Calvinism and Context?
- Thread starter throughfaith
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
Do you have so little faith in what you believe, that you can't even give an argument of support. I am not being drawn into your ridiculous way of arguing, with words that ignore Scripture support.
The original discussion, you butted your nose into, was presented by me on the word "all". That is the discussion. How it is misused by some to support their side, ignoring context. If you have a problem with it, then give Scripture to support your side. Otherwise you have nothing meaningful to say.
The original discussion, you butted your nose into, was presented by me on the word "all". That is the discussion. How it is misused by some to support their side, ignoring context. If you have a problem with it, then give Scripture to support your side. Otherwise you have nothing meaningful to say.
Yet still, no Scriptural example of what you are going on and on about. Show where the scales are being used dishonestly.
I narrowed my part of the discussion, to show how one cannot defend their doctrine on the basis of the word "all" . You butted into it but want to change the rules of engagement. Give something worth looking at or get out. Not the thread but my conversation.
I narrowed my part of the discussion, to show how one cannot defend their doctrine on the basis of the word "all" . You butted into it but want to change the rules of engagement. Give something worth looking at or get out. Not the thread but my conversation.
When it comes to discussions of Romans 8 and 9, you and other calvinists in these threads have conveniently ignored discussion of the context stating that the plain text is sufficient, or bringing in other proof texts devoid of context. So you treat your proof texts as not needing to speak to the context for meaning.
When it comes to verses that contain "all" or "world" in place where your doctrine demands it be speaking only of the elect, you conveniently appeal to context whether the context actually moderates it or not. So in Scripture that goes against your doctrine suddenly context matters.
Some Scripture are treated with one measure, others with another. So the scales are dishonest.
When it comes to verses that contain "all" or "world" in place where your doctrine demands it be speaking only of the elect, you conveniently appeal to context whether the context actually moderates it or not. So in Scripture that goes against your doctrine suddenly context matters.
Some Scripture are treated with one measure, others with another. So the scales are dishonest.
-
1
- Show all
- Status