If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Why

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
#81
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Nobody is attacking the Bible here.

But Bible is just a written record about the real Word of God - Jesus Christ. Bible is not the goal, Jesus is.
Men in the end will offer to those who are ignorant more (and less) than what GOD has said by HIS WORD
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
#82
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Man's righteousness is doomed with or without it.

The righteousness of Christ is received by faith in Christ, no matter how many Bibles we have in our library...
In the end, the understanding of "righteousness" will be flexible and men will do what seems right in their own eyes

In the end, will HE find faith?
in HIS elect, yes HE will
for they know what they need to "do" when the evil day comes
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
#83
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Those of you who do not know THE written WORD


KNOW the written WORD
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
#84
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Please refer to Isaiah 8
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
#85
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

did He wait 1400 years before showing somebody how to build a printing press?
I don't know if you are scorning the written WORD

Dont

and in the last days, it will be hard to find
i suggest you read and pray NOW that you will be able to discern lying spirits who will have much to say

there will be many of them in the last days offering "soothing words and promises"

Bind up THE TESTIMONY amongst MY DISCIPLES
and when they tell you to seek spirit should not a people consult their GOD

To the dead (spirits) for the LIVING (ONE)?
(Isaiah 8)

never!

there will be a lot of praying in the last days
 
Last edited:

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
#86
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Sorry I bombarded the thread
 

GuessWho

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2014
1,227
34
48
#87
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

In the same way as in the times without the Bible. By a common agreement between local episcopates/churches. It worked for thousand years.

I agree that the Bible is a great help for us. I do not agree that our religion is doomed without it.

God has perfect timing. When things got too messed up in the western churches after 1500 years without a Bible, He provided the Bible from the East and the technology from Germany to spread it between people and to fix the catholic church.
I think it's not wrong to say that the Scriptures were not meant to be read individually, outside the communion with other Jews (in case of the Hebrew Scriptures) or other Christians (in case of the Bible from Genesis to Revelations).

That is not to say that I am against reading the Bible!!!! (this one is not for you, trofimus, cause I know you don't misread me)

Also, in the Bible, we don't see God say: "Read, O Israel: The Lord is One", but "Hear, O Israel!"
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
#88
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

I think it's not wrong to say that the Scriptures were not meant to be read individually, outside the communion with other Jews (in case of the Hebrew Scriptures) or other Christians (in case of the Bible from Genesis to Revelations).

That is not to say that I am against reading the Bible!!!! (this one is not for you, trofimus, cause I know you don't misread me)

Also, in the Bible, we don't see God say: "Read, O Israel: The Lord is One", but "Hear, O Israel!"
And who is the one who owns the ears so that one can hear?
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
#89
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

HIS WORD is a double edged sword!

because you mentioned "faith comerh by hearing"
and then you mentioned "Hear". Oh ISRAEL...


but we also know that, as per HIS WORD, HE also said through the prophet Isaiah, make the hearts of the people fat...be ever seeing but never seeing, ever hearing but never hearing

And through Jeremiah and Ezekiel, HE would make a NEW COVENANT, a NEW HEART and a NEW SPIRIT to know HIM

we can't lose sight that HE knows the hidden intents of the heart

and we know without faith it is impossible to please GOD for one would have to believe that HE exists and is a rewarder of all who diligently seek HIM

so to thise whose hearts intent is sonething orher than seeking THE TRUTH, it will be known. It will not be hidden from HIM
 
Last edited:

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#90
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

I think it's not wrong to say that the Scriptures were not meant to be read individually, outside the communion with other Jews (in case of the Hebrew Scriptures) or other Christians (in case of the Bible from Genesis to Revelations).

That is not to say that I am against reading the Bible!!!! (this one is not for you, trofimus, cause I know you don't misread me)

Also, in the Bible, we don't see God say: "Read, O Israel: The Lord is One", but "Hear, O Israel!"
The fact is that it was not given to individuals but to churches or namely to elders in churches. The question is if it was meant to stay that way or if it was just too expensive to copy...

All in all, we should study the Bible, knowing that we are not studying the Bible to know the Bible more but to know God more :)
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#91
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Nobody is attacking the Bible here.

But Bible is just a written record about the real Word of God - Jesus Christ. Bible is not the goal, Jesus is.

The goal is not to study the Bible, but to study Jesus Christ. The goal is not to follow the Bible, but to follow Jesus Christ, etc.

Awww so close,you and I agreeing for once in another thread and disagreeing in this one.
It deeply concerns me what people place little importance on Gods Word. The Bible isn't "just" it is the Word of God. If the goal is Jesus why would we not cherish His every word to us? The goal is to read His word to us and become more like Him in doing so. How can one say the goal is not to follow the Bible when God says in the Bible that it clearly is?! The Bible admonishes us to follow His Words.

Think of it this way. A couple that love each other deeply are parted by war. The womans husband writes her as often as he can. Does she not cherish his every word to her? Does she not read his words again and again until he returns? Why would we not do the same for Christ who gave His life for us? Why would we not cherish His every word to us until his return? It makes no sense at all.
 
Mar 21, 2017
329
7
0
#92
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

is anyone here saying that The written WORD contradicts GOD?
There's not much of anything be said from those folks who believe not in the verifiable, inspired word of God. They just need to come out of their religious catacombs and say what they believe.

That ain't going to happen.

Me thinks people love their cathedrals and manmade traditions more than they love God and His word.


(It was a lovely morning until I got to reading the posts!)
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#93
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh


Awww so close,you and I agreeing for once in another thread and disagreeing in this one.
It deeply concerns me what people place little importance on Gods Word. The Bible isn't "just" it is the Word of God. If the goal is Jesus why would we not cherish His every word to us? The goal is to read His word to us and become more like Him in doing so. How can one say the goal is not to follow the Bible when God says in the Bible that it clearly is?! The Bible admonishes us to follow His Words.

Think of it this way. A couple that love each other deeply are parted by war. The womans husband writes her as often as he can. Does she not cherish his every word to her? Does she not read his words again and again until he returns? Why would we not do the same for Christ who gave His life for us? Why would we not cherish His every word to us until his return? It makes no sense at all.
:) Disagreement does not matter if we are civil to each other.

In your example the woman has nothing else than the letter. She is truly separated from her husband.
But we have Christ inside us and seen in everything He created. He is between two or three who meet in His name. He is not far away from any of us.

I am not saying that the Bible is of a little importance. I am saying that the Bible is a helper, not a goal of our life. He will not ask "how many times have you read the Bible in your life" but "have you lived it?"
 
Mar 21, 2017
329
7
0
#94
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

I think it's not wrong to say that the Scriptures were not meant to be read individually, outside the communion with other Jews (in case of the Hebrew Scriptures) or other Christians (in case of the Bible from Genesis to Revelations).

That is not to say that I am against reading the Bible!!!! (this one is not for you, trofimus, cause I know you don't misread me)

Also, in the Bible, we don't see God say: "Read, O Israel: The Lord is One", but "Hear, O Israel!"
GuessWho, Could Philemon read the letter that Paul wrote to him? How about Timothy and Titus? Did they need to first summons other believers and then read the letters?

Also, in the bible, we don't see God say: "Read, O Israel: The Lord is One, but Hear, O Israel!"

A bit sly. You were avoiding...we don't READ!
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#95
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

GuessWho, Could Philemon read the letter that Paul wrote to him? How about Timothy and Titus? Did they need to first summons other believers and then read the letters?

Also, in the bible, we don't see God say: "Read, O Israel: The Lord is One, but Hear, O Israel!"

A bit sly. You were avoiding...we don't READ!
All three were significant figures and teachers in churches, not just common members. They were supposed to teach others and so spread the teaching of the apostles.
 
Mar 21, 2017
329
7
0
#96
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

All three were significant figures and teachers in churches, not just common members. They were supposed to teach others and so spread the teaching of the apostles.
Where do you READ that? Don't throw out verses for me to check, I'm here by myself and if you agree with Guesswho, then you'll understand why I shouldn't read the bible by myself. Maybe.
Now you wouldn't dare ask me to do something you believed was wrong, would you?

Besides, Guesswho made the statement. My question was address to her or him. That name ought to be changed to Guesswhat. As in GuessWhat I believe?



 
Mar 21, 2017
329
7
0
#97
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

All three were significant figures and teachers in churches, not just common members. They were supposed to teach others and so spread the teaching of the apostles.
Besides, they are three individuals. Guesseverything/Guesswhat/Guesswho said the scriptures were not meant to be read by individuals. Period. They are individuals. They couldn't read the letters unless there was a group.
 
Mar 21, 2017
329
7
0
#98
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

I think Catholicism runs all through several posts in this thread.

Scriptures not meant to be read by individuals.
If the majority of Catholics would learn the bible, the truth, Catholicism would collapse. Keep the commoners in the dark.

I think it's not wrong to say that the Scriptures ....
What is that? Another Guesswho and Guesswhat form.
Just say: I think it is right to say that the Scriptures....

I think....
Well GuessWhat, I KNOW it is right to say your THINK is not the authority. God's word is.

 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#99
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

Where do you READ that?
You can check "The History of the Church", for example... or there is a note that Timothy is teaching others in one of the letters to him...

Do you agree that the purpose of the Bible is to know God? That the reading of the Bible is not the ultimate goal of our life?
 
Mar 21, 2017
329
7
0
Re: If Jesus Intended for Christianity to be Exclusively a “Religion of the Book,” Wh

I think it's not wrong to say that the Scriptures were not meant to be read individually, outside the communion with other Jews (in case of the Hebrew Scriptures) or other Christians (in case of the Bible from Genesis to Revelations).

That is not to say that I am against reading the Bible!!!! (this one is not for you, trofimus, cause I know you don't misread me)

Also, in the Bible, we don't see God say: "Read, O Israel: The Lord is One", but "Hear, O Israel!"
You can't read the bible unless others present!

Maybe I'm stupid. But I figure if you can't read the bible alone, then you can't meditate upon it when you're alone. Can't teach it to an individual unless another believer is present.

The problem with the Guesses and the Trofimusess is they practice what they teach. They don't read the bible by themselves. That's sad. They remain blind. Sad.

(If anyone replies to this post with Reply With Quote and begins with Yes. I don't mind. Maybe I'm stupid...Yes,...)