Stonesoffire: Genesis study

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#81
So when it says darkness covered the face of the deep, you think there was natural light there apart from the sun? So you think there is natural light other than the sun? Like, if our sun went dark, we could still see?
Probably a quite moot question now that I think of it...Because no life could even exist without the sun, so even if there were some light to see by without it, no one would be alive to see by it.:rolleyes:

Temporal life cannot exist apart from the Sun.
Spiritual life cannot exist apart from the Son.
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#82
Thanks stunnedbygrace. I completely agree with you that the book of Genesis is written in parable form, as is all of the Bible (Psalm 78:1-2, Mark 4:34). You are entirely correct to look for a spiritual meaning. When the Bible says to compare spiritual with spiritual in 1 Corinthians 2:13 it means to compare spiritual words of the Bible with other spiritual words of the Bible to get at the spiritual meaning. Comparing same words throughout the Bible is a good way to do this.

oh mercy...where to begin...where to begin

no...the entire Bible is not a parable...that is a Preterism/Gnostic construct and not viable

comparing the same words throughout the Bible is the WORST way to study

context and a thorough knowledge of the doctrines of scripture...so that we do not insert our own misaligned thoughts and preconceived notions...is the correct way...

taking the Bible and saying it is all spiritual is not correct..it leads to gross error and confusion

what is even worse, is when people try to understand or believe they have found the answers to questions that the world's most advanced Christians well versed in apologetics and theologians shy away from!

it becomes nonsense and error and nothing more!

Genesis is not a parable

your tiny minds and my tiny mind cannot conceive of what really happened or how powerful the word spoken by God is!

do you not know that creation continues? stars are still being formed! the galaxies are expanding!

and BECAUSE God spoke them into existence

creation is not stagnant...are you made of spirit only?

there is a concept of material and spirit being combined that you have totally miscontrued

Adam and Eve were not spirit beings only as some think, possibly due to the recent movie in which they were represented as such...'Noah'

there is a very good reason teachers have much more to answer for............
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#83
So when it says darkness covered the face of the deep, you think there was natural light there apart from the sun? So you think there is natural light other than the sun? Like, if our sun went dark, we could still see?
How did you come up with to place natural light into darkness covered the face of the deep??.

The sun is a star just like many billions of them in our universe not all the same size or stage. I'm of science as well so to get into that with someone we have to be on the same page, because we will only be rebuking each other...

If the sun went out, first the earth would loose a lot of heat it gets from it, sure the distance stars you'll see in the night sky may illuminate a little but not much, electricity which mind you is a natural agent as well as machine generated like a nuclear reactor on earth is compared to the fusion in a natural sun..
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#84
Lauren, taking the word and saying it is all spiritual is not to negate the temporal.
It is to say that the word of God is spirit because God is Spirit.
The words I give you, they are Spirit and truth.

Yes, Adam and Eve were not Spirit beings only. They also walked in the temporal.
After the fall, that is when the fracture occured and they walked in the temporal without the cohesiveness of the Spirit.

Once we do receive the Spirit though, we begin to walk in the cohesiveness that was lost to us.
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#85
Lauren, taking the word and saying it is all spiritual is not to negate the temporal.
It is to say that the word of God is spirit because God is Spirit.
The words I give you, they are Spirit and truth.

Yes, Adam and Eve were not Spirit beings only. They also walked in the temporal.
After the fall, that is when the fracture occured and they walked in the temporal without the cohesiveness of the Spirit.

Once we do receive the Spirit though, we begin to walk in the cohesiveness that was lost to us.

are you correcting what I stated? or backpeddling on what you stated and some have agreed with?

pardon my frankness...it is not an attack..

big news: EVERY SINGLE CHRISTIAN ALIVE is sealed with the Holy Spirit for the day of redemption...for which ALL of creation groans

what do you mean by 'once we receive the Spirit? and frankly, I prefer to call the third person of the Godhead the Holy Spirit or Spirit of God to avoid any confusion because there are many spirits

the Bible is a far greater book than the limits I see being placed on it in this thread

again, I am direct...not attacking

thank you
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#86
Lauren, taking the word and saying it is all spiritual is not to negate the temporal.
sorry

but want to delve further into the above statement stunned

did I somehow limit my response to an outrage at limiting the temporal?

sounds like you are being dismissive and slightly condescending...I hope not
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#87
How did you come up with to place natural light into darkness covered the face of the deep??.
..
I'm not rebuking you...I'm having a conversation with you to try to understand your thoughts...;)
You were saying this first light is a natural light, which meant to me, that you were saying there was a natural light before the sun. I am trying to figure out what you mean by that.

Before this light came to here, it says darkness covered. But you appear to me to be saying that although this darkness and light are before the created light of the sun, there was some sort of natural light. Which means darkness did not cover...It is confusing to me that God made the temporal sun to light the temporal earth but you say there was temporal light of some sort before this. So I am trying to figure out what temporal light you are talking about before the creation of the sun.:)
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#88
sorry

but want to delve further into the above statement stunned

did I somehow limit my response to an outrage at limiting the temporal?

sounds like you are being dismissive and slightly condescending...I hope not
Oh no! I am not being dismissive or condescending! I am trying to figure out what you where meaning. :)
Iamjusthavingaconversation.:)
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#89
I don't know what you mean about outrage. I've never heard the word.
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#90
Oh no! I am not being dismissive or condescending! I am trying to figure out what you where meaning. :)
Iamjusthavingaconversation.:)


well good then

perhaps, as I have read your posts and the rest of this thread, you might answer my questions please

and it would also be nice if you address my post

thanks

you are stating this is a conversation...yet you refer to the op as a study...so...the responsibility is far greater than just tossing ideas around
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#91
I don't know what you mean about outrage. I've never heard the word.


you don't know what outrage means?

I was being slightly humorous and sarcastic...let it go if you did not get it...no problem...:)
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#92
oh mercy...where to begin...where to begin

no...the entire Bible is not a parable...that is a Preterism/Gnostic construct and not viable

comparing the same words throughout the Bible is the WORST way to study

context and a thorough knowledge of the doctrines of scripture...so that we do not insert our own misaligned thoughts and preconceived notions...is the correct way...

taking the Bible and saying it is all spiritual is not correct..it leads to gross error and confusion

what is even worse, is when people try to understand or believe they have found the answers to questions that the world's most advanced Christians well versed in apologetics and theologians shy away from!

it becomes nonsense and error and nothing more!

Genesis is not a parable

your tiny minds and my tiny mind cannot conceive of what really happened or how powerful the word spoken by God is!

do you not know that creation continues? stars are still being formed! the galaxies are expanding!

and BECAUSE God spoke them into existence

creation is not stagnant...are you made of spirit only?

there is a concept of material and spirit being combined that you have totally miscontrued

Adam and Eve were not spirit beings only as some think, possibly due to the recent movie in which they were represented as such...'Noah'

there is a very good reason teachers have much more to answer for............
World most advanced Christian who that be lol....
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#94
New flash not only Does God inform the worlds most advanced Christian of things but also the worlds most least knowledgeable Christian...
 
L

LaurenTM

Guest
#96
ok...well...I gotta get going here

real time life calls...yelling at me in fact...no one else...just my own conscience..;)

so....be back later to assess the damage I did (sarcastic humor)

hope you get around to answering my questions there stunned!

you did call this a study...
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#97
are you correcting what I stated? or backpeddling on what you stated and some have agreed with?

pardon my frankness...it is not an attack..

big news: EVERY SINGLE CHRISTIAN ALIVE is sealed with the Holy Spirit for the day of redemption...for which ALL of creation groans

what do you mean by 'once we receive the Spirit? and frankly, I prefer to call the third person of the Godhead the Holy Spirit or Spirit of God to avoid any confusion because there are many spirits

the Bible is a far greater book than the limits I see being placed on it in this thread

again, I am direct...not attacking

thank you
No worries. I don't feel attacked! :)
I'm not correcting. I was trying to respond to where you said it is a mistake to say all the word is spiritual. We know the word is Spirit because God is Spirit. And Jesus said, the words I give you, they are spirit...So to say the words are spirit does not do away with them also having literal temporal meaning, but it is the Spirit of the word that avails us. The temporal will be done away with.Then I was responding to the part where you said Adam and Eve were not just Spirit beings but also had temporal bodies. So I agreed they were spiritual and also temporal before the fall. There was no war between the two then.

Have I answered all of the questions?

Oh wait, you asked what I meant by saying: when we receive the Spirit. I meant when we are born again from above and receive Gods' Spirit. :)
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
#98
New flash not only Does God inform the worlds most advanced Christian of things but also the worlds most least knowledgeable Christian...
He gives us each some parts, yes. This is why we should listen to all parts of the body and what they have to say. Sometimes we dismiss what the hand has to say because it isn't the mouth! :) we don't always listen well to each other and sometimes dismiss everything someone has to say because we disagree with one part or even one word of it.
 
B

BeyondET

Guest
#99
I'm not rebuking you...I'm having a conversation with you to try to understand your thoughts...;)
You were saying this first light is a natural light, which meant to me, that you were saying there was a natural light before the sun. I am trying to figure out what you mean by that.

Before this light came to here, it says darkness covered. But you appear to me to be saying that although this darkness and light are before the created light of the sun, there was some sort of natural light. Which means darkness did not cover...It is confusing to me that God made the temporal sun to light the temporal earth but you say there was temporal light of some sort before this. So I am trying to figure out what temporal light you are talking about before the creation of the sun.:)
Yes there was a light natural it be before our own sun light.

Adam and Eve were called man and woman today is the same...

A man is a man a woman is a woman and a sun is a sun no matter were in the universe it be...
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
Yes there was a light natural it be before our own sun light.

Adam and Eve were called man and woman today is the same...

A man is a man a woman is a woman and a sun is a sun no matter were in the universe it be...
Sorry you lost me here...:D
Maybe it would help me to understand if you give me the verses that describe the natural light that existed before the creation of the sun and before the creation of the eyes of humans. It usually helps me to see the verses for how someone came to their understanding.