Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
D

Discern

Banned
#123,961
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
#123,961
EleventhHour said:
Yes and you are to expose us correct because you dogma of perseverance of the saint states a believer has no choice in the matter of sanctification.

And I am wise to your "professed believer" terminology.

A believer does not practice sin because Jesus within us does not practice sin...it is really a shame Mr Calvin made this error because his false understanding now permeates Churchianity....nuff said.

I am not being made righteous...only Jesus is righteous ...l walk in Him I exemplify Him...I walk in the flesh I exemplify the flesh...is this such a difficult truth concept?

The more we walk in the Spirit the less power/control of the flesh...again simple.

But no....you have to make sin the big issue rather being honest with scripture and agreeing with scripture that the believer who is practicing sin has a faith and grace issue.

I am done with you sir for now because life calls but I an intuitive person and you keep adding credence to my suspicions of who you are.
Click to expand...
I didn’t expose anyone.
 
D

Discern

Banned
#123,964
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
#123,964
VCO said:
Here is where most Christians, forget what was taught about Controversy, which can be a sugar coated argument.


Titus 3:9 (NIV)
9 But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels
about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless.
Click to expand...

Examining myself is a foolish question?
 
D

Discern

Banned
#123,966
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
#123,966
VCO said:
Here is where most Christians, forget what was taught about Controversy, which can be a sugar coated argument.


Titus 3:9 (NIV)
9 But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels
about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless.
Click to expand...
Do you think 123,963 are foolish questions too?
 
D

Discern

Banned
#123,970
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
#123,970
EleventhHour said:
Anyone else agree...but you are coming close to revealing yourself.

Your response to EG on besetting sin...very revealing.
Click to expand...
The definition of besetting reveals that besetting sin is never what I was ever talking about😀
 
D

Discern

Banned
#123,973
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
#123,973
Discern said:
Define besetting. How does it differ from what I have been talking about? Think real hard
Click to expand...
I did ask you. And you answered. And I discerned inconstency in argument. People say “those who are saved do not practice sin” and then say “some who are saved do practice sin”

Law of non contradiction applies here. Both cannot be true. Pick one or the other
 
Melach

Melach

Well-known member
#123,974
Mar 28, 2019
2,055
1,524
113
#123,974
eternally-gratefull said:
So this excuses sin
wow man your scaring me
Click to expand...
it wasnt sin then when they did it man. sin depends on the law. if the law says it at that time its wrong. like back then it was good to bring animal sacrifices to temple but now its no longer good because its different covenant. thats why sometimes things in the o.t. its different

like noah can eat all animals but in leviticus only certain animals. but noah didnt break the law because that wasnt the law for him.. or is it for us either
 
D

Discern

Banned
#123,975
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
#123,975
Discern said:
I did ask you. And you answered. And I discerned inconstency in argument. People say “those who are saved do not practice sin” and then say “some who are saved do practice sin”

Law of non contradiction applies here. Both cannot be true. Pick one or the other
Click to expand...
So is John right in saying what he repeatedly said in his writings? Yes. Everything he said was right.
 
OneOfHis

OneOfHis

Well-known member
#123,976
Mar 24, 2019
1,430
2,209
113
#123,976
Discern said:
The experiment is concluded.
Click to expand...
I disagree, I personally didn't like you pretending to ask a question.... saying it is not a yes or no question... before asking "simple yes or no".. me then explaining why it is not a yes or no question as well as giving an honest answer.... you then choosing wether my answer was yes or no... followed by you saying "it was not a yes or no question"...



If you look to the last post where I addressed the tactics of the dishonest. You DEFINITELY show more than one of them.
 
D

Discern

Banned
#123,977
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
#123,977
Melach said:
it wasnt sin then when they did it man. sin depends on the law. if the law says it at that time its wrong. like back then it was good to bring animal sacrifices to temple but now its no longer good because its different covenant. thats why sometimes things in the o.t. its different

like noah can eat all animals but in leviticus only certain animals. but noah didnt break the law because that wasnt the law for him.. or is it for us either
Click to expand...
Take a look at 2 Samuel 12:8. You might find something there.
 
Melach

Melach

Well-known member
#123,978
Mar 28, 2019
2,055
1,524
113
#123,978
Discern said:
but you cannot say someone is morally upright if they reject Jesus
Click to expand...
i can and will. what we mean by morally upright is that they are in our perspective "ok" regular people. like they arent evil as can be.

take example some single guy in his 40s who works as a car mechanic. he goes to work, goes to the store, goes home is on computer watches maybe tv or has coffee with friends after work.
take example some family guy in his 40s who does same things plus family stuff

so yes these people are morally upright people they dont steal they dont do anything crazy against the law like that. thats what i call morally upright. that doesnt mean they are saved many unsaved people behave amazingly good like buddhists and mormons etc.
 
D

Discern

Banned
#123,979
Dec 6, 2019
1,206
691
113
#123,979
OneOfHis said:
I disagree, I personally didn't like you pretending to ask a question.... saying it is not a yes or no question... me then explaining why it is not a yes or no question as well as giving an honest answer.... you then choosing wether my answer was yes or no... followed by you saying "it was not a yes or no question"...



If you look to the last post where I addressed the tactics of the dishonest. You DEFINITELY show more than one of them.
Click to expand...
.

You said both propositions were possible. Therefore you said yes to both. But as originally framed, it was not a yes or no question. Was it?
 
Melach

Melach

Well-known member
#123,980
Mar 28, 2019
2,055
1,524
113
#123,980
Discern said:
Take a look at 2 Samuel 12:8. You might find something there.
Click to expand...
yes what about it? i agree with the verse but im horrified by it at the same time. ive seen that verse here before and i read it and was shocked that God would just give wives to someone like that. doesnt the wife get a vote? :D God is God wife opinion not important
 
You must log in or register to reply here.