The Temple Of God

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
There's a difference between an outward structural temple
and THE TEMPLE
If I could add...The outward structure as a temple seen is in respect to the temporal as in most parables the spiritual unseen understanding in respect to the eternal is hid according to 2 Corinthians 4;18.... the prescriptive for rightly diving or rightly distinguishing one from another. The thing of God not seen from those of men the temporal, as that seen

2Co 4:18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.

There’s a difference between an outward structural church
and THE CHURCH
Yes ..the church as the bride of Christ is represented by that seen . She as the chaste virgin bride of Christ is made up of many lively stones that does make the spiritual house .(not seen) She is shown coming down on the last day prepared as bride of our Husband Christ’s, eternal church.
It makes sense but it is clear that you do not understand THE BODY of believers is a different gathering from a body of unbelievers


one group is in THE TEMPLE/CHURCH

The other group isn't
Or rather one group has the treasure of the authority by which we can believe Him who has not form but the other has not the Spirit of Christ... meaning they do not belong our husband Christ. So its not so much they are in the temple but the temple works in them to both will and do the good pleasure of God not seen the eternal Spirit.
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
My goodness. It is clear it will be in human form.
There you go, yes 2 thes 2 explained that.

2 thes 2
3 Let no one deceive you in any way, for it will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness ( the son of destruction is revealed.
4 He will oppose and exalt himself above every so called god or object of worship. so he will seat himself in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God.

The lawless one will take on human form, satan didn't create the human body God did, thus the lawless one will seat inside a human bodily form and deceive many.
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
There you go, yes 2 thes 2 explained that.

2 thes 2
3 Let no one deceive you in any way, for it will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness ( the son of destruction is revealed.
4 He will oppose and exalt himself above every so called god or object of worship. so he will seat himself in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God.

The lawless one will take on human form, satan didn't create the human body God did, thus the lawless one will seat inside a human bodily form and deceive many.
And he, the antichrist, will "sit" in the temple showing himself to be gd


correct?
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
Do you believe the lawless one will be in spirit form or human form?

He will be a lying spirit(no form) who used the form of a creatures.a serpent in the garden and then after the fall man, another beast of the field (formed from the dust.) He worked in Cain as a antichrist in order to murder his brother Abel.

Below he uses the Pharisees with Saducees as antichrists)

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

God is the father of truth.
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
If I could add...The outward structure as a temple seen is in respect to the temporal as in most parables the spiritual unseen understanding in respect to the eternal is hid according to 2 Corinthians 4;18.... the prescriptive for rightly diving or rightly distinguishing one from another. The thing of God not seen from those of men the temporal, as that seen

2Co 4:18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.



Yes ..the church as the bride of Christ is represented by that seen . She as the chaste virgin bride of Christ is made up of many lively stones that does make the spiritual house .(not seen) She is shown coming down on the last day prepared as bride of our Husband Christ’s, eternal church.


Or rather one group has the treasure of the authority by which we can believe Him who has not form but the other has not the Spirit of Christ... meaning they do not belong our husband Christ. So its not so much they are in the temple but the temple works in them to both will and do the good pleasure of God not seen the eternal Spirit.
Should we wait and keep watch with our eyes set above and beyond to HIM whobthiyfh HE may delay, though HE may hide HIS FAVE (temporarily) from "Jacobs troubles, HE will no longer delay but will come straightaway?

blessed the man who waits 1335 days?
what is happening during that time sir?
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
the antichrist will take on human form, and deceive many into thinking he is.
I agree

y fortunately, there is a poster here who seems to think the beast is not a literal human fleshly form of a man (whose number is 666) of whom the dragon has given his power to
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
He will be a lying spirit(no form) who used the form of a creatures.a serpent in the garden and then after the fall man, another beast of the field (formed from the dust.) He worked in Cain as a antichrist in order to murder his brother Abel.

Below he uses the Pharisees with Saducees as antichrists)

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

God is the father of truth.

1 John 43

And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
Garee

with your logic:

Job was tares (as his friends even falsely accused him) and GOD as understanding spiritual hidden truths...and Peter as not understanding

job is a picture and a shadow pointing to CHRIST

And peters rebuke "get behind me satan" was because Peter did not fully understand what CHRIST has to suffer for us

you are claiming that job and ahadrach misjach and abesbego, who were given by god's grace as pictures and representations of what a believer by the Bew Covenant will suffer and must endure as knowing better than Peter...when they were only used as prophecies to point is to CHRIST


Snd not only that, you divide CHRIST implying that because HE is true man and true GOD, that Peter was forgiven because he offended Jesus I. HIS flesh when he spoke not fully understanding that THE CUP could not pass
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
you forget that Peter had just been given a theophany of THE LORD's GLORY and had confessed the LORD as THE CHRIST

And yet, as the LORD began to show himote of what HE must suffer, Peter in his dumbstruck confusion, spoke without wisdom
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
Jesus, upon Peter's confession said:

blessed are you Simon bar Jonah
for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you

but only MY FATHER who is in heaven

and I tell you you are Peter and upon you I shall build MY CHURXH

ANS THE HATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
Garee

with your logic:

Job was tares (as his friends even falsely accused him) still understanding spiritual hidden truths...and Peter as not not tares and not understanding spiritual truths

job is a picture and a shadow pointing us to CHRIST

And peters rebuke "get behind me satan" was because Peter did not fully understand what CHRIST has to suffer for us (because THE APIRIT had not yet been poured out upon those who believed that JRAUS is THE CHRIST and came in the flesh for the very purpose to willingly lay down the flesh so as to take it up again

because there was no other way

you are claiming that job and shadrach, and mishach, and abednego who were given by god's grace as pictures and representations of what a believer by the New Covenant will suffer and must endure as knowing better than Peter...when they were only used as prophecies to point is to CHRIST


And not only that, you divide CHRIST implying that because HE is true man and true GOD, that Peter was forgiven because he offended Jesus in HIS flesh when he spoke not fully understanding that THE CUP could not pass
What if those who speak for GOD without THE SPIRIT?
 
Last edited:

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
591
113
I fixed my typos in the above long post

sorry for all my typis

i type faster than autocorrect can correct and I'm on a cell phone which doesn't make it easy
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,776
13,534
113
i was wondering, since a traditional Hebrew year is 360 days, is that, 'prophetically'

360*3.5*1,000 = 1,260,000 years?

someone who knows better ought to check my math . . .



Why are you being condescending?

Or are you trying to sound clever?

My general advice is if you cannot understand something, then skip it and move on. Not being harsh, but I don't play games, and I don't in normal life waste time with gameplayers
i'm hoping to make it clear to you how silly it is to arbitrarily decide that any given mention of a "day" in scripture should be mathemagically understood as a thousand years.

The apostles understood that 3 days meant 3 days - so why dispute them and tell us it's 3,000 years? want to know what Jesus meant when He said He would rebuild the temple in three days? read on - it's explained in the very next sentence: He was speaking of the temple of His body.

if you can decide capriciously that this should be 3,000 years, that it's really about brick and mortar, even though the scripture tells us it's neither of these things, why can't i also arbitrarily decide that He won't even be resurrected until sometime in the 3000's and that all of what's written about His rising from the dead was speaking '
prophetically' looking forward to that time, instead of literally? why can't i change the 40 days and 40 nights Noah spent in the ark into 40,000 years?
oh, because it doesn't make sense?
well Jesus Himself building a temple - or as you say, demanding that one be built - in the year 3070 or so seems to me to make equally little sense.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,670
6,860
113
Jesus said the Kingdom of God WAS IN OUR HEARTS..........try looking there?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,776
13,534
113
I don't want to humiliate you Posthuman, or your likers, but here is the folly of your position.

You have absolutely no problem accepting that the Temple is figurative, representational

and yet you throw the toys out of the pram with the idea that the 3 days is figurative / representational.
because there's abundant evidence in scripture that the 3 days after which Christ assured us He would rise is quite literal. unless you deny the resurrection?? or was Jonah in the fish for 3,000 years? no? then again - aren't you being arbitrarily figurative & ignoring the explanation John immediately gives for what Jesus was talking about?

but for your part you seem to have no problem with tossing out 1/3 of Psalm 90:4 -- you'd rather quibble over whether 1,000 years equates to either 3 or 4 hours, though not to the point that you'd actually take to heart the implication: it's not a unit conversion from '
human time' to 'divine time' at all.

does all your thinking really fall apart if 1,000 1 ?
if that's the case, perhaps some '
re-thinking' is in order: you may be building on sand, not stone, at least in this respect.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,670
6,860
113
Luke 17:20) And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
21) Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.


 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,776
13,534
113
I am querying really BG, not asserting.

In the Temple Prophecy (Matt 24, Mark 13, Luke 21), Jesus states that the Temple will be destroyed and sit as a ruin.

The disciples ask when will this be? i.e When will it be destroyed, and when will it be rebuilt? (or in other words, how long will it remain a ruin?)

Jesus replies to the effect that it will remain a ruin right up until his return.

The issue for me is whether (as Thessalonians suggests) the Temple is rebuilt which causes Jesus to return, or it simply lies a ruin until Jesus returns.

I am interested in what you see in Zechariah
a temple may very well be built in Jerusalem. or the mormons may build one in Missouri. as inconsistent as they are, they may even start slaughtering goats there. either event precursing the Lord's return would establish the whole 70AD business as only a type, a precursor according to the Hebrew principle of recurrence.

what i'd dispute is the notion that what Jesus said about His own resurrection allows us to predict that it will happen in about 1,000 years from now, give or take a few decades.
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
some of the most bizarre tings ive read u see... what
Only Jesus can confirm this truth I have shared with you to you when we take in context what Paul is talking about in regards to what that strong delusion is and how and why it comes about that God would permit it to occur that believe the lie.

2 Thessalonians 2:1Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, [SUP]2 [/SUP]That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. [SUP]3 [/SUP]Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; [SUP]4 [/SUP]Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

Paul is citing 2 events here; the falling away from the faith and then the event when the man of sin be revealed. That means Christ has to deal with both of them in its own time. Note verse 6 as to Christ dealing with that man of sin in his time, thus alluding to dealing with the falling away from the faith at a different time.

[SUP]5 [/SUP]Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? [SUP]6 [/SUP]And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.


Paul goes on to pointing out that the iniquity which causes this falling away from the faith was at work in his day.

[SUP]7 [/SUP]For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

So Paul is assigning the iniquity by which the restraining power of the Holy Spirit will be taken out of the way, not that the Holy Spirit be taken out, but the restraining power of the Holy Spirit will be withheld to permit the strong delusion to occur.

Then Paul moved from that event as happening prior to the event in the next verse.

[SUP]8 [/SUP]And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

So Jesus will deal with that man of sin in verse 8 in his time just as the Lord will deal with the falling away from the faith which is to happen apart from & before his time.


[SUP]9 [/SUP]Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, [SUP]10 [/SUP]And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. [SUP]11 [/SUP]And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
[SUP]12 [/SUP]That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

So that is the iniquity that is at work in Paul's day that is to happen in droves in the latter days when God will deal with it at the pre trib rapture event for that is when God will judge His House first because of the falling away from the faith.

To identify that iniquity... we go back to verse 7 where Paul cites a new age mentality that can be attributed to opening yourselves up to receiving spirits after a sign, thinking it is the Holy Spirit being received apart from salvation.

[SUP]7 [/SUP]For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

Tying it in with the following verses again...

[SUP]9 [/SUP]Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, [SUP]10 [/SUP]And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.[SUP]11 [/SUP]And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: [SUP]12 [/SUP]That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Now how does this relate to receiving the Holy Spirit apart from salvation after a sign as being that iniquity? By the reproof that Paul gives to expose it as that iniquity by reminding every saved believer when they had received the sanctification of the Spirit & the belief of the truth at the calling of the gospel.


[SUP]13 [/SUP]But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: [SUP]14 [/SUP]Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. [SUP]15 [/SUP]Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

That is the tradition taught.

Now one will say, but those who go after Satan and signs and lying wonders are to be damned. Right, but not in the way you would think. If they do not repent, they run the risk of being damned as vessels unto dishonor in His House; disqualified and thus reprobate from attending the Marriage Supper at the pre trib rapture event wherein they will be received by Him after the great tribulation. That is where the vessels unto dishonor comes from and why they are still in His House; those are the castaways that get left behind at the pre trib rapture when Jesus will deal with the saints that have not repented after having fallen away from the faith or for other iniquity that they had not repented from. They are still His, having His seal, but not looking to the author & finisher of our faith to help them to discern & depart from iniquity comes at a cost of more than the loss of rewards of crowns, but the dire consequence of becoming a castaway.

In 2 Thessalonians 3:1-7, Paul continue to speak against those who have fallen away from the faith and departed from the tradition taught of us and are DISORDERLY.... as those in those movements of the "Spirit" are like "slain in the Spirit" or holy laughter movement or Toronto's Blessing, or Pensacola Outpouring, or Ernest Angeley's Healing Crusade, or receiving the Holy Spirit apart from salvation for a sign of tongues or receiving another baptism with the Holy Spirit with evidence of tongues where that supernatural tongue can be found in the world as vain & profane babbling nonsense as of the devil.

1 Timothy 4:1Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; [SUP]2 [/SUP]Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;

Is it not hypocrisy to receive the Holy Spirit apart from salvation when He is already in the saved believer? Yes. And so they will depart from faith in hypocrisy, opening themselves up to seducing spirits thinking they are receiving the Holy Spirit again or apart from salvation after a sign.... and for believing that LIE, God will permit that strong delusion to occur.

Paul goes on to say as a commandment from the Lord to withdraw from those that refuse to repent of this apostasy, and to not treat them as the enemy, bit admonish them as brothers in 2 Thessalonians 3:14-15. That means they are still His.

So there is a damnation to become vessels unto dishonor in His House coming at the House of God and those who do not look to Him for help as their personal Good Shepherd to discern and to depart from iniquity, they will become castaways at the pre trib rapture event because the Lord will judge His House first to deal with the first event of the falling away from the faith first. Vessels unto dishonor is the damnation that awaits those who do not look to Him for help to depart from iniquity.

So that is how all the elements tie in with how I was applying Paul's words to mean and why the strong delusion has nothing to do with the third Temple being rebuilt because that is the second event wherein the strong delusion is in the 1st event which has to deal with the falling away from the faith from which that iniquity was already at work in Paul's days.
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
the pre-tribulation doctrine originated in the eighteenth century, with the Puritan preachers increase and cotton Mather, and was then popularized in the 1830s by John Darby. Others including Grant Jeffrey, maintain that an earlier document called Ephraem or Pseudo Ephraem already supported a pre tribulation rapture. Pre tribulation rapture theology was popularized extensively in the 1830s by John Darby and the Plymouth brethren, further popularized in the United States in the early 20th century by the wide circulation of the scofield reference bible.

Pre tribulation rapture is just another theory floating around.