It is definitely relevant. You keep claiming that tongues is a sign to unbelievers. I'm telling you that when Cornelius spoke in tongues, there were no unbelievers present. Therefore, your view regarding the sign of tongues is not valid.
I have explained this several times. I suggest that you read Acts 10 so that you understand the context.
I have explained this several times. I suggest that you read Acts 10 so that you understand the context.
You say it is relevant but give me no idea as to what? I understand the context perhaps you don't have a proper spiritual understanding?
Show how you idea is relevant . . . still waiting for the first time...