I think I should wait until the millennium age to start dating again.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,778
8,614
113
#61
Just a little levity folks....

1678118959118.png
 

JohnB

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2022
2,078
456
83
Calif
#62
If you haven't already found your purpose, then you have nothing to contribute to a wife or family. Children are not for feeding your emotional lack. You are to provide for them, not the other way around.
Sure you tell that to any parent.
 

JohnB

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2022
2,078
456
83
Calif
#64
"“Son of man, with one blow I am about to take away from you the delight of your eyes. Yet do not lament or weep or shed any tears. " Ezekiel 24:16 . I guess to some, GOD took his wife because his wife was the delight of his eyes.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
#65
Yet in Genesis Chap 6, the Sons of GOD (fallen angels) saw the daughters of men were beautiful and took for themselves wives.
They were not fallen angels.
Angels are not sexual beings.
 

JohnB

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2022
2,078
456
83
Calif
#66
They were not fallen angels.
Angels are not sexual beings.
Do you really think the Sons of GOD were the line of Seth? Were the daughters of men, the line of Cain? if so, were the daughters of Seth really that ugly?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,778
8,614
113
#67
They were not fallen angels.
Angels are not sexual beings.
Absolutely no doubt whatsoever that they WERE in fact fallen angels. The case is vast and overwhelming.

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030139

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030142

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030208

There is NO Scripturally based argument anyone can muster to contradict the fact of fallen angels.
The Sethite argument and/or Kings argument is little more than banal insipid senseless irreverent specious speculation.

So far....nobody has reply to those three posts in any sensible manner. Not even my favorite scholar TheDivineWatermark.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
#68
Then I'll have a new body, new home and money will not matter.
But then there will be no dating at that time. You will be clean out of luck.:p What you can do right now is take a trip to India and someone will arrange a bride for you. No need for dating. It will be a done deal.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,778
8,614
113
#70
Absolutely no doubt whatsoever that they WERE in fact fallen angels. The case is vast and overwhelming.

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030139

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030142

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030208

There is NO Scripturally based argument anyone can muster to contradict the fact of fallen angels.
The Sethite argument and/or Kings argument is little more than banal insipid senseless irreverent specious speculation.

So far....nobody has reply to those three posts in any sensible manner. Not even my favorite scholar TheDivineWatermark.
EDIT^^
"The Sethite argument and/or Kings argument is little more than banal insipid senseless irreverent specious speculation."

Sorry......that earlier draft may have sounded a little harsh. True perhaps.....but harsh. :censored:
 

JohnB

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2022
2,078
456
83
Calif
#71
But then there will be no dating at that time. You will be clean out of luck.:p What you can do right now is take a trip to India and someone will arrange a bride for you. No need for dating. It will be a done deal.
How do you know that? You've never been to heaven, You have no clue what people do there. You would have everyone in heaven neutered.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,165
1,795
113
#72
The problem with this is there is no marrying or giving in marriage in the resurrection. The sons of the resurrection shall be like the angels of God in heaven. If Genesis 6 is about such beings leaving heaven, coming to earth, and having sex with women, then according to Jude, that didn't turn out well for them.

If you aren't too picky, maybe one of us can match you up. You could also try talking to a pastor from a culture where they like to match people up. I spoke with a man who'd married a Korean woman. He'd asked her pastor if there were any single women in the church. He might have been around 50, and she might have been around 40.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,165
1,795
113
#73
When I was 30 and 40 I would ask people in my church, when you got married of had your first child, did the world look like a different place, did bible verses have deeper meaning? Many told me after these events the world had changed for them. They understood many bible verses in a new light. A friend told me, when he had his daughter he finally understood how GOD sees us as children. One man said, after getting married, he felt closer to GOD.
That's good. But Paul had revelation and wisdom, too. Of course, he got to experience being a father in the faith to many, and maybe he got spiritual insight through that.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
#74
How do you know that? You've never been to heaven, You have no clue what people do there. You would have everyone in heaven neutered.
The Bible says there is no marrying or giving in marriage in Heaven.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
#75
Do you really think the Sons of GOD were the line of Seth? Were the daughters of men, the line of Cain? if so, were the daughters of Seth really that ugly?

For to which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son, today I have begotten you”? Or again, “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son”?
Hebrews 1:5
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
#77
Absolutely no doubt whatsoever that they WERE in fact fallen angels. The case is vast and overwhelming.

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030139

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030142

https://christianchat.com/threads/what-about-gen-6.208962/post-5030208

There is NO Scripturally based argument anyone can muster to contradict the fact of fallen angels.
The Sethite argument and/or Kings argument is little more than banal insipid senseless irreverent specious speculation.

So far....nobody has reply to those three posts in any sensible manner. Not even my favorite scholar TheDivineWatermark.

For to which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son, today I have begotten you”?
Or again, “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son”?
Hebrews 1:5
 

JohnB

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2022
2,078
456
83
Calif
#78
The Bible says there is no marrying or giving in marriage in Heaven.
Yet in the Book of Job it says. "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came among them" Job 1:6