And all believed in the taking up of the church. The teachers that you proclaim believed that they were living in the tribulation. Your theology is no older than his.
actually, no they didn't.
Hippolytus taught futurism... not historicism.
Treatise on Christ and Antichrist, 27,28
"As these things, then, are in the future, and as the ten toes of the image
are equivalent to (so many) democracies, and the ten horns of the fourth
beast are distributed over ten kingdoms, let us look at the subject a little
more closely, and consider these matters as in the clear light of a personal
survey. The golden head of the image and the lioness denoted the
Babylonians; the shoulders and arms of silver, and the bear, represented
the Persians and Medes; the belly and thighs of brass, and the leopard,
meant the Greeks, who held the sovereignty from Alexander’s time; the
legs of iron, and the beast dreadful and terrible, expressed the Romans,
who hold the sovereignty at present; the toes of the feet which were part
clay and part iron, and the ten horns, were emblems of the kingdoms that
are yet to rise; the other little horn that grows up among them meant the
Antichrist in their midst; the stone that smites the earth and brings
judgment upon the world was Christ."
rergardless of them being futurist or historicist or postmillennialist, they still taught the most important lesson that post-tribulation teaches today: endurance and perseverance through tribulation... not some escapist fantasy before facing tribulation, as pre-tribulation and dispensationalism teaches. The doctrine of these teachers have more credibility than your doctrine, because what they taught has been carried out and taught all throughout history...
it's seen within the early teachings of Catholicism
within the teachings of orthodoxy
within the teachings of the Protestant Reformers... that was when you got your Historcist viewpoint. it was the Protestant Reformers that believed the pope was Antichrist, and the Roman Catholic Church was the was the whore of Babylon.
your pre-trib doctrine has utterly no foundation whatsoever in the entire history of the church prior to 1827, when Edward Irving began to teach it in his Catholic-Apostolic church in Scotland.
YES, they believed in a taking up of the church... SO DO I.
however, they also believed they would suffer at the hands of Antichrist before the glorious appearing of Jesus Christ...
they also believed in the Six Day Theory, which says that a thousand years on earth is like a day to God in Heaven... it teaches that we would be on earth for 6,000 years before Jesus Christ would return. Commodianus, Irenaeus, Cyprian, Methodius, Lactantius, and Theophilus taught this... they knew they would be on this earth for the reign of Antichrist, and as such, they continued to teach perseverance and endurance.
they never taught an imminent return, as pre-trib does today... they taught expectancy.
your man-made doctrine holds no ground whatsoever against the teachings of Christ.