Catholic Heresy (for the record)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
F

frankleespeaking

Guest
And the Holy Spirit led them to believe everything the Catholic Church teaches today. As you yourself pointed out,


The Early Church didn't have Bibles as we know them, they relied on hearing the word of God, and on Holy Tradition. We are fortunate in this age of technology to have easy access to the records of the Early Christians, and you'll note that when you study them, you see things like a belief in the Eucharist as the LITERAL Body and Blood of Jesus, the belief in the perpetual virginity of the Virgin Mary, asking saints in heaven to pray for them, infant baptism, and the idea that baptism isn't just symbolic but truly salvic.

The Holy Spirit will guide and protect Christ's Church, it continues to do so, despite the failings of men throughout history. And by looking at the rich resources we have left to us by our earliest forefathers in the Christian faith, we can compare what they believed to what current churches teach as well. The Catholic Church has nothing to fear from comparing her teachings to the teachings of the Apostles and the earliest Christians.

the failings of MEN? It was the CHURCH! She instituted wars and crusades, inquisitions and torture
you must be completely blind if you do not see your Mother Church was behind ALL THESE THINGS!
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,421
6,700
113
People post the most unseemly notions, and then our dander is up, and lo, we begin to debate, however the original post on this thread says it all, so I am out of here. If anyone wants to delve into what I may think, please read the original post..
 
H

hermanodaniel

Guest
If its all God's word then why are there books removed from the canon? There should have been at least 72 books not 66. The Protestant Reformers removed at least 8 books from the inspired word of God.

The Catholic canon is 72, the Orthodox canon is 76.

This was a bad mistake because the books it removed were most edifying. One such book they removed which is notable is called the "Wisdom of Sirach", you should go and read it. Along with the Wisdom of Solomon and the rest of the Deuterocanonical books.
Eternally Grateful said it best... "If one wants a bible which contradicts itself. it is fine to have 72 or 76. But if one wants a bible which does not contradict itself then they will follow the 66."

The Word of God defends itself just as Jesus Christ was able to expose the motives and sins of people's hearts! You mentioned that we are not to accept anything blindly yet you accept the heresy of 72, 73, 76, etc. without testing the spirits! (1 John 4) The apocrypha clearly contradicts God's Word (66 books). Michael, if you abandon your orthodox faith and embrace the truth according to God's Word the truth will set you free! Don't take my word pray on it and use the Word of God as your guide (66 books). I am not referring to any denominations but to the truth that is not labeled by man but by God's Word. Those who belong to God identifies themselves using God's Word! In fact, why use anything else? Man's words, titles, and labels bring division but God's Word says that we are >>> Born of God, Child of God, Servant of the Most High, Friend of God. Thus I am who God says in His Word that I am. I choose not to identify myself with any denomination titles that are subject to biases and the like. God translated US into the Kingdom of His dear Son not denomination or religious affiliations.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
thats funny, according to your church, baptism removes original sin, and the sacrament of penance is required to remove personal sin.,. Both of course require works of men.
Yes the Sacrament of Reconciliation is required to remove mortal sin your point?



thats the point, You can't pay for your own sin, if you could Christ would not have had to come. It has been satan's lie from the beginning that we can pay for our own sin. Saying you can pay for your own sin mocks Christ and his death, and is an insult to his character.
You should look at the example closer I said even if my neighbor forgave me that doesn't mean I shouldn't pay for the window. Me paying for the window was not what caused my neighbor to forgive me, but it was something I did afterwards to make amends.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Yes the Sacrament of Reconciliation is required to remove mortal sin your point?
1. All sin is mortal, The penalty of sin is death, there is no such thing as a venial sin.
2. My point is you just proved you have to do something to make up for your sin, thus depending on works to justify yourself and not God


You should look at the example closer I said even if my neighbor forgave me that doesn't mean I shouldn't pay for the window. Me paying for the window was not what caused my neighbor to forgive me, but it was something I did afterwards to make amends.
The example is flawed though. for these reasons.

1. You stated you had to make amends. What if you did not make amends, would you still be forgiven?
2. You stated he forgave you before you made amends, which means you were not obligated to make amends to earn his forgiveness. And it also means even if you did not make amends, His forgiveness would still stand, or it was a fake forgiveness.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
1. All sin is mortal, The penalty of sin is death, there is no such thing as a venial sin.


Sure there is, "there is sin not unto death" and whatnot.

2. My point is you just proved you have to do something to make up for your sin, thus depending on works to justify yourself and not God
Confession isn't doing something to make up for your sin, it's coming to God in the confessional for forgiveness. Of course I know your definition of a work includes everything but prayer. So arguing that with you is going to be useless.

The example is flawed though. for these reasons.

1. You stated you had to make amends. What if you did not make amends, would you still be forgiven?
2. You stated he forgave you before you made amends, which means you were not obligated to make amends to earn his forgiveness. And it also means even if you did not make amends, His forgiveness would still stand, or it was a fake forgiveness.
I never said had to, I said should. Yes even without penance the forgiveness would still stand, but does that mean we should not make penance? Of course not.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Sure there is, "there is sin not unto death" and whatnot.
Aww now. we are not talking about spiritual death here. If I go out and get drunk and drive and do not get killed doing it, I have committed a sin which was not unto death. Lets not twist a passage of scripture to try to make a sin mortal, as in you forfiet your salvation when there is no evidence to support this.



Confession isn't doing something to make up for your sin, it's coming to God in the confessional for forgiveness. Of course I know your definition of a work includes everything but prayer. So arguing that with you is going to be useless.
A work is anything I do. Something I can boast of. Scripture is clear on this matter. Not of works lest any man should boast (take credit)

I can most definitely boast, or be proud of the fact I go to confessional on a regular basis. You still trusting your self.


I never said had to, I said should. Yes even without penance the forgiveness would still stand, but does that mean we should not make penance? Of course not.

Then how can one lose salvation if they are not required to make penance?
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
Aww now. we are not talking about spiritual death here. If I go out and get drunk and drive and do not get killed doing it, I have committed a sin which was not unto death. Lets not twist a passage of scripture to try to make a sin mortal, as in you forfiet your salvation when there is no evidence to support this.

We've been round and round on that point before in another thread.



A work is anything I do. Something I can boast of. Scripture is clear on this matter. Not of works lest any man should boast (take credit)

I can most definitely boast, or be proud of the fact I go to confessional on a regular basis. You still trusting your self.
I can boast that God has given me the grace of contrition to go to confession, and I can boast that His merciful forgiveness is forever open in that Sacrament. All you go to confession are drawn because of the contrition they feel for their sins which is itself a grace from God.



Then how can one lose salvation if they are not required to make penance?
Not sure what your trying to say here.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
We've been round and round on that point before in another thread.
Yeah we have, And Paul is still talking about physical death, not spiritual.




I can boast that God has given me the grace of contrition to go to confession, and I can boast that His merciful forgiveness is forever open in that Sacrament. All you go to confession are drawn because of the contrition they feel for their sins which is itself a grace from God.
I can boast of nothing. Christ paid it all. He suffered dearly for my sins, he was separated from the father because of my sin.

You boast to much of your work. Trying to shift the focus back on God and grace does not remove the fact your doing the work. This should show you you are in danger


Not sure what your trying to say here.
It is simple. If penance is not required. And my forgiveness is based on Gods love, I could never lose salvation
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
The bible begs to differ.
No, it actually agrees with Catholic theology. :) In fact, reading the Bible is a great way to make people Catholic. :D Worked for me.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
No, it actually agrees with Catholic theology. :)
I suppose, after you make it, it would agree. Of course, that would no longer be "The Bible", but rather "a bible".

In fact, reading the Bible is a great way to make people Catholic. :D Worked for me.

John 16:13
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.

1 Cor. 2:10
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.


You may have "read"The Bible in the sense that the gaze of your eyes met the letters of the page, but the truth within was never made known to you.
 
M

murraymuzz

Guest
By the way the title of this thread is erroneous, Heresy is a catholic word, if you teach and practice other doctrines than that of the orthodox doctrines (ie. Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide), you are considered a heretic, technically speaking.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
I suppose, after you make it, it would agree. Of course, that would no longer be "The Bible", but rather "a bible".
Nope, not "a bible" but "The Bible", even the abridged version with only 66 books in the canon is completely in line with what the Catholic Church teaches. Which is natural of course, after all...


John 16:13
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.

1 Cor. 2:10
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come.
As you so graciously pointed out, the Holy Spirit was sent to guide us. And this promise wasn't just made to us individually, but to the Church.

You may have "read"The Bible in the sense that the gaze of your eyes met the letters of the page, but the truth within was never made known to you.
I respectfully disagree. The fullness of the faith has come alive even more than when I was still a Protestant.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
I suppose, after you make it, it would agree. Of course, that would no longer be "The Bible", but rather "a bible".
Hey, I don't find the Biblical case for Calvinism even remotely compelling, but some people do of course. The same goes for pretty much every single contested theological assertion or premise ever thought of.


You may have "read"The Bible in the sense that the gaze of your eyes met the letters of the page, but the truth within was never made known to you.
Oh come on now diggs, it's not your Biblically Illiterate folks that are converting to Catholicism, It's often your old-guard that has been reading the Bible and studying for years. I know your better than this "only the blinded convert to Catholicism" line.
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
We try to welcome everyone to our site including people who grow up with Catholic tradition because of course we want to lead people to the truth.

But sometimes it's perceived that we tolerate error and heresy. Please understand first of all that we don't screen every thread and post in this forum. YOU can help with that. :) If there's something that you really think we should deal with, then use the Report button (there's a Report button on every post). But please understand that there will be some error and we don't remove all error or even all heresy from the site, partly because it's an opportunity for Christians to correct it and respond with the word of God. But if there's too much of it or too much from one person then we do some housecleaning. We certainly don't want our site to be dominated by Catholic heresy or whatever heresy or error, and we don't want people to get the impression that we just tolerate all of that.

So for the record, Catholicism is heresy. That's what the admins of this site believe.

Mary WAS A SINNER.

She needed a savior, just like you and me.

She is NOT the "mother of God". God has no mother, because God is God. Yes Jesus is God, and Mary was his mother, but we have to understand the dual nature of Jesus. He was 100% God yes, and also 100% man. Mary was his mother as a man, not as God. No where does the scripture refer to Mary as the "mother of God". And in fact, she's not even mentioned in all the epistles. All the New Testament instruction to the church is all about Jesus, not Mary. They never said "hail Mary, mother of God, pray for us sinners". They always said JESUS .. JESUS... JESUS.

This is preaching to the choir for most people here. But it regularly happens that we start to accumulate Catholics here who really promote and argue their Catholicism, along with all the heresy.

So for the record, if anyone wants or needs to hear it, we don't agree with Catholic heresy. And yes it is heresy to exalt any other human being as sinless to the same level as Jesus (as the Catholics do with Mary -- they actually teach that Mary was sinless like Jesus!!!), and put equal focus on a person other than Jesus.

At the same time, we understand that no one is born a Christian. That's why Jesus said you must be born again. So we welcome all who are seeking -- Catholics, Muslims, homosexuals, and even protestants who are "Christian" only by tradition -- to experience our fellowship here on this site and learn the truth that Jesus is the way and the truth and the life and no one can come to the father except through Him. And there is only one God, and one mediator between God, the man Christ Jesus. Because he was both 100% man and 100% God, that makes him the perfect mediator between man and God. That's why the scripture also tells us to go straight to Jesus -- go to the throne of grace with confidence, knowing that he can understand our weaknesses and everything, since he lived as a man like us (and even experienced all temptation). Hence we don't need Mary to go to or go through -- that defeats the purpose of Jesus.

I saw my mother-in-law die before my eyes putting her faith in Mary. Days before she died I asked her if Mary can save her and she actually said yes. Then in her dying moments, my father-in-law pushed me in front of her to pray for her as she was dying before our eyes. I simply prayed out loud in front of everyone that she would put her faith in Jesus, and ONLY JESUS. There was protesting in the background "wala na Maria? wala na Maria?", which is Filipino language for "No Mary?? No Marry??". You see how deceived they all are. It is sad. You see how the devil uses that poison to add something to Jesus.

So I hope it's clear what we believe and we hope that we can promote the truth here in love.
I can see this getting ugly real quick.

I wish people would learn how to discuss a subject without resulting in personal attacks and illogical assertions.

I see how the above statement might offend some people who are a part of Catholic church. I believe you could point out the heresy found in many different denominations not just Catholicism. For example you could point out the word of Faith Heresy and its false prosperity doctrine.

However I would stress that everyone who comes is an individual who we hope seeks God's truth. that not everyone who is a part of the Catholic church is a heretic and there are some born again Christians for whatever reason attend Catholic churches. They do not pray to Mary but to Jesus alone.

Personally I don't know what a "true Catholic" believes. I know of my friends who are Catholic and what they believe. The basic tenets of faith in Jesus does not change. The love of the Bible and study of the Bible is no different for them.

However I have met pagans pretending to be Christians hidden in the Catholic church. Ones who pretend to worship a saint but in their hearts are worshiping a local tribal deity they have given the name of that saint. How do I know this? they give me a tour and tell me that the saint is very much like their old gods and in truth they make Jesus just another deity among their many.

That I believe is wrong and any priest who teaches such things as to have the spirit of the antichrist within them.

I don't think you can treat people as a denomination but as individuals in bondage to lies of this world. It may not be the "catholic heresy" It may b other lies or sins that enslave them.

Before we can help tear down the strongholds in the minds of others that war against the knowledge of God, we must first tear down our own and love the person enough to care and listen to what they truly believe and not what we assume they believe just because they belong to one church or another.

have you ever studied how abused children react to certain words or actions or sounds?

they are called triggers that makes them react either violently or fearfully and fold within themselves, not listening or truly responding to others.

sometimes people remind me of abused victims who do not recognize that demons have been tormenting them so much that a single word or phrase will trigger a reaction that is completely illogical to the situation.

Sometimes all we can do is pray, be patient and loving.

I watched a young teenage boy lose faith in Jesus because someone told him it was because of HIS lack of faith that his prayers were not answer and his father died.

anyways I've ranted enough.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
Oh come on now diggs, it's not your Biblically Illiterate folks that are converting to Catholicism, It's often your old-guard that has been reading the Bible and studying for years. I know your better than this "only the blinded convert to Catholicism" line.
That is true. I didn't become a Catholic till I was in my 30s. Though I started that path in my mid 20s. But that was after being raised in a Protestant church and being a very devout, bible reading Protestant Christian for many years.
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
That is true. I didn't become a Catholic till I was in my 30s. Though I started that path in my mid 20s. But that was after being raised in a Protestant church and being a very devout, bible reading Protestant Christian for many years.

There lies your problem, 'was...being a very devout, bible reading". Get back to the Bible and leave those traditions where they belong. If this does not tell you are anyone else where the problem lies, then nothing will.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
There lies your problem, 'was...being a very devout, bible reading". Get back to the Bible and leave those traditions where they belong. If this does not tell you are anyone else where the problem lies, then nothing will.
It was the Bible that lead me there! There are no traditions in the Catholic faith that contradict the Bible.


Sent from my XT875 using Tapatalk 2
 
C

cfultz3

Guest
**There are no traditions in the Catholic faith that contradict the Bible.
Hmmm, well!!! Better tell that to the Catholics' Queen of Heaven. The same one who promises salvation to those who will honor her with the Rosary.