Reject Paul and you're no follower of Christ

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#41
The Gospel of Luke was written by the same person who wrote the book of Acts and the book of Acts upholds Paul as an apostle by the will of Jesus Christ and his endorsement by the apostles Peter, James etc at Jerusalem. So you can't trust the Gospels and ignore the book of Acts without sounding like a hypocrite.
 
Jul 6, 2009
318
2
0
#42
Well yeah, Luke had a high view of Paul; Matthew not so much. Google the quote "Least in the Kingdom of Heaven".
 

DinoDillinger

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2009
839
19
18
#43
It is dangerous to start throwing books out of the bible because they contridict your logic in matching up with the Gospels. See the fruit it bears you and you will see what I mean. As far as the law goes, I would assume you still trust James? Did he say something about testing God to make the gentiles keep the law? If you have seen the things I have on that, then the explanation you get from it is implied, not in scripture.
 
Jul 6, 2009
318
2
0
#44
I'm not advocating that we throw books out of the Bible, just that we understand the history and motivations of the authors.

Matthew was a Judaizer; Paul was adamantly against Judaizing. Luke was in Paul's camp. These things matter when trying to figure out what Jesus wanted us to learn.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#45
Let's not forget the difference between Jew and Gentile. If Jews want to keep their laws, fine. But don't impose them on gentiles. Paul's view was unifying to both Jew and Gentile, he taught both were equal in the eyes of Christ. Paul should be seen as a mediator and peace-maker not as a divider or heretic or false apostle. The ones doing the dividing are the Jews who wish to impose their high standards and unattainable sabbath, food laws, and circumcision keeping on non-Jews. Rejection of God's grace and imposing their own old testament ways is an affront to the Gospel of Christ. Paul already said, in his great wisdom, that if you break the least you break them all. And Jews certainly dont' keep all the laws, not even Messianic Jews. In fact God left the temple and allowed it to be ruined to make it impossible to keep the laws and force everyone to trust in Christ alone not keeping the Torah. If you dont keep them all yourself, why bother telling us gentiles that we must keep and follow them. If it's not relevant for salvation or justification, why bother. If it is relevant, then the Jew has just contradicted their view that the torah is not for salvation. The Messianic Jews i've known have no problem with Christian belief nor the teachings of Paul. It leads me to suspect then that opponents to either Christianity or Paul are on the enemies side.
 
Last edited:
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#46
eh...if Paul were false or whatever, then half or more of the Bible wouldn't even be there....also, if you look up Paul in the Bible dictioanry or whatever, you'll find it says ''the earliest and most influential interpreter of Christ's message and teaching: an early Christian missionary; correspondent with early Christian churches.'' Now just the part that says he was ''the MOST INFLUENTIAL interpreter of Chist's message'' is more than enough to prove he wasn't false all by itself.
 
Apr 13, 2007
985
6
0
36
#47
oops...I'm really tired,I meant half or more of the New Testament wouldn't even be there...not really half the Bible, as the Old Testament is longer than the new...I have to sleep more ^_^
 
Oct 16, 2009
33
0
0
#48
shouldn't this be locked or something, if people aren't allowed to disagree anyway?
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#49
Interesting.. And would you also say that HE accepted the APOSTLES?

Don't worry, I'll have a lengthy, biblical post soon enough. But having been ambushed here, it's just gonna have to wait until after dinner.
Come to a christian site and start denying scripture as just the writings of a man, and expect to be ambushed.
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#50
The Gospel of Luke was written by the same person who wrote the book of Acts and the book of Acts upholds Paul as an apostle by the will of Jesus Christ and his endorsement by the apostles Peter, James etc at Jerusalem. So you can't trust the Gospels and ignore the book of Acts without sounding like a hypocrite.
Amen, MS!!!
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#51
Sorry didn;t know Mobius was banned, but i am certainly glad he is.
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#52
So, at the moment Mobius is unable to respond due to being banned while he was eating dinner. He has, however, assured me that he is working on a response for this thread, and will somehow get it posted for y'all to read.

So, do not think Mobius has simple decided not to respond because he doesn't have a legitimate rebuttal for the arguments made against his beliefs. He does. He just can't post it right now.
So you are agreeing with Mobius that Paul was not an Apostle and 2/3 of the New Testament should be tossed out?
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#53
Let's not forget, Peter was also a liar who denied Yeshua, and was even called "satan" by Yeshua.

But of course, let's let him be the determining factor on what is Scripture. You guys are looking awesome. Not only can a man be considered Scripture by saying he is, but he can also be confirmed Scripture if a lying, messiah-denying "satan" says so!

G-d is so pleased :p
Arel was banned also, Woohooo weeding out the anti christs :) Thank God.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#54
So you are agreeing with Mobius that Paul was not an Apostle and 2/3 of the New Testament should be tossed out?
Seriously?

I am conveying a message for a friend, and that means I share his beliefs? Are you seriously making that assumption? Like, I am really questioning you on this. Are you so dense that you would make such an assumption or are you simply trying to stir up dissention and get me banned for the simple reason that Mobius is my friend and I defended him?
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#55
Sorry didn;t know Mobius was banned, but i am certainly glad he is.

Arel was banned also, Woohooo weeding out the anti christs :) Thank God.
"I don't accept Paul as scripture and I follow the mitzvot." "Anti-christ!!! May you burn in hell, you heretical heathen sent here by satan to turn us all from the word of God and lead us down the path of destruction!"

Yes, thank God, those evil heathens are gone. We were all in danger of losing our eternal souls listening to the blasphemous words they spoke against the great and mighty, infalliable words of the everlasting... Paul. [/sarcasm]

Honestly, I can understand y'all maybe being worried for Arel and Mobius because you believe they have a twisted view of scripture that could be harmful to their walk with Christ, but the way you all handled it was very sickening and saddening to me. Instead of reaching out to them in love and showing them why you believed them to be wrong in a Godly, you attacked their beliefs and mocked them and insulted them, spoke anti-semitic words to them.

And in the end Mobius was banned for what? Saying he doesn't believe Paul is scripture and calling out a guy for appearing to be a blatant Jew-hater? And Arel was banned for what? Finally snapping after repeatedly being called names and having his beliefs insulted?

the question is, if you were in their shoes and had to deal with attacks from people who call themselves loving and understanding Christians, would you have reacted any differently?
 
I

iraasuup

Guest
#56
"I don't accept Paul as scripture and I follow the mitzvot." "Anti-christ!!! May you burn in hell, you heretical heathen sent here by satan to turn us all from the word of God and lead us down the path of destruction!"

Yes, thank God, those evil heathens are gone. We were all in danger of losing our eternal souls listening to the blasphemous words they spoke against the great and mighty, infalliable words of the everlasting... Paul. [/sarcasm]

Honestly, I can understand y'all maybe being worried for Arel and Mobius because you believe they have a twisted view of scripture that could be harmful to their walk with Christ, but the way you all handled it was very sickening and saddening to me. Instead of reaching out to them in love and showing them why you believed them to be wrong in a Godly, you attacked their beliefs and mocked them and insulted them, spoke anti-semitic words to them.

And in the end Mobius was banned for what? Saying he doesn't believe Paul is scripture and calling out a guy for appearing to be a blatant Jew-hater? And Arel was banned for what? Finally snapping after repeatedly being called names and having his beliefs insulted?

the question is, if you were in their shoes and had to deal with attacks from people who call themselves loving and understanding Christians, would you have reacted any differently?
Here's a friendly little suggestion.

You don't know what they were banned for, so I suggest you refrain from commenting.

It's very clear in the chat rules, to not question/appeal other peoples bans on their behalf. By all means, the banned users have a chance to appeal, but it is not acceptable for other people to do so on their behalf.

Chances are you probably don't have the full story, and we can't discuss it with you anyway. So please, if you wish to disagree, do so silently. Continuing on in such a manner as you are now, is a sure-fire way to see yourself banned too, and you don't want that do you?
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#57
"I don't accept Paul as scripture and I follow the mitzvot." "Anti-christ!!! May you burn in hell, you heretical heathen sent here by satan to turn us all from the word of God and lead us down the path of destruction!"

Yes, thank God, those evil heathens are gone. We were all in danger of losing our eternal souls listening to the blasphemous words they spoke against the great and mighty, infalliable words of the everlasting... Paul. [/sarcasm]

Honestly, I can understand y'all maybe being worried for Arel and Mobius because you believe they have a twisted view of scripture that could be harmful to their walk with Christ, but the way you all handled it was very sickening and saddening to me. Instead of reaching out to them in love and showing them why you believed them to be wrong in a Godly, you attacked their beliefs and mocked them and insulted them, spoke anti-semitic words to them.

And in the end Mobius was banned for what? Saying he doesn't believe Paul is scripture and calling out a guy for appearing to be a blatant Jew-hater? And Arel was banned for what? Finally snapping after repeatedly being called names and having his beliefs insulted?

the question is, if you were in their shoes and had to deal with attacks from people who call themselves loving and understanding Christians, would you have reacted any differently?
They were blasphemers, and for you to suggest it was Paul they were blaspheming shows were you really stand
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#58
Here's a friendly little suggestion.

You don't know what they were banned for, so I suggest you refrain from commenting.
...technically, that's not quite true. Seeing as how Arel and Mobius are my friends, we do talk about... stuff. I mean, they do tell me things like the reasons given to them for being banned.

It's very clear in the chat rules, to not question/appeal other peoples bans on their behalf. By all means, the banned users have a chance to appeal, but it is not acceptable for other people to do so on their behalf.
They can appeal to you? I figured being banned means they can't send messages on CC. In any case, I'm not appealing their case. I am saying nothing with the expectation that my arguments might have their bans lifted. An appeal, in legal terms, means that upon a verdict being made in the trial courts, the appellant goes to appeals courts and tries to get the decision reversed by presenting a convincing argument that some breach in the rules of evidence-or any other rules of court- was committed. I am not vying for any sort of reversal in the bans of Arel and Mobius. I honestly think there is no argument I could make, no matter how convincing, that could get my friends back on this site, so I would not even bother.

Chances are you probably don't have the full story, and we can't discuss it with you anyway. So please, if you wish to disagree, do so silently. Continuing on in such a manner as you are now, is a sure-fire way to see yourself banned too, and you don't want that do you?
I am sure I do not have the full side of you and the other admins' story, since I cannot know what you are thinking, but I have the full side of the story from Arel and Mobius, and seeing as how I have a friendship with them I would suppose I am rather biased.

In any case, as I said, I am not arguing for their return. I am simple pointing out the discrepancies I see in the character of the so-called Christians on here that profess love, grace, mercy, and understanding. None of these character traits have I seen demonstrated by most of the Christians on here in relation to Mobius and Arel. All I want is for the people who were acting hypocritical to realize that, yes, they were wrong, and maybe next time an occasion arises where they must deal with true Messianics (and not Jews-for-Jesus) they will be better able to interact with them and perhaps converse on friendly and understanding terms without casting insults out toward them.

The thing is, the only example I have to live by is that of my family -more specifically my sister- when it comes to Messianics and the belief that people should follow mitzvot. She did not appreciate the fact that I follow mitzvot at first and has made it abundantly clear through insults masked in humor or blatant statements of distain, such as "how long are you going to act like a Jew?" It was hurtful, but she is family, so what could I do?

But you know what? When we finally sat down and talked about why I believe what I do the insults and hurtful comments ceased completely. She still does not agree with my beliefs, but because she was finally willing to listen to why I believe what I do she became more understanding.

And I really feel like it could be the same for those on here that reacted so offensively toward Mobius and Arel. If you had just been willing to listen to why they believe what they do, an understanding could have been reached and discussions could have branched off from there. My sister and I still talk about my beliefs, and she still thinks I am wrong. she even said she was praying for me(that I might return to my former beliefs, I suppose, where I didn't follow mitzvot), but that is it. There is no hostility, no insults, no snide remarks. It could have been the same on here. It can be the same on here. I believe God gives second chances, and there are numerous Messianics out there that, when given the chance, you all can listen to instead of attacking.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#59
They were blasphemers, and for you to suggest it was Paul they were blaspheming shows were you really stand
because I didn't write the word "sarcasm" after that statement...

I believe Paul is scripture, jsyk.
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#60
...technically, that's not quite true. Seeing as how Arel and Mobius are my friends, we do talk about... stuff. I mean, they do tell me things like the reasons given to them for being banned.
When you get banned you are not given a reason. Definitely not the detailed explanations you gave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.