The Place of Oral Tradition

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,280
6,565
113
#81
According to what I have learned, and I always have found this fascinating, recorded history began with writing down events from the inception of writing them down to the present. Now whether this applies to the writings that make up the Word, I do not know, but I do know, this being a web site calle Christian, and this forum being dedicated to the discussion of the Word makes me adhere to the Bible as source authority of time, this age, as we know it. This is based on faith. Therefore I read the Word, I believe It, and I worship God, Yahweh in so doing. It makes life so much easier, faith that is.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
#82

What you say here is true, about the denominations. Once a label is placed on a system of belief outside the teachings from the Word Itself, you will discover apostasy has begun to set in. None of the named religions are correct, they are all in part apostetic. The only true faith is believing the Savior. Coming together in His name with authorities teaching His Word is the Way. There are true disciples of Christ in all religions of the Word, but you and I are not privileged to be judges either way. This is why we do not judge to condemnation, lest we be judged with the same judgment, however the same Teacher Who teaches us this lovely and beautiful teaching also teaches us to judge for ouselves what is right, otherwise He says we would be hypocrites. God bless you always, amen.
Jesus established ONE Church - ONE Body.
He didn't establish 50,000. We need to remember that.

As I stated before, this Church - this Body is called:
The Pillar and Foundation of Truth (I Tim. 3:15)
The FULNESS of Christ (Eph. 1:22-23)
Jesus identifies His very SELF with His Church (Acts 9:4-5)

Just as there can only be ONE truth, ONE Pillar and foundation of athat Truth and ONE fullness of that Truth - there can only be ONE Church - not 50,000 disjointed, splintered "versions" of it . . .
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#83
Jesus told the Apostles to excommunicate a member of the Church if they did not LISTEN to the Church (Matt. 18:15-18).
He didn't say to excommunicate them if they didn't read their Bibles. Jesus gave full and supreme Authority to His Church that whatever it ordained on earth would be ordained in heaven.

NOWHERE in Scripture do we see that kind of Authority being given to Scripture.
Actually, the Scripture you quote for this is the authority in which the church would judge by. So, yes, the Scriptures does have that authority, and the church has it only when they judge by the Word.
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#84
WRONG.

First of all, Luther called the Book of James the "Epistle of straw" and had it not been for Philip Melancton, he would have removed James, Hebrews and Revelation from his German translation. This is a point of HISTORY.
You cannot change that fact.

As for Jerome, He had issues with the Deuterocnonicals but acquiezced to the Authority of the Church on the matter. In his later life, He used the Books of Wisdom, Baruch, Tobit and Judith in his debates and referred to the as HOLY SCRIPTURE.
That is another point of HISTORY that you simply cannot argue with.

Funny thing about history - you can't change is no matter HOW much you don't like it . . .
It's also in history that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and had chemical weapons.......... just because it's in history doesn't mean it's true:p
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
#85
no you don't...but seeing that your arguments are so predictable i know what you -do- have...

what you have is a set of new testament passages that you are going to argue are quotations of or allusions to your apocryphal books...and on that basis you are going to argue that your apocryphal books belong in the canon but were taken out by jews and protestants...

you can go ahead and post that stuff if you want...but in response i will point out passages where the new testament authors quoted from the writings of pagan philosophers...and i will rhetorically ask why -your- church removed -those- writings...
Here is the FIRST bit of evidence that the Deuterocanonical Books from the Septuagint were quoted or alluded to in the NT writings over 100 times.

Eph. 6:13-17 - the whole discussion of armor, helmet, breastplate, sword, shield, etc. is from Wisdom 5:17-20.

Let's see if you can refute this one because I've got about 100 more . . .
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
#86
Actually, the Scripture you quote for this is the authority in which the church would judge by. So, yes, the Scriptures does have that authority, and the church has it only when they judge by the Word.
WRONG.
That's not what these passages say (Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 20:21-23).
You see - Jesus told His Church that the Holy Spirit would guide it to ALL truth (John 16:12-15).

This includes the Canon of Scripture, which was declared by none other than His CHURCH..
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
#87
It's also in history that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and had chemical weapons.......... just because it's in history doesn't mean it's true:p
WRONG.
History doesn't tell us those things about Iraq. It says that this is what was believed at the time but later proven false.

All of the things Luther did and wrote about are matters of History and there's nothing you or I can do about it.
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#88
And you have YET to show me a verse where it states that the Scriptures are more authoritative than the Church. I have provided the verses that state just the opposite.

Look, here's alittle advice about debating: Try to bring some evidence to the table instead of mere opinions. I'll start by showing the Supreme Authority of the Church:

The Church is the Body of Christ and He is the Head (1 Cor. 12:12-31, Eph. 4:3-6, Col. 1:8).
Jesus is Truth itself (John 14:6).

Jesus promised His Church that the Holy Spirit would guide her to ALL Truth (John 16:12-15).

The Church is the Pillar and Foundation of Truth (1 Tim. 3:15).

The Church is the FULLNESS of Christ (Eph. 1:22-23).

Jesus identifies His very SELF with His Church (Acts 9:4-5).


About His Church, Jesus said the following:

Matt 16:18-19
I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

Matt. 18:17-18
If he refuses to listen to them, tell the church. If he refuses to listen even to the church, then treat him as you would a Gentile or a tax collector. Amen, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

Luke 10:16Whoever listens to you listens to me. Whoever rejects you rejects me. And whoever rejects me rejects the one who sent me."
Sorry, but you cannot win this argument on your anti-Catholic opinions.
They MUST be Scripturally-based.

Is this the Scripture you're looking for?

John 1:1[SUP]1[/SUP] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.[SUP]2[/SUP] The same was in the beginning with God.
2 Timothy 3:16[SUP]16[/SUP] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
Since Jesus is the living Word, the Word does have more authority than the church. Since the church is to walk in the Spirit, surely you know that the Spirit of God always lines up with the Word. Jesus gives authority to the church, true; but the church can only use authority according to the leading of the Spirit, and not by their flesh.
1 Corinthians 2:13 [SUP]13 [/SUP]Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

The Father, The Word, and the Spirit are all one in perfect agreement.
1 John 5:7 [SUP]7 [/SUP]For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

When the church judges according to God's word, God honors the authority of his own Word.
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#89
WRONG.
History doesn't tell us those things about Iraq. It says that this is what was believed at the time but later proven false.

All of the things Luther did and wrote about are matters of History and there's nothing you or I can do about it.
Neither history nor tradition of men can claim no authority above the Word of God. It was the traditions of men that perverted the teachings of the scribes and Pharisees in Jesus' day and perverted the teachings of the original Catholic Church. After two strikes, you want to hang onto that? If you do, it will pervert you also.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
#90

Is this the Scripture you're looking for?

John 1:1[SUP]1[/SUP] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.[SUP]2[/SUP] The same was in the beginning with God.
2 Timothy 3:16[SUP]16[/SUP] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
Since Jesus is the living Word, the Word does have more authority than the church. Since the church is to walk in the Spirit, surely you know that the Spirit of God always lines up with the Word. Jesus gives authority to the church, true; but the church can only use authority according to the leading of the Spirit, and not by their flesh.
1 Corinthians 2:13 [SUP]13 [/SUP]Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

The Father, The Word, and the Spirit are all one in perfect agreement.
1 John 5:7 [SUP]7 [/SUP]For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

When the church judges according to God's word, God honors the authority of his own Word.
"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."

The Church agrees - all Scripture IS profitable (useful) for teaching doctrine, reproof, correction, etc., and every single Catholic doctrine is backed up by Scripture. NONE of it is the teachings of man. It is all God at work through the Holy spirit - just as Jesus guaranteed His Church in John 16:12-15.

And, you're right - Jesus IS the Word and He equates the Church with His very SELF:

Acts 9:4-5
He (Saul) fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?”
“Who are you, Lord?” Saul asked.
“I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting."

Saul (Paul) was persecuting the Church, yet Jesus chose to identiify HIMSELF as the one being persecuted.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
#91
Neither history nor tradition of men can claim no authority above the Word of God. It was the traditions of men that perverted the teachings of the scribes and Pharisees in Jesus' day and perverted the teachings of the original Catholic Church. After two strikes, you want to hang onto that? If you do, it will pervert you also.
Who said that the Church is above the Word of God?
It is in the Word of God that we see the Church's Authority.

PS - what is the "original" Catholic Church that you speak of??
There's only ever been ONE . . .
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#92
Well, at least you're letting everybody else rest.:p
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,782
2,952
113
#93
Bad analogy.
As i have stated twice already - Jesus of Nazareth was not mentioned in the Old Testament. The Bereans, therefore, believed in something that was not explicit in Scripture but WAS explicit in ORAL teaching.
Are you kidding?? The entire Bible is the revelation of Jesus Christ!! Are you like the modern day Jews who will not read Isa. 53 or Psalm 22 because it sounds suspiciously like a "suffering Messiah?"

The entire Old Testament is about God choosing a people through which would come the Messiah. It is the record of the progress of these people, including the prophecies and the promises of God that Jesus would come and be king.

For example:

"For to us a child is born,
to us a son is given;
and the government shall be upon his shoulder,
and his name shall be called
Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." Isa. 9:6

I have heard anywhere from 300 to 600 prophecies were directly fulfilled in the coming of Jesus. I admit to never having studied them all, but it certainly is a good idea to study them to counter people who do not understand the entire purpose of the Bible was to reveal Jesus, and confirm him as Lord and Saviour of the world.
 
May 6, 2013
119
1
0
#94
Are you kidding?? The entire Bible is the revelation of Jesus Christ!! Are you like the modern day Jews who will not read Isa. 53 or Psalm 22 because it sounds suspiciously like a "suffering Messiah?"

The entire Old Testament is about God choosing a people through which would come the Messiah. It is the record of the progress of these people, including the prophecies and the promises of God that Jesus would come and be king.

For example:

"For to us a child is born,
to us a son is given;
and the government shall be upon his shoulder,
and his name shall be called
Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." Isa. 9:6

I have heard anywhere from 300 to 600 prophecies were directly fulfilled in the coming of Jesus. I admit to never having studied them all, but it certainly is a good idea to study them to counter people who do not understand the entire purpose of the Bible was to reveal Jesus, and confirm him as Lord and Saviour of the world.
You're not understanding what I am saying. I know the Bible is the revelation of Jesus Christ.
What I am saying is that the Bereans ultimately believed that this guy from Nazareth named Jesus, who lived in the first century was the Messiah prophesied in Scripture. The prophecies were implicit or explicit but they NEVER mentioned Jesus of Nazareth. That came from ORAL teaching.

Do you understand the difference between implicit and explicit teaching in Scripture?
 
May 6, 2013
101
0
0
#95
It's also in history that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and had chemical weapons.......... just because it's in history doesn't mean it's true:p

It is NOT in history that Iraq was "responsible" for 9/11
The case made before before the UN involved WMD's (true)
Resolution 1441 violations (true)
Saddam's Open Support for Terror (true)

Iraq DID have WMD's
read; "Saddam's General" by General Georges Sada
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#96
It is NOT in history that Iraq was "responsible" for 9/11
The case made before before the UN involved WMD's (true)
Resolution 1441 violations (true)
Saddam's Open Support for Terror (true)

Iraq DID have WMD's
read; "Saddam's General" by General Georges Sada
It was also history that Columbus discovered America. Then history had to be rewritten two more times after that to finally tell the truth of who actually did. History is not always recorded facts...... sometimes it's something written from one's own point of view. You couldn't add a point of view to a dollar and get a cup of coffee with it......:rolleyes:
 
H

hattiebod

Guest
#97
WRONG.
History doesn't tell us those things about Iraq. It says that this is what was believed at the time but later proven false.

All of the things Luther did and wrote about are matters of History and there's nothing you or I can do about it.
I have been on the receiving end of your posts, tad curt? Certainly all the ones I read here could be viewed that way...you may have knowledge, but it is nothing if we do not have love....that's in the Bible....I think for those of us who are not so well- learned, we respond better to a gentle, more patient approach. Fruits of the Spirit? If we have no in dwelling of the Spirit, no amount of Knowledge will ever achieve anything in His name. God Bless you for your passion! many here try to put their beliefs rather forcefully, treating those that do not immediately agree with them as a bit dim...I am sure you are not doing that. We need to remember, many think they are right, but there is only one Truth. Regardless of what Bible we read, i trust in a God of the impossible, and for those with a seeking heart, He will guide them and reveal His Truth to them.....even through The Message! :) God Bless you. <><
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
#98
I have been on the receiving end of your posts, tad curt? Certainly all the ones I read here could be viewed that way...you may have knowledge, but it is nothing if we do not have love....that's in the Bible....I think for those of us who are not so well- learned, we respond better to a gentle, more patient approach. Fruits of the Spirit? If we have no in dwelling of the Spirit, no amount of Knowledge will ever achieve anything in His name. God Bless you for your passion! many here try to put their beliefs rather forcefully, treating those that do not immediately agree with them as a bit dim...I am sure you are not doing that. We need to remember, many think they are right, but there is only one Truth. Regardless of what Bible we read, i trust in a God of the impossible, and for those with a seeking heart, He will guide them and reveal His Truth to them.....even through The Message! :) God Bless you. <><
AMEN!! (*stands & applauds*)
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#99
if anyone ever read the cia report both on wmd's
and saddams agreement to full cooperation with america
they just might scratch their heads about the propaganda.
but noway would that "ever" happen in the church.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
i also witnessed yesterday twisting of Matthew 18 for the purpose of
a wrong application of church authority...but that prolly comes as no surprise