Legalism's Mistake: Confusing Cause & Effect (Sanctification)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
2 Corinthians 12:21 (KJV) And lest, when I come again, my God will humble me among you, and that I shall bewail many which have sinned already, and have not repented of the uncleanness and fornication and lasciviousness which they have committed.
[HR][/HR]Revelation 2:5 (KJV) Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent.
[HR][/HR]Revelation 2:16 (KJV) Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.
[HR][/HR]Revelation 2:21 (KJV) And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. 22 Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.
[HR][/HR]Revelation 3:3 (KJV) Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee.
[HR][/HR]Revelation 3:19 (KJV) As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.

Entire churches of christians were told to repent & you don't have to? Since when are you better than them?


Yep. the catholic church better repent. Your church better repent.

Dude, Tell us, how do we repent of sins we ALREADY AGREE ARE SINS?

I guess I stop agreeing they are sins, and they are ok now?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This is very correct , as a clear indicator of this we have the 7 churches in revelation that no man can disprove that some had to repent. It was not because they did not know the LORD but it was due that some were heading in a incorrect direction.

The Revelation Jesus gave to John to the seven church , clearly identifies them as God possession.

Revelation 1:4-6 John to the seven churches which are in Asia: Grace be unto you, and peace, from him which is, and which was, and which is to come; and from the seven Spirits which are before his throne;And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness,and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
These people , Brothers & sisters in Christ Jesus knew clearly who was there Lord and savior. They were born again of God, but some of them clearly forgotten the purpose of being saved. Thee works that God ordained them to do. Look clearly how by examining them and the context we are given in scripture all seven churches God Almighty pointed out there works . 5 Churches were given a clear message to repent once more, and get right with God Almighty. Can no man disprove that.

Jesus clearly stated: If not, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent.

Personally they all were smart to repent.

PS. If anyone is obsess with disputes on this truth, take it up with God Almighty , it His word simple as that.

Shalom
They had to repent of some wrong beliefs.

People want repent to mean of sin, How can it mean sin, If you do not agree a sin is a sin, are you a christian?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Doesnt it say work out your salvation with fear and trembling....or the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom..
you refuse to adhear to scripture and sound doctrine...being dull of hearing and understanding...and the scripture or in some rare cases scriptures that you do you use are so chopped up and twisted out of context its sickening...i guess its why he said let the blind lead the blind...they both fall in the ditch...its amazing to watch scripture fulfilled out of your own mouths...and its against yourself...void of understanding...never truly having the revelation of christ who he is and why he came. and if your going to quote paul..who by the way was full of the holy ghost..really read what paul says about the fear of the Lord

It says work out the salvation YOU HAVE ALREADY RECIEVED with fear that you will not be a light.

Paul did not fear God, He feared that an action he did would cause his word to be useless..


whats amazing is seeing people claim they can do more than what the cross of Christ did, and that the Cross of Christ is not adequate. The people will puff themselves up as something worthy of anything..
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
If you repented, then did something that you knew was wrong, why did you do it again? My guess is because of sin that you are not aware of.
Why did paul do it again, Why do any of us do it again? Our flesh is weak. and we put our own needs above someone elses.

Please don't tell me your one who only sins when he does not know it is a sin or you just make boo boo's or oopsies..
 
G

Geuty

Guest

It says work out the salvation YOU HAVE ALREADY RECIEVED with fear that you will not be a light.

Where is this scripture in the bible, exactly?

Paul did not fear God, He feared that an action he did would cause his word to be useless..


Oh, and where is this one aslo?

whats amazing is seeing people claim they can do more than what the cross of Christ did, and that the Cross of Christ is not adequate. The people will puff themselves up as something worthy of anything..
I never made this claim, you pull this out of the air to try and down play my responses to your lack of wisdom and blindness... you want salvation in your pocket so you claim that christ's work gives you that.... without conditions. If your ideology was correct the whole world would be saved...wake up.
Mathew 7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for broad is the way which leadeth unto distruction, and many there be which go thereat.
Mathew 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which laedeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
Mathew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheeps clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

Sounds to me like your idea of gloriously saved doesnt fit with the scriptures

Mathew 7:24 Therefore whosoever heareth these saying of mine, and DOETH them, i will liken unto him a wise man, which built his house on a rock.
Mathew 7: and every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and DOETH THEM NOT, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which bulit his house upon the sand

I dont puff myself up because this is not my scripture...it is God's sent down and delivered by Christ and the apostles..so if your offended at me your actually offended at the apostles first then Christ and last God.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I never made this claim, you pull this out of the air to try and down play my responses to your lack of wisdom and blindness... you want salvation in your pocket so you claim that christ's work gives you that.... without conditions. If your ideology was correct the whole world would be saved...wake up.
Mathew 7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for broad is the way which leadeth unto distruction, and many there be which go thereat.
Mathew 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which laedeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
Mathew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheeps clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

Sounds to me like your idea of gloriously saved doesnt fit with the scriptures

Mathew 7:24 Therefore whosoever heareth these saying of mine, and DOETH them, i will liken unto him a wise man, which built his house on a rock.
Mathew 7: and every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and DOETH THEM NOT, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which bulit his house upon the sand

I dont puff myself up because this is not my scripture...it is God's sent down and delivered by Christ and the apostles..so if your offended at me your actually offended at the apostles first then Christ and last God.
No The whole world would not be saved, People like you prove it.

If true FAITH in the work of Christ is required, and so few people have it, but actually more have it in their on deeds (whatever deeds they may be) then how could the whole world be saved.

Your ignorance as to what people believes is truly amazing. but you can still come around there is always hope.

You do puff yourself up if those things are required to eternal life. Because you EARNED IT.

I do those things because my foundation is on the true rock (christ) Not the other way around.

Your foundation is your works (self) Not Christ.
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,826
1,740
113
I was just curious to whether you have read the op yet:Obsession with Confession (1 John 1:9, sin confession) that BenFTW mentioned in post#102.
No I didn't read either one. Too long for my tastes. Is there a Cliff Notes version?
I asked because unless that OP (original post) is read a person will interpret 1st John 1:9 to be talking about sanctification and not understand how we can sin in the light and be forgiven but that scripture is talking about those that are not saved.
+++
1st John 1:9
king James version(KJV)

9.)If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
I asked because unless that OP (original post) is read a person will interpret 1st John 1:9 to be talking about sanctification and not understand how we can sin in the light and be forgiven but that scripture is talking about those that are not saved.
+++
1st John 1:9
king James version(KJV)

9.)If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness
Well even if I had read it, I would still consider the verse you mentioned to be talking about our walk with Christ, i.e., sanctification. John was communicating to believers when he wrote 'we'; he didn't say 'they', meaning unbelievers.

It's really not a question of being forgiven when we sin because all sin has been forgiven. Also, we cannot sin in the light because we cannot sin when we are walking in the spirit. If we sin, we are not walking in the spirit, but darkness. Sanctification requires acknowledging that our mind is in darkness and turning from the darkness back to the light. I don't believe we have to ask for forgiveness because the light is forgiveness. Instead I think we need to thank GOD for his abiding mercy.
 
Last edited:

BenFTW

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2012
4,834
981
113
34
Well even if I had read it, I would still consider the verse you mentioned to be talking about our walk with Christ, i.e., sanctification. John was communicating to believers when he wrote 'we'; he didn't say 'they', meaning unbelievers.

It's really not a question of being forgiven when we sin because all sin has been forgiven. Also, we cannot sin in the light because we cannot sin when we are walking in the spirit. If we sin, we are not walking in the spirit, but darkness. Sanctification requires acknowledging that our mind is in darkness and turning from the darkness back to the light. I don't believe we have to ask for forgiveness because the light is forgiveness. Instead I think we need to thank GOD for his abiding mercy.
All the points you bring up, including the "we" statement of John is addressed in the article I shared, and the subsequent posts: http://christianchat.com/bible-disc...on-1-john-1-9-sin-confession.html#post2240057

If you don't want to give it the time of day, its sort of hard to condense. The basis of the argument is historical and scriptural evidence, that he was speaking to a group known as the Gnostics. He was addressing Gnosticism that held belief that were contrary to our faith. They didn't believe they had sin, for example, therefore John tells them that they would be calling God a liar. They didn't believe Jesus actually came in the flesh because flesh was inherently sinful, but John says to them that they saw, and touched him. A lot of the things said in 1 John looks like it is addressing each belief of Gnosticism if you read a side by side comparison of their beliefs while reading.

Your "we" argument is addressed in a post of mine in the thread I linked but here is a copy/paste of what I shared...

---This is a rhetorical narrative voice which is used in nonfiction. It has the effect of creating a sense of level ground between the narrator and audience by creating an inclusive feeling. There is a separation between us and the subject matter, but we (narrator and audience) are both on the same side of it, approaching it together as equals.

They go on to define it in the form of cooking books. We then put the chicken in the oven... it could be then said of sin confession, that we then confess our sin therefore showing our need for the Savior Jesus Christ. So, John was not so much including himself in the process now, so much as showing the method by which we receive forgiveness. Acknowledge we are sinners in need of a Savior and then repent. Believe.

Also said: The first person plural we-voice is particularly suitable for presenting in front of an audience.
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,826
1,740
113
Well even if I had read it, I would still consider the verse you mentioned to be talking about our walk with Christ, i.e., sanctification. John was communicating to believers when he wrote 'we'; he didn't say 'they', meaning unbelievers.

It's really not a question of being forgiven when we sin because all sin has been forgiven. Also, we cannot sin in the light because we cannot sin when we are walking in the spirit. If we sin, we are not walking in the spirit, but darkness. Sanctification requires acknowledging that our mind is in darkness and turning from the darkness back to the light. I don't believe we have to ask for forgiveness because the light is forgiveness. Instead I think we need to thank GOD for his abiding mercy.
I really think that if someone were to read the whole thing it would give them understanding that John was referring to unbelievers

Snip
"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us"(verse 8).
John is now addressing the belief the Gnostics had regarding sin because they didn't believe it was real and therefore believed they had no sin. The "we" John is using here doesn't refer to believers. He is referring to the Gnostics, who believed they were without sin. Because they claimed to be without sin, then they were only deceiving themselves and the truth (Jesus) was not in them.

However, verse 9 says that "if we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness." In other words, if the Gnostics were to confess they had sins, then God, Who is faithful and righteous, would forgive and cleanse them from their unrighteousness. In the Greek language, the words "forgive" and "cleanse" mean past actions that have results today and will continue to have results in the future. Also, the word "all" used in these verses means all. It doesn't mean that we are cleansed of our past sins and our past unrighteousness, it means we were cleansed of all our unrighteousness. And if God cleanses us from all unrighteousness, then we are cleansed forever!
You see how it's talking to unbelievers and salvation?

And I know it's hard to believe that we sin in the light after salvation.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
All the points you bring up, including the "we" statement of John is addressed in the article I shared, and the subsequent posts: http://christianchat.com/bible-disc...on-1-john-1-9-sin-confession.html#post2240057

If you don't want to give it the time of day, its sort of hard to condense. The basis of the argument is historical and scriptural evidence, that he was speaking to a group known as the Gnostics. He was addressing Gnosticism that held belief that were contrary to our faith. They didn't believe they had sin, for example, therefore John tells them that they would be calling God a liar. They didn't believe Jesus actually came in the flesh because flesh was inherently sinful, but John says to them that they saw, and touched him. A lot of the things said in 1 John looks like it is addressing each belief of Gnosticism if you read a side by side comparison of their beliefs while reading.

Your "we" argument is addressed in a post of mine in the thread I linked but here is a copy/paste of what I shared...

---This is a rhetorical narrative voice which is used in nonfiction. It has the effect of creating a sense of level ground between the narrator and audience by creating an inclusive feeling. There is a separation between us and the subject matter, but we (narrator and audience) are both on the same side of it, approaching it together as equals.

They go on to define it in the form of cooking books. We then put the chicken in the oven... it could be then said of sin confession, that we then confess our sin therefore showing our need for the Savior Jesus Christ. So, John was not so much including himself in the process now, so much as showing the method by which we receive forgiveness. Acknowledge we are sinners in need of a Savior and then repent. Believe.

Also said: The first person plural we-voice is particularly suitable for presenting in front of an audience.
now see what you did, You had to not only bring CONTEXT, but HISTORICAL context and relevance into the equation.

You legalist!!
:p
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
The basis of the argument is historical and scriptural evidence, that he was speaking to a group known as the Gnostics. He was addressing Gnosticism that held belief that were contrary to our faith. They didn't believe they had sin, for example, therefore John tells them that they would be calling God a liar. They didn't believe Jesus actually came in the flesh because flesh was inherently sinful, but John says to them that they saw, and touched him. A lot of the things said in 1 John looks like it is addressing each belief of Gnosticism if you read a side by side comparison of their beliefs while reading.

Your "we" argument is addressed in a post of mine in the thread I linked but here is a copy/paste of what I shared...

---This is a rhetorical narrative voice which is used in nonfiction. It has the effect of creating a sense of level ground between the narrator and audience by creating an inclusive feeling. There is a separation between us and the subject matter, but we (narrator and audience) are both on the same side of it, approaching it together as equals.

They go on to define it in the form of cooking books. We then put the chicken in the oven... it could be then said of sin confession, that we then confess our sin therefore showing our need for the Savior Jesus Christ. So, John was not so much including himself in the process now, so much as showing the method by which we receive forgiveness. Acknowledge we are sinners in need of a Savior and then repent. Believe.

Also said: The first person plural we-voice is particularly suitable for presenting in front of an audience.
I don't believe the person whoever wrote what you based your post on knows what they're talking about.
 
Jan 7, 2015
6,057
78
0
Here is what I've seen the false accusers do in order to slap a false label on a true believer in Jesus Christ who speaks out against sinful behavior. (or how they are to spot a "sinless perfectionist", or "works Salvationism", and to spot a "legalist")

1st here is how they spot of one who is a "sinless perfectionist"......
Matthew 5:48 "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect."

2nd here is how they spot one who preaches "works Salvationism"....
James 2:17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

James 2:20
But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

James 2:26
For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.


And thirdly
, this is how they spot one who preaches "legalism"...

John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

It's a sad time indeed when professing Christians speak out against what the words of God plainly say, just in order to try and justify their own sinful behavior.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
And I know it's hard to believe that we sin in the light after salvation.
It's impossible to sin while walking in the light, i.e. the spirit. That's the whole point; the light keeps us from sinning. When we sin we're kidding ourselves if we think we're walking in the light. That's the whole point of John's writing. The is no occasion to sin when we walk in the light because we are doing GOD's will.

He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him. 1 John 2:10
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
It's impossible to sin while walking in the light, i.e. the spirit. That's the whole point; the light keeps us from sinning. When we sin we're kidding ourselves if we think we're walking in the light. That's the whole point of John's writing. The is no occasion to sin when we walk in the light because we are doing GOD's will.
He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him. 1 John 2:10

While no one will disagree with you here, The issue many have is saying that while we are commiting a sin, we are not Gods children (although disobedient children)

If we were all perfect and never sinned, why would God have to chasten us, and if we have not been chastened by God we are not his true children as scripture clearly states. Then how can Gods true children ever be perfect?
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
Here is what I've seen the false accusers do in order to slap a false label on a true believer in Jesus Christ who speaks out against sinful behavior. (or how they are to spot a "sinless perfectionist", or "works Salvationism", and to spot a "legalist")

1st here is how they spot of one who is a "sinless perfectionist"......
Matthew 5:48 "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect."

2nd here is how they spot one who preaches "works Salvationism"....
James 2:17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

James 2:20
But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

James 2:26
For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.


And thirdly
, this is how they spot one who preaches "legalism"...

John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

It's a sad time indeed when professing Christians speak out against what the words of God plainly say, just in order to try and justify their own sinful behavior.
More hypocritical irony. You come here and falsely accuse "others" of what you yourself are engaged in. Ironic indeed.
 

BenFTW

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2012
4,834
981
113
34
Here is what I've seen the false accusers do in order to slap a false label on a true believer in Jesus Christ who speaks out against sinful behavior. (or how they are to spot a "sinless perfectionist", or "works Salvationism", and to spot a "legalist")

1st here is how they spot of one who is a "sinless perfectionist"......
Matthew 5:48 "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect."

2nd here is how they spot one who preaches "works Salvationism"....
James 2:17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

James 2:20
But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

James 2:26
For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.


And thirdly
, this is how they spot one who preaches "legalism"...

John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

It's a sad time indeed when professing Christians speak out against what the words of God plainly say, just in order to try and justify their own sinful behavior.
Since we are doing copy/paste of what we have written in other threads, I will give you my same answer here.

How do you justify your sinful behavior? You make all those points as if people use it (those points/titles) to excuse sin in their own lives and neglect the points of what the accuser is saying. The accuser is trying to address their sin but not offering them a solution. What good is it to point someone to the Law and not offer a solution to their sin? You only condemn them. You don't offer them life and victory. Point them to Jesus and help them renew their minds to who they are in Him. That is the solution, not beating them over the head with the ten commandments.
 

BenFTW

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2012
4,834
981
113
34
I don't believe the person whoever wrote what you based your post on knows what they're talking about.
I think they, including me, would think the same of you. As I said earlier, you keep going from grace all the way back to some form of self-righteousness (works). Yes, sin confession (for forgiveness) is a work of the flesh and not of faith which is dependent upon Jesus Christ.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
I think they, including me, would think the same of you. As I said earlier, you keep going from grace all the way back to some form of self-righteousness (works). Yes, sin confession (for forgiveness) is a work of the flesh and not of faith which is dependent upon Jesus Christ.
No, I really don't, but if you believe that, it's your cross to bear.