If the gender makes no difference, then the Bible wouldn't specify.
Or if his sin, which he hath sinned, come to his knowledge: then he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a female without blemish, for his sin which he hath sinned. Leviticus 4:28
And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord for his sin which he hath sinned, a female from the flock, a lamb or a kid of the goats, for a sin offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for him concerning his sin. Leviticus 5:6
Do you know why a male bull or ram was worth more? Because most of the males were castrated and used for food. So the high priest, and the prince or king, and the people were making a more costly sacrifice. The females were worth less, because there were a lot more of them. Because they were breeding stock. And because the sins they committed were less, and therefore needed an animal that was worth less. Or, a pair of pigeons or doves, or an ephah of flour - a special compensation God gave to the poor, who could not afford the more costly sacrifice!
So they are not specifying the gender, but the WORTH!
And I guess you are clueless as to not only what a metaphor is, but also how the entire book of Proverbs is a metaphor? A comparison without use of like or as. And while there is good advice in Proverbs, it is not meant to be taken literally, as if wisdom was an actual female! Sheesh!
You are reading into the text, that which is not there. You need to more about genre, and the history of the Bible. (Grammar might help, to!)
Then you would not continue to commit these constant egarious errors!
