Actually you're incorrect about the effect on his doctrine and they are, in fact, gravely important.
His contradictions greatly conflict his doctrine. He is feeding doctrine, daily, post by post and I have no issue with that. Your saying he is not doing this is absolutely false and you're using an unjust balance in your judgment here.
You are nearly on the verge to at least be honest and make a feeble attempt to admit, yes, he made contradictory statements, but you won't totally go there for fear of distancing a colleague by owning the whole truth. That said you're trying to justify when there is no justification; the mistakes and contradictions need to be owned.
As to your lording statement above, and in due respect, it is such a hypocritical accusation it is absurd and unfounded.
His contradictions greatly conflict his doctrine. He is feeding doctrine, daily, post by post and I have no issue with that. Your saying he is not doing this is absolutely false and you're using an unjust balance in your judgment here.
You are nearly on the verge to at least be honest and make a feeble attempt to admit, yes, he made contradictory statements, but you won't totally go there for fear of distancing a colleague by owning the whole truth. That said you're trying to justify when there is no justification; the mistakes and contradictions need to be owned.
As to your lording statement above, and in due respect, it is such a hypocritical accusation it is absurd and unfounded.