Im not hyper, I just have no idea why you would ask me to prove they were written to Christians, should not you be the one to try and find support they were not. This is not the book of acts, it is not a historical account. But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to myriads of angels
Right.
So if they were solidly in the faith, why does the writer have to convince them that Sinai was NOT the place they needed to think about?
Everything about this book is teaching and reminding HEBREWS that they now have a NEW Covenant.
Context. Period. Acts was written as an account of what happened as the Aposteles went their ways to differnt places preaching the word.
Did they or did they not contend with believer and unbelievers?
Did Stephen's sermon sound a lot like the Book of Hebrews?
Hebrews is a book written directly to chiristians, for the the purpose of:
1. exhoriting them, to stay faithful and and showing them that Christ is above (better) than the law, in which false teachers were trying to bring them back under.
So you agree it was written to keep them (HEBREWS) from returning to a Covenant and system which would soon be thoroughly and literally demolished?
Gentiles were never included in that Covenant
2. To scold them because they needed to be taugtht basic princlpes chpater 5.
3. to reveal to them why jesus came in human form, and to conitnue in the His covanant.
Okay. So far you haven't said anything I haven't already said.
With the exception that the Book was written to HEBREWS. You state categorically Christians. Saved people.
There is NOTHING which says the audience was all saved individuals.
In fact, everything about it says it was a mixed audience, just like the assembly of Israelites had always been. Some believing and faithful, some who would want to turn back.
c. 68 AD.
Jerusalem and all the Temple system would soon be GONE (though sacrifices and observances were still taking place, even during the roman jewish wars).
No more sacrifice for sins if they departed from the teachings they had received about JESUS, since no more system would be in place. Within a few short years.
Returning to the people )Rabbis etc) who had mocked and called for the Crucifixion was akin to recrucifying Him.
The Book goes on to tell them the Patriarchs NEVER looked for a continuing city (earthly Jerusalem), and that they suffered as pilgrims, persecuted.
The warning was against going BACK to the system which was never intended to continue.
This book was not written for pagan gentiles who had left their own systems. You know this.
I don't see your problem.
It is not an account of what happened, like Acts, it is a letter written to the church.
The Church - which is the remnant of the ancient assembly of the faithful into which the gentiles were grafted.
But unless i missed it, where is it addressed to A church, as are the other epistles?
Even though I feel I the burden of proof is on you, I will show why we know they were Christians.
But you have so many separte statments, I will first answer them.
Alright.
Sure, some Israelite fell through disobeidne. Some Christians may return to a life of sin. This still does not afect the context.
In the context, there are passages that show us without a doubt these were saved, and there is nothing between those passages and chapter 4 to support a change in groups. Or a chagne in audiences. Or even that there were two groups. I will get to that.
Alright.
Without a doubt.
Even though you say:
Sure, some Israelite fell through disobeidne.
They fell because of UNBELIEF. Unbelief is the reason people are disobedient.
That's why they didn't enter the promised land.
They wanted to GO BACK.
They didn't BELEIVE.
The same message is in Hebrews.
Don't Go Back. There's nothing to go back to.
Sure in Romans, yet this does not mean because Paul mentions Jews that were not saved to the Romans, that he was speaking to non-saved people in Romans. Again that letter was written to teh church, and if one is member of the Lord's church, he/she is saved. Again no kind of support to show he stopped addressing the church, and started addressing unebleivers.
Same answer above, this has nothign to do with the context of Hebrews.Your showing everything BUT hebrews.
What?
Is there a consitent theme throughout scripture or not?
Believe and be saved (and obey becvause you believe), or turn away in unbelief (because you don't believe)?
It seems simple enough to me.
The Jewish Christians suffered terrible persecution for their faith.
There are warnings throughout Scripture not to crumple under persecution.
They are not all Israel who are Israel.
Many would have seen the blessings and heard the news, but just as they do today, they can not break away from what they know (tribally and historically - and today's Jewish people have no more sacrifice for sins...do they)
What's your point?
If people REALLY believe what is written, will they not endure?
I don't understand.
I'm already dead to this world. What can man do to me?
You cant make a case with every sernio in the Bible to show what is being wriiten in a a certian book. That is like me saying since Jesus spoke to Satan in Matt 4:4, it is possible he was speaking to Satan in Jn 17.
You're reaching.
We need to look at Hebrews, not every other account in scripture.
No, I'm going to look at Hebrews AND every other account. You do what you like.
Sure, how do we know? Context. See where I am going with that?
Yes, you want to isolate that Book for one purpose, yet universalize it for another.
That's fine, and why significant?
Because within 2 years there would be PROOF that there was nothing to go back to.
This is also invalid, because of what the passage says. He is not saying "we" as in all hebrews, saved and unsaved, or in tour case "we" as in Hebrews, but "you need to take heed". That does not make sense.
As it is said, “
Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion.” - Hebrews 3:15
Is this about gentiles who weren't delivered from egypt and wandered in the wilderness?
Is the warning one they would have recognized from their own history?
Is he saying
IF, IF, today
you finally do hear His voice, don't harden your hearts against Him like your fathers did in the rebellion.
Hear Him TODAY.
What is so hard to understand?
The warning to heed the gospel is the same for everyone.
Don't turn away.
The parable of the Sower knits into this well.
Look at the passage.
let "us" labor (him and those who hear, race, saved, unsaved?)
So, "us" they needed to Labor, be diligent, strive, for what???
Strive to enter the REAL Promised Rest - Christ!
Don't reject the Gospel due to UNBELIEF.
Clearly some were in danger of unbelief and turning back to Judaism!
It does not matter even if you want this to mean Us Hebrews:
Lets use your theory, and it still gives the same message:
Let US HEBREWS labor, lest (so that, for the reason, unless) any man fall after the same example of disobedience.
Let us Hebrews labor not to such, just as Israel did, who thought they were God's people, and thoguht they could not be condemned.
Right.
But what is the HEART of it all - JUST SIN?
or faith in JESUS????
Chapter 3 and 4 is giving this message. Notice Chapter 3:
Heb 3:12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.
To "depart" means they were there at one time. Just as Paul says many will "Depart from the faith".
Oh now it suits you to bring in other parts of the scriptures?
No, I believe the writer was convincing them that JESUS IS the Living God.
He describes the Spiritual Rock. All of it.
Here's an example of departing due to unbelief:
John 6
41The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, I am the bread which came down from heaven. 42And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven? 43Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves. 44No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day. 45It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me. 46Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father. 47Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. 48I am that bread of life. 49Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead. 50This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die. 51I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
52The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat? 53Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. 54Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. 55For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. 56He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. 57As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. 58This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
59These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.
60Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it? 61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you? 62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? 63It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. 64
But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him. 65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Just because it says they were His "disciples" doesn't mean they were His disciples INDEED.
They departed due to unbelief.
If you continue in my word, you are my DISCIPLES INDEED:
66
From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him. 67Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away? 68Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. 69And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God. 70Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil? 71He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him, being one of the twelve.
But you want to make this about WILLFUL SIN
.
The true believers will always say:
"Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God."
I know he is not telling them who Jesus is, that supports what I am saying, they already knew the truth, and were already part of the church:
No, they were being TAUGHT about Who Jesus was in relation to the Old Covenant.
Some were believers and clearly some were not.
i'll finish the rest later. Too long, Late here and I'm watching the "Selection" puppet show
God Bless
marianna