The Lie of Evolution......
- Thread starter FirstLovedByHim
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Evolution: change with respect to time
Evolution: change in the nature of an organism as a result of genetic mutations
Evolution: development of new kinds/species over long ages as a result of genetic mutations and environmental pressures
Evolution: the belief that all life is the result of millions of accidents
Evolution: the conscious rejection of any idea of an omnipotent (or benevolent) Creator
The first is not a lie.
Let's be clear and honest about which sense we're using.
Evolution: change in the nature of an organism as a result of genetic mutations
Evolution: development of new kinds/species over long ages as a result of genetic mutations and environmental pressures
Evolution: the belief that all life is the result of millions of accidents
Evolution: the conscious rejection of any idea of an omnipotent (or benevolent) Creator
The first is not a lie.
Let's be clear and honest about which sense we're using.
-
1
- Show all
ROFL
I know exactly what evolution is and the simple fact that science currently says it is not factual. The way that scientists have found DNA acts proves evolution is absolutely not scientific. Any modification to DNA has a still born birth. I suggest you go with what is scientifically feasible not what isn't feasible. Evolution is not feasible. Of course the atheists must hold to it because they don't believe in the Genesis account.
I know exactly what evolution is and the simple fact that science currently says it is not factual. The way that scientists have found DNA acts proves evolution is absolutely not scientific. Any modification to DNA has a still born birth. I suggest you go with what is scientifically feasible not what isn't feasible. Evolution is not feasible. Of course the atheists must hold to it because they don't believe in the Genesis account.
-
1
- Show all
You are teaching the traditions of men that are 1000's of years old.
The Bible does not teach that everything "popped" into existence. That is the "popcorn creation" theory.
This is the same problem that "flat earth" teachings have.
Even though the planet is shown to be a sphere, there are some who still maintain that the earth is flat.
That is where you are. The flat earth creation theory.
-----------
The creation story (Gen 1) is symbolism from ancient times. Written 3500 years ago.
It is understood by relating it to the people of that time.
To try to make the symbolism literal degrades from the text, taking it out of context from the time of writing.
-------
Taking the story as symbolic does not prove the Bible wrong. It only proves that the literal view is wrong and outdated. Flat earth.
----------
The Bible does not teach that everything "popped" into existence. That is the "popcorn creation" theory.
This is the same problem that "flat earth" teachings have.
Even though the planet is shown to be a sphere, there are some who still maintain that the earth is flat.
That is where you are. The flat earth creation theory.
-----------
The creation story (Gen 1) is symbolism from ancient times. Written 3500 years ago.
It is understood by relating it to the people of that time.
To try to make the symbolism literal degrades from the text, taking it out of context from the time of writing.
-------
Taking the story as symbolic does not prove the Bible wrong. It only proves that the literal view is wrong and outdated. Flat earth.
----------
-
3
- Show all
I would rather you find the proof that man directly evolved from apes. I will be waiting.
Or that man has evolved period. I will still be waiting
Or that man has evolved period. I will still be waiting
U
Looking different is not evolving, evolving is going to something more complex, do you think his brain has evolved in the last 6000 years.
There is not evidence that man physiologically, biological and neurologically was different than the way his now we have adapted and learned but we have not evolved. We have the same DNA.
There is not evidence that man physiologically, biological and neurologically was different than the way his now we have adapted and learned but we have not evolved. We have the same DNA.