Number two The city in revelation says the city has control of nations and kings. Jerusalem has never that I know of , ruled anyone. Not to mention. revised Rome is said to be the final great power. Jerusalem is not rome. Nor would rome ever allow jerusalem to have that great of power that it could influence other nations under roman tyrany. which is going on at this time.
As with all scripture.
That's because you're viewing it as a 21st century futurist and not as our original hearers saw it.
Jerusalem was literally the city of God. It wouldn't be a stretch for them to assume it literally controlled the nations. That is if you're a Jew at the time it's written.
Your part about the revived roman empire is again, a 21st century presupposition imposed on the text by a futurist perspective.
The original hearers of this would know that the leaders in jerusalem were rejecting God, his prophets apostles and Christians, thus worthy of the coming destruction Jesus told about. This is a full parallel to the oiivet discource.
Remember in the beginning of Rev Jesus tells them these things are SOON to come upon them. To the original hearers soon meant soon, so my interpretation matches better than yours that is 2000 years removed.