If Jesus was the final and true sacrifice by being slain in the last days, how can dispensationalists adhere to the following in their idea of a future 1000 year kingdom where Christ rules in Jerusalem?
"There were also four tables of hewn stone for the burnt offering, a cubit and a half long, and one cubit and a half wide, and one cubit high, on which the instruments were to be laid with which the burnt offerings and the sacrifices were slaughtered." (Ezek 40:42, NRSV)
That is the point I find most blasphemous in dispensationalism. It was also a point never emphasized from the pulpit, yet most people in the pews of dispensationalist churches are not aware that is taught because of a nutty literalism of Ezekiel.
How can you have faith in the sacrifice of Christ when you are going to repeat it over and over in your idea of the millennium? It can't be seen as merely a memorial because Christ is there with you so you don't need to memorialize!
"There were also four tables of hewn stone for the burnt offering, a cubit and a half long, and one cubit and a half wide, and one cubit high, on which the instruments were to be laid with which the burnt offerings and the sacrifices were slaughtered." (Ezek 40:42, NRSV)
That is the point I find most blasphemous in dispensationalism. It was also a point never emphasized from the pulpit, yet most people in the pews of dispensationalist churches are not aware that is taught because of a nutty literalism of Ezekiel.
How can you have faith in the sacrifice of Christ when you are going to repeat it over and over in your idea of the millennium? It can't be seen as merely a memorial because Christ is there with you so you don't need to memorialize!
If God wants to institute sacrifice as a teaching took in the millenium to continue to teach people what he taught. then who am I to question God?
You want to question him feel free.. No sacrifice has ever or will ever remove one sin..