i pointed out that jesus openly contradicted the book of sirach...
you responded by insinuating that jesus must have also contradicted leviticus...a notion that i reject...
you made an argument bringing the agreement between the gospels and leviticus into question and now you are attempting to deny it...
you responded by insinuating that jesus must have also contradicted leviticus...a notion that i reject...
you made an argument bringing the agreement between the gospels and leviticus into question and now you are attempting to deny it...
I did not make an argument bringing the agreement between the gospels and Leviticus into question -- I presented an obvious turnabout which you fell right into by voicing the logical error in the gospel<==>Leviticus relationship, which only makes my point about your original error. Unless you can improve your bogus 'condemnation' of the entire book of Sirach based on some ambiguous hand waving on something you never clearly identified... you have merely buttressed my argument.