Obviously it would be to insult your intelligence to say that the apostles commented on Jesus' words, and also quoted him directly, and therein lies the difference, just like it would be to insult mine to assume that I don't know that the records of Jesus in the canon are written by the apostles. You already knew that, but for some reason you decided to dodge the question for some pointlessly hard-headed response.
Also, in context, I'd imagine you'd have the intelligence to realize that by 'labels' I meant 'christianity', and by throwing them out I meant 'for five minutes, forget that I don't take the label ''christian'' and ask yourself, what did Jesus ask of us in his own words? To be christian, or love thy neighbour?
It's really a quite simple premise - belief in Jesus doesn't need to be under a heading.
that is to say, to your previous posts, that a person calling themselves 'christian' doesn't automatically speak words more valid than someone who isn't.
That relates to beforehand when you tried to assert my label as proof that what I say is heretical or that I'm some devil-lover - whatever it was you were asserting; certainly nothing positive.