God didn't think it robbery to be equal to Himself

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
The fact that you are quoting a guys who got a prophecy wrong, can mean one or two things:
I have never quoted William Miller. Obviously, you prefer to make up whatever you want to believe to justify whatever convenient deceit that others have started for you, like the Old Hermit.
 
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
If millerites believe that Christ is not God how do they escape that the Bible says when Christ comes He will be from everlasting to everlasting which means He will have no beginning,that the Son shall be called the mighty God,the everlasting Father,He is God manifest in the flesh,and God said that one day He would reveal a new name to the Jews and speak to them who is Jesus.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
If millerites believe that Christ is not God how do they escape that the Bible says when Christ comes He will be from everlasting to everlasting which means He will have no beginning,that the Son shall be called the mighty God,the everlasting Father,He is God manifest in the flesh
According to Millerite doctrine, Christ is from everlasting to everlasting and is called Wonderful Counselor (i.e, the Holy Spirit), Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace because He is God's Representative. So, when Christ said, "He who has seen Me has seen the Father," Christ didn't mean there is only one divine Being or that He and the Father are indistinguishable. Christ meant that He is a Perfect Representative of the Father. Yes, Christ is God manifest in the flesh but is not perceived correctly by Trinitarians.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
You do know this is written by a TIME journalist who's given no references for her source material and has no degree in history, religion or anything relevant to this post?
Will you believe that Wikipedia got the History right?

William Miller (February 15, 1782 – December 20, 1849) was a Baptist preacher, from the United States, who is credited with beginning the mid-nineteenth century North American religious movement that was known as the Millerites. After his prophetic interpretations did not happen as he expected, new heirs of his message emerged, including Seventh-day Adventists and Advent Christians.

. . . Further, Miller became convinced that the 2,300 day period started in 457 B.C.with the decree to rebuild Jerusalem by Artaxerxes I of Persia. Simple calculation then revealed that this period would end in 1843. Miller records, "I was thus brought... to the solemn conclusion, that in about twenty-five years from that time 1818 all the affairs of our present state would be wound up."Although Miller was convinced of his calculations by 1818, he continued to study privately until 1823 to ensure the correctness of his interpretation. In September 1822, Miller formally stated his conclusions in a twenty-point document, including article 15: "I believe that the second coming of Jesus Christ is near, even at the door, even within twenty-one years,--on or before 1843." Miller did not, however, begin his public lecturing until the first Sunday in August 1831 in the town of Dresden.
In 1832 Miller submitted a series of sixteen articles to the Vermont Telegraph, a Baptist newspaper. The first of these was published on May 15, and Miller writes of the public's response: "I began to be flooded with letters of inquiry respecting my views; and visitors flocked to converse with me on the subject." In 1834, unable to personally comply with many of the urgent requests for information and the invitations to travel and preach that he received, Miller published a synopsis of his teachings in a 64 page tract with the lengthy title: Evidence from Scripture and History of the Second Coming of Christ, about the Year 1844: Exhibited in a Course of Lectures. . . .


William Miller (preacher) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Miller made predictions that the Second Coming of Christ would happen in 1844, JUST LIKE HAROLD CAMPING DID. And what does GOD say we are to do with a Prophet, whose prophecies do not come true?

Deuteronomy 18:20-22 (HCSB)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] But the prophet who dares to speak a message in My name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods—that prophet must die.’
[SUP]21 [/SUP] You may say to yourself, ‘How can we recognize a message the LORD has not spoken?’
[SUP]22 [/SUP] When a prophet speaks in the LORD’s name, and the message does not come true or is not fulfilled, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him.

Now in the last very part of verse 22 that I underlined, that word afraid is:

[/quote]Hebrew NASB Number: 1481c

Hebrew Word: [FONT=&quot]‏גּוּר‎[/FONT]

Transliterated Word: gur (158d)
Root: a prim. root;

Definition: to dread:--

List of English Words and Number of Times Used
afraid (2),
dreaded (1),
fear (4),
feared (1),
stand in awe (2).


New American Standard Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible.[/quote]

If you continue to follow a proven false prophet's teachings, are you not still "standing in awe" of him? And how do you "put to death" the teachings of a proven false prophet? You stop following his teachings.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
Please confess that you are not qualified to judge the extraordinary beauty and genius of Cantor's revelation.
It is not I that tested the false claim of Divine Revelation, it is the Word of GOD.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
And what does GOD say we are to do with a Prophet, whose prophecies do not come true?

Deuteronomy 18:20-22 (HCSB)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] But the prophet who dares to speak a message in My name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods—that prophet must die.’

If you continue to follow a proven false prophet's teachings, are you not still "standing in awe" of him? And how do you "put to death" the teachings of a proven false prophet? You stop following his teachings.
In no way do the Millerites of today believe that the world ended in 1843 or 1844. To put it simply, we believe that William Miller has been vindicated in interpreting Daniel 8:14 as pointing to the end of the world after 2300 years just as Jesus Christ has been vindicated in interpreting the book of Daniel to imply for Christ's time in the first century, “Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” (Matthew 24:34).
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
It is not I that tested the false claim of Divine Revelation, it is the Word of GOD.
You did judge Cantor's mathematics, all elementary mainstream stuff today, as an error. However, all undergraduate level mathematics students know that you are greatly deceived because it is now an uncontested fact among educated persons that all infinities have a rank in a hierarchy of infinities. Millerites today simply respect Cantor's revelation that the Father has the rank of the greatest infinity.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
In no way do the Millerites of today believe that the world ended in 1843 or 1844. To put it simply, we believe that William Miller has been vindicated in interpreting Daniel 8:14 as pointing to the end of the world after 2300 years just as Jesus Christ has been vindicated in interpreting the book of Daniel to imply for Christ's time in the first century, “Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” (Matthew 24:34).
Making one false prophecy, means he does not speak for GOD, and therefore he is a false prophet. And you still follow him and put him up on a pedestal?

Before you answer that, REMEMBER, you are the one that said: "My joy is Christ commending me for putting false teachers to the test and proving that they are liars." {ref: your post #185}
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
William Miller was essentially right. Daniel 8:14 does mean that the world was to end after 2300 years. His only mistake was in not see the multiple scenarios in the book of Revelation.
Daniel 8:14 (NASB)
[SUP]14 [/SUP] He said to me, "For 2,300 evenings and mornings; then the holy place will be properly restored."

What part of the Jewish expression "evenings and mornings" that means "COMPLETE 24 hour periods", do you not understand?

The prophecy was fulfilled with the rebuilding of Jerusalem and the Temple, after the Babylonian captivity.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
You did judge Cantor's mathematics, all elementary mainstream stuff today, as an error. However, all undergraduate level mathematics students know that you are greatly deceived because it is now an uncontested fact among educated persons that all infinities have a rank in a hierarchy of infinities. Millerites today simply respect Cantor's revelation that the Father has the rank of the greatest infinity.
NO, I objected to your labeling his mathmatics as Divine Revelation, which is an untruth, no matter what he or you claim.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
Making one false prophecy, means he does not speak for GOD, and therefore he is a false prophet. And you still follow him and put him up on a pedestal?

Before you answer that, REMEMBER, you are the one that said: "My joy is Christ commending me for putting false teachers to the test and proving that they are liars." {ref: your post #185}
Who are you condemning here? William Miller or Jesus Christ? Both are condemned for making false prophecies. I put both of them in the same boat. The Millerite defense of both William Miller and Christ is that they both interpreted the book of Daniel correctly. The issue is that William Miller didn't understand that the prophecies in the book of Daniel are highly conditional but that Jesus Christ did, which is evidenced by the fact that Christ taught the main prophetic variations in Daniel's two scenario scheme.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
Daniel 8:14 (NASB)
[SUP]14 [/SUP] He said to me, "For 2,300 evenings and mornings; then the holy place will be properly restored."

What part of the Jewish expression "evenings and mornings" that means "COMPLETE 24 hour periods", do you not understand?

The prophecy was fulfilled with the rebuilding of Jerusalem and the Temple, after the Babylonian captivity.
If you were to study the book of Daniel carefully and then compare your conclusions with the writings of notable scholars, you would find many respected scholars that agree that Daniel 8:14 was not fulfilled.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
It'd do you good to look through the Gospels, the psalms and the proverbs more, rather than the Revelation. Yal are getting too lost in thoughts that have no bearing on living here and now.

Being 'ready' doesn't mean lookin up at the right time.
It's about what you do for your brothers and sisters in the Lord, and how you treat your neighbors.

The book of Revelation is simple to understand.
1. God knows what's gonna happen.
2. He's got it under control.
3. Bad stuff goes down, but He wins.
4. We don't understand the details, but it'll be clear soon, and the clarity will bring glory to God.

you don't need any more interpretation than that.

Last thought: look to the Scripture for yourself. If another person is telling you how to interpret it, they are definitely trying to deceive you. Scripture is clear to the Spirit. If you have the Spirit, then you have the clear Word of God infront of ya when you open that Book.

Amen, brother! Soon and Very Soon!

Andrae Crouch *Soon And Very Soon* "Live" - YouTube
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
NO, I objected to your labeling his mathmatics as Divine Revelation, which is an untruth, no matter what he or you claim.
The Millerite interpretation of Scripture is that the Holy Spirit teaches on all things.

John 14
25 These things I have spoken to you while being present with you. 26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name,
He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.

The evidence that they are right and you are wrong is that they were given the answers to the greatest theological riddles in book of Daniel and Revelation and that you don't even know what you're talking about.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
If you were to study the book of Daniel carefully and then compare your conclusions with the writings of notable scholars, you would find many respected scholars that agree that Daniel 8:14 was not fulfilled.
Oh really? Respected by who? You asked for it, now here are quotes from several Mainline Christianity Commentaries:

Believer's Bible Comentary
by William MacDonald and Arthur L. Farstad:

[h=3]---
When Alexander died, his kingdom was divided into
four parts, depicted by the four notable horns which came up toward the four winds of heaven.[/h]Dan. 8:9-14 One of these was later ruled by a little horn (Antiochus Epiphanes), whose military success took him south, east, and into Palestine (the Glorious Land). Verse 10 describes his persecution of the Jews. He blasphemed the Lord, caused the sacrifices to cease in Jerusalem, and desecrated the temple (vv. 11, 12). Daniel learned that this desecration would continue two thousand three hundred days. This took place between 171 b.c. and 165 b.c.

Believer's Bible Commentary: A Thorough, Yet Easy-to-Read Bible Commentary That Turns Complicated Theology Into Practical Understanding.
Dallas Theological Seminary Faculty:
---
Dan. 8:13-14. For Daniel's benefit an angel (a holy one; cf. "holy ones" in 4:17) addressed the revealing angel (another holy one) and asked, How long will it take for the vision to be fulfilled? The answer was, It will take 2,300 evenings and mornings. (For the meaning of the "2,300 evenings and mornings" see the comments on 8:23-25.) At the conclusion of that time, the sanctuary that had been defiled would be cleansed and restored (reconsecrated) to its rightful place in the nation's life.
---
. . .
---
each evening and each morning representing a day, the reference may be to evening and morning sacrifices
---
The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures by Dallas Seminary Faculty.
J. Vernon McGee:
---
There has always been a great deal of disagreement as to the interpretation of these twenty-three hundred days. Seventh-Day Adventism grew out of the "great second advent awakening" in which this verse was given the day-year interpretation and the date for Christ's second coming was set for the year 1843. William Miller and his followers, among whom was Ellen G. White, understood "the sanctuary" to be the earth which would be cleansed at His coming. Miller was a sincere but badly mistaken Baptist preacher. The day-year interpretation was a fragile and insecure foundation for any theory of prophecy, and history has demonstrated it to be false.
---
However, if the twenty-three hundred days are taken as being literal twenty-four-hour days, the period would be between six and seven years, which approximates the time of Antiochus who began to perpetrate his atrocities in about 170 B.C. Finally the Jewish priest, Judas Maccabeus ("the hammer"), drove out the Syrian army, at which time the temple was cleansed and rededicated after its pollution. This cleansing is celebrated in the Feast of Lights.

Thru The Bible with J. Vernon McGee.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary
---
two thousand... three hundred days—literally, "mornings and evenings," specified in connection with the morning and evening sacrifice.
A Commentary: Critical, Experimental, and Practical on the Old and New Testaments.
Dr. John MacArthur Jr.:
---
Dan. 8:14 two thousand three hundred days. These are 2,300 evenings/mornings, with no “and” in between, which refers to 2,300 total units or days. Genesis 1:5 does use “and,” i.e., “Evening and morning, one day.” The period runs to about six and one-third years of sacrificing a lamb twice a day, morning and evening (Ex. 29:38, 39). The prophecy was precise in identifying the time as that of Antiochus’s persecution, c. September 6, 171 b.c. to December 25, 165/4 b.c. After his death, Jews celebrated the cleansing of their holy place with the Feast of Lights, or Hanukkah, in celebration of the restoration led by Judas Maccabeus.

The MacArthur Bible Commentary.
etc., etc., etc.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
William Miller was just a mighty servant of God that dreamed that he would be vindicated by new light, which has now arrived: The Millerite Interpretation of Multiple Prophetic Scenarios
REALLY?

A proven false prophet, and still with a straight face, you lift him up and say, "William Miller was just a mighty servant of God".

Deuteronomy 18:21-22 (HCSB)
[SUP]21 [/SUP] You may say to yourself, ‘How can we recognize a message the LORD has not spoken?’
[SUP]22 [/SUP] When a prophet speaks in the LORD’s name, and the message does not come true or is not fulfilled, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously. Do not be afraid of him.

I repeat, a proven false prophet!
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
Who are you condemning here? William Miller or Jesus Christ? Both are condemned for making false prophecies. I put both of them in the same boat.


The Millerite defense of both William Miller and Christ is that they both interpreted the book of Daniel correctly. The issue is that William Miller didn't understand that the prophecies in the book of Daniel are highly conditional but that Jesus Christ did, which is evidenced by the fact that Christ taught the main prophetic variations in Daniel's two scenario scheme.
Now that explains a great deal to us about your false beliefs. You have never come to KNOW Jesus Christ spiritually in your heart. You only know about him, which even the demons have that kind of knowledge. You need to be convicted in your heart of your utter sinfulness, like all of us, mourn over your sinfulness and cry out to HIM for forgiveness; while out of Love for JESUS CHRIST it brings you to willingly show that Love for HIM by surrendering control of your life to HIM as your Master and LORD. Then and only then will you Hear His voice and the TRUTH as you read the Scriptures with born again spiritual ears.

Our LORD, Jesus Christ is PURE TRUTH, because He is GOD in the flesh.
NO prophecy He ever spoke will ever be false, because HE IS TRUTH.

Every time you think you found a failed prophecy or contradiction by Christ,
it is you who made an error in interpretation.

John 14:6 (HCSB)
[SUP]6 [/SUP] Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.

2 Corinthians 5:19 (ASV)
[SUP]19 [/SUP] to wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself, not reckoning unto them their trespasses, and having committed unto us the word of reconciliation.

John 14:9 (HCSB)
[SUP]9 [/SUP] Jesus said to him, “Have I been among you all this time without your knowing Me, Philip? The one who has seen Me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?

Colossians 1:16-18 (HCSB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP] For everything was created by Him, in heaven and on earth, the visible and the invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities— all things have been created through Him and for Him.
[SUP]17 [/SUP] He is before all things, and by Him all things hold together.
[SUP]18 [/SUP] He is also the head of the body, the church; He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that He might come to have first place in everything.

Romans 1:21-25 (NASB)
[SUP]21 [/SUP] For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
[SUP]22 [/SUP] Professing to be wise, they became fools,
. . .
[SUP]25 [/SUP] For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
Oh really? Respected by who?
I'm referring to those who are respected in academia, whose job is scholarship, not TV and radio personalities or Zionist trumpeters that survive by peddling easily believable but inaccurate popularizations for the gullible masses.

If you care to examine the best scholarship of mainstream Christianity, begin with the Commentary on the Old Testament by Keil and Delitzsch. It asserts truthfully that "The interpretation of the period of the time, 2300 evening-mornings, named by the angel is beset with difficulty." The insurmountable problem is the obvious conflict with history. "According to 1 Macc. i. 54, 59, cf. iv. 52, the desolation of the sanctuary by the worship of idols under Antiochus Epiphanes lasted not longer than three years and ten days."

Naturally, I prefer to cite Jesus as the indisputable Lord and true authority on the profanation of the temple in Daniel, and He interpreted the abomination of desolation as an event in the future, not in the past. Matthew 24:15.
 

SolidGround

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2014
904
17
18
I'm referring to those who are respected in academia, whose job is scholarship, not TV and radio personalities or Zionist trumpeters that survive by peddling easily believable but inaccurate popularizations for the gullible masses.

If you care to examine the best scholarship of mainstream Christianity, begin with the Commentary on the Old Testament by Keil and Delitzsch. It asserts truthfully that "The interpretation of the period of the time, 2300 evening-mornings, named by the angel is beset with difficulty." The insurmountable problem is the obvious conflict with history. "According to 1 Macc. i. 54, 59, cf. iv. 52, the desolation of the sanctuary by the worship of idols under Antiochus Epiphanes lasted not longer than three years and ten days."

Naturally, I prefer to cite Jesus as the indisputable Lord and true authority on the profanation of the temple in Daniel, and He interpreted the abomination of desolation as an event in the future, not in the past. Matthew 24:15.
you need to look up 'historical parallels to Biblical types'.
the idea of a 'type' is very present in Scripture.
Antiochus Epiphanes was a type for the 'man of sin' and the destruction and abomination he caused was a type as well.
A parallel type occurred in 70 ad.

the truth is, even the Dome of the Rock is an abomination that has left the Temple Mount desolate (in terms of there being no Holy Temple there) so it is a type (or the real deal by some allegorical interpreters.)

Christ didn't prophecy only of the destruction in 70ad, but also the one still future.

----------
I am not sure how to approach you to lead you from error. You assume that others are not listening, yet I am. I am simply disagreeing.
We don't hold the same authority.
You accept modern prophecies as authorities.
I cannot accept them as anything until I've tested them fully. If any error is found, then the whole is thrown out. There is too much Truth packed into the Word to be looking for scraps of truth in the rubble of men's thoughts.
 
Jun 22, 2014
312
2
0
Christ didn't prophecy only of the destruction in 70ad, but also the one still future.
For starters, let's just stick to the words of the text and ask what they mean according to grammatical-historical exegesis. Here is my argument that following such a procedure will obviously produce a respectable interpretation.

DANIEL 2
“There is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries. He has shown King Nebuchadnezzar what will happen in the days to come. Your dream and the vision that passed through your mind as you lay on your bed are these: As you were lying there, O king, your mind turned to things to come, and the revealer of mysteries showed you what is going to happen. As for me, this mystery has been revealed to me, not because I have greater wisdom than other living men, but so that you, O king, may know the interpretation and that you may understand what went through your mind” (2:28-30 NIV).

DANIEL 8
“And it came about when I, Daniel, had seen the vision, that I sought to understand it; and behold, standing before me was one who looked like a man. And I heard the voice of a man between the banks of Ulai, and he called out and said, ‘Gabriel, give this man an understanding of the vision’ ” (8:16). ... “Son of man, understand that...” (8:17). “And he said, ‘Behold, I am going to let you know what will occur...’ (8:19).

DANIEL 9
“While I was still speaking in prayer, then the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision previously, came to me in my extreme weariness about the time of the evening offering. And he gave me instruction and talked with me, and said, ‘O Daniel, I have now come forth to give you insight with understanding. At the beginning of your supplications the command was issued, and I have come to tell you, for you are highly esteemed; so give heed to the message and gain understanding of the vision’ ” (9:21-23).

DANIEL 10
“In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia, a revelation was given to Daniel (who was called Belteshazzer). Its message was true and it concerned a great war. The understanding of the message came to him in vision” (10:1 NIV).

“Now I have come to give you an understanding of what will happen to your people in the latter days, for the vision pertains to the days yet future” (10:14).