dishonesty? You did not deny it now did you. Since you did not deny it I asumed you were admiting it. Maybe if you would not make up stuff which does not make sense. there would be no question of honesty or anything else.
Oh dear.
Dude, do you not know what a figurative word is? It is using a KNOWN WORD to explain a spiritual truth. You would not use the word drag figuratively unless you mean DRAG.
Huh? are you saying I believe we are physically dragged by God? Like...huh?
Semantics.
If someone is injured on a battlefield and theyre buddy dragged them to safety is it FORCED or AGAINST THEIR WILL?
It's just a word man...and its a greek word anyway.
The way your argument relies so heavily on semantics just shows its weakness.
WHO CARES what word is used? I still dont believe we are FORCED against our will to love God. The very idea is absurd.
It is irressistable LOVE because we want it so much.
It baffles me how you dont get this.
ἕλκω (and in later writ. ἑλκύω also [Veitch s. v.; W. 86 (82)]); impf. εἷλκον (Acts 21:30); fut. ἑλκύσω [ἐλκ. Rec.elz Jn. 12:32]; 1 aor. εἵλκυσα ([inf. (Jn. 21:6) ἑλκύσαι Rbez elz L T WH, -κῦσαι Rst G Tr]; cf. Bttm. Ausf. Spr. § 114, vol. ii. p. 171; Krüger § 40 s. v.; [Lob. Paralip. p. 35 sq.; Veitch s. v.]); fr. Hom. down; Sept. for מָשַׁךְ; to draw;
1. prop.: τὸ δίκτυον, Jn. 21:6, 11; μάχαιραν, i. e. unsheathe, Jn. 18:10 (Soph. Ant. 1208 (1233), etc.); τινά, a person forcibly and against his will (our drag, drag off), ἔξω τοῦ ἱεροῦ, Acts 21:30; εἰς τὴν ἀγοράν, Acts 16:19; εἰς κριτήρια, Jas. 2:6 (πρὸς τὸν δῆμον, Arstph. eqq. 710; and in Latin, as Caes. b. g. 1, 53 (54, 4) cum trinis catenis vinctus traheretur, Liv. 2, 27 cum a lictoribus Jam traheretur).
2. metaph. to draw by inward power, lead, impel: Jn. 6:44 (so in Grk. also; as ἐπιθυμίας … ἑλκούσης ἐπὶ ἡδονάς, Plat. Phaedr. p. 238 a.; ὑπὸ τῆς ἡδονῆς ἑλκόμενοι, Acl. h. a. 6, 31; likewise 4 Macc. 14:13; 15:8 (11). trahit sua quemque voluptas, Vergil, ecl. 2, 65); πάντας ἑλκύσω πρὸς ἐμαυτόν, I by my moral, my spiritual, influence will win over to myself the hearts of all, Jn. 12:32. Cf. Mey. on Jn. 6:44; [Trench § xxi. COMP.: ἐξ-έλκω.]*
Thayer, J. H. (1889). A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament: Being Grimm's Wilke's Clavis Novi Testamenti (204–205). New York: Harper & Brothers.
Why use the word drag then? God did not drag me anywhere. He drew by inward power, he lead me bu his love, his promises and his work to where I needed to be, he did not have to DRAG me, He won me over by his love. I willingly followed him. BUT I HAD TO CHOSE TO FOLLOW.
OK! Use whatever word you want. It's still Gods power that does 'IT 'and if He does 'IT' you WILL come to Him out of your own freewill. He DOMINATES your freewill. Dont you think God effects your freewill?
Your entire semantic argument is a giant strawman.
No what is sickening is that you think God forces us to chose him, and forces those whome he does not chose to NOT chose him.
Why do you keep lying and using the word FORCE?
Those whom He gives understanding and faith come to Him out of they're own free will. Every single time.
Those whom He does NOT give these gifts DONT, out of their own freewill.
Stop using the strawman...its boring.
I do give God the glory. My faith is not in MY WORK. It is in THE WORK OF GOD. I GET NO CREDIT.
But you get the credit for making correct decisions right?
I do. But I don't make God a dictator. I make him a loving father. Who though his love and leading drew me to him. If He did not. I would have nothing to trust in.
Dictator = Strawman.
Semantics = Strawman.
NO ITS NOT. Your saying HE DRAGS YOU. YOU DO NOT DRAG A WILLING PERSON>
Semantics = strawman.
God dragged, drew, impelled me...rescued me....dragged me out of the world...like I was injured...dead in my sins. the choice by the KJV writers to use the word drag is perfectly reasonable. Notwithstanding the spurious objections from nitpicky Calvinist HATERS.
It all means the same thing.
Hey, I am just using your example. Not everyone will see the person I love as attractive. Like I said use a different example. your example stinks. I know many calvanists that use MUCH MUCH better examples and figuratives than what your using.
You want me to use a different example cuz you have no answer to this one. Again you talk of OTHER PEOPLE when I am asking YOU.
Those who see or don't see. is it not a free will choice to see??
YES it is!!!
Is our freewill influenced by God?
Dominated by Him in fact?
And again you will not get a direct answer. YOUR QUESTION SUCKS!! and DOES NOT SUPPORT YOUR THEORY!
Coz you cant answer.
Thats interesting. I think of girl I knew in HS at my church who I loved, and she continued to draw me. but I did not pursue her because I was afraid of rejection. I know MANY MANY people who have done the same thing
Oh how little you know..
You didnt pursue her BUT YOU STILL LOVED HER!!
You didnt stop loving her did you? Just coz you fealt fear?
Why did the prodigal son leave the love and blessings of his father? Why do men leave the love of their wives for a sexual encounter with someone who could never give them what their wife has?? Next??
Probably coz they lacked TRUE LOVE. And you keep making this about other people when I'm asking about you.
Ducking diving dodging.
I DID FOR 5 YEARS! God had to take me to my knees to bring him back to him.
Don't you think when you come up with this stuff??
OK! thanks for finally answering. So you took a break.
Did you know exactly the same truths about God before you took the break and after?
Even if you did...you DIDNT turn your back on God. you came back.
You are just proving my point.
Semantics = Strawman.
No one is saying we are forced against our will. Its just a word, one of many words that could be used to translate the greek. Take yer pick. It's still God who does 'IT' and those who 'IT' happens to WILL come to Him because of true irresistable LOVE.
CALVANISM SAYS I AM DRAGGED. And those who do not come to Christ ARE NOT EVEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT BELIEVE ANYWAY. Unless your a hyper calvanist, this is what you believe. I have been here done that with to many calvanists. who teach regeneration happens BEFORE FAITH.
I dont care what calvinism teaches. I'm not calvinist. Lets stick to what I'm teaching. The free will coming to God of His sheep because of irressistable love for Jesus.
what does predestination have to do with assurance? My assurance is based on what Christ did. not what I did. My faith comes and Goes. I have even left God for 5 years. But I never doubted my assurance. My assurance is based on Christ and HIS Promise. Not on me! Person who rejects Christ either does not believe in this assurance, or does not think he needs it. HE STILL MADE A FREE WILL DECISION TO REJECT
Pedestination = assurance
**yawn** yes its free will. No one has denied free will. Boooooooring.
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.
32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
Your argument is with God and Paul. Not me!
You didnt respond to my points about the scripture you posted.
Here it is again. I'd appreciate a reply. Or you could concede you were wrong.
By the way,,,knowing right from wrong does not EQUAL 'seeing the beauty of God'. No siree.....not even close. Romans 1 doesnt support your position in the slightest. Romans is written to (shock horror) Romans and also greeks who knew of the one true God, they had an aquaintance with Him but that doesnt mean they were Gods sheep. The whole chapter is talking about those who have an idea of God but who get lost in their philosophies (very popular with the heathens).
Yep God did. BECAUSE GOD DOES NOT FORCE ANYONE AGAINST THERE FREE WILL
No one said He did. Not one of us.
STRAWMAN.