Has anyone found secret messages in the bible?

[NTNT58]

Every one of your rebuttals have been answered by someone. You began a thread seeking understanding. Why not receive it?

And everyone's answer is different. Most don't even provide any proof, just claim an answer. I did learn a lot in this thread, but the main answer still goes unproven. Nobody has rebutted Isiah 22 and Matthew 16:19.

 

[NTNT58]

Yes, it does. But, listen…How do you know that no one else was given the keys?

Because the Bible states clearly it was given to Peter.

 

[Magenta]

You think people remember the exact words they posted pages ago? Stop being so clingy, you're not doing ANYTHING to contribute to this discussion.

I am pointing out your inconsistencies and lies. That contributes by showing others you are not trustworthy. I can understand why you, however, do not appreciate that. I have also asked questions you have not answered trying to understand where you are coming from with all your inconsistencies. The fact you do not answer just adds to your being suspect. I asked some days ago, if you believe this method of showing non-believers hidden codes will help bring them to Christ (that is a paraphrase, btw), why you brought it to a Christian site? Did you ever answer that question? Is that how you were brought to Christ? By having someone show you hidden codes? What or where is the value in you saying we are to follow the authority of the RCC when you claim you do not support them yourself?

 

[selahsays]

Nobody has rebutted Isiah 22 and Matthew 16:19.

… that what?

 

[Cameron143]

God

Right. In fact it was Jesus Himself. Who appoints Popes?

 

[selahsays]

Because the Bible states clearly it was given to Peter.

Go ask your Father in heaven then. You won’t listen to us. Let the Holy Spirit reveal the truth of the matter.

 

[Cameron143]

And everyone's answer is different. Most don't even provide any proof, just claim an answer. I did learn a lot in this thread, but the main answer still goes unproven. Nobody has rebutted Isiah 22 and Matthew 16:19.

When Paul was appointed, was he given the same authority as Peter?

 

[NTNT58]

I am pointing out your inconsistencies and lies. That contributes by showing others you are not trustworthy. I can understand why you, however, do not appreciate that. I have also asked questions you have not answered trying to understand where you are coming from with all your inconsistencies. The fact you do not answer just adds to your being suspect. I asked quite a few days ago, if you believe this method of showing non-believers hidden codes will help bring them to Christ (that is a paraphrase, btw), why you brought it to a Christian site? Did you ever answer that question? Is that how you were brought to Christ? By having someone show you hidden codes?

You're lying, I did answer your questions, while you've been ignoring many of mine. I did talk in detail about how in-depth study of the Bible can uncover proof of divine authorship, including the hidden codes. I was not even aware of these codes until a few weeks ago. I was brought to Christ by studying the Bible verse by verse.

 

[hornetguy]

How convenient of you to ignore the points you can't refute while pretending like you won the argument.

Please don't be stupid..... I just refuted your points.

 

[NTNT58]

When Paul was appointed, was he given the same authority as Peter?

Depends on the question at hand. Was Peter given special keys in light of Isiah 22?

 

[NTNT58]

Please don't be stupid..... I just refuted your points.

Please stop lying, you ignored the point about Peter conforming with the Judaizers.

 

[Magenta]

You're lying, I did answer your questions

You have not answered these. There may have been others that also went unanswered.

Was Jesus speaking to Christians then, or Jews under the law?

Do you believe Christians are under the law?

Also questions in post #883:

I asked some days ago, if you believe this method of showing non-believers hidden codes will help bring them to Christ (that is a paraphrase, btw), why you brought it to a Christian site? Did you ever answer that question? Is that how you were brought to Christ? By having someone show you hidden codes? What or where is the value in you saying we are to follow the authority of the RCC when you claim you do not support them yourself?

 

[Dino246]

If you think you can forgive sins against God, you are greatly mistaken.

If you think RC priests can forgive sins against God, you are greatly mistaken.

 

[Cameron143]

Depends on the question at hand. Was Peter given special keys in light of Isiah 22?

I explained already. Isaiah 22 deals with physical descendency in the OT. The NT is dealing with spiritual descendency. You are conflating 2 things that don't equate.

 

[Dino246]

That doesn't answer the question why only Peter was given the keys.

He wasn’t.

 

[hornetguy]

Please stop lying, you ignored the point about Peter conforming with the Judaizers.

again, don't be stupid..... I told you that disobedience (conforming to Judaizers, not wanting to eat unclean) did NOT constitute meekness or cowardliness...... which are the two qualities you assigned to Peter, and I disagreed with... quit playing word games, little man, you are not that good at it.

 

[NTNT58]

You have not answered these. There may have been others that also went unanswered.

Was Jesus speaking to Christians then, or Jews under the law?

Do you believe Christians are under the law?

Also questions in post #883:

I asked some days ago, if you believe this method of showing non-believers hidden codes will help bring them to Christ (that is a paraphrase, btw), why you brought it to a Christian site? Did you ever answer that question? Is that how you were brought to Christ? By having someone show you hidden codes? What or where is the value in you saying we are to follow the authority of the RCC when you claim you do not support them yourself?

You've never asked these.

Jesus lived under the law until his death.

Christians are not under condemnation of the law but still have to obey God's commandments to him.

I've answered the other.

 

[Magenta]

You've never asked these.

Yes I did ask them. I even linked to them in my post. Click the word "these" in my first sentence of that post.

I can also give the link again since you may not be too keen on being proven wrong.

Click here.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Yes, the context is Peter's statement of faith/belief/truth.... that Jesus is the son of God.... and the rock that the church is built upon.

Amen!

 

[NTNT58]

I explained already. Isaiah 22 deals with physical descendency in the OT. The NT is dealing with spiritual descendency. You are conflating 2 things that don't equate.

And I've explained that popes aren't chosen by physical descendency. You can say they are corrupt, but God has chosen corrupt rulers many times in the Bible.