Baptism by Fire

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

What is the baptism of/by/with fire?

  • refers to the day of Pentecost

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • refers to the Holy Spirit’s office as energizer/purifier for believers

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • refers to judgment

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#81
Q: is there any other place the word baptize is used with fire (as john used it)?
the word baptize is only found in the NT.

most of the time there is only talk about baptizing with water (cleansing) and Holy Spirit (sanctifying/anointing)

Does it really matter if baptism by fire is a good or bad thing? We can't do it, only God can.

You can't control the Holy Spirit and if people claim to they are either deceiving themselves, intentionally deceiving others or both.

anyways I"m going to go and listen to some more sermons. :) hope ya'll have a blessed day.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#82
Does it really matter if baptism by fire is a good or bad thing? We can't do it, only God can.

it might matter if it means judgment, and we have people making a doctrine out of asking for it directly.

here's another study (this time from a pentecostal believer):

Text

Luke 3:15-18. "The people were waiting expectantly and were all wondering in their hearts if John might possibly be the Christ. John answered them all, "I baptize you with water. But one more powerful than I will come, the thongs of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. His winnowing fork is in his hand to clear his threshing floor and to gather the wheat into his barn, but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire." And with many other words John exhorted the people and preached the good news to them.



Exposition

Every year individuals are propelled from obscurity into the national limelight -- a hit song, an act of kindness or evil that is picked up by the press. Celebrities attract fawning hero-worshippers who can distort the celebrity's sense of who he is. Celebrities sometimes mistake the gushing good will of their followers for reality. John the Baptist was an instant celebrity.

John's Submission to the Messiah (3:15-16)

In a culture that had Messiah on their mind, it was inevitable that people would wonder if the powerful desert prophet John the Baptist were the long-awaited Messiah himself. "Is he the Christ?" the crowds inquired.

The word "Christ" is a transliteration of the Greek word christos, meaning "the Anointed One, the Messiah." The word "messiah" is a transliteration of the Hebrew word mashiah. "Christ" is not Jesus' last name. It is a title that means "Messiah."

To his credit, nowhere does John the Baptist try to cling to his public following. John's Gospel tells us that The Baptist even pointed his own disciples to Jesus (John 1:35-37), and accepted Jesus' eclipsing role with graciousness.

John the Baptist refers to the Messiah as "One more powerful than I" (3:16b). "More powerful" (NIV) and "mightier" (KJV) translate the comparative form of the Greek adjective ischuros, "strong, mighty, powerful" in physical strength, or mental or spiritual power."[1]

This is similar to the expression in John's Gospel, "He must become greater (auxano); I must become less (elattoo)" (John 3:30). Self-exalting ego doesn't motivate John. Being faithful to the "word of God" (3:2) that came to him does.

John illustrates this submission to the Messiah with his statement about sandals: "the thongs of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie." (3:16c) Jewish servants were not required to perform the menial duty of unfastening their master's sandals, only non-Jewish slaves.[2] But John says that he isn't even as worthy as a foreign slave to perform this service. He isn't in the same league as the Messiah. But the most striking comparison John makes between his ministry and the Messiah's is in terms of baptism.

Water Baptism (3:16a)

John had been known as "the Baptist." Baptism set him apart from other prophets in the past, and other reformers in his own day. But even in terms of baptism, John says, the Messiah exceeds him.
Our word "baptize" is a transliteration of the Greek word baptizo, which means "dip, immerse, submerge, baptize."[3] It's important to understand this basic meaning, regardless of our own church's practice of baptism, or how much water our church may use.

John was baptizing in the Jordan River, and probably assisted penitents by either dipping them into the water himself (or perhaps by assisting them to dip themselves). Jesus did not annul this form of water baptism but continued it, having own disciples baptize believers in his name (see Matthew 28:19; Mark 16:16; John 3:22, 26; 4:1-2; Acts 2:38, 41).

The Early Church understood water baptism much as John the Baptist did, representing God's cleansing and the washing away of our sins (Acts 22:16). It is a baptism of repentance still, since by submitting to Christian baptism, a person either tacitly or explicitly acknowledges his need for cleansing, and therefore his sins that demand forgiveness and cleansing.

On the Day of Pentecost, Peter told his convicted hearers, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2:38), tightly tying repentance to baptism as John the Baptist had done (Luke 3:3).

The point of comparison between John the Baptist and the Messiah is in the medium in which or with which [4] the baptism takes place. John immerses his disciples in water, while the Messiah will immerse his followers in the Holy Spirit.

Spirit Baptism (3:16d)

The biggest question in this passage is what it means to "baptize in the Holy Spirit." Church doctrines aside, the basic meaning is to immerse or dip a person in the Holy Spirit. To flood a person with the Holy Spirit. Water is just a symbol of cleansing. The Holy Spirit, on the other hand, is the actual agent of cleansing and empowerment.

To study the meaning a bit further, let's look at two closely-related passages written by Luke, one at the end of Luke, the other early in Acts:
"I am going to send you what my Father has promised; but stay in the city until you have been clothed (enduo) with power (dunamis) from on high." (Luke 24:49)
"Do not leave Jerusalem, but wait for the gift my Father promised, which you have heard me speak about. For John baptized with water (hudati), but in a few days you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit (en pneumati hagio).... But you will receive power (dunamis) when the Holy Spirit comes on (epiechomai) you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth." (Acts 1:4, 5, 8; see 11:15-16)
Examine some of the words with me as we expand our understanding a bit:

  • [*]"Clothe (KJV 'endue') with power."
    The verb is Greek enduo, "dress, clothe"[5]. This may be similar to the analogy of baptism, the idea of covering completely with. The word translated "power" is Greek dunamis, from which we get our word "dynamite." To cover with power. What a thought!

    [*]"Receive power."
    The verb here is the extremely common Greek word lambano, "to receive." The emphasis here is not on voluntary acceptance here but upon possessing it. Tag. You're "it." It's your turn. What would you do if you were given a package of high explosives or a grant of limitless hydroelectric power from a dam high in the mountains? Think what you could do with it! You've received power.

    [*]"Come upon."
    The Greek verb is eperchomai, a compound word that means "come over or upon." It can refer to unpleasant happenings or to an enemy attack. But here it used of the Holy Spirit coming upon the disciples. [6] The word suggests something out of our control that happens to us. Spirit baptism is wholly in God's power and at his time and pleasure.

    [*]"Pour out."
    The Spirit is "poured out" upon believers (Acts 2:17-18, 2:33, 10:45). Similar to the water baptism analogy, in pouring the water is in a vessel above the believer, and is saturating the believer with the Holy Spirit.
The "baptism of the Holy Spirit" involves being covered with, immersed in, empowered by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the very basis of our life in Christ and our connection to God. Jesus floods us with the Holy Spirit. What a wonderful thought and promise!

(In a separate essay entitled "Spirit Baptism, the New Birth, and Speaking in Tongues," I explore this in greater detail. You can read this essay at Spirit Baptism, the New Birth, and Speaking in Tongues - Christian Articles Archive, but discussion of its contents is off-limits for our regular JesusWalk discussion groups. We have a special, short-lived group if you want to discuss it with me and others.)

Fire Baptism (3:16e-17)

Luke's Gospel connects the baptism of the Holy Spirit with a baptism of fire. John the Baptist says:
"He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. His winnowing fork is in his hand to clear his threshing floor and to gather the wheat into his barn, but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire." (3:16d-17)
The process of preparing grain involved (1) threshing, that is, crushing, beating or thrashing the grain heads in order to loosen the grain kernels from the surrounding stems and husks; and (2) winnowing, using a kind of wooden pitch fork (a winnowing fork) to throw the threshed grain heads into the breeze, so the lighter chaff will blow downwind, and the heavier grain kernels will fall back to the ground, separating the two. The floor would be "cleared" by threshing and then winnowing all the grain heads until the chaff and grain had been completely separated. The grain was then gathered into baskets and stored in the barn, but the remaining stems and husks piled together and set ablaze.

Look with me at a couple of interesting words. The verb translated "clear" (NIV) or "purge" (KJV) is Greek diakathairo, "clean out, cleanse thoroughly."[7] The idea of thoroughness and complete cleaning is contained in this compound verb. The second interesting word translated the "unquenchable" is Greek asbestos, a mineral supposed by the ancients to be inextinguishable when set on fire.[8] John the Baptist isn't talking about just regular fire here that would burn itself out when the chaff is consumed, but a kind of eternal, unquenchable fire.


So what is this fire baptism? There are three possibilities:

  1. [*]A figure of purification of sin
    as the Holy Spirit does his cleansing work in us as part of the process of sanctification. Indeed, the Spirit's cleansing in us is sometimes painful, but nothing in the context suggests that this is what John had in mind.

    [*]A symbol of the tongues of fire
    that appeared over the heads of the 120 disciples in the upper room on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:3). This, too, is a stretch for John the Baptist. In the Pentecost passage, the fire probably represents the Shekinah glory of God rather than fires of purification.

    [*]A prophecy of the eschatological separation of the righteous from the unrighteous,
    and judgment by the Messiah at the end of the age. This fits contemporary expectations of the Messiah, as well as the words "cleanse thoroughly" and "unquenchable fire" contained in the passage. Jesus' parable of the Wheat and the Tares (Matthew 13:30, 41-42) includes this kind of analogy of separation and final judgment. Remember Henry Alford's well-known Thanksgiving Hymn, "Come Ye Thankful People, Come," verse 3?

    "For the Lord our God shall come, And shall take His harvest home.
    From His field shall in that day All offenses purge away;
    Give His angels charge at last In the fire the tares to cast,
    But the fruitful ears to store In His garner evermore."
So John is prophesying of Jesus that he will (1) flood his followers with the Holy Spirit, and (2) judge the unrighteous at the End of the Age.

#3 Baptized with the Holy Spirit and Fire (3:15-18) -- JesusWalk
 
Last edited:
A

Abiding

Guest
#83
there he goes again adding the word unquencable to the babtize with the Holyspirit AND fire verse....man that was slick barely seen it.:(
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#84
there he goes again adding the word unquencable to the babtize with the Holyspirit AND fire verse....man that was slick barely seen it.:(
well Abiding, take the word unquenchable out off the passage and re-read it.
i wonder why it is in there?
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#86
there he goes again adding the word unquencable to the babtize with the Holyspirit AND fire verse....man that was slick barely seen it.:(
yeah....Holy spirit teaches, Fire of God disciplines (if you are listening to God you are ok and have the Holy Spirit teaching you, if you sin and stop listening you get the Fire of God to convict you because once you are God's you can not be lost but you can still be punished for disobedience) whether people believe it or not is their decision.

I think Fire is judgement of God and Holy Spirit is mercy and grace of God. that is why people pray for the HOLY SPIRIT and not the FIRE of God because everyone knows they would be judged guilty if not for the remission of sins by Jesus Christ.

John 14:26
But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.

1 Corinthians 2:13
These things we also speak, not in words which man’s wisdom teaches but which the Holy Spirit teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

Colossians 3:16
Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.



Psalm 50

A Psalm of Asaph.

1 The Mighty One, God the LORD,
Has spoken and called the earth
From the rising of the sun to its going down.
2 Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty,
God will shine forth.
3 Our God shall come, and shall not keep silent;
A fire shall devour before Him,
And it shall be very tempestuous all around Him.

4 He shall call to the heavens from above,
And to the earth, that He may judge His people:
5 “Gather My saints together to Me,
Those who have made a covenant with Me by sacrifice.”
6 Let the heavens declare His righteousness,
For God Himself is Judge. Selah


16 But to the wicked God says:
“What right have you to declare My statutes,
Or take My covenant in your mouth,
17 Seeing you hate instruction
And cast My words behind you?
18 When you saw a thief, you consented[a] with him,
And have been a partaker with adulterers.
19 You give your mouth to evil,
And your tongue frames deceit.
20 You sit and speak against your brother;
You slander your own mother’s son.
21 These things you have done, and I kept silent;
You thought that I was altogether like you;
But I will rebuke you,
And set them in order before your eyes.

22 “Now consider this, you who forget God,
Lest I tear you in pieces,
And there be none to deliver:
23 Whoever offers praise glorifies Me;
And to him who orders his conduct aright
I will show the salvation of God.”


anyway I will study and pray about it some more :)
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#87
Ive already told you that. It needs to be where it is.....thing is its been put in a verse it wasnt in...changing the meaning.

Look i see the context, anyone can..It doesnt change anything as if the context allows shifting words from verse to verse?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#88
Ive already told you that. It needs to be where it is.....thing is its been put in a verse it wasnt in...changing the meaning.

Look i see the context, anyone can..It doesnt change anything as if the context allows shifting words from verse to verse?
Matthew 3
John the Baptist Prepares the Way

1 In those days John the Baptist came, preaching in the Desert of Judea 2 and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near.” 3 This is he who was spoken of through the prophet Isaiah:

“A voice of one calling in the desert,
‘Prepare the way for the Lord,
make straight paths for him.’”a

4 John’s clothes were made of camel’s hair, and he had a leather belt around his waist. His food was locusts and wild honey. 5 People went out to him from Jerusalem and all Judea and the whole region of the Jordan. 6 Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River.

7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to where he was baptizing, he said to them: “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? 8 Produce fruit in keeping with repentance. 9 And do not think you can say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. 10 The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.

11 “I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. 12 His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor, gathering his wheat into the barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#89
So do you think John was tellin gthem Jesus would baptise them with both the HS and fire when he would not even baptise them in water.

Why do people take context out of a passage?
Wait, John DID baptize them with water, but he warned that that would not save them from hell if they did not bear the fruits of repentance.

Notice he did NOT say he would NOT baptize them. where did you get that?

Matthew 3:11
I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
)
Luke 3:16
John answered, saying to all, “I indeed baptize you with water; but One mightier than I is coming, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#91
Wait, John DID baptize them with water, but he warned that that would not save them from hell if they did not bear the fruits of repentance.

Notice he did NOT say he would NOT baptize them. where did you get that?

Matthew 3:11
I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
)
Luke 3:16
John answered, saying to all, “I indeed baptize you with water; but One mightier than I is coming, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
THEY DIDN'T REPENT: HE KNEW THEY WOULDN'T.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#92
thanks for writing it out. Lets bypass personal agenda this time ive reread posts and its there.

...burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire cannot be called a babtism..we know this is hell and hell is not for the purpose of immersion for cleansing.
that why it doesnt say babtism in verse 12.

on the otherhand verse 11 says He will babtize you with: the Holyspirit "and"(not or) "with"fire.


I appreciate all the context business and to whom he is talking to but it does not change what is written
Also it gives noone a right to shift words and make a private interpretation
It doesnt give place to a charismatic interpretation
your safe im sure it doesnt lead to dispensationalism or a pretrib rapture.
Ive given other texts with the word fire to examine the actual use of fire.
Another one is acts in context(wider) chapter 1 reminds of this statement 1:5 showing more were there than John and the Pharisees and ch 2..tongues of fire. At what should be considered the first babtism of the Holyspirit.
So verse 16 can be left alone, and verse 17 can stand along with it.
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#93
THEY DIDN'T REPENT: HE KNEW THEY WOULDN'T.
how do you know that the ones who went to be baptize didn't repent?

Paul was a Pharisee and there were others among the disciples of Christ among the 120.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#94
how do you know that the ones who went to be baptize didn't repent?

Paul was a Pharisee and there were others among the disciples of Christ among the 120.
read the whole book. the same ones who came to glory in john's light for a time, were the same ones who were in conflict with Christ.

maybe some did repent: they would have been baptised by John, or believed later.

that's got nothing to do with the ones JOHN in the spirit of Elijah was rebuking as he came to turn the hearts of the sons back to their fathers (and to God).

John knew who wasn't bearing fruits for repentence or he wouldn't have made the proclamation: he was a prophet...
 
Last edited:
A

Abiding

Guest
#95
add to that v11 fire
v12 unquenchable fire

theres the distinction...not a combination
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#97
ok....we disagree: that's allowed, isn't it?:)

Well sure....on what I have no idea?:)

Im not sure i agree with how you amen word shuffling or allow the context to do more than shed light, and make a verse say more than its intent and content...but what the final outcome on this was..im only left to guess. And I wasnt in it for any other reason but that it bothered me to see the word shifting.


Our take on this small piece of scripture really hasnt much affect anyway. And no I dont think He will judge the idiots who call fire down...they have bigger problems than their just their knowledge difficiency. Yet i would tell them of their error when i see it.

The types of the Holyspirit has always been fire, wind, oil, oil burning, and more at Penticost there were at least 2 manifestations.

So we disagree on what?
 
H

Hearer

Guest
#98
The sign of fire represents the presence of GOD:
The father in the burning bush; and the fire which led the Hebrews out of Egypt and in their travels in the desert
Jesus as having the power to baptise with fire prophesied by John the Baptist
The Holy Spirit's annointing at pentecost.

This means baptism is being immersed in the presence of God.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#99
there he goes again adding the word unquencable to the babtize with the Holyspirit AND fire verse....man that was slick barely seen it.:(
Barely seen it. have you read the passages in question? I have to wonder now.. since you think I slipped it in!!

Matthew 3:11–12 (NKJV)
11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 12 His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather His wheat into the barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”



Luke 3:16–17 (NKJV)
16 John answered, saying to all, “I indeed baptize you with water; but One mightier than I is coming, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 17 His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather the wheat into His barn; but the chaff He will burn with unquenchable fire.”



Hmmm. Seems John called it inqunchiable. or a fire which will never stop burning. And you say I slipped it in?


As I said, your rejecting context of the passage.. Context says the baptism of fire is a baptism in a fire that shall never be quenched. John said it. Not me!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The sign of fire represents the presence of GOD:
The father in the burning bush; and the fire which led the Hebrews out of Egypt and in their travels in the desert
Jesus as having the power to baptise with fire prophesied by John the Baptist
The Holy Spirit's annointing at pentecost.

This means baptism is being immersed in the presence of God.
It does?? Funny. It says this baptism is in fire. Not in God. and this fire shall never be quenched.. Oh wait. I forgot.. you have not read this yet.. again read the passages which talk about the chaff being burned with an unquenchable fire.. See the context. you will see what we are saying.