Awesome analogy but then we must ask ourselves, is the Holy Spirit, coupled with the Word of God and proper instruction not enough to keep up? (which will be a central theme to my post and will tie in when I get Romans 8). That is the key difference in your analogy and baseball. It's one thing to take on a new nature alone but it's another knowing that we have something in us once we accept Christ that we didn't have before. (another tie in to Romans 7 & 8).
Not enough to keep up.... keep up with what? If you trust that Word of God, it says that you are to get your maturity through works, not study. In fact it says that the knowledge you gain that is important comes from works, not study. AND it says that what you learn to guide your walk, comes from the direction of those church leaders appointed by God. So, not being Catholic of the Roman or other Catholic descent, I have to note, they have that one right and me as a protestant does not.

Eph 43:11-17. err 4: not 43:.
What praytell do you think you have in you?
My analogy, shows, hopefully, that you can read books and study and know everything you need to know about throwing and batting lefty. But if you are a righty, it won't do you any good, until you get out and do the work. ONLY THEN will you be changed to a different person. You aren't made a different person by being invited to the team, that's just a small step. Altar call theology I teasingly call it. Not anywhere in scripture.

Really ticks off my friends. They'll give an AH OH if someone says something that they know is a tweak. It's fun.
Actually, that was moreso in Chapter 1. In Chapter 2, John begins it by saying he is writing this so that they may not sin. And he was even more stern in Chapter 3, saying that whoever sins (hamartánoon) has not seen or known Him. Wow. Honestly, the first step of maturation is surviving the test of temptation that opens the door to sin.
Nooo, you are looking at it backwards. You are adopting the benefits from the journey before the journey.
Why does he want them to not sin? According to 1 j 1:3-7 it was so they would be in fellowship with them, and they were in fellowship with God and His Son. To do that they had to walk in the light as He does.
BUT IF YOU DO SIN, yo uhave a mediator and can be forgiven, does that sound like someone who isn't under Grace to you? So those he wrote to were not in fellowship with Divinity, but they were under Grace. In 3:6 you find that if they are still sinning they don't know Him and haven't met Him. BUT THEY STILL HAD GRACE. 1 john 1:9.
He wrote it so they may not sin, so they could get there. In 2:8 or 9 they only needed a little more darkness to be gone, and then they would be in fellowship, but..> THEY STILL HAD GRACE!!!!!....
Hey, I love Romans 6 too but if you read it, it pretty much draws a spritual line in the sand; you are either a slave to Christ OR a slave to sin. Should we sin because we are no longer under the law but grace? Also, I believe that you read that wrong. Romans 6:22 doesn't state that you have been atoned for; but it states that you have been set free (eleutheroo) from sin. That presents it in a whole new light then the way set forth. Christ atonement on the cross is the act that brought forth the state of being set free from sin.
You understand the word sanctified, yes? Why are they not sanctified at the first of the list in 6:22 rather than at the end of 22? AFTER they receive the benefit?
ANd why, if being freed from sin means they no longer sin, is he warning them that are already freed, not to sin? That really doesn't make much sense in the way the chapter reads. But that is a whole other chapter.... errr thread, I mean. We shouldn't take that tangent here... If you make one, invite me please?
And yes, it is things that we do regarding staying strong in the Lord. I've never seen my Bible glide to me nor was forced to get on my knees and pray. The Bible tells us to put on the full armour of God. so we can stand against the enemy. Things are not a given, and that's probably why people fall into continual sin. Again, do we give the Holy Spirit any credit?
Respectfully, it sounds like you are giving yourself and what you do (meaning OURSELVES ) the credit for things.... not the Spirit. Putting on the whole armor of God. THERE IS NO U IN ARMOR!!!!!!
Europeans and their infatuation with "U"s.... sigh...
Scripture, again, says the important thing you learn is by being guided by the Church to works, not by reading the Bible. In fact it says Knowledge PUFFS UP. Why do you think there are fifty billion protestant denominations? TOO much knowledge, too many chiefs not enough tee pees. but, it says that through works you are built up..... it's a very definite delineation between the two paths. One puffs up, the other builds up...
Again, maturation does not equal sin. Do some sin along the way? Yes but in life, we have those who learn from being taught and those who feel like they need experience.
Umm no maturation means you have learned to love as God loves. Period. Not sinning is a result of the love finally blossoming inside of you, something only the Gardner can tend to. Not the flower stem.
Romans 7 & 8 or as I like to call it "The Power of God in the transition from Law to Spirit." If you read Romans 7, he speaks of life under the Law. Where I don't have nothing but myself to try to steer my actions. I want to do what right but I have nothing to keep me from doing wrong. This is exactly what Paul was talking about. The law was not bad in itself but sin produced an evil desire in what the Law showed was sin. Also, the Law in itself could not bring life. If you read 25, you would see one thing missing. He mentioned that he followed the law in his mind but sin in his flesh, but what about the Spirit.
you do realize Paul wasn't discussing himself there, right? That it was a "historical present" tense?
If he was discussing himself, then romans 7:5,6 where he says he's no longer IN THE FLESH, is really going to complicate things for you.
But, you are correct to draw the line with the SPIRIT being the missing part. Which is what he covers in 8:9, and it sounds like we'll agree on this... But when the Spirit indwells you, the flesh is no longer there. It's one or the other, not both and. And in Gal 5 it says if the Spirit is inside of you that you can not sin. or rather that you will not give into temptation, which is other than semantics, the same thing.
Romans 8 brings that in. There is no condemnation to those in Christ Jesus who walk according to the Spirit. Because the law was weak through flesh, God sent his Son in sinful flesh, and while living a sinless life, condemned sin in the flesh. Because of the Spirit, the righteous requirement of the law was fulfilled. Romans 8 also tells us that the Spirit helps us in our weakness.
it doesn't help us, it's the car, the driver and the motor, taking us home. We are there for the ride.
So, to finish this off, what changes our life is the Holy Spirit. Sin is not the process to change our lives but the sign of one weak in the Spirit. If sinning is part of the process to change my life, I totally negate the power and purpose of the Holy Spirit.
If you claim to be indwelled by the spirit, and still be in the flesh, you contradict scripture. Where does jahsoul see himself at there?
BTW, I use YOU in the general sense, as in for EVERYONE. I'll be clear when it means to you personally.... I'm usually not talking about you personally unless it's obviously you personally, like you said....