ONE BAPTISM - Ephesians 4:5

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#61
If a prisoner got saved in a prison with no ability to get submersed for baptism does God issue him a waiver or is he just not saved?
Not saved.

If an atheist were on an airplane that was about to crash and he began to think there is a higher power and life after death but died not knowing who or what to believe, would he get granted a "wavier" and be saved as an unbeliever seeing as he would have believed but just did not have time?
 
Last edited:
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#62
A person can be baptized in water and still be dead in his sins however, when a person gets baptized with,in,and by the Holy Spirit that person is saved to the end of time


Water baptism is where God removes the body of sins, Col 2:12-14.

You are creating two baptisms in your post, there is just ONE baptism in effect.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#63
if you have a look at the whole book of Ephesians, not just one snippet of one sentence "one baptism" -- you will find Paul throughout the epistle encouraging us to be in Christ, and extolling all the blessing that God has made and given us in Christ, and proclaiming the salvation and redemption and glory we have in Christ.

Christ Jesus is exactly what we must be immersed in!! in Him are all things for us, and all we have for God is in Him. it is the gospel of Christ we received, not the gospel of H[SUB]2[/SUB]O - every virtue of the common ritual receives it's worth only because it points to Christ and reflects the spiritual reality of our own crucifixion and resurrection, which is in Christ. the Holy Spirit is the guarantee of God to us in Christ -- there is only one immersion, and it is to be immersed in Christ!!
Water baptism puts one in Christ, Gal 3:27.
Was the eunuch immersed in Christ?
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#64
To me it sound as if he is letting the readers to know that there is one Baptism, but which one is he is referring to? I doesn't know, but God knows. But only thing that I does know is that if we perceive thing in the natural, we will be judge in that same manner that we has chosen to see it. But I want God to look at my heart, not literally by opening my chest up and seeing it pump, but look at by the spiritual nature.

2 Corinthians 3:6 He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. (this is how they explained in those days, not to take thing literally, but now we has a word for it, and which it is called, "Literally".)
What baptism was the eunuch baptized with? What baptism did Paul baptize with in 1 Cor 1:14,16? What baptism was the Gentiles commanded to be baptized with in Acts 2:47,48?
 
May 15, 2013
4,307
27
0
#65
What baptism was the eunuch baptized with? What baptism did Paul baptize with in 1 Cor 1:14,16? What baptism was the Gentiles commanded to be baptized with in Acts 2:47,48?
Was Jesus Baptize? How can someone that has no faults in them be Baptize? The people weren't spiritually knowledgeable in those times, and so Jesus and Paul had to first implant the image of being baptize in them, and so they had taken a bath with their children to get them use to the idea of being baptize. Eventually overtime they'll know what is the true meaning of being baptized. See John had used water for his Baptism, but the next one that comes after him will bring the spirit that comes down upon them like a dove that will get rid of the filth of the woman of Zion. There's a dish liquid detergent and it's called, "Dove", maybe people should put that in the water before they are baptize in it, it probably get rid of the filth that we had accumulated over time.
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
#66
Acts 8:38 must be unscriptural according to some.
I really think the issue isn't so much with the Scriptures as it is a matter of either, not knowing how to or refusing to reason correctly. So many people use incorrect and illogical reasoning and when this is shown they, simply ignore it. This is the real is driving force behind what happens on these forums. It's what fuels all of this debated. It's also what is behind all of the denominations within Protestantism.
 
C

ChristIsGod

Guest
#67
There are people that do die before they have the chance to get baptized. People in some countries don't have enough water to be immersed, so they do the best with whatever water they have. The thief on the cross has probably been brought up already but I haven't been able to read the whole thread. It just grieves me that we have such divisions when we have concordances available to all of us and only need to type in the word "baptism" and see in what ways and places that word is used in the N.T.. I know you'll find it used in a number of ways. Even in the place where Jesus asked them if they really were willing to be baptized in the same manner in which He would be - meaning His death on the cross!

Yes, He did say that we should be baptized in water - but there are truthfully - as the thief on the cross that didn't get the chance.
I also believe in the Spirit baptism - but some people have only been taught that it's not for today or something similar so they don't seek God for that.

I will never say that Presbyterians and the like are not saved - God forbid. They sprinkle and most are cesstationists - but God forbid that I should say they're not saved, because I've been to almost every conservative Christian denomination that there is and even though I don't agree with them on many doctrines - I KNOW that they are saved because God uses them in the gifts, except not tongues or interpretation and they don't even realize that they are using 7 out of the 9 gifts of The Spirit and I just smile.

If we make the demand that a person must be 100% perfect as in the belief of sinless-perfection teaching - than that is what we're requiring when we say that ALL must be immersed or speak in tongues or have the exact doctrine that we carry, when it's just that though they've been obviously born again / changed / regenerated and manifest His Spirit working in their life and are living the life - many laying down their lives for Christ through martyrdom - but they were raised & convinced by someone that the way they were water baptized was a 'dedication' or something other than how we believe.

I was hard core in my beliefs until I had been around a whole church of conservative Presbyterians. I'm not hard-core on these two doctrines anymore - but I still have a hard time with most of Calvinism - but this conservative Presby Church preached "Holiness" and like I mentioned, they were used by the Holy Spirit in every way except for the tongues+ part. I wish I could have brought you guys there for a few weeks and let you see what "saved but not 100% doctrinal" in line with what we read in The Word. As Paul told Timothy to watch "his life and his doctrine" closely --- I see how we live our lives -- as in to live holy as unto the LORD and our doctrine as equally - very equally important - but I don't find that any of us are perfectly perfect in either.

If a person can be baptized by immersion, they are to do so for the reasons Jesus said, to represent death and resurrection.
If a person searches the Scriptures, as we all should, and sees that we're to seek the baptism of The Spirit, they should.
Some that never believed in tongues or interpretation did seek the baptism in the Holy Spirit and their lives changed, but they never spoke/prayed in tongues.

There are differing views of what the 'essentials' are and we need to truly seek the mind of Christ on what those 'essentials' are. We should go "Church hopping" to Bible preaching-Born again churches and get to know some of these people and see if we think they're not regenerated/saved/born-again or not and not by what we hold onto as necessary for Salvation.

In the non-essentials - Unity is where I stand.

Sinless perfection & doctrinal perfection are one in the same and we'll find neither - whether we think we can, or think we are or not.

His Love in us is an essential, btw - but who of us can say that we love every human on this planet 100% of the time?
But we're supposed to and should be aiming to, for by this they will know that we're His disciples.
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#68
Was Jesus Baptize? How can someone that has no faults in them be Baptize? The people weren't spiritually knowledgeable in those times, and so Jesus and Paul had to first implant the image of being baptize in them, and so they had taken a bath with their children to get them use to the idea of being baptize. Eventually overtime they'll know what is the true meaning of being baptized. See John had used water for his Baptism, but the next one that comes after him will bring the spirit that comes down upon them like a dove that will get rid of the filth of the woman of Zion. There's a dish liquid detergent and it's called, "Dove", maybe people should put that in the water before they are baptize in it, it probably get rid of the filth that we had accumulated over time.

Jesus was not baptized because He had sins that needed remitted, but was baptized to identify Him as the Son of God and to full all righteousness in obeying His Father.

Further reading on why Christ was baptized:
https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/584-why-was-jesus-baptized


Many will quote Mt 3:11 but this verse does not in any way promise anyone today baptism with the Holy Spirit.
The water in water baptism does not remit sins, it is the blood of Christ that washes away sins, Rev 1:5. Christ shed that blood in His death, Jn 19:34. So we need a way into the death of Christ to access that shed blood and it is water baptism that puts one into Christ's death, Rom 6:3,4,5 where then His blood washes away sins.


Is the baptism of 1 Cor 1:14,16 the same ONE baptism of 1 Cor 12:13?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,696
13,514
113
#69
apparently if i'm not sitting in a bathtub immersed in H[SUB]2[/SUB]O as we speak, i've lost my salvation ... ?

i feel like there must be a forest just beyond all these trees. :p
 
Mar 12, 2014
6,433
29
0
#70
There are people that do die before they have the chance to get baptized. People in some countries don't have enough water to be immersed, so they do the best with whatever water they have. The thief on the cross has probably been brought up already but I haven't been able to read the whole thread. It just grieves me that we have such divisions when we have concordances available to all of us and only need to type in the word "baptism" and see in what ways and places that word is used in the N.T.. I know you'll find it used in a number of ways. Even in the place where Jesus asked them if they really were willing to be baptized in the same manner in which He would be - meaning His death on the cross!


Yes, He did say that we should be baptized in water - but there are truthfully - as the thief on the cross that didn't get the chance.
I also believe in the Spirit baptism - but some people have only been taught that it's not for today or something similar so they don't seek God for that.

I will never say that Presbyterians and the like are not saved - God forbid. They sprinkle and most are cesstationists - but God forbid that I should say they're not saved, because I've been to almost every conservative Christian denomination that there is and even though I don't agree with them on many doctrines - I KNOW that they are saved because God uses them in the gifts, except not tongues or interpretation and they don't even realize that they are using 7 out of the 9 gifts of The Spirit and I just smile.

If we make the demand that a person must be 100% perfect as in the belief of sinless-perfection teaching - than that is what we're requiring when we say that ALL must be immersed or speak in tongues or have the exact doctrine that we carry, when it's just that though they've been obviously born again / changed / regenerated and manifest His Spirit working in their life and are living the life - many laying down their lives for Christ through martyrdom - but they were raised & convinced by someone that the way they were water baptized was a 'dedication' or something other than how we believe.

I was hard core in my beliefs until I had been around a whole church of conservative Presbyterians. I'm not hard-core on these two doctrines anymore - but I still have a hard time with most of Calvinism - but this conservative Presby Church preached "Holiness" and like I mentioned, they were used by the Holy Spirit in every way except for the tongues+ part. I wish I could have brought you guys there for a few weeks and let you see what "saved but not 100% doctrinal" in line with what we read in The Word. As Paul told Timothy to watch "his life and his doctrine" closely --- I see how we live our lives -- as in to live holy as unto the LORD and our doctrine as equally - very equally important - but I don't find that any of us are perfectly perfect in either.

If a person can be baptized by immersion, they are to do so for the reasons Jesus said, to represent death and resurrection.
If a person searches the Scriptures, as we all should, and sees that we're to seek the baptism of The Spirit, they should.
Some that never believed in tongues or interpretation did seek the baptism in the Holy Spirit and their lives changed, but they never spoke/prayed in tongues.

There are differing views of what the 'essentials' are and we need to truly seek the mind of Christ on what those 'essentials' are. We should go "Church hopping" to Bible preaching-Born again churches and get to know some of these people and see if we think they're not regenerated/saved/born-again or not and not by what we hold onto as necessary for Salvation.

In the non-essentials - Unity is where I stand.

Sinless perfection & doctrinal perfection are one in the same and we'll find neither - whether we think we can, or think we are or not.

His Love in us is an essential, btw - but who of us can say that we love every human on this planet 100% of the time?
But we're supposed to and should be aiming to, for by this they will know that we're His disciples.

But circumstances do not change the word of God. There have been many unbelieving people that have lived and died that would have believed if they only lived longer. Will they be saved anyway since they never had the chance to believe?

The thief on the cross was promised paradise under the OT law and is not an example of NT salvation. The thief lived and died before the NT came into effect (Heb 9:16,17), that is, before Mk 16:16, Acts 2:38 came into effect so he was not accountable to being baptized as we today are who live after the NT gospel has come into effect.

Presbyterians, myself nor anyone else DO NOT determine how man is saved...God does and God has made water baptism the means by which He saves. And who gets to decide for others what is or is not essential?

You speak of "unity". The bible says God word is "truth" Jn 17:17 and truth does not contradict itself as all these various religious groups do. That's all the proof I need to know for certain that all these groups DO NOT have the truth of God's word. There is no unity in contradiction..."Can two walk together, except they be agreed?" No! So all these groups cannot contradict each other and all be biblically right, impossible for them all to be going by the word of God. If Christianity was really made up of all the conflicts and contradictions it would be a very sorry, sick joke that I would not waste my time with. There is no truth, no credibility no unity in contradictions. Anyone has a desire to be lost? Just go along with all the contradictions. In the same context Paul said ONE baptism he said ONE body yet man has tried to corrupt that into many bodies that contradict each other.
 
Last edited:
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
#71
On the contrary, those who deny the words of Lord are the one's who will be regretful. Logical fallacies do not lead to truth
Which did God give under inspiration?...

A. When I see the blood I will pass over you...
B. When I see the blood, water and works I will pass over you....

I am the LORD THY GOD..I CHANGE NOT!

You pick...A = biblical salvation...B= A gospel of a different kind which has no power to save...

Quite simple!
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,696
13,514
113
#72
Jesus was not baptized because He had sins that needed remitted, but was baptized to identify Him as the Son of God and to full all righteousness in obeying His Father.
the baptist called him the Lamb of God as He approached, before He entered the water.
He himself when He was a child and Mary & Joseph were looking for Him, said
"Did you not know that I must be in my Father's house?"
even the shepherds knew from the day He was born - as the angels told them "
unto us a Son is given"

to all who had eyes to see, the thing was known from the beginning, and yet more and more signs were given, and still many did not believe. even today - though He dwells within us, we'll say "He is in the mikvah!"

but whoever is thirsty, let him drink.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
#73
But circumstances do not change the word of God. There have been many unbelieving people that have lived and died that would have believed if they only lived longer. Will they be saved anyway since they never had the chance to believe?

The thief on the cross was promised paradise under the OT law and is not an example of NT salvation. The thief lived and died before the NT came into effect (Heb 9:16,17), that is, before Mk 16:16, Acts 2:38 came into effect so he was not accountable to being baptized as we today are who live after the NT gospel has come into effect.

Presbyterians, myself nor anyone else DO NOT determine how man is saved...God does and God has made water baptism the means by which He saves. And who gets to decide for others what is or is not essential?

You speak of "unity". The bible says God word is "truth" Jn 17:17 and truth does not contradict itself as all these various religious groups do. That's all the proof I need to know for certain that all these groups DO NOT have the truth of God's word. There is no unity in contradiction..."Can two walk together, except they be agreed?" No! So all these groups cannot contradict each other and all be biblically right, impossible for them all to be going by the word of God. If Christianity was really made up of all the conflicts and contradictions it would be a very sorry, sick joke that I would not waste my time with. There is no truth, no credibility no unity in contradictions. Anyone has a desire to be lost? Just go along with all the contradictions. In the same context Paul said ONE baptism he said ONE body yet man has tried to corrupt that into many bodies that contradict each other.
More COC heresy and rejection of the truth....The LAW and the PROPHETS were until John...Jesus called out HIS CHURCH and is called a church at least twice in the present context and JESUS said YOU WILL BE WITH ME...WHERE is JESUS now? AND JESUS COULD NOT ASCEND with those in PARADISE until he offered HIS BLOOD on the mercy seat in HEAVEN after his THREE days in the grave...WAKE up dude and quit following Alexander Campbell to hell!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
#74
the baptist called him the Lamb of God as He approached, before He entered the water.
He himself when He was a child and Mary & Joseph were looking for Him, said
"Did you not know that I must be in my Father's house?"
even the shepherds knew from the day He was born - as the angels told them "
unto us a Son is given"

to all who had eyes to see, the thing was known from the beginning, and yet more and more signs were given, and still many did not believe. even today - though He dwells within us, we'll say "He is in the mikvah!"

but whoever is thirsty, let him drink.
They blindly fail to recognize that JESUS, just as WE ARE, are a CHILD/SON of GOD by birth (of the SPIRIT) and that JESUS was THE SON of GOD before HIS IMMERSION.....MORE CAMPBELLISM and gospel of a different kind which has no power to save for sure......
 
May 2, 2014
1,060
12
0
#75
Which did God give under inspiration?...

A. When I see the blood I will pass over you...
B. When I see the blood, water and works I will pass over you....

I am the LORD THY GOD..I CHANGE NOT!

You pick...A = biblical salvation...B= A gospel of a different kind which has no power to save...

Quite simple!
Is that the only passage in your Bible? Do you ignore those passages that don't fit with what you want to believe?

Is this also inspired?

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. (Mar 16:16 KJV)
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
#76
Is that the only passage in your Bible? Do you ignore those passages that don't fit with what you want to believe?

Is this also inspired?

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. (Mar 16:16 KJV)
Yeah added by men to the cannon as they too erroneously added water where water was not added....again you fail to acknowledge the truth........

Ephesians 2..Saved by faith
John 3:16 Saved by faith
Titus 3 Saved by MERCY
Romans 3 Justified by FAITH
Galatians 3 Justified by faith

For every ONE you take out of context there are 10 to 30 that teach faith based upon BLOOD

Lets try again.....ANSWER THE FOLLOWING which DID GOD SAY....

Originally Posted by dcontroversal
Which did God give under inspiration?...

A. When I see the blood I will pass over you...
B. When I see the blood, water and works I will pass over you....

I am the LORD THY GOD..I CHANGE NOT!

You pick...A = biblical salvation...B= A gospel of a different kind which has no power to save...

Quite simple!
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,696
13,514
113
#77
i would never say we should disobey the command;
it's just that there is only one pure spiritual soap that is able to remove the stain of sin, and i know it isn't H[SUB]2[/SUB]O, but 'sblood.


Out, damn'd spot! out, I say!—One; two: why, then
'tis time to do't.—Hell is murky.—Fie, my lord, fie, a soldier, and
afeard? What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our
pow'r to accompt?—Yet who would have thought the old man to
have had so much blood in him?


i am compelled in my heart to give all glory to Jesus Christ through His grace, and not to any human work.
the one consistent message of immersion throughout the scripture is to be immersed in Christ, and this is a spiritual thing, not carnal, though the fruit of it becomes corporeal by the good works that we have been chosen to carry out.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
#78
Is that the only passage in your Bible? Do you ignore those passages that don't fit with what you want to believe?

Is this also inspired?

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. (Mar 16:16 KJV)
and these signs shall follow them...DO YOU
1. CAST OUT DEVILS
2. SPEAK IN TONGUES
3. TAKE UP SNAKES
4. DRINK ANY DEADLY THING

SO...if you believe MARK 16:16 go get a bottle of bleach right now and drink some...or do you speak in unknown languages?
When is the last time you handled a nice warmed up Timber rattler? And have you cast out any demons?

If not, by your own theology you are not saved as he said THESE SIGNS WILL SHALL FOLLOW THEM...WHAT about YOU SEA PERCH do you do theses things and if not why not?
 
C

ChristIsGod

Guest
#79
But circumstances do not change the word of God. There have been many unbelieving people that have lived and died that would have believed if they only lived longer. Will they be saved anyway since they never had the chance to believe?

The thief on the cross was promised paradise under the OT law and is not an example of NT salvation. The thief lived and died before the NT came into effect (Heb 9:16,17), that is, before Mk 16:16, Acts 2:38 came into effect so he was not accountable to being baptized as we today are who live after the NT gospel has come into effect.

Presbyterians, myself nor anyone else DO NOT determine how man is saved...God does and God has made water baptism the means by which He saves. And who gets to decide for others what is or is not essential?

You speak of "unity". The bible says God word is "truth" Jn 17:17 and truth does not contradict itself as all these various religious groups do. That's all the proof I need to know for certain that all these groups DO NOT have the truth of God's word. There is no unity in contradiction..."Can two walk together, except they be agreed?" No! So all these groups cannot contradict each other and all be biblically right, impossible for them all to be going by the word of God. If Christianity was really made up of all the conflicts and contradictions it would be a very sorry, sick joke that I would not waste my time with. There is no truth, no credibility no unity in contradictions. Anyone has a desire to be lost? Just go along with all the contradictions. In the same context Paul said ONE baptism he said ONE body yet man has tried to corrupt that into many bodies that contradict each other.
Well, 'baptismal regeneration' is a belief that I'm familiar with but don't agree with - but I do believe that a person is responsible before GOD to "search the Scriptures" for themselves and to never learn from man alone. Bereans, if you will.
When we stand before Him, He will ask us where we learned what we believe - and if we answer that it's because that's what our demonination or Pastor or favorite radio preacher taught, He will not take that as an exceptable answer.

We're to search the Scriptures on our own. It grieves me more than anything to see that on the internet there's every type of concordance and means to do cross-references and study with ease yet most don't know most of their New Testament - a book that's only a 1/2 inch thick.
Some can say they love Jesus, but give little time to The Word of God, which is His Name and function as well as the means of Salvation. That's my pet peeve and I grieve that His Spirit of Truth is not depended on to "teach us all things".

I grieve that we stay in just one denomination and say that we only agree with that group or feel that they're the only ones out there that have the way to Salvation. I refuse to be linked to any denomination - I'm just a Christian and want to fellowship with all those that are born-again into His Kingdom.

Jesus had his disciples baptizing believers and John's disciples told John about it - so the thief on the cross was saved after Christ's baptism was acted upon. His reputation had already been established by then. Yes, the thief knew that Jesus was LORD and Messiah, after he had just finished mocking Him - but that thief knew about why Jesus was on that cross and knew enough about Jesus' ministry to know that he was speaking more than O.T. knowledge.

Your last paragraph sounds just like something I would have written at one time.

All I can say in closing and leaving this to you men is - Don't you realize that people have come to Christ with their heart and mind wide open for forgiveness and for salvation, truly believing that He is Who He said He is but for some reasons could never get to water? Like in Hospital death bed conversions and the like. Having worked in health-care - I surely wouldn't have said, Well, they did it all right but because they died before we could baptize them, they fell out from between His fingers.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#80
No one was ever commanded to be baptized with the Holy Spirit, but man has been commanded to be water baptized as in Acts 10:47,48.
You are flat wrong. Your opinion is of no merit. You have assumed a position and you make all scripture fit your preconceived notions.

Acts 10:44 Peter preaches and the Holy Spirit comes upon those who believed. Peter preached Christ and souls got saved. Then in vs 48 Peter tells them to baptize them with water and Peter stayed to disciple them certain days. Peter never said nor implied that the water baptism added to or took away from the salvation they received when they heard the word and the Holy Spirit fell upon them.

I find you guilty of reading into the scriptures not reading out of them. It is wholly proper for saved people to receive water baptism. Water baptism does not nor can it ever save a soul from sin.

Acts 10 clearly refutes your contention. You will not to see it so you remain outside the gates.

For the cause of Christ
Roger