FreeGrace2 said:
There is NOTHING about taking glorified believers to heaven. That's what you can't prove.
Aren't you the one mocking trying to prove a negative? What do you call this mess of yours here?
Basically, your ludicrous defense here is this:
Since there "is nothing about not taking glorified believers to heaven, we can SAFELY ASSUME/PRESUME/INSINUATE that there is sometning about taking glorified believers to heaven".
That is just stupid.
You are beyond funny. Sad, though, as well.
btw, in Henry Morris' commentary "The Revelation Record" he believes that Rev 14 is about God's wrath, as do I. And NONE of the verses in that chapter are about a resurrection or "rapture". Or he would have mentioned it.
And he is unfortunately a pretribber and is forced to rip the single resurrection into stages, like all pretribbers.
He calls the "first resurrection" of Rev 20:5 and "final first resurrection".
It's just too funny for words. He should know better.
There is NOTHING about taking glorified believers to heaven. That's what you can't prove.
Aren't you the one mocking trying to prove a negative? What do you call this mess of yours here?
Basically, your ludicrous defense here is this:
Since there "is nothing about not taking glorified believers to heaven, we can SAFELY ASSUME/PRESUME/INSINUATE that there is sometning about taking glorified believers to heaven".
That is just stupid.
Lol
It is parody. Using your same stupid argument back at you.
I am using YOUR stupid argument back at you.
YES...YOU NOW GET IT.... it took some doing, but out of your own mouth, when you are on the other side of your own ridiculous methods.....it reeks of stupidity as you indicate.
Yes
Your deal is beyond stupid
THANKS for admitting it finally.
It is parody. Using your same stupid argument back at you.
I am using YOUR stupid argument back at you.
YES...YOU NOW GET IT.... it took some doing, but out of your own mouth, when you are on the other side of your own ridiculous methods.....it reeks of stupidity as you indicate.
Yes
Your deal is beyond stupid
THANKS for admitting it finally.
btw, in Henry Morris' commentary "The Revelation Record" he believes that Rev 14 is about God's wrath, as do I. And NONE of the verses in that chapter are about a resurrection or "rapture". Or he would have mentioned it.
And he is unfortunately a pretribber and is forced to rip the single resurrection into stages, like all pretribbers.
He calls the "first resurrection" of Rev 20:5 and "final first resurrection".
It's just too funny for words. He should know better.