SAID SO! ...
Your post from Spurgeon on Justifcation is void. Sproul is in Question for his office.
What I have seen in this thread (that I can remember):
* No one can be perfect
* We are called to be perfect
* I am not perfect, but I can work on it ...
* Blah, Blah, Blah
* Goo-Goo, Gah-Gah
* more verses without context or depth
* Office or Station as a hindrance
* Romans Chapter 7
* Philippians Chapter 3
* Blah, Blah, Blah
* Goo-Goo, Gah-Gah
* more verses without context or depth
* 24 words for perfect
* Blah, Blah, Blah
* Goo-Goo, Gah-Gah
* more verses without context or depth
* Spurgeon on Justification / imputed righteousness
* Blah, Blah, Blah
* Goo-Goo, Gah-Gah
* more verses without context or depth
* imputed righteousness
* Justification
* Sanctification
* Regeneration
* Forgiveness
* New Walk
* Covenant, -- Abrahamic, or Noah, or Sharia, or Adamic, or Jehovah, Satan, ELOI, ELI ...
* ??substitutionary atonement??
* Blah, Blah, Blah
* Goo-Goo, Gah-Gah
* more verses without context or depth
* Calvin - Total Depravity (have not seen that yet, I alluded to it)
* Mormon Perfectionism - denial of original sin (I alluded to it)
* Pelagian heresy (have not seen that yet, I alluded to it)
* Booth - Salvation Army (have not seen that yet)
* Blah, Blah, Blah
* Goo-Goo, Gah-Gah
* more verses without context or depth
I agree, there is more to say ... but a Masters Student in Theology would
need no more than 5 pages to elucidate the doctrine - some Professors might only allow
one page ... John's letters were sort of that way too - concise. too much Opinion, too
many off topic conversations, too much bickering, too many verses that apply to other
things, or are not enough in and of themselves ... it's your thread ... press on, I would not
say the topic has been covered at all, just saying it should have been by now.
And again, by way of encouragement and constructive criticism:
* You are a bit deeper than many here.
* Thus, the subjects you bring up and discuss are deep and important ones.
* Many contributors to any topic mean an almost necessary convolution apart from rigor
* Many topics brought up in conversation could or should or need to be their own thread
* A frame of reference, proposed outline, Key words, words to keep people on topic,
periodic review, and summary, would all aid the discussion.
Literature teachers who teach - stream of consciousness technique - would love you, I am
sure