problem related to praying in tongues
- Thread starter TheLearner
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
for not being JW, you chose a man, whose research is displayed all over the JW's website.
Ulrich Luz : https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/wp20151201/
incredible, how many answers have you given that i can trace back to the JW.
i'll just leave it at this then, what you appear to be, is very well hidden because you deny it.
but, you don't deny rejecting Jesus as God.
you might as well be JW minus the arch angel baloney.
Ulrich Luz : https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/wp20151201/
incredible, how many answers have you given that i can trace back to the JW.
i'll just leave it at this then, what you appear to be, is very well hidden because you deny it.
but, you don't deny rejecting Jesus as God.
you might as well be JW minus the arch angel baloney.
I have never heard of Ulrich Luz.
Oh, I see what you did. You saw the footnote at the bottom of the commentary and "shot from the hip" and assumed all the information in that commentary came from him. It doesn't.
I have never been to that link before, and I saw nothing about "in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" at that link.
What do I deny?
I believe the Bible. I believe Jesus Christ. I believe Paul.
Again, you seem determined to lump me in with the JWs. If it boosts your ego, or feel that it somehow puts me down, do whatever floats your boat.
Oh, I see what you did. You saw the footnote at the bottom of the commentary and "shot from the hip" and assumed all the information in that commentary came from him. It doesn't.
I have never been to that link before, and I saw nothing about "in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" at that link.
What do I deny?
I believe the Bible. I believe Jesus Christ. I believe Paul.
Again, you seem determined to lump me in with the JWs. If it boosts your ego, or feel that it somehow puts me down, do whatever floats your boat.
We've been through this. God's Word is His logos. His will, plan, purposes. A logos is not a "he." God's logos was made flesh when God miraculously caused Mary to conceive His human Messiah, Jesus Christ. Another way to think about it might be that God's plan materialized. It came into being. It came into fruition when He caused Mary to conceive. Jesus Christ is called the Word of God (Rev. 19:13) because he is God's plan that came into being.
Pay attention to the words in various contexts and if you are seeking truth and reality you will recognize that the word glosse in the Greek means "language"
Tongue is just the archaic word for language.
Example: He spoke in his native tongue.
Here is the same word used by John ( 1 John 3:19)
18My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth. KJV
Read Corinthians and use the word "languages" instead of "tongues" and it is undeniable that Paul was addressing known earthly languages if one reads the letter with correct hermeneutics.
We have information now, this is not the turn of the last century where people were fooled by false teachings.
Tongue is just the archaic word for language.
Example: He spoke in his native tongue.
Here is the same word used by John ( 1 John 3:19)
18My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth. KJV
Read Corinthians and use the word "languages" instead of "tongues" and it is undeniable that Paul was addressing known earthly languages if one reads the letter with correct hermeneutics.
We have information now, this is not the turn of the last century where people were fooled by false teachings.
I am well aware that "tongues" is languages. If someone said they "speak in languages" there may be some question as to what they were talking about. But when someone is talking about "speaking in tongues," it is usually understood that they are talking about the manifestation of the gift of the Holy Spirit.
No it isn't.
oh, the irony.....
No it isn't.
oh, the irony.....