Just, "
No." It just goes way over your head. You can't seem to get it.
SeaBass let me give you another analogy on top of my previous ones that refute you.
I own a business and I give it to you. As someone who owns the business you will be working in the business. However, if you never go into work, do you still own the business? The answer is "Yes." You would say, "So if I never do the work, do I own the business?" To which the answer is, "Yes."
Not a good enough analogy? Let me think of another.
I give you a car and hand you the keys. Its a gift, it is now yours. You upon the first of the month of next month receive a bill however. Its for a loan payment from the bank, so that the car could be purchased. Now, you have this new nice car, this gift, but you have to pay it off. Is it really a free gift if you have to work to keep it? Wasn't really all that it was cracked up to be, if you have to work for it? The car really isn't yours, not until you fully work to pay it off.
That is how you are treating the Gospel. Jesus says, "I died on the cross for you, all you need to do is believe and you have eternal life."(a free gift, in so much as you did nothing to receive it) So, you confess Jesus Christ. Now, as a Christian you are told that you must do good works to maintain salvation. So you go back to Jesus and say, "Hey! I thought this was a free gift? I'm working for it!" By saying that works are necessary for salvation, you are calling Jesus a liar.
Works are a necessary out-flow of who you now are(a Christian), just as an apple tree necessarily produces apples, as that is what it is. An apple tree. To argue that works are necessary for salvation is a categorization error. Thats like saying apples are necessary for an apple tree to be considered an apple tree. If the tree doesn't bear the apples, it is still an apple tree, its just to the outside world it isn't witnessing itself as an apple tree.
Your argument is silly and illogical, also arbitrary.
These analogies might not be the best, as I was just pondering them, but regardless you can't get past the fact of my last point in The Simplicity of The Gospel.
A. Faith in Jesus Christ leads to salvation
B. Salvation leads to (possible) works
c. Therefore works are necessary for salvation. (incorrect)
That is your argument, but if that is the case, then you can't move past premise A, without first addressing works.
There is no way of working around it, the argument fails as C negates what has been said in A. So start over, try again. Your argument doesnt work.