And then you go on to talk about flopping on the floor and acting crazily. I've rarely heard or seen Charismatics claim cessationists believe the Bible is a part of the trinity, if at all. 'Doesn't believe in the gifts'-- I've probably heard that. It's inaccurate-- doesn't believe some gifts operate now is more accurate, usually. Though there are cessationists who will claim there is no more charismata. This is a rather bleak and ignorant position, IMO, since teaching, exhortation, and service are gifts. I suppose they think we are left with only carnal energies to work for God, or just haven't thought it through. But that is not a typical position.
I have known Charismatics who seemed to think it was spiritual to shake and act weird. There was a movement of that in the early 1990's. Be that as it may, there are things in scripture like priests not being able to minister when the kavod of God was present, or the soldiers falling down or Daniel being weak after a visionary experience. If you were praying with someone and that person fell down, would you be out of order?
The vast majority of Pentecostal churches I've been in have not had people shake or flop around. That's not the norm.
As far as disorder goes, I spent many years in the Assemblies of God (A/G) growing up and I went to an independant 'full gospel' church for many years. Someone would speak out in tongues, and another would interpret. One of the churches i attended (we moved quite a bit) had teaching against just speaking in tongues without interpretation. I just considered that an odd Charismatic practice. Some of the Charismatic groups, particularly WOF, seem to take one verse or two out of I Corinthians 14 about speaking in tongues and how edifying it is to the individual, but I wonder if they never study out the whole chapter. Other churches don't do that.
Now some of the Pentecostal churches, particularly the ones that started in the Appalachian region had been Holiness churches before the Azusa Street Revival, and they had a custom of everyone praying at the same time when they prayed. Maybe it had to do with Acts 4 where they prayed. I've heard that used as an argument, that they prayed at the same time. In the A/G churches I grew up in, I didn't see that. Some of the churches that pray at the same time do that in tongues, too, and take Paul's words in I Corinthians about interpretation just to apply to messages spoken out to the congregation, and some of the A/Gs do that too, apparently.
Historically, Pentecostals understood 'tongues' to be languages. I found The Apostolic Faith newsletter from the early 1900's, and there many testimonies of people identifying tongues as languages they knew. Someone who was there said that is what drew the crowds, with people hearing their own languages 'in tongues.' There are many accounts of this in the A/G also, with the missionaries. One missionary was trying to decide how to transliterate Jesus' name in the target language in the Bible when he was on furlough in the US, and he heard someone speak in tongues in that language and use one of the pronunciations he was considering. I haven't experienced it myself, but I have known several people who have either spoken in tongues and someone understood the language or heard a language they knew 'in tongues.'
Of course, I think most Pentecostals who consider such things and the teaching of scripture would allow for speaking in tongues to be 'tongues of angels.'
From what I have read, the early Charismatics in the US had the same understanding of what tongues is. Some linguists have labeled some kind of artificial language as 'glossalalia'. Some Christians use that term without knowing it is meant to mean a fake language, since it is made of terms used in the Biblical passages. I am not sure where the idea of tongues as some kind of spiritual language no one understands came in as a teaching. Maybe it's WOF. I think there are also academic theologians who want to embrace the glossalalia concept, (as opposed to xenoglossia, though glossalalia is made of words form the passage) who have promoted the idea of nonlanguage tongues. There are also liberals, one commentator from Germany, for example, who thought the actual speaking in tongues in Corinth was identical to what pagans did. This may also influence theologians.
Paul has a list of people who have different gifts starting with first apostles, then prophets, then teaching, then miracles, then gifts of healings...(I Corinthians 12:28.)
That implies people who are not apostles or prophets heal.
The foundation is not part of the building? That's like saying water is not wet. I suppose you wouldn't mind if someone removed the foundation from your house if it is not a part of it, then. If apostles and prophets are part of the foundation, that is not the same as saying all are.
In another metaphor, Paul, and apostle laid foundations. The found of Christ no doubt had been laid in Jerusalem decades before, but Paul still laid a new foundation in Corinth. A house can have foundations continually laid if it expands sideways and not just up. If you want to add a nursery to a one-story house, you'd need to dig a foundation for it.
Historically, there are records that support ongoing prophecy in the second and third centuries. There is evidence for prophesying being done in church meetings in the second century. Apparently, liturgy was embraced instead of actually obeying the scriptural commands for church meetings. Not that liturgy is necessarily bad, but ignoring what was specifically commanded is.
planted.