-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I dont normally agree with her but in her defense she has a right to stand by her beliefs even if we dont agree with them because everyones walk with God and understanding of scripture is different..
Btw..i could care less bout the lunar eclipse as well..lol
Btw..i could care less bout the lunar eclipse as well..lol
No offense but that was obvious, but then again none of know that we don't know until someone shows us what we didn't see if you hear what I am saying.
Earlier you had cited the passage about Jesus seeing all the kingdoms of the earth in a moment of time, now a lot people will tell you that there is no way you can see all the kingdoms of the earth on a globe in a moment of time.
And if those earthly things he told us about are not true then why should anyone believe what he said about heavenly things?
Simple fact is that the answer to whether or not all the kingdoms of the earth can be seen in a moment of time can be proven; although some might not like the answer....
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.
1 Thess 5:21
1 Thess 5:21
Earlier you had cited the passage about Jesus seeing all the kingdoms of the earth in a moment of time, now a lot people will tell you that there is no way you can see all the kingdoms of the earth on a globe in a moment of time.
If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?
John 3:12
John 3:12
And if those earthly things he told us about are not true then why should anyone believe what he said about heavenly things?
Simple fact is that the answer to whether or not all the kingdoms of the earth can be seen in a moment of time can be proven; although some might not like the answer....
If you can't see any land mass from this side of the earth satellite image
of the earth then how much of the land mass would you see from the other side, all of it?
]
See John 3:11
of the earth then how much of the land mass would you see from the other side, all of it?
]
See John 3:11
I dont normally agree with her but in her defense she has a right to stand by her beliefs even if we dont agree with them because everyones walk with God and understanding of scripture is different..
Btw..i could care less bout the lunar eclipse as well..lol
Btw..i could care less bout the lunar eclipse as well..lol
Everything that is against this belief we will ignore (like lunar eclipse everybody could see some weeks ago).
This belief does not deserve any defense. Not publicly. This belief is stupid.
Right to believe? Well, everybody has a right to believe any stupidity he wants. But she went public with it and propagate it between Christians. Why to defend such ignorance? Christianity has always been based on truth. Truth is a basic element of Christianity.
That is rich. I hope my question doesn't offend you but is there any particular reason why the gospel is freely given if christianity is actually based upon truth.
Of course it is, the gospel is given to Christians to know the mystery of the kingdom of God but unto them that are without the gospel is given in parables so that by seeing we can not see and by hearing we hear not. So wouldn't it go to follow that the gospel is given to Christians so that those Christians which see not might see and hear not might hear.
So it would only follow that the NT scriptures wouldn't have been written because Christians don't know the truth but because they know that no lie is of the truth.
I finally found some posts by an flat-earther advocate on another cite which suggest that this is a new way to draw people to Christ. According to my understanding of the post, the flat earther was claiming that in a relatively short period of time he had brought more people to Christ and in greater numbers than he had experience using any other method before.
Since no prophesy of scripture is of any private interpretation, if the flat earthers interpretation are not as Biblically sound as any other interpretations, Then what criteria do you assert an interpretation must adhere to in order to for Biblical soundness of a doctrine. I am not sure that falsehood or deception is prohibited by NT, although I had heard that Muslims are allowed to lie to
certain people, but seeing that I am not allow to read from a Quran then reason follows reason the I would conclude that been found it written in Paul's gospel then if it is I would suggest that the reason then I believe the reason would be self-evident.
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? Rom 3:7
Of course it is, the gospel is given to Christians to know the mystery of the kingdom of God but unto them that are without the gospel is given in parables so that by seeing we can not see and by hearing we hear not. So wouldn't it go to follow that the gospel is given to Christians so that those Christians which see not might see and hear not might hear.
So it would only follow that the NT scriptures wouldn't have been written because Christians don't know the truth but because they know that no lie is of the truth.
However, she defends them as soundly biblical; with that I cannot agree.
Since no prophesy of scripture is of any private interpretation, if the flat earthers interpretation are not as Biblically sound as any other interpretations, Then what criteria do you assert an interpretation must adhere to in order to for Biblical soundness of a doctrine. I am not sure that falsehood or deception is prohibited by NT, although I had heard that Muslims are allowed to lie to
certain people, but seeing that I am not allow to read from a Quran then reason follows reason the I would conclude that been found it written in Paul's gospel then if it is I would suggest that the reason then I believe the reason would be self-evident.
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? Rom 3:7
Im defending the PERSON..her beliefs are her own for whatever way she got them just like youre beliefs are YOUR own..cant fault someome for maybe not knowing better..thats saying that NONE of us have anything more yo learn in this life bout God or the scriptures? So please..put your "stones" away
We do not come to her home town and do not limit her life. So there is not need to "defend her personally".
Yes..im fully aware of what this forum is and what its become amongst sac religious pompus christians that seem to do no wrong and quick to condemn..dont like being called that then maybe we gotta show a bit more respect especially if we DONT agree with someones views.
If you go to OTHER forums you dont see NEARLY as much contension and bible slinging..gotta ask yourself...WHY IS THAT? And im preaching to the choir here too as its easy for me to get caught up on that religious band wagon and pick up a "stone" when i dont agree with whats being said...THATS my point...more respect n agree to disagree..
If you go to OTHER forums you dont see NEARLY as much contension and bible slinging..gotta ask yourself...WHY IS THAT? And im preaching to the choir here too as its easy for me to get caught up on that religious band wagon and pick up a "stone" when i dont agree with whats being said...THATS my point...more respect n agree to disagree..
My wife grew up in the RLDS church (similar to LDS) and was falsely taught that the third Heaven was divided into 3 separate compartments - 1. Celestial 2. Terrestrial 3. Telestial
In the so called "Inspired" version of the bible, Joseph Smith "added" the word "telestial" to support his false doctrine.
1 Corinthians 15:40 (IV) - Also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial, and bodies "telestial;" but the glory of the celestial, one; and the terrestrial, another; and the "telestial," another.
The Word of God actually says (NKJV) - There are also celestial bodies and terrestrial bodies; but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
In the so called "Inspired" version of the bible, Joseph Smith "added" the word "telestial" to support his false doctrine.
1 Corinthians 15:40 (IV) - Also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial, and bodies "telestial;" but the glory of the celestial, one; and the terrestrial, another; and the "telestial," another.
The Word of God actually says (NKJV) - There are also celestial bodies and terrestrial bodies; but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
-
2
- Show all
ok Einstein
better wear your asbestos suit when you go out
better wear your asbestos suit when you go out
-
2
- Show all
did you read about or hear where they have launched a probe to go closer to the sun than anything before?...launched a couple of days ago now I think
but who cares about science, right? lol!
but who cares about science, right?
lol!
-
1
- Show all