless command it is very important, and when one hears the good news of Jesus Christ, they can either stay in spirituall death or respond to the call in faith.. I responded to the call by Faith. I hope that helps you Issachar. And please calm down its not good for the heart.
Again no answer. I command dogs to build a castle = useless command. I gotta build it for them.
You said you responded to the call by faith but no you didnt, God just gave you the will and new heart to respond, so God believed for you in reality. You had no choice, He made you willing (insert verse)
Ok so that question cannot be answered logically i can see cause calvinism doesnt deal with reality.

Now just answer this one and i'll leave you alone, PLEASE, straight answer:


I am calvinist joe, i go to preach in a town square, I tell people God commands every man everywhere to repent, the odds are most folks arent elect out there. So, does them hearing the Gospel message serve a purpose? A purpose such as further hardening them or damning them? Thats all I wanna know and ill let ya be.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,671
3,541
113
Agreed, there is much of Scripture you do not believe by your own admittance and assertions.

Ephesians 1, ironically, is where we find the truth you reject above.



No, sorry, you were not.

You can't just insert yourself into Ephesians 2, when that passage is, in context, those referred to in chapter 1 of which you've opted yourself out of due to unbelief of the text. You don't just skip parts then jump in later, especially here.

Theology isn't like Burger King, i.e. Have it Your Way ®.

You don't get to abuse the Word of God and pick and choose yourself in and out of contexts as you do and still have integrity in handling the Word correctly. It is mishandling the Word, yet, this is what you do.

You need some 2 Timothy 2:15 refresher courses, or more likely 101.
Ephesians is written to those in Christ. Those in Christ have been predestined to receive the adoption which is the redemption of the body. That is a future thing. It hasn't happened yet. That's my destination since I am in Christ. How did I get into Christ? Verse 13, I heard the gospel. I trusted the gospel. I was sealed by the Holy Spirit for the adoption. Scripture never states anyone being predestined to believe the gospel and be saved. Nowhere.