The "Man of Sin" Prophecies

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
#61
How many times do you need to be told before you believe? Jesus IS God.
John 20:27-29
27 Then Jesus said to Thomas, “Put your finger here and look at My hands. Reach out your hand and put it into My side. Stop doubting and believe.”

28 Thomas replied, “My Lord and my God!”

29 Jesus said to him, “Because you have seen Me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”
 

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
#62
Thanks for all of the contributions so far.

If anyone would like to post their perspective on who the "man of sin" was, is, or will be (whether from a preterist, historicist, or futurist view) feel free to share. For futurists, I know you can't predict "who" specifically, but if you have a strong opinion as to where he'll originate, or whether he'll be Semitic or non-Semitic (as we've read from other members), or other details like that, please share.

The goal of this thread is to list the qualifying characteristics of the "man of sin" from each of the major perspectives believers have so that we have a basic understanding of where folks are coming from when discussing related topics in other threads.

Thanks!
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#63
What are you saying regarding your above comment which I have highlighted and enlarged? Please provide scripture which states this...
Christ the Holy Spirit as the Master Teacher not seen resisted being worshiped according to the corrupted flesh. (what the eyes see".)

Speaking of his own flesh which he says it profits for nothing .

God in worship does not desire to identified with as if he was a man, a creation with a beginning . But rather known as Faithful Creator not seen . When accused of being called Good Master according to what the eyes see .The father gave the Son words to say. Only one is our GOOD master. GOD defining good by that not seen . No student to include Jesus was above the lord as Master teacher. . The Lord not seen has power to rebuke Satan .The Son of man no power.

Jesus asked why call me Good?

Mark 10:16-18 King James Version (KJV) And he took them up in his arms, put his hands upon them, and blessed them.
And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life? And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.


No man can serve two teaching Masters. The temporal flesh seen. Body of death (the Son of man) And the unseen eternal Spirit typified as the father or Lord .

The prescription below for rightly dividing the parable must be applied if we are see the unseen understanding .

2 Corinthians 4:18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.

John 6:63 It is the spirit (eternal) that quickeneth; the flesh (temporal) profiteth nothing:(zero) the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

God is not a man.The Son of man had no power .when rebuking the spirit of error .The father rebuked the old devil .

We derive no power coming from the corrupted flesh of mankind. No such thing as the flesh of holiness. That's a Catholic doctrine venerate dead flesh and call it faith .

Romans 1:3-5 King James Version (KJV)Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead: By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:

Son of man corruptible Seed of David according to the flesh; (many seeds mankind no power )

Son of God with power, seed (singular ) The spiritual seed. . . Christ

No such thing as the flesh of holiness.

God is not a man.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#64
Thanks for all of the contributions so far.

If anyone would like to post their perspective on who the "man of sin" was, is, or will be (whether from a preterist, historicist, or futurist view) feel free to share. For futurists, I know you can't predict "who" specifically, but if you have a strong opinion as to where he'll originate, or whether he'll be Semitic or non-Semitic (as we've read from other members), or other details like that, please share.

The goal of this thread is to list the qualifying characteristics of the "man of sin" from each of the major perspectives believers have so that we have a basic understanding of where folks are coming from when discussing related topics in other threads.

Thanks!
I would offer.

The motive of operation of the antichrist as another kind of teacher has already revealed the man of sin. It can be found in 1 John 2. Warning us of them (antichrists plural a legion)

The man of sin (many antichrists) influenced by the father of lies (antichrist) the spirit lies . The man of sin is whoever as another kind of teaching or anointing authority is influenced by the father of lies, the god of this world, in order to prevent the gospel as it is written. Making (sola scriptura) to no effect by the oral traditions of men as mere commandment of corrupted mankind . .

In that way all the kingdoms of the world have their own man of sin to represent their beliefs. Kings, Emperor, Fathers that Lord it over the faithless ..

It would seem that God removed that pagan form of government.(walking by sight) ...no faith or out of sight out of mind. performing that good work at the time of reformation conferred at Pentecost. A new Kingdom of priests, as prophets sent with the gospel from all the nations men and woman Jew and gentile . Satan could no longer deceive all the nations after that manner. He lost his face . Today the god of this world looks to influence all as another teaching authority as the man of sin .He is on the prowl any human will do.

We need the whole suit of armor . It would of help Peter not deny the faith that protected him.

Peter is used as a example of the man of sin.( Mathew 16: 22-23) He was forgiven of His blasphemy .That forgiveness window was open and disappeared when Jesus disappeared . Blasphemy against the power of God not seen "the gospel" is not forgivable.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,411
13,754
113
#65
Christ the Holy Spirit as the Master Teacher not seen resisted being worshiped according to the corrupted flesh. (what the eyes see".)
No He did not; He accepted worship. You are avoiding the obvious truth.

God in worship does not desire to identified with as if he was a man, a creation with a beginning . But rather known as Faithful Creator not seen .
Where is that in Scripture?

When accused of being called Good Master according to what the eyes see .The father gave the Son words to say. Only one is our GOOD master.
Given that I have corrected you on this many times, you have clearly demonstrated that you are stubborn and unteachable.

GOD defining good by that not seen . No student to include Jesus was above the lord as Master teacher. . The Lord not seen has power to rebuke Satan .The Son of man no power.
Jesus had power to heal; He also had power to rebuke Satan.

No man can serve two teaching Masters.
That's not in Scripture.

God is not a man.The Son of man had no power .when rebuking the spirit of error .The father rebuked the old devil .
Already addressed.


God is not a man.
Jesus is God in the flesh.
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#66
Yes the Son of man, Jesus the first born of the brethren us Jesus our High priest and prophet and apostle. The Son of man as a living parable displayed the unseen work of the Good Master Teacher, the father, working in the Son of man to both will and do the good pleasure as two working as one. . The same treasure of the power of the father that we have in our earthen bodies of death also . The power of the unseen, power of faith . Call no man one earth Good Master one is our Teacher in heaven not seen . Not a man.

2 Corinthians 4:7 But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.

If it applies to our brother in Christ. Jesus. .it applies to us. He spoke through the son of man putting his words on the prophet Jesus' lips not as the Son of man but by and through like all prophets. . Call no man Master Teacher on earth. One is our Father in heaven

There came then his brethren and his mother, and, standing without, sent unto him, calling him. And the multitude sat about him, and they said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren without seek for thee. And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother, or my brethren? And he looked round about on them which sat about him, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother. Mark 3:31-35

He calls us brothers and sisters and mothers but "not fathers' .One is our Holy Father in heaven

Matthew 12:49-50 King James Version (KJV) And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.
Whose SPIRIT is powerfully at work in us?
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#67
I don't think the Son of man Jesus had rights like all believers they have responsibilities. to do the will of God .the food or power the disciples at first knew not of.

I would say he had the responsibility to pronounce the words the father put on his lips? you have heard it said long ago . "(The father speaking from heaven" ) ...but I the father SAY TO YOU...

We magnify the father not seen the holy place
No. We do NOTHING in the HOLY PLACE apart from CHRIST
I think you might have to review Ephesians 2:18

This should help you answer my question in post 66 as well
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#68
Hi Miknik. Thanks for your perspective.

When I read this chapter of Paul's letter I ask myself, "why would Paul need to be passive or cryptic about who was restraining or holding back the "man of sin" if it were the Almighty or His Holy Spirit"? Why not just say it as plainly as Paul mentioned Christ in the opening verse? ...and why here of all places, you know?

It's like he definitely knew something but didn't want to share it openly.
He wouldn´t have been, He was speaking to those who were of the BODY...they would have understood...

Further, you can´t just take this apart from his whole letter...he was talking to those who KNEW CHRIST, knew there would be a RESURRECTION...but also were being troubled by those who were saying THE DAY of THE LORD, and with it, THE RESURRECTION had already come...

Paul´s words are very clear telling them that this can´t happen until the man of sin is revealed...and the only way he can be revealed is if HE, who holds all things back by HIS POWER (WHO IS GOD), is taken out of the way...

Did you think satan holds things back? Or that satan has any power to do anything unless GOD, removes HIS HEDGE?
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#69
Thanks for all of the contributions so far.

If anyone would like to post their perspective on who the "man of sin" was, is, or will be (whether from a preterist, historicist, or futurist view) feel free to share. For futurists, I know you can't predict "who" specifically, but if you have a strong opinion as to where he'll originate, or whether he'll be Semitic or non-Semitic (as we've read from other members), or other details like that, please share.

The goal of this thread is to list the qualifying characteristics of the "man of sin" from each of the major perspectives believers have so that we have a basic understanding of where folks are coming from when discussing related topics in other threads.

Thanks!
Heś a man who will have the power of the dragon working in him...just as revelation 13 indicates
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#70
Christ the Holy Spirit as the Master Teacher not seen resisted being worshiped according to the corrupted flesh. (what the eyes see".)

Speaking of his own flesh which he says it profits for nothing .

God in worship does not desire to identified with as if he was a man, a creation with a beginning . But rather known as Faithful Creator not seen . When accused of being called Good Master according to what the eyes see .The father gave the Son words to say. Only one is our GOOD master. GOD defining good by that not seen . No student to include Jesus was above the lord as Master teacher. . The Lord not seen has power to rebuke Satan .The Son of man no power.

Jesus asked why call me Good?

Mark 10:16-18 King James Version (KJV) And he took them up in his arms, put his hands upon them, and blessed them.
And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life? And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.


No man can serve two teaching Masters. The temporal flesh seen. Body of death (the Son of man) And the unseen eternal Spirit typified as the father or Lord .

The prescription below for rightly dividing the parable must be applied if we are see the unseen understanding .

2 Corinthians 4:18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.

John 6:63 It is the spirit (eternal) that quickeneth; the flesh (temporal) profiteth nothing:(zero) the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

God is not a man.The Son of man had no power .when rebuking the spirit of error .The father rebuked the old devil .

We derive no power coming from the corrupted flesh of mankind. No such thing as the flesh of holiness. That's a Catholic doctrine venerate dead flesh and call it faith .

Romans 1:3-5 King James Version (KJV)Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead: By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:

Son of man corruptible Seed of David according to the flesh; (many seeds mankind no power )

Son of God with power, seed (singular ) The spiritual seed. . . Christ

No such thing as the flesh of holiness.

God is not a man.
Yet GOD has instructed HIS angels to worship HIM...and GOD as well has said, KISS THE SON lest HIS ANGER be stirred and you be destroyed in the way...

When Mary was told that she would have a child...THAT HOLY THING was how HE was identified to Mary BY THE ANGELS.

Whose SPIRIT was in JESUS from the beginning that HE entered into the world and dwelt amongst us...
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#71
Dwelt amongst us....

Those words, sir...even in the flesh, one should understand that there was something different about THIS ONE who came and dwelt amongst us....it indicates that one, though it be similar to the group/crowd/its likes, stands alone as somehow superior...different...unique....
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#72
And if that is not enough, please review 1 John 5 and pay careful attention to how John describes HIM...

THIS IS HE_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#73
No He did not; He accepted worship. You are avoiding the obvious truth.
Its obvious he avoided the worship (lust of the eye lust of the flesh ) of His corrupted flesh(what the eyes see) which was needed for the one time demonstration do show and do what the letter of the the law "death" could not .Show the Father and Son as one perfect work . The just and the justifier of those who hear and obey the gospel .He lived in a body of death just as us. We do not serve gods in the likeness of men .That's a Catholic thing. (Acts 14 making the apostles into gods in the likeness of man. God is not a man.

Where is that in Scripture?
From the opening page to the close . God is not a man. Or did you mean where did I find those word verbatim?

Given that I have corrected you on this many times, you have clearly demonstrated that you are stubborn and unteachable.
I appreciate discussing. But I am not the one accrediting the one Good Master to the flesh. That's your idea. Jesus learned from father the Good Master that same as us. One word at a time. That doctrine is found in many places.

No man can serve two Teaching Masters. The temporal flesh seen and the eternal Holy Spirit not seen. We are warned in 1 John 2 of the antichrists . . .they say we need flesh and blood to teach us. The holy Spirits inform s us we abide in him not seen as it his living word teaches us. Why make flesh the Master? I have corrected you on this many times, you have clearly demonstrated that you are stubborn and unteachable.

Jesus had power to heal; He also had power to rebuke Satan.
The Son of God as eternal God not seen has that power.

Jesus as the Son of God not seen as eternal spirit had the power to rebuke as in; "the Lord rebuke you." As the Son of man living in a body of death he was powerless. The father gave his words to the Son of man Jesus the prophet, apostle. The voice of the father. Jesus said it to Peter, directed at Satan signifies as if behind Peter .


But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men. Mathew 16:23

In effect saying get behind me I am the unseen one with the power to rebuke . Peter was forgiven of his blasphemy against the Son of man seen .The Son of man had no power according to His flesh. The power of revealing is in the gospel .The unseen eternal good new .

A similar parable is used in Numbers. There God showing us he is not served by two masters. Human hands the flesh and the power of the gospel the unseen hand of God. There the father put his words on the lips of a donkey a ceremonial unclean beast of the field. Used to represent the non-redeemed .The words spoken stopped the madness of the false prophets Balaam .Balaam was having pleasure with the the things of men and not God . the donkey was used to rebuke the father of lies in that parable. You could say just as the Lord not seen through the Son of man rebuked him .and forgave Peter.

That's not in Scripture.
According to whose teaching master?

Already addressed.
I think you refused to define words like DAYSMAN (Good Master) God is not a man. He has no beginning...

Jesus is God in the flesh.
Jesus was the Son of God as eternal God in the flesh as the Son of man .God is not a man. The one time promised outward demonstration of a invisible work is over .Whoever does not have both the Father and the Son. . have neither.

2 Corinthians 5:16 Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more.
 

bojack

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
2,309
1,006
113
#74
Its obvious he avoided the worship (lust of the eye lust of the flesh ) of His corrupted flesh(what the eyes see) which was needed for the one time demonstration do show and do what the letter of the the law "death" could not .Show the Father and Son as one perfect work . The just and the justifier of those who hear and obey the gospel .He lived in a body of death just as us. We do not serve gods in the likeness of men .That's a Catholic thing. (Acts 14 making the apostles into gods in the likeness of man. God is not a man.



From the opening page to the close . God is not a man. Or did you mean where did I find those word verbatim?



I appreciate discussing. But I am not the one accrediting the one Good Master to the flesh. That's your idea. Jesus learned from father the Good Master that same as us. One word at a time. That doctrine is found in many places.

No man can serve two Teaching Masters. The temporal flesh seen and the eternal Holy Spirit not seen. We are warned in 1 John 2 of the antichrists . . .they say we need flesh and blood to teach us. The holy Spirits inform s us we abide in him not seen as it his living word teaches us. Why make flesh the Master? I have corrected you on this many times, you have clearly demonstrated that you are stubborn and unteachable.



The Son of God as eternal God not seen has that power.

Jesus as the Son of God not seen as eternal spirit had the power to rebuke as in; "the Lord rebuke you." As the Son of man living in a body of death he was powerless. The father gave his words to the Son of man Jesus the prophet, apostle. The voice of the father. Jesus said it to Peter, directed at Satan signifies as if behind Peter .


But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men. Mathew 16:23

In effect saying get behind me I am the unseen one with the power to rebuke . Peter was forgiven of his blasphemy against the Son of man seen .The Son of man had no power according to His flesh. The power of revealing is in the gospel .The unseen eternal good new .

A similar parable is used in Numbers. There God showing us he is not served by two masters. Human hands the flesh and the power of the gospel the unseen hand of God. There the father put his words on the lips of a donkey a ceremonial unclean beast of the field. Used to represent the non-redeemed .The words spoken stopped the madness of the false prophets Balaam .Balaam was having pleasure with the the things of men and not God . the donkey was used to rebuke the father of lies in that parable. You could say just as the Lord not seen through the Son of man rebuked him .and forgave Peter.



According to whose teaching master?



I think you refused to define words like DAYSMAN (Good Master) God is not a man. He has no beginning...



Jesus was the Son of God as eternal God in the flesh as the Son of man .God is not a man. The one time promised outward demonstration of a invisible work is over .Whoever does not have both the Father and the Son. . have neither.

2 Corinthians 5:16 Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more.
Jesus could not have did everything He did if He were not God in the flesh .. He could not have been the sinless Lamb of God and died for us if He were not God in the flesh .. Jesus could not have had a perfect unbroken relationship with the Father if He had not been God the Son in the flesh .. He come as a new born of the virgin to show us, how to act towards both man and God.. He was God Immanuel in the flesh .. He accessed The father and learned like we must as men in the flesh ..
12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,375
113
#75
There may have been threads like this already but I think it may be helpful for us to post - in list form - the prophecies in scripture that support who the "man of sin" was/is/will be (depending on your position whether preterist, historicist, futurist) while providing the identity of that man (or your best guess as to what type of man it'll be or where he'll come from).

I don't expect this thread to be too large seeing as there are probably only three points of view matching the three positions, but I think it'll help to see where certain members are coming from in other threads.

I was a futurist during my childhood and then became a historicist as an adult, and I've never been a preterist, so if others could provide the preterist and futurist lists (respectively) I'd appreciate it.

My intent for this thread is to provide passages to study and consider for each position.
Greetings!

I'm sorry to hear that you moved away from the truth from futurist to historicist regarding this issue.

Without going through all of the scriptures that you provided, I will provide the following:

=================================================================================
As you, O king, were watching, a great statue appeared. A great and dazzling statue stood before you, and its form was awesome. 32The head of the statue was pure gold, its chest and arms were silver, its belly and thighs were bronze, 33its legs were iron, and its feet were part iron and part clay.

34As you watched, a Rock was cut out, but not by human hands. It struck the statue on its feet of iron and clay, and crushed them. 35Then the iron, clay, bronze, silver, and gold were shattered and became like chaff on the threshing floor in summer. The wind carried them away, and not a trace of them could be found. But the Rock that had struck the statue became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. (Daniel 31-35)
================================================================================

Head of Gold = Babylon

Chest and Arms of Silver = Medo/Persia

Belly and Thighs of Bronze = Greece

Legs of Iron = Rome

Feet of Part Iron and Clay = The Future Ten Toed Kingdom

The Stone cut out of the Mountain = The Lord Jesus

The Great Mountain that fills the whole earth = The Lord Jesus

========================================================

The statues represents all of the all human government, with the ten toed kingdom being that last kingdom who will rule with the beast as described in Revelation 17:12-13.

"The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but will receive authority in one hour as kings, along with the beast. These kings have one purpose: to yield their power and authority to the beast."

The Rock cut out of the Mountain without human hands, is symbolically representing the Lord Jesus who will fall on the feet of the statue smashing it to pieces so that no trace of it will be found, i.e. the end of all human government. The reference to the Mountain falling on the feet of the statue will be carried out through God's wrath via the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments, with the outcome as follows:

"The great city was split into three parts, and the cities of the nations collapsed."

The above verse takes place after the 7th bowl judgment, which is the last plague of wrath and the complete destruction of the nations takes place via that world-wide earthquake which will cause the cities of the nations to collapse.

This dismantling of all the nations is to make way for the Rock who will become a huge mountain filling the whole earth, which is in reference to the Lord's millennial kingdom on this present earth.

Just based on the scriptural information above, the Historical view is not supported by scripture in part for the following reasons:

The antichrist/beast has not yet been revealed and will be destroyed when the Lord returns to the earth to end the age:

"And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming." (2 Thess.2:8)

"But the beast was captured along with the false prophet, who on its behalf had performed signs deceiving those who had the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. Both the beast and the false prophet were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur." (Rev.19:20)

Neither the beast nor the false prophet have yet been revealed

In addition, that last ten-toed kingdom has not yet come into existence in order for the Rock to be able to fall on it smashing it to pieces, which is accomplished through the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments which is the wrath of God and which also has not yet taken place.

And before all of those things can take place, the Lord will come to gather His church to in order to keep us out of the hour of the trial which about to come upon the whole inhabited world, to try those dwelling upon the earth. Needless to say, the event of the Lord gathering His church has also not yet taken place, but must happen before any of the plagues of wrath can take place.


- He is restrained until "another power" is taken out of his way
Below is the correct rendering:

"He will oppose and exalt himself above every so-called god or object of worship. So he will seat himself in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God. And you know what is now restraining him, so that he may be revealed at the proper time. 7For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work, but the one who now restrains it will continue until he is taken out of the way. 8And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of His mouth and annihilate by the majesty of His arrival.

The man of lawlessness is currently being restrained so that he can be revealed at his proper time. The One who is restraining the full impact of lawlessness and the man of lawlessness can only be referring to the Holy Spirit as that restraining power



Revelation 13
- Will receive a deadly wound but will be healed
- All the world will marvel at him
- Will be in power for 42 months (1260 days)
- Another king will take his power
No other earthly king will take his power. He and his power will come to an end when the Lord returns to the earth to end the age, where both the beast and the false prophet will be thrown alive into the lake of fire. Immediately following that, Satan will be seized and thrown into the Abyss for a thousand years.

As a historicist, I believe this "man of sin" was and is the office of The Papacy, as it:


The man of sin is the antichrist and the beast which comes up out of the Abyss will be the power behind him.

One of the future popes is going to play the part of the false prophet.

The first beast is the antichrist who will be a man and who will be empowered by that angel of the Abyss, also called the beast who once was, now is not and yet will come up out of the Abyss. The second beast is the false prophet who as I believe, will be played by one of the future popes.

The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) with the office of the pope is the woman who will ride the beast. The antichrist/beast will afford her the power that she desires, which is to have every human being under the authority of the pope and the RCC.

- Ruled from 538 AD to 1798 AD (1260 years) until exiled by the French.
The number 1260 is in reference to literal days, not years. The book of Revelation refers to that seven year period as 1260 days, 42 months and a time, times and half a time, all referring to the two 3 1/2 year periods.

In Daniel 9:24, Israel and Jerusalem are given a decree of seventy 'sevens' or seventy seven-year periods (490 years). Sixty nine (483 years) were fulfilled when the Anointed One was cut off, i.e. Christ crucified. At that time God paused the last seven years to be fulfilled at the end of the age and began building His church. Once the church has been completed, the Lord will appear and catch up his church. Once the church has been gathered, then God will pick up right where He left off with Israel in fulfillment of that last seven years. Regarding this, Israel is already to go. For she has all of the furniture and items of the temple prepared. The Sanhedrin has been reconvened and have been studying the requirements for temple worship and sacrifice. This can be verified by going to https://templeinstitute.org/

That last seven years is divided into two 3 1/2 year periods, which is initiated by that ruler/antichrist, establishing his covenant with many for One seven. In the middle of the seven years, he causes the sacrifices and offerings to cease and sets up that abomination that causes the desolation of Jerusalem and Judea. This event begins the second 3 1/2 years of that seven year period. Jesus returns at the end of that seven year period where He has the beast and the false prophet captured and Satan cast into the Abyss. It is at this time that the millennial kingdom will be established.

All of these events are still future. And I pray that God will give you understanding and turn you back to the truth.
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#76
Jesus could not have did everything He did if He were not God in the flesh .. He could not have been the sinless Lamb of God and died for us if He were not God in the flesh .. Jesus could not have had a perfect unbroken relationship with the Father if He had not been God the Son in the flesh .. He come as a new born of the virgin to show us, how to act towards both man and God.. He was God Immanuel in the flesh .. He accessed The father and learned like we must as men in the flesh ..
12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
HE modeled for us the exact relationship that a son of GOD is to have with HIS FATHER in HEAVEN...and HE had all authority to show/treach/reveal THE FATHER, because HE came forth from GOD, the visible image of the inivisble GOD made manifest, the exact represenation of HIS BEING.. and the FULL RADIANCE of HIS GLORY...
 

bojack

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
2,309
1,006
113
#77
There may have been threads like this already but I think it may be helpful for us to post - in list form - the prophecies in scripture that support who the "man of sin" was/is/will be (depending on your position whether preterist, historicist, futurist) while providing the identity of that man (or your best guess as to what type of man it'll be or where he'll come from).

I don't expect this thread to be too large seeing as there are probably only three points of view matching the three positions, but I think it'll help to see where certain members are coming from in other threads.

I was a futurist during my childhood and then became a historicist as an adult, and I've never been a preterist, so if others could provide the preterist and futurist lists (respectively) I'd appreciate it.

My intent for this thread is to provide passages to study and consider for each position.

-----

Daniel 7
- Is a different kingdom that rises after 10 smaller kingdoms
- Uproots 3 of those kingdoms
- Speaks pompous words against the Almighty
- Try to change the Almighty's times and laws
- Will conquer the Almighty's people for a "time, times, 1/2 time" (1260 days)

Daniel 11
- Will not regard the god of his fathers or any god
- Will not desire women
- Will honor the "god of fortresses" with wealth
- Will attack many governments with this "fortress god"
- Will give rule to those who acknowledge him
- Will divide land at a price
- Will fight a "southern king"
- Will invade Jerusalem
- Authority will cover many countries and he'll gain great wealth

2 Thessalonians 2
- Places himself above all gods
- Calls himself God
- Will be destroyed by Messiah's brightness
- Gained authority from satan to work lying miracles
- He is restrained until "another power" is taken out of his way

Revelation 13
- Will receive a deadly wound but will be healed
- All the world will marvel at him
- Will be in power for 42 months (1260 days)
- Another king will take his power


As a historicist, I believe this "man of sin" was and is the office of The Papacy, as it:

- Is a unique State (The Vatican; even has its own army) that rose out of the 10 kingdoms after the Roman empire (which is the 4th beast and 2 legs of iron of Daniel)

- Uprooted the Heruli, Ostrogoths, and Vandals by the year 538 AD

- Speaks pompous words like "The pope is christ vicariously" and "The pope holds the place of God on earth"

- Established the Gregorian calendar (time), set midnight as the new day (time), changed the day of rest to Sunday (law), changed 2nd & 10th commandments (law). and established new holidays (time & law).

- Initiated the Inquisition through Papal Bull (Dum Diversas), authorizing the hunting, torture & enslavement of "heretics".

- Ruled from 538 AD to 1798 AD (1260 years) until exiled by the French.

- Takes a vow of celibacy

- Honors the statue of Cybele, the goddess of fortresses - also known as Ishtar - which was renamed "Blessed Mary, the queen of heaven". She literally has a fortress as her crown.



- Installed kings who conquered lands and nations in his name

- Was in constant battles with Saracens (from the south) and Ottoman Turks who fought in the name of allah (king of the south) and Islam.

Bonus: By the way, a tabernacle ("Dome of the Rock") was literally established on the temple mount, fulfilling Daniel 11:45 for a tabernacle to be planted on the holy mountain between the seas. The "Dome of the Rock" is Roman/Byzantine architecture, not Islamic.

- Invaded the holy land to take it from Muslims during The Crusades

- Has gained vast wealth and would rule over many countries of Europe

- Gained its power from the Roman Emperor.

- Presents "miracles" to the world from Mary and saints.

- Was restrained in power until Pagan Rome was conquered and taken out of the way. Paul wouldn't need to be cryptic about the Holy Spirit if that is Who was restraining the "man of sin", he would just speak plainly as he has about the Holy Spirit in many other letters. But Rome was still in power at the time of his letter, and there's no telling who would read his letter before it reached his intended audience...especially if he was in custody.

- Was said to have had it's "wound healed" when the papacy's temporal power was restored in the Lateran Concordat of 1929



- Hasn't restored itself to its former level of power and leadership in the world because another world-leading power has currently taken over that role.

- Has many people wondering after him in awe (no matter who sits in the office), seeking an audience with him or a blessing from him

----

So historically, the office of the papacy checks all the boxes for me. And I believe it will not be destroyed until the Messiah comes to burn it away with the brightness of His coming.
Pope will make a proclamation on Israels re-birthday from May 20 1948 ..
A new ''humanism'' that is godless .. I understand he is wanting to get signatures from various religions and famous celebrities to pledge a new education .. ''reeducation camps ?'' .. Sounds like Babylon for sure .. He's already agreed with mmgw which is a lie and pagan nature worship to put nature above mankind .. Open borders , God said he sets borders for nations but to treat strangers well
I trust Pope frances about as much I trust hitler
 

bojack

Well-known member
Dec 16, 2019
2,309
1,006
113
#78
HE modeled for us the exact relationship that a son of GOD is to have with HIS FATHER in HEAVEN...and HE had all authority to show/treach/reveal THE FATHER, because HE came forth from GOD, the visible image of the inivisble GOD made manifest, the exact represenation of HIS BEING.. and the FULL RADIANCE of HIS GLORY...
It is quite overwhelming when you think about it
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
#79
It is quite overwhelming that GOD, who foreknew our fall, stil, in HIS GRACE, created us.
 

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
#80
I would offer.

The motive of operation of the antichrist as another kind of teacher has already revealed the man of sin. It can be found in 1 John 2. Warning us of them (antichrists plural a legion)

The man of sin (many antichrists) influenced by the father of lies (antichrist) the spirit lies . The man of sin is whoever as another kind of teaching or anointing authority is influenced by the father of lies, the god of this world, in order to prevent the gospel as it is written. Making (sola scriptura) to no effect by the oral traditions of men as mere commandment of corrupted mankind . .

In that way all the kingdoms of the world have their own man of sin to represent their beliefs. Kings, Emperor, Fathers that Lord it over the faithless ..

It would seem that God removed that pagan form of government.(walking by sight) ...no faith or out of sight out of mind. performing that good work at the time of reformation conferred at Pentecost. A new Kingdom of priests, as prophets sent with the gospel from all the nations men and woman Jew and gentile . Satan could no longer deceive all the nations after that manner. He lost his face . Today the god of this world looks to influence all as another teaching authority as the man of sin .He is on the prowl any human will do.

We need the whole suit of armor . It would of help Peter not deny the faith that protected him.

Peter is used as a example of the man of sin.( Mathew 16: 22-23) He was forgiven of His blasphemy .That forgiveness window was open and disappeared when Jesus disappeared . Blasphemy against the power of God not seen "the gospel" is not forgivable.
Ok thanks Garee. So from your view the "man of sin" is now, as in "anyone who would deny the Messiah and his authority". Interesting. This is similar to the historicist view in terms of it being a "body of people" currently existing...except, we've named a particular office.

I'm reminded of the movie The Matrix with the villain being a single man as well as a body of people. Forgive the secular reference. Just using it for illustration. Indeed scripture says there are many antichrists.

Thanks for the perspective.