Are WOMEN Pastors Biblical??

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Major

Active member
Dec 12, 2020
885
183
43
#61
The strongest argument I find is that God gives spiritual gifts, I believe God can give a woman the skills/gifts to be pastor. Keep in mind that women also pray to God about this issue before becoming a pastor, and wait for His answer. Another compelling reason I find is that the Bible says single unmarried men cannot be church leaders:

1 Timothy 3:2 “A bishop (elder) then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach”; 1 Timothy 3:12 “Let deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well”; and Titus 1:6-7 “. . . appoint elders in every city as I commanded you—if a man is blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of dissipation or insubordination...” These three passages suggest that an elder or deacon must be a married man.
However, if that's the case even Jesus and Paul would be unqualified to be pastor.

The authority issue is about the husband and wife relationship; the husband has authority over the wife. However, any random man does not automatically have authority over a woman. If the woman is married, I do think she needs the husband's approval before being pastor. My observation with the female pastors I see is that the husbands are proud of their wives.
What you posted is your heart felt thinking. However, that is NOT what the Word of God says......now is it.

So what is more important to believe in life.....what we think and want to do, OR do and live as God has directed us to live and serve?
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,747
29,113
113
#62
The Lord speaks a lot about the teamwork God asks for between women and men. The ideal team of woman/man is that men act as leaders of this team and women are equal to men, but operate as support for that team.
When Eve was made for Adam, the term used to describe her role was ezer kenegdo.

Re: Hebrew ezer kenegdo. In Genesis 2:18, the word "helpmeet" does not occur. The Hebrew expression ezer kenegdo appears, meaning "one who is the same as the other and who surrounds, protects, aids, helps, supports." There is no indication of inferiority or of a secondary position in an hierarchical separation of the male and female "spheres" of responsibility, authority, or social position.

The word ezer is used twice in the Old Testament to refer to the female and 14 times to refer to God.
For example, in the Psalms when David says, "The Lord is my Helper," he uses the word ezer.

Click

and click again.

:)
 

jb

Senior Member
Feb 27, 2010
4,940
591
113
#63
Whether or not you wish to cause arguments and divisions, those already exist. However I am in full agreement with you (or should I say with the Word of God).

God has plainly forbidden women to be (1) pastors, (2) teachers, or (3) elders within the local church in order to exercise authority over the assembly. And the reasons have also been clearly stated. Also, the husband is the head of the wife, therefore Christian women (whether single or married) must cover their heads and hair during worship (1 Corinthians 11).

There are other threads which have discussed this matter at length. Absolutely no one will change their minds regarding this (or any other matter) if they have committed themselves to false doctrine. You can show then 100 Scriptures, but it makes no difference. The same applies to Calvinists, or other groups with unscriptural beliefs. The love for false teachings generally exceeds the love of the truth.
I wonder who the "male chauvinists" are?

Oh, here they come now!
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#64
I'm going with what scripture says about it.
 
T

TheIndianGirl

Guest
#65
What you posted is your heart felt thinking. However, that is NOT what the Word of God says......now is it.

So what is more important to believe in life.....what we think and want to do, OR do and live as God has directed us to live and serve?
Which parts of what I wrote do you find disagreeable? All I said was, God gives people spiritual gifts (including women) and that that verses which say a church leader needs to be married man maybe should not be taken literally (and so we should consider the context of the text), because if we do, even Paul and Jesus would be unqualified to be pastor.

But, I understand why someone who only considers a few verses and takes them literally would believe women cannot be pastors. People who agree with women being pastors look into a lot of other factors as well: spiritual gifts, (how Jesus treated women (he taught Marta which is unusual as women did not receive education back then, he appeared first to women after his death (the first missionaries were women)), how God uses women for leadership postions (Deborah), Priscilla taught Aquillas, etc.

With Priscilla teaching Aquillas, do you at least agree that a married woman can teach another man? (as Priscilla was married).
 

SoulWeaver

Senior Member
Oct 25, 2014
4,889
2,534
113
#67
What you are doing is called "Facetious". Now what is an example of facetious language?

An example of facetious is someone saying that people whose homes have burned down don't have to worry about whether the housekeeper did a good job.

The Bible does not say what you just posted. There are NO words that say ANY MAN in church has the authority of ANY woman.
I intentionally exaggerated a little to make a point...
If we interpret things as you suggested (=> the authority not referring to marriage only, and it's a matter of study what Paul meant by "usurping" (in your interpretation not husband's but MALE) authority and what is the context to properly understand him)... we then come to the worldview where every woman is spiritually inferior to every men, and always has to be spiritually babysat by men, because man is somehow spiritually more capable and she will walk into error the second she isn't under male supervision. In fact, a lot of churches in the West basically hold this view albeit I exaggerated it, but they're not too far from it. In Eastern Orthodox and Catholic there's the also veil or scarf in the church to physically symbolize the right to be silent. You're wrong that there are no words, because it is said in the Bible through the very phrase referring to woman "usurping AUTHORITY" (of man) when interpreted as you suggest.
 

soberxp

Senior Member
May 3, 2018
2,511
482
83
#68
If there is a female teacher in the school, her scientific knowledge comes from God, but her knowledge is the same as other male teachers, what kind of situation is that?

I think this kind of question is similar to the topic of Jesus facing the Sabbath.

Q:you can't do anything in The day

Jesus answer:why not?
 

breno785au

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2013
6,002
767
113
39
Australia
#69
Simple, because a 'pronoun" always refers back to a previously given noun, and in this case the noun is "Husband", a male. The King James Translators were wise, pious, prayerful and studious men. Please come to understand language and its syntax and use, before approving Dino246's errors. Yes, the pronoun can mean 'anyone', 'one', but the context dictates it's closed meaning. By this, is meant, among males which are husbands (since children are involved, along with the wife and household) having the connected specified qualifications. Members of the church are as "little children" (John 13:33), and as such, one with proper authority, needed to know how to 'rule' over their own smaller church (home) first, before engaging the larger.
Thank you for your explanation.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
#70
Whether or not you wish to cause arguments and divisions, those already exist. However I am in full agreement with you (or should I say with the Word of God).

God has plainly forbidden women to be (1) pastors, (2) teachers, or (3) elders within the local church in order to exercise authority over the assembly. And the reasons have also been clearly stated. Also, the husband is the head of the wife, therefore Christian women (whether single or married) must cover their heads and hair during worship (1 Corinthians 11).

There are other threads which have discussed this matter at length. Absolutely no one will change their minds regarding this (or any other matter) if they have committed themselves to false doctrine. You can show then 100 Scriptures, but it makes no difference. The same applies to Calvinists, or other groups with unscriptural beliefs. The love for false teachings generally exceeds the love of the truth.
I agree with you whole heartedly. A woman should not be allowed to Pastor, Teach or have authority over men in the assembly meetings. There is a distinct Biblical order:

1Co 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

Also agree that the "head covering" for the woman, is still to be done today. This was a common practice until around the late 1950's and 60's. Although many women at that time wore "hats" rather than a "veil". This probably demonstrated a drifting away from the proper teaching at that time. When the "Woman's Liberation" movement picked up steam in the 1960's, the practice of the "head cover" was dropped by most denominational churches. Today it is rarely practiced and is generally scoffed at by many professing Christians. This could be a serious matter, since Paul asserted:

1Co 11:5 But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled dishonors her head; for it is one and the same thing as if she were shaven.

By extension, the woman having her head unveiled would be dishonoring Christ. Sadly, I witnessed Steven Lawson ( a minister connected to Legonier Ministries), give a three day exposition of 1 Cor. 11, on the "head covering" and he proved in his exposition that it should be done but since it seemed to have no impact on his congregation, he just blew it off and did nothing to enforce it.
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
#71
Has anyone read 1 Timothy 2, verse 9 - 12 ?
Paul must not have ever read this scripture, for he tells of women in positions of authority. Perhaps it was because their authority was with men and not over a man? And what about Deborah listed as a leader in the book of Judges?

1 Timothy 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man;
 
S

Scribe

Guest
#72
I agree with you whole heartedly. A woman should not be allowed to Pastor, Teach or have authority over men in the assembly meetings. There is a distinct Biblical order:

1Co 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

Also agree that the "head covering" for the woman, is still to be done today. This was a common practice until around the late 1950's and 60's. Although many women at that time wore "hats" rather than a "veil". This probably demonstrated a drifting away from the proper teaching at that time. When the "Woman's Liberation" movement picked up steam in the 1960's, the practice of the "head cover" was dropped by most denominational churches. Today it is rarely practiced and is generally scoffed at by many professing Christians. This could be a serious matter, since Paul asserted:

1Co 11:5 But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled dishonors her head; for it is one and the same thing as if she were shaven.

By extension, the woman having her head unveiled would be dishonoring Christ. Sadly, I witnessed Steven Lawson ( a minister connected to Legonier Ministries), give a three day exposition of 1 Cor. 11, on the "head covering" and he proved in his exposition that it should be done but since it seemed to have no impact on his congregation, he just blew it off and did nothing to enforce it.
It would require 3 days of confusion to make it hard to understand. Simply read it:

13Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? 14Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? 15But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. 16But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

It is an appeal to their customs to make a point. But then he says... we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

So NO the Christians did not require women to cover their heads.

It is amazing that people don't notice verse 16.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
#73
Col 4:15Give my greetings to the brothers at Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her house.

No one can say for certain that this verse proves that a woman was pastoring a house church but no one can say for certain that Nympha was not the pastor of the church that met in her house.

I think she probably was. We will find out when that which is perfect is come.
 
S

Scribe

Guest
#74
Has anyone read 1 Timothy 2, verse 9 - 12 ?
We've been discussing it. Have you read 1 Pet 3:1-6? Did you notice the striking similarities?
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
#75
It would require 3 days of confusion to make it hard to understand. Simply read it:

13Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? 14Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? 15But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. 16But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

It is an appeal to their customs to make a point. But then he says... we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

So NO the Christians did not require women to cover their heads.

It is amazing that people don't notice verse 16.
Actually, verse 16 has been terribly misunderstood by many. It has certainly not been ignored. Let's break this verse down:

1Co 11:16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God. (KJV).

Two Greek words need to be examined herein: The word translated "contentious" and "custom". The Greek word translated "contentious" is: φιλονεικος, an adjective meaning "argumentative, quarrelsome or contentious" and the Greek word translated "custom" is συνηθειαν, a compound noun, which literally means "common habit" and by inference "assembly habit or acceptance". Now let's put it together:

1 Cor. 11:16 But if any one seems to be argumentative, we have no such assembly habit, neither the assemblies of God.

Thus, Paul is saying, 1st. Is there anyone who wants to argue about the things I just said, 2nd Arguing is not an acceptable habit in the assembly. 3rd. Nor in any of the assemblies of God.

So Paul was not telling them that the veil was not a custom or practice, he was reiterating the fact that being quarrelsome was not acceptable. We saw this same kind of statement from Paul in these verses:

1Co 14:37-38 If any man thinketh himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him take knowledge of the things which I write unto you, that they are the commandment of the Lord. But if any man is ignorant, let him be ignorant.
 
Nov 15, 2020
1,897
362
83
Newcastle, NSW, Australia
#78
Paul must not have ever read this scripture, for he tells of women in positions of authority. Perhaps it was because their authority was with men and not over a man? And what about Deborah listed as a leader in the book of Judges?

1 Timothy 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man;
those verses in 1 Tim 2 were written because the women were doing what men should have been, regarding leadership, and authority, correct ?
 
S

Scribe

Guest
#79
those verses in 1 Tim 2 were written because the women were doing what men should have been, regarding leadership, and authority, correct ?
I know you were replying to awelight but I will comment on this. Maybe it was a schism of women infected by false teachers.
In 2 Tim 3 there is a hint of some things going on with women being seduced by false teachers.
5 having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof. From such turn away.

6 For of this sort are those who creep into houses and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,

7 ever learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
 

awelight

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2020
1,629
490
83
69
#80
Col 4:15Give my greetings to the brothers at Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her house.

No one can say for certain that this verse proves that a woman was pastoring a house church but no one can say for certain that Nympha was not the pastor of the church that met in her house.

I think she probably was. We will find out when that which is perfect is come.
I don't get your point here. This verse in the KJV reads:

Col 4:15 Salute the brethren which are in Laodicea, and Nymphas, and the church which is in his house. There is some disagreement here by some Greek scholars as to the feminine nature of the word translated house. Whether it goes to the person or the church. Ecclesia is always feminine. thus "house" maybe feminine because it is modifying "church". Either way, here is what John Gill had to say on this verse:

Salute the brethren which are in Laodicea,.... Where there was a church mentioned in the following verse, of which see on Gill Rev_2:10.
And Nymphas; which some, unskillful in the Greek language, have took for a woman; whereas it is the name of a man, as the following words show; and is a contraction of Nymphios, or Nymphidios, or Nymphodoros:
and the church which is in his house. This man seems to have been an inhabitant of Laodicea, and that the church there met at his house to worship God, to pray unto him, sing his praise, hear his word, and attend on all ordinances: or his own family was brought up so strictly to the observance of these things, that they looked like a little church of themselves.