That's because OSAS is false.
The OSAS advocates may use the novice was "never really saved to begin with" excuse.
But how can he be called a novice/new convert/new believer if he was never really saved/always an unbeliever/never converted?
There you have it, SeaBass just making things up; no scripture.
I don't recall anyone who believes in Eternal Security using the word "novice."
Now SeaBass, if you have such a statement, you may quote it; but I haven't used such a term in my posts here. You ask "how can he be called . . . /new believer if he was never really saved/"
You make up a straw man. Show me any Bible verse whatsoever where it is said that a man who believed in the Lord Jesus as Savior later stopped believing in Him as Savior.
More SeaBass in Wonderland:
And how can he fall into condemnation if he were always in condemnation? Logically one must first be OUT of condemnation (saved) in order to fall into condemnation.
No scripture quoted, just Seabass saying things.
Unsaved persons indeed are under condemnation.
And for saved persons, "There is therefore now no condemnation."
It is God who justifies, who is he who condemns; is it SeaBass?
You have no scripture whatsoever to prove that a person who trust Christ as SAvior is ever condemned to the Lake of Fire.
Of course whenever anyone sins, that sin is judged to be sin.
Yet we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the Righteous, who made propitiation for our sins. (1 John 2). Thus He can say, "Yes, Atwood sinned, but I paid for Atwood's sin on the cross. Now let us take him to the woodshed for a little loving correction."
Beware of insisting on translation words more severely than necessary. No scripture is of private interpretation; it all goes together. Since scripture is abundantly clear that the saved do not perish, but have everlasting life; interpret everything else in harmony with that.
All persons will have their works judged; believers may get chastisement in this life, and lose reward at the Bema Judgment Seat of Christ. But they won't be cast into the Lake of Fire after the Great White Throne Judgment at which they never appeared anyway.
And don't tell me that the Lord is going to throw a widow into the Lake of Fire for having taken a vow of celibacy, then deciding she wants to get married. Breaking a vow indeed receives a negative judgment; but not a condemnation to the Lake of Fire if the person is a child of God. In fact such a woman took a vow contrary to God's will at the getgo, since if she has a sexual itch & lacks the gift of celibacy, she stands under the commandment to have her own husband (1 Cor 7:1-2)
The whole thing was so outrageous that Paul forbad the practice of putting young women widows on the church roll.
So there you have it: a widow who was saved and escaped the condemnation to the Lake of Fire, she vowed a vow of celibacy & broke it to get married. The vow-breaking gets a negative judgment, for which "condemnation" is too strong a translation; but this is not losing salvation (an oxymoron).