Is the Hebrew Roots Movement a cult?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
K

Karraster

Guest
I cannot say it any plainer. Live your life the way you want to, it's not my business.
 
L

LT

Guest
sorry if I sounded argumentative. I do disagree with the Hebrew Roots Movement, or whatever they'd like to call it, because of the fruit I've seen from it.

I do not judge any individual, and I excuse myself from the debate, as nothing productive ever happens with this topic.
 
V

Veritas

Guest
Galatians 5
Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. [SUP]
2 [/SUP]Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.
[SUP]3 [/SUP]For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.
[SUP]4 [/SUP]Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
[SUP]5 [/SUP]For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
[SUP]6 [/SUP]For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.
Yeshua addressed this yoke of bondage when he spoke to the pharisees:
[SUP]46[/SUP] And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.

It wasn't the Torah he was speaking of. Did you read my very first post along with the words of Messiah?
 
Dec 29, 2013
599
6
0
Christ AD 33

when the sacrificial system was abrogated along with the governmental, cerimonial, Levitical, dietary and societal Laws.

Don't misquote me to say that we can live in sin, but that what is sin is in Spirit, not in what meat we eat, or day we go to worship/fellowship, or how we trim our beard.




If the sacrifice is fulfilled, what is not fulfilled in Christ?
If you believe in the sacrifice of Christ, then you understand what freedom is.
If you do not believe in the sacrifice of Christ, you will continue to serve the Law.
LT, your interpretations of "law" are broad, undefined, and not in agreement with scripture or Christian history on this subject. I have numerous books on Bible law, all by reputable scholars and all refute your liberal antinomian position. Your definition of law would have us believe that Psalm 119, the entirety of which describes the Law of the Lord is also describing a temporary only form of religious hocus pocus. How can you not realize this? Psalm 1 and 119 teach the exact opposite of what you are claiming in your posts. Someone, apparently, has convinced you of a teaching that that was unheard of until recent decades. Your interpretation of law is so broad that it leaves no room for right or wrong. It denies the Bible definition of sin ("sin is the transgression of the law" [1 John 3:4]).
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
Yeshua addressed this yoke of bondage when he spoke to the pharisees:
[SUP]46[/SUP] And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.

It wasn't the Torah he was speaking of. Did you read my very first post along with the words of Messiah?
Paul dealt with the Torah in Galatians.
The author of Hebrews also dealt with the Torah.

If you want to celebrate Sabbath on Saturday, go ahead.
If you want to get circumcised, go ahead.
If you want to abstain from pork, go ahead.
If you want to dress like an Israeli and use Israeli terms, go ahead.

Just know that there are Scriptures that release you from needing to do these things.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
sorry if I sounded argumentative. I do disagree with the Hebrew Roots Movement, or whatever they'd like to call it, because of the fruit I've seen from it.

I do not judge any individual, and I excuse myself from the debate, as nothing productive ever happens with this topic.
no,i notice you are always very apologetic if you think you may have offended anyone,,,and that is love(to stand back and have feelings),,,so it is productive,,
 
V

Veritas

Guest
Romans 2
[SUP]25 [/SUP]For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.
[SUP]26 [/SUP]Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
[SUP]27 [/SUP]And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law?
[SUP]28 [/SUP]For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
[SUP]29 [/SUP]But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.


In case you don't like the KJV, since you didn't seem phased by Galatians 5
[SUP]25 [/SUP]For indeed circumcision is of value if you practice [SUP][v][/SUP]the Law; but if you are a transgressor [SUP][w][/SUP]of the Law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. [SUP]26 [/SUP]So if the [SUP][x][/SUP]uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? [SUP]27 [/SUP]And he who is physically uncircumcised, if he keeps the Law, will he not judge you who [SUP][y][/SUP]though having the letter of the Law and circumcision are a transgressor [SUP][z][/SUP]of the Law? [SUP]28 [/SUP]For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. [SUP]29 [/SUP]But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter; and his praise is not from men, but from God.
There is some background to these passages. A covenant requires blood to be shed. Yes? When Yeshua's blood was shed for all it was a renewing of a covenant. What Paul was saying is those fully grown men coming to the faith from paganism had no need to cut their foreskin off in order to enter into covenant with YHWH because Yeshua shed His blood. It was not necessary.
 
V

Veritas

Guest
Paul dealt with the Torah in Galatians.
The author of Hebrews also dealt with the Torah.

If you want to celebrate Sabbath on Saturday, go ahead.
If you want to get circumcised, go ahead.
If you want to abstain from pork, go ahead.
If you want to dress like an Israeli and use Israeli terms, go ahead.

Just know that there are Scriptures that release you from needing to do these things.
Ok. So the Commandments are null and void?
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
=LT;
as nothing productive ever happens with this topic.[/
I think there is something productive from this question. We are working out how much we should believe in OT scripture, what can be taken out of these words of God. Whether learning how God operates helps us know how Christ operates. What is the relationship between the way law is presented in scripture, is there a major difference? We have learned that God does not demand rituals in our walk, should we learn why God suggested them in the first place and if that has anything to do with God's eternal way of being. Are rituals forbidden to us? I could go on and on, and I think it is worthwhile to think about these things and search for God's way in them.
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
Ok. So the Commandments are null and void?
void is not a useful word in this.
Those who are in Christ are no longer condemned by the Law, which includes the 10 Commandments. No sin can be held against Believers on the Last Day, because the Blood of Christ has cleansed us of them. Some will go so far as to call this 'voiding them', but that is going too far.

The 10 Commandments, like the rest of the Law, still holds wisdom and is useful for edification, rebuke, and instruction in righteousness. Those who are weak in conscience will need to simply follow the words, and those who are strong will follow what is between the lines... the spirit.

Salvation is not the issue. Maturity is the issue.
Continue reading the Word, meditating upon it, and praying without cease, and maturity is promised through the work of the Holy Spirit.

Putting yourself under more regulations is just gonna hamper your growth, by distracting your efforts from following Christ to following rules. Christ is about doing more than abstaining from sin, but pushing further into actually DOING righteousness.

Perfection is not abstinence from sin, but about having so many good things to do that there is no time to sin.
 
V

Veritas

Guest
RedTent, you are correct. It IS worth thinking about. If we look at Christianity we see all the separate sects therein. Many have been called cults at one time or another. I don't care about all that. I made up my mind some time ago that I did not want lies or dogmas or doctrines of men. I am in pursuit of the truth.

Some folks want to make fun of me. Even on this chat! That's okay, it's nice to have an elder join in to add reasonable questions. Thank you.
 
V

Veritas

Guest
So Ukorin, you didn't answer me about whether or not you read my very first post as a member on this thread.
 
Dec 29, 2013
599
6
0
If it is, the antinomian position I see on these pages is more so. Their interpretation of "law" contradicts what Psalm 1, Psalm 119, and scores of other references say on this subject. Their interpretation of "law" is so broad that it leaves no definition for sin. It is in total disagreement with what Jesus meant when saying "every word" (Matt. 4:4), and Paul when saying,"all scripture" (2 Tim. 3:16). Those of the antinomian position are denying the very laws used by Jesus as His moral compass. If, their all encompassing definition of "law" is correct why does 1 John remind us that "sin is the transgression of the law" (1 John 3:4)? Was John confused, or are those who claim that Jesus came to abrogate that which defines sin?
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Ok. So the Commandments are null and void?
lol,,null and void? men tried their best for years to make peace between themselves and the father,doves,goats and bulls,to make peace between themselves and god,,then after one sacrifice was completed and the next was then set in it's order the years went by,and at the end of these the final sacrifice was set upon the cross,,,

many years the priest looked at the grain and reckoned the time of the first fruits of the harvest and told the Hebrew when to come to the feast,,this month or that month so that it was the first fruit of the harvest ,,then there was an time and the final sacrifice was made ready,,an virgin was with child,and he was prepared and set forth on the alter of god as ordained.

there are only these to speak of the ten,and the sacrifices being presented to god at the alter for the breaking of the ten,,the child was then set upon the alter and the final sacrifice required by the father was received. the law requires an end sacrifice that is the son of god nothing left out of it's order,first the sinners bringing the sacrifice and the priest receiving it unto the ordnance,then the receiving it by god.

who then after this will bring a sacrifice to the alter other than one who denies the sacrifice brought before it?,that is if one sacrifice is full and accepted by god let none bring another and say the one before it is not pure as if it is judged blemished. without spot and without blemish bring the end of the sacrifices,that is the cross and let any whom in their heart,worry or doubt let him find another than the grace given by the law of god,,,
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
So Ukorin, you didn't answer me about whether or not you read my very first post as a member on this thread.
I don't see when you asked me... but yea, that's where i started reading from today.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
void is not a useful word in this.
Those who are in Christ are no longer condemned by the Law, which includes the 10 Commandments. No sin can be held against Believers on the Last Day, because the Blood of Christ has cleansed us of them. Some will go so far as to call this 'voiding them', but that is going too far.

The 10 Commandments, like the rest of the Law, still holds wisdom and is useful for edification, rebuke, and instruction in righteousness. Those who are weak in conscience will need to simply follow the words, and those who are strong will follow what is between the lines... the spirit.

Salvation is not the issue. Maturity is the issue.
Continue reading the Word, meditating upon it, and praying without cease, and maturity is promised through the work of the Holy Spirit.

Putting yourself under more regulations is just gonna hamper your growth, by distracting your efforts from following Christ to following rules. Christ is about doing more than abstaining from sin, but pushing further into actually DOING righteousness.

Perfection is not abstinence from sin, but about having so many good things to do that there is no time to sin.
I just do not see how your thinking can be the same as scripture tells us. We aren't condemned by the law for we have forgiveness available through Christ, but Christ asks us to follow the law. Not only that, but follow a stricter, harder to follow law than the ten commandments for we are also to follow in truth and spirit. That way not murdering expands to not calling anyone "you fool". More rules.

So how is this going to hamper your growth? It seems to me the way to hamper growth is to not follow these instructions. You call this following rules, and following what Christ tells us to do is not following rules and Christ? That can't be.
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
If it is, the antinomian position I see on these pages is more so. Their interpretation of "law" contradicts what Psalm 1, Psalm 119, and scores of other references say on this subject. Their interpretation of "law" is so broad that it leaves no definition for sin. It is in total disagreement with what Jesus meant when saying "every word" (Matt. 4:4), and Paul when saying,"all scripture" (2 Tim. 3:16). Those of the antinomian position are denying the very laws used by Jesus as His moral compass. If, their all encompassing definition of "law" is correct why does 1 John remind us that "sin is the transgression of the law" (1 John 3:4)? Was John confused, or are those who claim that Jesus came to abrogate that which defines sin?
you are implying that lawlessness is the necessary result of grace?
You are not arguing for Hebrew roots, but for legalism. Stick to the topic.

As for what you are saying, you are very mislead. There is a balance between legalism and antinomianism. It is not either/or.
It seems you have not found the balance that is in Scripture.
 

JesusLives

Senior Member
Oct 11, 2013
14,554
2,174
113
I just finished posting this in another thread, however, looks like it would be relevant here in this thread. Please note that I am referring only to the 10 Commandments written in stone by God Himself not all the other laws that were given to Moses.

I would also like to add that I don't believe the Sabbath was ever just a Jewish law as it was originally given to Adam and Eve at creation as a celebration of the end of the creation week. Yes, I believe that God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, Angels and Adam and Eve all celebrated that very First Sabbath and I believe it will be celebrated in heaven after Satan, evil angels, wicked, sin and death is destroyed.

I have never said that the 10 Commandments could save anyone. Unfortunately I have literally broken all 10 Commandments and I'm not proud of it. I had an abortion in my 20's I can't go back and change it, but I praise God that He has forgiven me with His grace. That was about 30 years ago - so believe me when I say I understand Gods grace.

However, I do believe that they are the rules that show us what sin is and what God expects and has asked us to obey. Have I obeyed them NO I can't Jesus did it for me that is called Grace.

I do not believe the 10 Commandments were nailed to the cross as some do. God thought it was important enough to write the rules of His government down on stone with His finger. When we all get to heaven the rules will still be in place, but they will all be obeyed out of love to God and our fellow man.

I'm talking about in heaven now when we have been made perfect. We will honor Gods rules there will never be stealing, killing, lying, adultery, coveting, in heaven we will all love God with all our hearts, we will not put anything above God as in no idols, we will keep Sabbath it says so in Isaiah 66:23, we will still love an honor our parents and no one will take Gods name in vain in heaven. Actually the whole chapter of Isaiah 66 is a good read the and the last few verses are talking about heaven.

Jesus is our Savior and His death on the cross paid the price for our salvation and reconciliation to God the Father. I so look forward to getting back to the Garden of Eden state that Adam and Eve started in. To be able to walk and talk face to face with God what glory, honor and praise is due our Savior
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
I just do not see how your thinking can be the same as scripture tells us. We aren't condemned by the law for we have forgiveness available through Christ, but Christ asks us to follow the law. Not only that, but follow a stricter, harder to follow law than the ten commandments for we are also to follow in truth and spirit. That way not murdering expands to not calling anyone "you fool". More rules.

So how is this going to hamper your growth? It seems to me the way to hamper growth is to not follow these instructions. You call this following rules, and following what Christ tells us to do is not following rules and Christ? That can't be.
Are you placing the ceremonial laws alongside the 10 Commandments?
Let us 1st separate the 'Law' and call it the 10 Commandments.
All else will be referred to as 'Mosaic regulations'.