The Abomination of Desolation

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
#81
Talk about minicreators. Flesh has no power to create...who drives this creation in man? I thought creation ended on the "6th" day.
 
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
#82
What are the first 4 commandments?
 
W

weakness

Guest
#83
while there may be a personal playing-out of scripture in each of our hearts and lives, this isn't the way to interpret Bible prophecy.
Israel was literally taken captive by Babylon, for example. as Daniel prophesied, Babylon literally fell - not the individual hearts of each Babylonian, but just as it was written. there was a literal succession of kingdoms after Nebuchadnezzar, just as Daniel prophesied - not just a metaphysical playing out of the prophesy in the hearts and minds of people.
Christ was literally hung on a cross and literally rose again; the temple was literally destroyed - not a metaphor; reality.

so i don't see why we shouldn't take this as being also a literal prophesy that will come to pass.

but now that you bring up the interpretation - the body of Christ is more than the individual believer, but the collective church -- some say accordingly that the office of the Pope, setting himself up as the mediator between God and man, demanding obeisance that should be given only to God, declaring his statements ex-cathedra and ordaining the abominable worship of Mary - some say that the Pope is the "Abomination that maketh desolate"
[/QUOTE I think the literal is also true in every case. There would be no spiritual interpretation without there being a literal one first. The word of God is just so wonderful and exceedingly full of knowledge and wisdom in even unspeakable ways. but the literal is always true and is as important as any other meaning God shows us in it.
 
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
#84
while there may be a personal playing-out of scripture in each of our hearts and lives, this isn't the way to interpret Bible prophecy.
Israel was literally taken captive by Babylon, for example. as Daniel prophesied, Babylon literally fell - not the individual hearts of each Babylonian, but just as it was written. there was a literal succession of kingdoms after Nebuchadnezzar, just as Daniel prophesied - not just a metaphysical playing out of the prophesy in the hearts and minds of people.
Christ was literally hung on a cross and literally rose again; the temple was literally destroyed - not a metaphor; reality.

so i don't see why we shouldn't take this as being also a literal prophesy that will come to pass.

but now that you bring up the interpretation - the body of Christ is more than the individual believer, but the collective church -- some say accordingly that the office of the Pope, setting himself up as the mediator between God and man, demanding obeisance that should be given only to God, declaring his statements ex-cathedra and ordaining the abominable worship of Mary - some say that the Pope is the "Abomination that maketh desolate"
[/QUOTE I think the literal is also true in every case. There would be no spiritual interpretation without there being a literal one first. The word of God is just so wonderful and exceedingly full of knowledge and wisdom in even unspeakable ways. but the literal is always true and is as important as any other meaning God shows us in it.
Literal huh? Says who? What creator is this that creates beyond the 6th day and does not keep the Sabbath holy? Jesus was literally hung on the cross? Which cross and where did the idea of a cross come from? Fixed cross? Mutable cross? Cardinal cross? Have the teachings of this crucifixion been manipulated beyond the teachings of Jonas? The story of Jonas was also a story of crucifixion! What cross did Jonas mount after the wishes of God. Jonas had sufferings but they are not inflated like those stories of the other. What is the meaning of all this?
 
W

weakness

Guest
#85
For starters the two horned beast is a kingdom not the false prophet.
We learn in Daniel that in the figurative language of prophecy beasts are kingdoms.
Dan 7:23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.

Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Mal 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.
Heb 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.

If the unchanging God/Word tells us a beast is a kingdom in Daniel it will still be a kingdom in Revelation. Can you show us where the unchanging God/Word changed the definition of a beast from a kingdom to the false prophet? Wouldn’t that require Scripture to contradict Scripture?

If you would like to see a hermeneutically sound study of the prophetic Scriptures I suggest reading the free online book The False Prophet <click

May God bless your studies!
​Rev 19:20 says and the beast was taken and with him the false prophet, that wrought miracles before him.....I guess he could be a kingdom and a false prophet.
 
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
#86
*Come, behold the works of the*Lord, what desolations he hath made in the earth.
 
D

doulos

Guest
#87
The first scholarly argument I saw for Islam being the anti-Christ or religion that would produce the anti-Christ was distributed by no less than Open Doors, the ministry famous for assisting the persecuted church. I'm familiar with the standard eschatological arguments on the subject; however, personally don't know for sure which one of them is correct.
The idea that islam could be the leopard, bear, lion beast or that a day = a year in many of the Scriptures is not new. Despite the fact that todays commonly taught doctrines hold that most of the prophetic Scriptures were either fulfilled in 70AD or just prior to the second coming eliminate either view (separated by a span of 1900+ years on the timing when the prophetic Scriptures are fulfilled) from considering that mohammad is the false prophet and that islam is the beast does not discount the FACT that many of the reformers themselves considered this to be a possibility.

Wesley believed Islam played a role. Many know that Martin Luther believed that Catholicism played a role in mystery Babylon, few realize he believed that islam was the kingdom of antichrists. Calvin believed Dan11:37 was applicable to islam. Jonathan Edwards also believed islam played a role. Concerning the belief that in many of the prophetic Scriptures a day can mean a year is not new either. A short list of those would include Matthew Henry, John Wycliffe. Martin Luther, and Thieleman van Braght, (while not for the feint of heart those who have not read Martyr’s Mirror by van Braght have missed out on a fascinating book providing a history of those martyred for Christ)

There are many more unfortunately most of my books are packed away and in storage (and unfortunately will remain that way until my situation changes) or I could provide more names for both lists (concerning islam and counting a day as a year) along with quoutes and sources.

So while many believe that those of us that believe islam islam is the leopard, bear, lion beast of Rev13 are basing our eschatological beliefs on today’s headlines, they would be incorrect. It appears that the church has forgotten what many of the reformers knew.

May God bless your studies!
 
D

doulos

Guest
#88
​Rev 19:20 says and the beast was taken and with him the false prophet, that wrought miracles before him.....I guess he could be a kingdom and a false prophet.
I'm not much on guess work theology. I have provided Scripture that says a beast is a kingdom. I have provided Scripture that shows God does not change. You on the other hand have provided a guess. Can you provide a verse that positively identifies a beast as a false prophet? If not then why would I consider your guess as a viable option? Should we believe a guess or what the unchanging God has provided in His inspired word?

May God bless your studies!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
#89
Regardless of how much others study the Scriptures, that doesn’t mean they will come to the same conclusions as you or understand how YOU arrived at your conclusions . This is the reason why you need to explain your view or at least provide a link to a study demonstrating the message you are attempting to convey, after all we aren’t mind readers.



The key is studying to rightly divide the word of truth. Just throwing up a post that requires us to be mind readers in order to understand what you are trying to convey and the reasoning behind it is counterproductive and only adds confusion to the discussion. Now if you would like to show the Scriptures and reasoning that details your belief then maybe it could be discussed otherwise an attempt to discuss your view will be an exercise in futility.

May God bless your studies!
Kind of like how you used scriptures to prove your point? Why don't you do something productive instead of the above...like give some scriptures to add to the post.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,396
113
#90
I'm not much on guess work theology. I have provided Scripture that says a beast is a kingdom. I have provided Scripture that shows God does not change. You on the other hand have provided a guess. Can you provide a verse that positively identifies a beast as a false prophet? If not then why would I consider your guess as a viable option? Should we believe a guess or what the unchanging God has provided in His inspired word?

May God bless your studies!
Just because you can cut and paste scripture does not mean that we will come to your conclusions as we like context as well. The beast and his kingdom is a blending of more than just a few verses out of Revelation ;) HAHAH just razzin you mi amigo!
 
D

doulos

Guest
#91
Just because you can cut and paste scripture does not mean that we will come to your conclusions as we like context as well. The beast and his kingdom is a blending of more than just a few verses out of Revelation ;) HAHAH just razzin you mi amigo!
LOL I was hoping you would explain your view in a little more detail but suspect it may take more space then could be done in a post. Check your pms just sent one a minute or two ago.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#92
It is a fact that many Protestant reformers, including Martin Luther, John Calvin, Thomas Cranmer, John Thomas, John Knox, and Cotton Mather, believed the Roman Papacy to be the Antichrist.

What is not so wildly known amongst Protestants today; however, is that some of them also believed Islam was as well.

Calvin and Luther saw the Antichrist as both the papacy and Islam. The papacy was the Western Antichrist and Islam the Eastern Antichrist. Calvin refered to them as the two "horns" and Luther called them the two "legs" of the Antichrist. (Luther's Works, Weimer ed., 53, 394f).

"the Pope is the spirit of antichrist, and the Turk is the flesh of antichrist. They help each other in their murderous work. The latter slaughters bodily by the sword; and the former spiritually by doctrine."
—Martin Luther, Tischreden, Weimer ed., 1, No. 330.

Islam According to the Reformers - Reformation Society

You're right to point this out.

Wesley believed Islam played a role. Many know that Martin Luther believed that Catholicism played a role in mystery Babylon, few realize he believed that islam was the kingdom of antichrists. Calvin believed Dan11:37 was applicable to islam. Jonathan Edwards also believed islam played a role. Concerning the belief that in many of the prophetic Scriptures a day can mean a year is not new either. A short list of those would include Matthew Henry, John Wycliffe. Martin Luther, and Thieleman van Braght, (while not for the feint of heart those who have not read Martyr’s Mirror by van Braght have missed out on a fascinating book providing a history of those martyred for Christ)
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
7,989
1,596
113
#93
I don't think so, but am not dogmatic about it.

Rev 13:11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
Rev 13:12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
Rev 13:13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
Rev 13:14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
Rev 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

2Th 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
2Th 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

It is possible, but I think it a stretch. Christ was pretty specific about it being just as Daniel said...

Mat 24:15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)

Dan 11:30 For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant.
Dan 11:31 And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.

This was Antiochus IV Epiphanes (Epidimes).

Here is an excellent commentary on Dan 11...

http://bible.ucg.org/bible-reading-program/materials/dan11x.pdf
some how or another i seem to "put my foot in my mouth",offend people by asking something,or ect. i do not mean it that way,,,"i really wish your thread would continue and a great amount is learned",,,i notice most threads go from peaceful to anger quickly,"i hope this one does not because i think it is very important and it is something i have always looked at in curiosity",,,

in the scriptures you give in rev.13, is rev. 13;12,,,"he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him,ect.,,,and causeth them therein to (worship the first beast)ect.

i am saying this because we are considering "islam to be the aod" and trying to see if it is also the "image of the beast",,,so my curiosity is if we say that "Jerusalem who was destroyed in ad70 is the beast before it" then "Islam is not trying to get us to worship the first beast before it",,that is Islam is against the Jews and not for them.

now if we think that Islam is trying to get us to worship the "head of gold/Nebuchadnezzar",,but in Danial the description of the Babylonians was that they took the wise men of all the kingdoms they overthrew and looked for the wisest one. so a type of "freedom of religion",but only to the point where he set up the image of the man and required them to fall down and worship it(so i suppose their religion was open-minded and then single minded"

but the two horned beast does something that is hard to figure out in rev.13;12 it "causes them to worship the first beast before it",,so what is the first beast before it? is it Rome,the Islams are not trying to get us to worship Rome or Greece or any of the Greek gods,,is it Egypt? the Islams aren't trying to get us to worship any of the Egyptian gods. is it Christianity,the Islams are against Christianity and so they are not trying to get us to worship the son of god.

now i am not defending Islam,i am christian,,i do see that Islam fits somewhere in the prophecies,but where?,,, now i just as curious as the rest of you about this and i think unless we think about it and tell each other what's on our mind about it we will never see it. lol,ive pretty much looked at the same things you are discussing in the pages before but when i get to rev. 13;12,,thats where it kind of gets stuck,,,but I'm listening don't think I'm closed minded,,