REFORMED?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#81
I am re-posting this as I didn't get to edit it at the end and it was jumbled together:


Brother MarcR, I realize I got snarky last evening with you. My apologies brother!


Now as to nehemiah6 I am still awaiting proof of your claim that Spurgeon preached or taught that other than the elect are saved, or however you put it. You need to be backing up your claim. I know for certain it's false, but am expecting;

1) You to take something out of context he stated (kind of how you do with Scripture) or;

2) Just avoid it altogether and make pretense that what you said is true when you know it isn't true.

3) Just more arguing, and offerings of unsubstantiated claims which the naïve will accept as being true when it is false.

Oh, and for the record, Paul expected none other to be saved, because none other than His chosen will be saved.

But this first: The duplicity of folks who are against biblical election is remarkable. You teach a person becomes elect when they choose God, which is false, mind you, then you teach that people other than the elect get saved which is also incorrect and false doctrine.

Hopefully you can see the sheer error and double standards you employ here: If the latter aren't elect, but believe in the same way, how does that, in your economy make them not elect since by choosing they then become elect? It doesn't, it is senseless and both teachings are fictitious.

Then you hold to yet another glaring error in that you teach "God looked down through time and chose those who He knew would choose Him."

See the error there as well? How are any "non-elect" in that group? There cannot be even any non-elect being saved in that teaching either, even though your entire premise is false.

Your hermeneutics and teachings are completely inconsistent, and have to be so in order to support your free will idol and doctrines against election and predestination, a teaching you are fearful of that is completely biblical. The fact remains that you are more secure in what you did, thinking you made the decision to elect yourself and choose God, than in the fact that God chose based upon nothing in us, and for nothing we would or would not do, but solely according to His purpose; note 1 Corinthians 1:26-31; Romans 9:11; Romans 8:28 &c.

Anyhow, back to Paul, who expected none other than the elect to be saved:

Think over what I say, for the Lord will give you understanding in everything. Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead, the offspring of David, as preached in my gospel, for which I am suffering, bound with chains as a criminal. But the word of God is not bound! Therefore I endure everything for the sake of the elect, that they also may obtain the salvation that is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.- 2 Timothy 2:7-10.

The fact remains, only those whom God has chosen will come to salvation, even though they are condemned and under His wrath prior to experiencing conversion; John 3:17ff, Ephesians 2:3&c. This is why we preach the Gospel because God has His sheep out there whom He elected prior to the foundation of the world, Acts 18:10; John 11:51-52; Ephesians 1; 2 Thessalonians 2:13.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
#82
It is an honest disagreement on the definition of a word that has multiple definitions.

A perversion would of necessity involve an intent to deceive or twist a meaning to suit one's purposes.

I don't see that from them. I believe they hold their view in sincerity however wrong they may be.
The issue here is that pervert is a hot word that has an inherently offensive character.

mistake is a neutral word that invites discussion.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
#83
Atoning sacrifice

An interesting aspect of the atoning sacrifice was it was applied to the general sin of Israel,
not for a specific sin. Though this sacrifice was given, as a covering of grace it did not save
those who rebelled against God.

Equally the sacrifice did not extend to sins outside the people of God.
John can therefore be easily miss read to mean the sins covered are worldwide forgiven, rather
than when brought into the Kingdom are covered.

There are similar verses that can be easily applied incorrectly.
No condemnation, included for those walking in the flesh.
Perfect like God in all aspects not just loving ones enemies.
Anything outside faith is sin, rather than anything banded by faith is sin.

The trouble with open ended phrases, is the boundaries are not specified so the unwise
take this as authority to have no boundaries.

Jesus said if you believe you will be saved, therefore any measure of belief no matter how
small at any point in your life, makes you saved from then on.

If ones faith is founded on desparation, looking for chinks to squeeze in ones theology, you
are not listening to Jesus and His core points He repeats time and again.
Love God, love your neighbour, love your brother and sister, get right with everyone.

Speak from an open heart, let everything you say be true, open and honest.
The light has come to show all the acts of man for what they are, good or deceived and
evil.
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#84
Sorry fella it is true.

What is untrue is your misunderstanding and resultant doctrine.

He didn't die for every mans sin who have ever lived.

That is, unless you're a Universalist. That must be it, you're a Universalist, and therefore following your beliefs logically He paid the penalty of sin for everyone who has ever lived, so all are in as far as heaven, their sins are paid for.
You do have a point there, Jesus didn't die for all who have lived but died for all who believe in Him by their own faith.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#85
You do have a point there, Jesus didn't die for all who have lived but died for all who believe in Him by their own faith.
Thanks.

Almost, but not quite, we don't possess this faith.

Biblical faith is a gift from God, it is not a persons own faith, instead it is external, supernatural, coming from God; Romans 10:17; Romans 12:3; Acts 3:16; Ephesians 1:19. Not all men have faith; 2 Thessalonians 3:2.
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#86
If you want to discuss it you can PM me. Why cant you just accept my apology and keep it moving? The edit time is up for it.
every thread has to be about him

every

single

thread

it's not fun if he can't give you a dust down in public

he needs an audience
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
#87
It is an honest disagreement on the definition of a word that has multiple definitions.

A perversion would of necessity involve an intent to deceive or twist a meaning to suit one's purposes.

I don't see that from them. I believe they hold their view in sincerity however wrong they may be.

I agree with you. Most people are not driven by evil but by circumstance and their perspective.
If they come across a view that fits there current state, they will jump on it as a real affirmation
they are right. Sadly unless they learn grace and charity, it can become an error, where others
are evil alone to disagree.

This is where loving your enemies really comes in. Understanding and loving others means going
into their world and seeing things from their perspective. There is always a risk one might find
one is wrong, but surely that is a good thing, and brings glory to God, as our walk is to walk in
the truth and we accept we are redeemed sinners who are very frail and susceptible to deception.

God bless you
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#88
That is not true. He died for everyone. Anyone can become one of his people by choosing to believe on him.

John 3:
16) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

Rev 22:
17) And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.
what you are looking at, shrume, is a hyper-calvinist

people need to understand that what is believed, colors what is said and said to others

apparently rudeness, snarkiness and derailing every thread he can, is part of his belief 'system'

it's boring, obnoxious and he loves the attention
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
#89
Yes, it is derogatory, and given your history of being anti-cal, well, what else would I gather from your post? You seriously didn't know "infamous" to be derogatory in nature? I find that quite difficult to believe bro.
My kids say this about lots of words I use, "I did not know", so unless you are exposed to
the words use, one would never know. It is not a big problem, lol, unless you actually believe
they are lying, which I know certain paranoid people certainly keep on thinking.
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#90
Thanks.

Almost, but not quite, we don't possess this faith.

Biblical faith is a gift from God, it is not a persons own faith, instead it is external, supernatural, coming from God; Romans 10:17; Romans 12:3; Acts 3:16; Ephesians 1:19. Not all men have faith; 2 Thessalonians 3:2.
Ok do you recall the time when you received the faith, what did you feel that was the defining moment?
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#91
Ok do you recall the time when you received the faith, what did you feel that was the defining moment?
I heard the Gospel, and realized I believed it, and in what Christ has done for me. Then I realized I was forgiven all my wicked sin and was born again.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
#92
1 Jn 2:2
2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
KJV

Jn 1:29
29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
KJV


All sins of every person saved or unsaved were forgiven through Jesus' sacrifice of Himself on the cross.

The unsaved are those who reject Jesus' sacrifice on the cross.

Jesus said " ye have not chosen me; but, I have chosen You." Soverign election! Jn 15:16

Jesus also said " whosoever will may come" man's freewill! Rv 22:17 my paraphrase.

How can these two statements from Jesus be simultaneously true?

I believe that God, in His divine sovereignty chooses on the basis of foreknowledge of who will willingly accept Jesus' sacrifice on their behalf.
My view on the sin issue....Jesus paid the entire sin debt of humanity upon the cross, sin is no longer the issue.....faith into Jesus is the issue.....the sacrifice of Christ which covers all sin is preemptive and applied unto ALL who exercise genuine saving faith....if one dies without said faith and salvation they are judged by the law and condemned because the sacrifice of Christ has not been applied by the blood.......

When I see the blood I will pass over you.

No blood applied, they will not be passed over in judgment and condemnation.......
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
#93
what you are looking at, shrume, is a hyper-calvinist

people need to understand that what is believed, colors what is said and said to others

apparently rudeness, snarkiness and derailing every thread he can, is part of his belief 'system'

it's boring, obnoxious and he loves the attention
In p4t most believers are probably not saved, so he feels like he is among enemies.
If you use open questioning language, that is a sure sign for him, you are possessed
and evil, lol. In the world of these guys, once labelled you might as well accept you
should be put against the wall and shot.

My first encounter was a full verbal assault followed by any accusation he could invent,
so expect nothing less. But once you know the nature of the individual, gauntlets work
very well, as they protect the heart and the hands.

I had to pick up a frightened young hedge hog, they really saved the day for both
parties. :)
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#94
I heard the Gospel, and realized I believed it, and in what Christ has done for me. Then I realized I was forgiven all my wicked sin and was born again.
Ok so the realization you had was that of your own free will?
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#95
My view on the sin issue....Jesus paid the entire sin debt of humanity upon the cross, sin is no longer the issue.....faith into Jesus is the issue.....
I hear what you are saying bro, but the fact remains, their sins have already been paid for, according to what you are teaching, specifically those who do not believe. It all sounds OK until we look at it thoroughly and via the character of God: A just God would not make a person pay a debt in eternal hell which has already been paid for. In fact a just God can not do that.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#96
Ok so the realization you had was that of your own free will?
I used to believe that it was of free will, of choosing until I realized no one is free, and none can come to God unless He draws them. We are unable. All that are drawn are saved. But God made me willing in the day of His power; Psalm 110:3. It is not unlike God to cause us to will for Him; Philippians 2:13. He causes us to walk in His ways; Ezekiel 36:27; He also causes (makes) us to lie down in green pastures; Psalm 23:2. We are rebellious to God, He does all the good in us.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
#97
I hear what you are saying bro, but the fact remains, their sins have already been paid for, according to what you are teaching, specifically those who do not believe. It all sounds OK until we look at it thoroughly and via the character of God: A just God would not make a person pay a debt in eternal hell which has already been paid for.
This logic summarises why the debt model is flawed and wrong.
Sin does not create a debt, it creates harm and death.

To put the effects of sin right takes great cost. To be thrown into hell is not paying
the debt for sin, it is getting rid of something that does not work and can never be fixed.

We have a charge of sin over us, which is removed when we are remade and changed,
which means we no longer walk in the ways of sin but righteousness. It is this walk
and the forgiveness of God that means the charge is removed.

The charge is not just removed while the sin continues. That would be pointless and
denial of love, purity and holiness, but this is exactly the theology of some.

Are they saved and deceived, or never really saved in the first place? I have no clue
but certainly what is being preached is wrong and deception leading to unresolved and
unrepentant sin while claiming to follow.
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#98
I was NOT trying to represent a church! I was trying to confirm or correct my understanding of Church history for no other reason than a love of history.
Sorry if I misunderstood you but you made a reference in your OP which seemed to be about you ( recognizing ) with a certain type of teaching that seemed to be represented by certain denomination. I took "recognizing" to mean your agreement with what you are trying to confirm so as to be "understood" as represented by those denomination.

I did not read your post rightly that it was about confirming church history; not about you wishing to confirm those denomination as in agreement with your beliefs. Sorry.

Because of a recent conversation I thought it might be interesting to post this thread.

Based on my understanding [or perhaps misunderstanding] of Church history I have come to recognize 4 major doctrinal distinctives that differentiate the denominations founded on pre-Reformation teachings from those denominations founded on Reformation teachings.

I am not looking to offend anyone; I'm looking to confirm or correct my understanding [or lack thereof]!

1) Believer's baptism by immersion not required for Salvation
2) Eternal security of the believer
3) rejection of literal trans-substantiation
4) congregational government of the church

Those denominations founded on pre-Reformation teachings include but are not limited to:

The Christian Church, The Baptists, Christian Missionary Alliance, Evangelical Free, Mennonite, In Faith, & Mission Covenant
.
 

1ofthem

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
3,729
1,921
113
#99
[FONT=Helvetica Neue, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Sorry to any of y'all who want to exclude people and leave people out for whatever reason, but I'm pretty sure scripture makes it clear that he did die for all...However, it is up to each and everyone to believe and accept it or not. He took the sins of the whole world upon him, and atoned for all. He paid the price but we have to accept it or not. He does not make anyone accept it and he does not turn any away...

[/FONT][SUP]2 Corinthians 5[/SUP]
[SUP]14 [/SUP]For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead:
[SUP]15 [/SUP]And that he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again.

 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
I used to believe that it was of free will, of choosing until I realized no one is free, and none can come to God unless He draws them. We are unable. All that are drawn are saved. But God made me willing in the day of His power; Psalm 110:3. It is not unlike God to cause us to will for Him; Philippians 2:13. He causes us to walk in His ways; Ezekiel 36:27; He also causes (makes) us to lie down in green pastures; Psalm 23:2. We are rebellious to God, He does all the good in us.
Ok so how do you feel on how sin came to be in the world, the bible teaches it was through Adam and Eve, was that a rebellious choice on their own?