Are We Really Predestined?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

elf3

Guest
Aren't you using circular reasoning? You assert that "drawing all men" doesn't mean all human beings to support your definition of "draw" and then you seek to prove it by saying that all men aren't saved. There is ample evidence in scripture that God wants ALL to be saved and NONE to perish or that He truly is "drawing all men", but you've got to insert "all OF THE ELECT" and "none OF THE ELECT" to support your position. Again, how were the people to whom and of whom Stephen spoke in Acts chapter 7 always resisting the Holy Ghost? Wasn't the Holy Ghost seeking to draw them to Christ?
I will admit that this post confused me. How do you see this as "circular reasoning"? It is only circular reasoning because you take John 12:32 out of context because you read it as John 12:32 for John 12:32 without study of other passages of Scripture. You have chosen this passage to support your view without proper Biblical study. This is poor exegesis on your part. You are also, as mentioned by others, adding things that aren't there and using "your own words" to interpret Scripture. Yes I used another person to explain something but this was also after proper study of a Greek word to help me understand Scripture. I also used other passages of Scripture to explain what the word "elko" meant in proper context.

So "circular reasoning"? No it is not as God ALWAYS does the drawing and not ALL men are saved. If ALL men are saved no matter what, by your interpretation, by Jesus then we no longer need God's Word. We no longer need to tell anyone about Jesus and we no longer need worry about anything.
 
L

LT

Guest
Seeing as freewill is always brought up, let's delve into the logic of freewill in regards to salvation.

If all humans are born with freewill, and the Call goes out to all humans,
then all humans start on equal footing when it comes to salvational opportunity, right?

Then what differentiates those who become saved, from those who reject salvation?

Is Faith something you are born with, or something you are given? What determines how much Faith a person has, if any at all?

Is the outcome of salvation based on something we are born with (our heart/soul/mind), or is it based on things that happen to us (our experiences, our upbringing).

If two men are born in the same house, are taught the same things, and given the same opportunities to choose Christ, but only one does,
what about the 2nd man stopped him from accepting Christ? Was he born with an unbelieving heart? What mechanism of freewill is somehow not connected to the way God made him?

Freewill does not make sense. What is the variable function of it? It has none. Is it just an internal randomizer!? Or is it based on something you are born with. If it is based on something you are born with, then it is still predestination.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
L

LT

Guest
The only way for freewill to exist, is if God doesn't actually make your soul.
Do you guys understand that?
It only works if we are somehow able to create ourselves... which is totally and utterly illogical and unbiblical.

According to science, the two variables of all life choices are genetics (biological/nature) and experiences (social/nurture). The Bible agrees, but adds a third: the heart/soul. This third variable is given to man by God, created individually by God.
Unless you made yourself and your soul/heart, and you control all the variables of your experiences,
God is actually in control of all outcomes.

Seriously, what part of you did you create? Your willpower? Or is that not equally given to all?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
L

LT

Guest
The smart man is proud of his smarts, but he didn't actually make himself smart.
The beautiful woman is proud of her beauty, but she didn't actually make herself beautiful.
The rich man is proud of his riches, the powerful man is proud of his power, and strong man is proud of his strength,
but all these things are given (and can be taken away) by God.

How then can the saved man be proud of his salvation? Because he believes in freewill...
but the Word says "so that no one may boast", referring to their salvation.

We boast in Christ, not in our "freewill choice".
He chose us, and not for anything we did or because of anything we can claim as ours,
but merely for His own good pleasure, in accordance to His Plan and purpose.
Nothing about us is the variable. It's all about Him.
 
L

LT

Guest
Lastly, by calling it "free will", and then relating it to salvation,
you are inadvertently saying that we are saved by our willpower.
Just a thought.
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
This is the part of Romans 9 that I was referring to but also much of Romans 8. I am currently studying the book of Romans and it is does seem to me that predestination is the Biblical stance:
Just as it is written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”[e]

14 What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15 For he says to Moses,
“I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”[f]


16 It does not, therefore, depend on human desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. 17 For Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.”[g] 18 Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.
19 One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who is able to resist his will?” 20 But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? “Shall what is formed say to the one who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’”[h] 21 Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use.
I'm going to address this, Lord willing, of course, some time over this coming weekend. I'm presently away on a business trip and I'm a bit hurried and I want to take some time in answering you because of the great importance of properly understanding this topic. I hope that you don't mind and I thank you for your patience. I am going to quickly address what somebody else said just for clarification and then I doubt that I'll be back on this thread before Saturday.
 
J

JesusistheChrist

Guest
I will admit that this post confused me. How do you see this as "circular reasoning"? It is only circular reasoning because you take John 12:32 out of context because you read it as John 12:32 for John 12:32 without study of other passages of Scripture. You have chosen this passage to support your view without proper Biblical study. This is poor exegesis on your part. You are also, as mentioned by others, adding things that aren't there and using "your own words" to interpret Scripture. Yes I used another person to explain something but this was also after proper study of a Greek word to help me understand Scripture. I also used other passages of Scripture to explain what the word "elko" meant in proper context.

So "circular reasoning"? No it is not as God ALWAYS does the drawing and not ALL men are saved. If ALL men are saved no matter what, by your interpretation, by Jesus then we no longer need God's Word. We no longer need to tell anyone about Jesus and we no longer need worry about anything.
When did I ever say that all men are saved? I said that God desires that all men should be saved because that is what the Bible teaches whether you or anybody else likes it or not:

"I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time." (I Timothy 2:1-6)

God's will is that all men would be saved and He gave Jesus Christ as a ransom for all. Of course, you and others, thinking yourselves to be wiser than God and His apostle, would have us to believe that God doesn't will for all to be saved and that Jesus wasn't given as a ransom for all either. No, according to your error, God only wants those whom He allegedly hand-picked before the foundation of the world for salvation to be saved and the rest can literally go to hell. If this is your god, then your god is the devil. I also stated that God is not willing that any should perish because the Bible states that as well:

"The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." (II Peter 3:9)

Whereas the Bible tells us that God is not willing that any should perish, you, again, thinking yourself to be wiser than God and His apostle, would have us to believe that God is not only willing that the majority of people who have ever walked upon the face of this earth should perish, but that He predestined them to such and actually created them for such without any choice of their own or without them ever having had a chance to be saved to begin with. Again, your god is the devil.

God truly does draw ALL MEN unto Himself, but men, through their own volition in exercising their God-given free wills, have the right to reject God's gracious offer of salvation even as the Bible teaches throughout its pages. Jesus stated how His will was to have oftentimes gathered the children of Israel unto Himself, BUT THEY WOULD NOT! That's just one of so many examples that when you tell me that you've studied this out in scripture I have a tremendously hard time believing you. Rather, I suspect that you've been brainwashed by the likes of Calvin and Sproul and then you've gone and read your Bible with rose colored glasses on to make the scriptures say what you've been conditioned into believing that they should say.

Anyhow, I'm really not going to waste anymore time arguing with you or certain others. I'll periodically address certain things just so that others here aren't potentially deceived, but my primary focus will be upon MPW because she started this thread. If she's not interested in me doing the same, then she already knows that she only needs to say the same to me and I'll be on my merry way away from this discussion altogether.

Jesus likened Christianity to that of a Father Who is making a marriage supper for His Son and instructing His servants to go out into the highways and the byways to "compel" people to come in. I'm guessing that you understand that to mean that God sanctions the unwilling abduction of His bride, the forceful raping or implanting of His "seed" which immediately follows and then the imprisonment of the same against her will since that is the type of god whom you and others here preach and worse still you'd have us to believe that this god IS LOVE!

If you have any daughters, friend, then I pray that no man ever shows up and tells you that he's planning on "loving" one of your daughters in the manner in which you and others here claim that your god loves. Send such a fellow near my house and near one of my two daughters and he'd better be enrolled in Obamacare.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Seeing as freewill is always brought up, let's delve into the logic of freewill in regards to salvation.

If all humans are born with freewill, and the Call goes out to all humans,
then all humans start on equal footing when it comes to salvational opportunity, right?
This is so. All are equally able freely to reject salvation. All are on the same footing. What none of them is practically able to do is choose to be saved. Their evil natures will never allow it.

Then what differentiates those who become saved, from those who reject salvation?

Is Faith something you are born with, or something you are given? What determines how much Faith a person has, if any at all?
We all have faith. It is not faith which saves except as a response to the One Who saves. We believe when the evidence is presented to us in some way, and we respond to that evidence. Saving faith is when that evidence is Christ presenting Himself to us so that we personally believe in Him.

Is the outcome of salvation based on something we are born with (our heart/soul/mind), or is it based on things that happen to us (our experiences, our upbringing).
Neither, the outcome of salvation is based on the working of God in our hearts.

If two men are born in the same house, are taught the same things, and given the same opportunities to choose Christ, but only one does,
what about the 2nd man stopped him from accepting Christ? Was he born with an unbelieving heart? What mechanism of freewill is somehow not connected to the way God made him?
He exercises freewill on the basis of his natural humanity without grace. The first man was caused to respond through the grace (unmerited favor and love) of God.

Freewill does not make sense.
We know from experience that freewill exists, although we are rarely called on to exercise it. Most of our choices are based on background, upbringing, prejudices, leanings, and so on.. But very occasionally we make choices which are against our natural desires, and that is in the moral environment when we want to do one thing and our conscience tells us we must do another. If we choose to follow our conscience that it a real act of freewill.


What is the variable function of it? It has none.
I disagree. It is the only real explanation of a man following conscience in a way contrary to all that he desires simply because it is right (and not because it makes him feel good). It is a rare occurrence, but real for all that..
 
L

LT

Guest
This is so. All are equally able freely to reject salvation. All are on the same footing. What none of them is practically able to do is choose to be saved. Their evil natures will never allow it.



We all have faith. It is not faith which saves except as a response to the One Who saves. We believe when the evidence is presented to us in some way, and we respond to that evidence. Saving faith is when that evidence is Christ presenting Himself to us so that we personally believe in Him.



Neither, the outcome of salvation is based on the working of God in our hearts.



He exercises freewill on the basis of his natural humanity without grace. The first man was caused to respond through the grace (unmerited favor and love) of God.



We know from experience that freewill exists, although we are rarely called on to exercise it. Most of our choices are based on background, upbringing, prejudices, leanings, and so on.. But very occasionally we make choices which are against our natural desires, and that is in the moral environment when we want to do one thing and our conscience tells us we must do another. If we choose to follow our conscience that it a real act of freewill.




I disagree. It is the only real explanation of a man following conscience in a way contrary to all that he desires simply because it is right (and not because it makes him feel good). It is a rare occurrence, but real for all that..
But what is the operational function?
What is the variable upon which this "freewill" operates?
How is it outside of the predetermined mathematical structure of all reality?
Our "experience" of freewill does not prove it exists. It proves that we think we are free.
 
L

LT

Guest
The pull on either side of any decision are weighted by God ordained attributes and variables.
The outcome is based purely upon which side is stronger: the flesh or the willpower.
There is no freedom in this, nor is there any logical way to place freedom in this.
It is predestined.
There is no variable that God didn't place there. Unless you believe that he made freewill as a randomizer... in which case, chance and luck are what determine all outcomes, even salvation.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,176
31,141
113
But what is the operational function?
What is the variable upon which this "freewill" operates?
How is it outside of the predetermined mathematical structure of all reality?
Our "experience" of freewill does not prove it exists. It proves that we think we are free.
I prefer to call it self will. The operational function, if I am understanding your use of this term regarding the topic under discussion, comes into play when we lay our self will aside and yield to the will of God.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
"I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time." (I Timothy 2:1-6)

God's will is that all men would be saved and He gave Jesus Christ as a ransom for all.
All this is true. It is on one level God's desire that all men be saved IF IT WAS POSSIBLE. He has made provision for the salvation of all men. But He knows that it is not possible. Why is it not possible? The answer certainly does not lie in man's freewill. God could easily persuade every man to accept Him if that was the only hindrance. I never had any difficulty in persuading my children to do what I wanted them to do if I really wished to. And God could do the same for any man.

The truth is that WE DO NOT KNOW WHY GOD CANNOT SAVE ALL MEN. To us it is a mystery. We simply know it is so because God has revealed it.

Of course, you and others, thinking yourselves to be wiser than God and His apostle, would have us to believe that God doesn't will for all to be saved and that Jesus wasn't given as a ransom for all either.
I certainly do not think that. But I am equally certain that the problem is not one of man's free wiil. God could overcome that. There is clearly something that God could not overcome which prevents it. And it is a problem that parallels the problem as to why God did not destroy or render inoperative the angels that sinned, and why He has allowed Satan limited sway in the world.

No, according to your error, God only wants those whom He allegedly hand-picked before the foundation of the world for salvation to be saved and the rest can literally go to hell.
I would not use the word wants, although the remainder is true. He wants all to be saved. But there is clearly some impediment which prevents Him from saving all and which thus compels Him to choose out those whom He would save. It is an impediment which He has chosen not to reveal to us. I do not pretend to know what it is. But that it is so is made clear by His word.



I
also stated that God is not willing that any should perish because the Bible states that as well:

"The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." (II Peter 3:9)
Exactly, so why will some perish? Why does He not entice them and move on them to respond to Him? Again it is a mystery (which freewill does not explain).

Whereas the Bible tells us that God is not willing that any should perish, you, again, thinking yourself to be wiser than God and His apostle, would have us to believe that God is not only willing that the majority of people who have ever walked upon the face of this earth should perish, but that He predestined them to such and actually created them for such without any choice of their own or without them ever having had a chance to be saved to begin with.
Your problem here is that this is certainly part of what the Bible says. It teaches both. God is not willing that any should perish, and yet the majority will perish. But it also teaches that only those chosen by God will be saved. People believe this because they SEE IT IN SCRIPTURE. The real problem is how to mesh the two together, and that is something that is beyond us. Naive people think that the explanation is found in freewill. But that is because they do not understand freewill. Freewill can always be persuaded. In the case of the saved it IS persuaded. There is some problem other than that which prevents God from being able to save all. When people challenged it Paul's response was, 'Who are you to argue against God?'

God truly does draw ALL MEN unto Himself,
In one sense, yes. Scripture and conscience both play their part. But Scripture also speaks of a drawing which cannot be resisted. 'No man can come to Me except My Father draws him and I will raise him up at the last day.' Here the one who is drawn is guaranteed to be raised up at the last day, and what that means is made clear in John 6.37-44.

but men, through their own volition in exercising their God-given free wills, have the right to reject God's gracious offer of salvation even as the Bible teaches throughout its pages.
Rubbish. The Bible says NOTHING about God-given freewill. Man is in no position to reject God's offer of mercy if God purposes for him to respond. God has ways of making us want to respond.


Jesus stated how His will was to have oftentimes gathered the children of Israel unto Himself, BUT THEY WOULD NOT!
But the question is, why would they not? And the answer is because of their own sinful hearts. They were so fashioned that they were unable to respond. They would not because they could not. You can call that freewill if you like. But why do others respond? Not because of freewill, but because of God's working.

That's just one of so many examples that when you tell me that you've studied this out in scripture I have a tremendously hard time believing you. Rather, I suspect that you've been brainwashed by the likes of Calvin and Sproul and then you've gone and read your Bible with rose colored glasses on to make the scriptures say what you've been conditioned into believing that they should say.
Is this the pot calling the kettle black? LOL The truth is that large numbers have reached their conclusions solely on the basis of the Scriptures.


Jesus likened Christianity to that of a Father Who is making a marriage supper for His Son and instructing His servants to go out into the highways and the byways to "compel" people to come in. I'm guessing that you understand that to mean that God sanctions the unwilling abduction of His bride, the forceful raping or implanting of His "seed" which immediately follows and then the imprisonment of the same against her will since that is the type of god whom you and others here preach and worse still you'd have us to believe that this god IS LOVE!
LOL I am not quite sure why compelling guests to come in has anything to do with raping the bride, but I'm sure you know LOL. . Is that what you did at your wedding? You are mixing your metaphors because, like so many, you force on parables your own interpretation, instead of accepting the simple message that those compelled to come into the wedding represented Christians called by God. In that parable the bride had no significance.
 
Last edited:
L

LT

Guest
I prefer to call it self will. The operational function, if I am understanding your use of this term regarding the topic under discussion, comes into play when we lay our self will aside and yield to the will of God.
And this I agree with entirely.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,176
31,141
113
The Bible says NOTHING about God-given freewill. Man is in no position to reject God's offer of mercy if God purposes for him to respond. God has ways of making us want to respond.

But the question is, why would they not? And the answer is because of their own sinful hearts. They were so fashioned that they were unable to respond. They would not because they could not. You can call that freewill if you like. But why do others respond? Not because of freewill, but because of God's working.
I agree. I was pretty much dead set against God, and I understand that Scripturally as being dead to God in my natural self, which was set against Him. Even when He unmistakably revealed Himself to me, I wanted to deny Him, for how could I believe that such a thing was possible, that He would and could do such thing in today's day and age? I was all for nice cozy spiritual answers as I pursued understanding in my seeking, but I really didn't want anything to do with this God of the Bible. And yet, He was the One that kept showing up for me. After a few encounters, and especially following what I call a spiritual circumcision, no other answers sufficed but what I could find in Scripture. One of the most perplexing attitudes I ran across from atheists was their insistence that I should make null and void the empirical experiences that lead to belief because they lacked such. They wished for lack of experience to trump experience! And yet, I cannot say I was any different: I thought all the millions of people who believed in God were somehow simply mistaken. Such pride.
 
E

elf3

Guest
When did I ever say that all men are saved? I said that God desires that all men should be saved because that is what the Bible teaches whether you or anybody else likes it or not:

"I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time." (I Timothy 2:1-6)

God's will is that all men would be saved and He gave Jesus Christ as a ransom for all. Of course, you and others, thinking yourselves to be wiser than God and His apostle, would have us to believe that God doesn't will for all to be saved and that Jesus wasn't given as a ransom for all either. No, according to your error, God only wants those whom He allegedly hand-picked before the foundation of the world for salvation to be saved and the rest can literally go to hell. If this is your god, then your god is the devil. I also stated that God is not willing that any should perish because the Bible states that as well:

"The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." (II Peter 3:9)

Whereas the Bible tells us that God is not willing that any should perish, you, again, thinking yourself to be wiser than God and His apostle, would have us to believe that God is not only willing that the majority of people who have ever walked upon the face of this earth should perish, but that He predestined them to such and actually created them for such without any choice of their own or without them ever having had a chance to be saved to begin with. Again, your god is the devil.

God truly does draw ALL MEN unto Himself, but men, through their own volition in exercising their God-given free wills, have the right to reject God's gracious offer of salvation even as the Bible teaches throughout its pages. Jesus stated how His will was to have oftentimes gathered the children of Israel unto Himself, BUT THEY WOULD NOT! That's just one of so many examples that when you tell me that you've studied this out in scripture I have a tremendously hard time believing you. Rather, I suspect that you've been brainwashed by the likes of Calvin and Sproul and then you've gone and read your Bible with rose colored glasses on to make the scriptures say what you've been conditioned into believing that they should say.

Anyhow, I'm really not going to waste anymore time arguing with you or certain others. I'll periodically address certain things just so that others here aren't potentially deceived, but my primary focus will be upon MPW because she started this thread. If she's not interested in me doing the same, then she already knows that she only needs to say the same to me and I'll be on my merry way away from this discussion altogether.

Jesus likened Christianity to that of a Father Who is making a marriage supper for His Son and instructing His servants to go out into the highways and the byways to "compel" people to come in. I'm guessing that you understand that to mean that God sanctions the unwilling abduction of His bride, the forceful raping or implanting of His "seed" which immediately follows and then the imprisonment of the same against her will since that is the type of god whom you and others here preach and worse still you'd have us to believe that this god IS LOVE!

If you have any daughters, friend, then I pray that no man ever shows up and tells you that he's planning on "loving" one of your daughters in the manner in which you and others here claim that your god loves. Send such a fellow near my house and near one of my two daughters and he'd better be enrolled in Obamacare.
First of all the post I responded too of yours does seem to say that ALL men will be saved. You seem to argue for that in your post by the way you wrote it.

Second you have now become accusational in your response too me. You accuse me of me thinking I am wiser than God not once but twice. You then accuse me of reading the Bible thru "rose colored glasses". You accuse me of "following" Calvin or Sproul instead of God's Word. Then you say twice that my "god is the devil".

You have no stupid idea what you are talking about as you again prove you use improper exigesis (you do know what this word means right?) Of Scripture. Finally you say you will not "argue" with me or certain others. That is quite a "cop out" for someone who claims they know Scripture like you do (seen through your posts). If you know Scripture so well then why would you not try to defend it better? A good apologist doesn't say "I won't argue with you anymore" because they feel "threatened". A good apologist would know how to defend God's Word with Biblical truth. A good apologist won't start swinging "insults" like you are doing.

As far as MPW being your "only concern" well that's a pretty good way of saying "I can sway her to my view" and "I don't care about anyone else". Good luck with swaying MPW by the way :) she has been looking at this for a while and yep she won't just "believe" what you say unless you have 100% proof of your view Biblically. You have not proven anything you have said thus far without picking and choosing and taking Bible verses out of context. MPW might be questioning "predestination" but you are missing one thing in her question...she is much smarter and Biblically grounded than you take her for. She knows much more than she gives herself credit for. In fact I know she understands God's Word much better than you do. So again..good luck "swaying" her to your belief.

I will be there to correct every one of your misinterpretations of God's Word. I will be there to defend God's Word with Biblical truth.

I will end this post on one passage of Scripture and one thought. Rev 13:8 "All that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world." So the names of those who will be in glory with God were written in the Lambs book "from the foundation of the world". That means before we were even born the names were in the book.
 
S

shotgunner

Guest
You guys are forgetting something very important. You say that since God influences a man's choice it must be predestination. It certainly is. God predestined what he would do for all who respond by believing in his word. That's why the preaching of the Gospel is necessary. If God picked and chose who would be saved, there would be no need for preaching.

Sometimes it looks like God picks and chooses but that's because he sees the end from the beginning. We think of time as being a straight line with a beginning and an end, but there is no beginning or end in God. He can see the free will choices you have made before you ever even make them, and then treat you as if you had already done what you, in your time, haven't even done yet.
 
L

LT

Guest
Are some people born with better freewills than others?

This might sound like a silly question, but it is exactly why free will does not exist. (In the mode of it being actually free, or having salvic significance)
 
L

LT

Guest
If my freewill leads me to Christ,
and Johnny's freewill leads him to reject Christ,
I was born with a better freewill.
 
L

LT

Guest
If I wasn't born with a better freewill, then my experiences instilled a better freewill within me... thus I am a product of my environment, and not in control of my destiny.
 
L

LT

Guest
No matter how you look at it, freewill is not a logical (or Biblical) idea.
It certainly is not a solution for your problem, if you think that predestination makes God responsible for sin.
It exacerbates the problem.