The works of the law of righteousness vs works by faith to justification

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
The original bases on the freedom that was sought from England got based further on prosperity, cloaked as equality.
If it were based on equality, rather than prosperity freedom, we would have had equality to this day as they did in the days of Acts where they burned all the evil junk and shared with each other giving to the others as they needed, making each equal, yet we do have a great country at the same time. Too Bad it was not set up totally on equality , then there would not be the problems that there are today, as in prosperity, one acting better than the other.
Just what I see
The hippies tried this without the moral aspects written in the Bible. It just doesn't work without the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. That includes the persuasion of ALL of the Word of God, SPIRITUALLY.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
answered and thoroughly refuted here



Considering you had nothing to say to counter what I wrote. I (and all of us0 can only assume you have no counterpoint.
Yes I did have something to say about you comment. I'll say it another way. Your response proves the point that I was making. I'll add a scripture:
1 Timothy 1:9-11 (KJV)
[SUP]9 [/SUP]Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
[SUP]10 [/SUP]For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
[SUP]11 [/SUP]According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,447
205
63
The law will not save you, but you still have to obey the law.
The ones with Faith in Christ's finished work do, not of themselves but of God's grace given to them as a response to God in Thankfulness, as in Loving all as God does equally
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,447
205
63
No. my friend, You have no understanding.

If you did, you would on your knees praising God for saving you. You would be out trying to show the love of God. not judging others. You would be acknowledging daily you still sin and are totally unworthy of Gods love and mercy.

Your like the pharisee stuck on a few pet sins, And think because you have kept them you are righteous under the law. When like them you do the outer, but can't see the inner..(you can't even see some of the outer. which is well displayed in here)
why not just go to the cross and die with Christ deeper and deeper, because then just maybe we might be able to see the new life deeper and deeper as Paul was Saul did daily, kept up a co-crucifixion with Christ daily HMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I wonder what this might cause to happen in us if we leave trying to be imitators to participators in the death first carrying that about in our bodies being dead to self, and alive to God through the resurrected Christ
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
why not just go to the cross and die with Christ deeper and deeper, because then just maybe we might be able to see the new life deeper and deeper as Paul was Saul did daily, kept up a co-crucifixion with Christ daily HMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I wonder what this might cause to happen in us if we leave trying to be imitators to participators in the death first carrying that about in our bodies being dead to self, and alive to God through the resurrected Christ
WOW!!! Now that's what I like!!! Dying daily is the key. God has given us all we need so we understand what we need to die to.

Hebrews 4:12 (KJV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP]For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

This is in Hebrews???? Written to the Hebrews???? Oh wow, what a coincidence. LOL
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,447
205
63
How did this thief overcome his sin?

Ephesians 4:28... Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.

God says sin is TRANSGRESSION of the law... and the Holy Spirit will reproof ALL SINNERS OF THEIR SIN... then the Holy Spirit will show us where we transgress the law, and as long as we do we will be reproofed... So sinners I guess switch the volume down so much that the Holy Spirit can scream if He wants, they will not hear Him.... Or what..

But let us say our thief does stop stealing and he goes and work with his hands THE THING WHICH IS GOOD, and then he share his income with him that needeth.... What happened to thsi man, does he still steal, or does he labour that is good?

How did he overcome the want to steal? And what made him go to work whith his hands what is GOOD?

I say this.... He had a conscience and he heard the Holy Spirit, but then God decided... That man I will give to my Son... Then God called the man to be holy and perfect. God called the man with the HIGH CALLING IN CHRIST... and God gave the man to Jesus... Jesus does what HE does best... Jesus recreates the man to the WILL OF GOD... PERFECT... Jesus not only take away the heart that wants to steal, but Jesus puts a NEW HEART in the man. A heart that LOVES WORKING WITH HIS HANDS THAT IS GOOD.... and Jesus bless the work to make a good income, and then Jesus bless the man with HIS SPIRIT so that the Spirit only wants to share... and HE DOES....
I like for it begins at the heart transplant and works its way out permeating the whole body that went to death with Christ at the cross, and as one decides daily to be co-crucified with Christ to old self, one sees further the new live that God has planted within them that started at the heart, and the Love of God is spread abroad through out our whole being, giving all credit to God, and none to old self or new self, for God is the only one good given for us to partake in, and share to others
Being participators past imitators as once UI started as an imitator, now a participator
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Yes I did have something to say about you comment. I'll say it another way. Your response proves the point that I was making. I'll add a scripture:
1 Timothy 1:9-11 (KJV)
[SUP]9 [/SUP]Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
[SUP]10 [/SUP]For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
[SUP]11 [/SUP]According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.

wow..

No, you still have not answered.

Let me give you a clue how you answer someone. You show them in their post the points they got wrong and why.

You do not just tell them they are wrong. This makes you look bad.

So either show me how my points are in error. Or prove you have no counterpoint.

and to prove even this wrong.

those people th elaw was written to? They are people who do not have christ. why do they need the law? to bring them to Christ. those who have found Christ already know those things are true and thus are no longer judged by them.

As paul said to the corinthian church.


[SUP]9 [/SUP]Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,[SUP][a][/SUP] nor sodomites, [SUP]10 [/SUP]nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. [SUP]11 [/SUP]And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.

Show me where Paul said they stopped their sin, or did not struggle with it, and it was because of this they were justified?

it does not. it says they were washed , santified and justified/. Not by the law/ But by THE SPIRIT OF OUR GOD.

Keep trying to get holy by the law. you will fail

keep trying to bring repentnance of others by the law, you will fail

People need God because they are judged. Not judged by modern day pharisees.

They need to fill the void in their lives, Only Christ can do this. Until christ fills that void, no amount of law will help them fill that empty void, they will continue searching for ANYTHING which they think will make them happy, and never find it!
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,447
205
63
You made an interesting point when you suggested that we "love all equally".

I have a bit of a problem with that phrase. We are humans. We are biased. We can't understand like God does, because we do not have His Wisdom and Understanding. We can comprehend somthing that has an "end". But our finite minds cannot Comprehend somthing that has no beginning. I'm speaking of God.


I have children. I love them all, "equally". But,, when I see my children standing among their school peers, my affections are for my children! Although I care very much, and even love other children, my children are far more dear to me than sombody elses. I am biased. My love is biased.

Let me be blunt. I love honesty and I love the truth, even when I don't like what I'm hearing.

If 2 kids needed saving and I could only save one. I'm saving my kid. Then, I will attempt to save the other kid as well, even at the cost of my own life. But make no mistake, my love is biased, I'm saving my kid first! And that's just the cold hard Truth!
It is only God that can and does do this, and can through you, me and all that believe if we might

Well just maybe we need to daily go to God and co-crucify our flesh, and maybe we might sink deeper into being dead to self as you pointed you are not dead to flesh and want to know God deeper and can't quite manage to do this
Paul co-crucified with Christ daily and the more death of himself the deeper it got he was finally able to say
Galatians 2:20
I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.

So just maybe it takes a daily co-crucifixion of self, in order to see the new life God gave you through the resurrected Christ?
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0

wow..

No, you still have not answered.

Let me give you a clue how you answer someone. You show them in their post the points they got wrong and why.

You do not just tell them they are wrong. This makes you look bad.

So either show me how my points are in error. Or prove you have no counterpoint.

and to prove even this wrong.

those people th elaw was written to? They are people who do not have christ. why do they need the law? to bring them to Christ. those who have found Christ already know those things are true and thus are no longer judged by them.

As paul said to the corinthian church.


[SUP]9 [/SUP]Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,[SUP][a][/SUP] nor sodomites, [SUP]10 [/SUP]nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. [SUP]11 [/SUP]And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.

Show me where Paul said they stopped their sin, or did not struggle with it, and it was because of this they were justified?

it does not. it says they were washed , santified and justified/. Not by the law/ But by THE SPIRIT OF OUR GOD.

Keep trying to get holy by the law. you will fail

keep trying to bring repentnance of others by the law, you will fail

People need God because they are judged. Not judged by modern day pharisees.

They need to fill the void in their lives, Only Christ can do this. Until christ fills that void, no amount of law will help them fill that empty void, they will continue searching for ANYTHING which they think will make them happy, and never find it!
I already detected that you would take no exhortation from me.

Matthew 7:15-20 (KJV)
[SUP]15 [/SUP]Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
[SUP]17 [/SUP]Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
[SUP]19 [/SUP]Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
[SUP]20 [/SUP]Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

Not accusing you of anything, brother, and I think we could agree that the door swings both ways. I addressed the state of America, and the state of lawlessness, and how the church fits in. You missed the whole point of my comments and accused me of being legalistic. If you can't see how you fit in by your comments concerning the state of the union, it is clear that you didn't even try to discern. The lack of discernment in your arguments prove the point I was making. How much more explicit can I get?
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,447
205
63
The hippies tried this without the moral aspects written in the Bible. It just doesn't work without the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. That includes the persuasion of ALL of the Word of God, SPIRITUALLY.
maybe this is because man needs to die to himself, his selfish tendencies, go to the cross and die with Christ there to self as Paul did, daily so much that he came to the point of definitely dead to self and alive to God
Co-crucified to self and he knew of self prior to knowing God through Chirst
Galatians 2:20
I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I already detected that you would take no exhortation from me.
exhortation?

you do not even know what this is. You STILL have not commented on ANYTHING I said. and you want me and others to listen to you?


Matthew 7:15-20 (KJV)
[SUP]15 [/SUP]Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
[SUP]17 [/SUP]Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
[SUP]18 [/SUP]A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
[SUP]19 [/SUP]Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
[SUP]20 [/SUP]Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

from what I see, this speaks of you. Your trying to put people under law. and are part of the problem.


Not accusing you of anything, brother, and I think we could agree that the door swings both ways. I addressed the state of America, and the state of lawlessness, and how the church fits in. You missed the whole point of my comments and accused me of being legalistic. If you can't see how you fit in by your comments concerning the state of the union, it is clear that you didn't even try to discern. The lack of discernment in your arguments prove the point I was making. How much more explicit can I get?
No. I countered your arguments. I knew exactly what you were saying,, I have heard it so many times before.

So your telling me

1. America is not selfish?
2. America is not greedy (because of selfishness)
3. That america is not trying to fill the hole left in their flesh caused by the separation of man from god due to sin?
4. That america is trying to fill that hole by commiting these sins, and living these lifestyes that they THINK will fill that void and make them happy. But fail to do so?

and finally. That they way to their hearts is not the law. But to fill that hole with Christ, which will cause them to stop being selfish, Start living like Christ and become others focused?

Prove those things are wrong!!
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
I don't see how two fine christian gentlemen can be so adverse to each other.
Is your docturnal casm really that great?
I don't see how it can be? Seeing as you both love Jesus Christ.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
No. I countered your arguments. I knew exactly what you were saying,, I have heard it so many times before.

So your telling me

1. America is not selfish?
2. America is not greedy (because of selfishness)
3. That america is not trying to fill the hole left in their flesh caused by the separation of man from god due to sin?
4. That america is trying to fill that hole by commiting these sins, and living these lifestyes that they THINK will fill that void and make them happy. But fail to do so?

and finally. That they way to their hearts is not the law. But to fill that hole with Christ, which will cause them to stop being selfish, Start living like Christ and become others focused?

Prove those things are wrong!!
Why did you think I was arguing from the beginning. If I was, then I would like to hear from others reading this thread from post #262. You fired first, finally raising accusation that I'm trying to endorse the law according to what you have heard before. I understand your argument very well cause I've heard it before from others. If you think for a minute that I'm insinuating that others and I should be under the condemnation of the law, then you have missed the entire point, yet proving what I was saying by missing it, and starting an argument that I have heard for years. As far as exhorting you, please get the point that is clearly defined. Until you can acknowledge that I will not entertain responding to your comments again as Rickshafer has written, and I agree with him. Thank you, and rail all you want. I'll read what you post, but I will no longer waist my time. Again, my our Lord bless you with wisdom.
 
May 24, 2013
682
10
0
I don't see how two fine christian gentlemen can be so adverse to each other.
Is your docturnal casm really that great?
I don't see how it can be? Seeing as you both love Jesus Christ.
Jesus brings Division! As we near the end, we will all be part of 2 distinct classes.

Those who keep the Commandments of God & Those who do not. There will be a Large group of christians that claim Jesus, only they will not keep His law. They will be keeping the Mark of the Beast,, all while claimng to be followers of Jesus. There will be another group that claims Jesus as well, only they will be keeping the Commandments of God. One group will hate and despise the other group. They will even seek their lives, to kill them,, all while claimng Jesus! Ought to be interesting!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Why did you think I was arguing from the beginning. If I was, then I would like to hear from others reading this thread from post #262. You fired first, finally raising accusation that I'm trying to endorse the law according to what you have heard before. I understand your argument very well cause I've heard it before. If you think for a minute that I'm insinuating that others and I should be under the condemnation of the law, then you have missed the entire point, yet proving what I was saying by missing it, and tarting an argument that I have heard for years. As far as exhorting you, please get the point that is clearly defined. Until you can acknowledge that I will not entertain responding to your comments again as Rickshafer has written, and I agree with him. Thank you, and rail all you want. I'll read what you post, but I will no longer waist my time. Again, my our Lord bless you with wisdom.
There is no use in railing. I was not railing, I was giving another aspect of what the problem with america might be.

You stated that america needs to get back to the law


When I speak about laws, I see them as a deterrent of crime. The Mosaic law is in 3 parts Levitical, that Jesus completely fulfilled, the moral concerning love of God and our brothers, and the consequence of breaking the 2nd. If we were to abide by the moral part that we are responsible for, in truth, as it was first given, (the moral persuasions thereof), we not only would be in the will of God as a nation, but also be knit together in brotherly love and respect. And our nation wouldn't be in the critical mess that it is in today. If we were a nation under God, such as our pledge to the flag depicts, why would our churches teach against the moral aspect of the Mosaic law? Here is scripture that will complement what I'm saying:


Those were your points. and I countered them with a different opinion.

And you just said I was wrong..

whatever!



I showed a counterpoint.

You totally ignored my counterpoint. refused to acknowledge my counterpoint. Failed to show where i was wrong in my counterpoint. and all you can do is sit there and say I am wrong.

Again, It is YOU who proves something... You have no desire to discuss.. only to show your points, and tell everyone else they are wrong.
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
Me in blue.

Oh so now you make an excuse for sin? When is sin not ever willful? Perhaps this is a semantics issue. Sin might always be willful in the context that everything we choose to do is an "act of the will." Perhaps I ought to use the word "presumptuous" then.

The Bible does say "sin willfully" as opposed to just "sin."

Heb 10:26 For if we "sin wilfully" after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,


Likewise it also says...

Num 15:25 And the priest shall make an atonement for all the congregation of the children of Israel, and it shall be forgiven them; for it is ignorance: and they shall bring their offering, a sacrifice made by fire unto the LORD, and their sin offering before the LORD, for their ignorance:
Num 15:26 And it shall be forgiven all the congregation of the children of Israel, and the stranger that sojourneth among them; seeing all the people were in ignorance.
Num 15:27 And if any soul sin through ignorance, then he shall bring a she goat of the first year for a sin offering.
Num 15:28 And the priest shall make an atonement for the soul that sinneth ignorantly, when he sinneth by ignorance before the LORD, to make an atonement for him; and it shall be forgiven him.
Num 15:29 Ye shall have one law for him that sinneth through ignorance, both for him that is born among the children of Israel, and for the stranger that sojourneth among them.
Num 15:30 But the soul that doeth ought presumptuously, whether he be born in the land, or a stranger, the same reproacheth the LORD; and that soul shall be cut off from among his people.
Num 15:31 Because he hath despised the word of the LORD, and hath broken his commandment, that soul shall utterly be cut off; his iniquity shall be upon him.


First one gets the thought then one thinks on it long enough and what is born? I agree that we are to subject our minds to that which is good. Indeed it gives birth to good things. Yet I don't see how that negates the "conscious exercise of the will to forsake sin in repentance" Yes sin and sin is sin no matter how big or small, and anything without Faith in God's finished work is sin
So you say if it is willful sin or not willful, Again when is it not ever willful? When a sin is done non-presumptuously.
Ignoring truth that God did take away the sin of the whole world all the way back to Adam and Eve and all the way up to this very present moment, and not receiving this and thanking God for this one does not see the new life God wants to give you once one accepts that God has forgiven them I am curious as to what repentance means to you?, then when one receives this new Life in the Spirit and see to just be in the Spirit of God refrains from even thinking of or about sin, because they are too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! busy thanking God and praising God for this through Jesus who made this possible by his death for new life to be received by the resurrection, just ask God and receive if you believe without any malice in mind and God knows who have malice and who do not, those without malice receive and Love as God loves
Colossians 1:22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Jesus brings Division! As we near the end, we will all be part of 2 distinct classes.

Those who keep the Commandments of God & Those who do not. There will be a Large group of christians that claim Jesus, only they will not keep His law. They will be keeping the Mark of the Beast,, all while claimng to be followers of Jesus. There will be another group that claims Jesus as well, only they will be keeping the Commandments of God. One group will hate and despise the other group. They will even seek their lives, to kill them,, all while claimng Jesus! Ought to be interesting!
its been that way since the begining of time

Those who sin (includes those who know it but don;t care. and those who think they do not do it because of some legalistic system of righteousness)

Those who follow Gods commands, Given power by God by working the law of faith. But understand, they are still sinners, Still unworthy, and will be until the day of their redemption..
 
Nov 26, 2011
3,818
62
0
Me in blue.

No I have never defended sin, Not in a direct manner but you have stated in a previous post that your sins were forgiven 2000 years ago at the cross which means God forgave your sins BEFORE you even committed them. This line of thought removes the necessity of mercy being granted on the condition of having to confess and forsake sin. and no I do not excuse serial rapists and or murderers, and or anyone that is harming another, this is not what the grace of God is about, you have miss interpreted God's grace for I guarantee anyone that takes it for granted will not escape ever. When do these sins stop though? God is a God of LOVE to us all, so if one sees this and sees that they are forgiven by God and ignores this, takes it for granted and just goes on doing wrongly to others as the Corinthians did, and why Paul wrote that first letter to them, because this is exactly what they were doing and Paul rebuked them, them being carnal still, not mature had to be put back under law and he did just that, to teach them, and they did learn came to a Godly sorrow in place of the worldly one they had. So when were the Corinthians forgiven? Are you saying that when the man was in an illicit relationship with his father's wife that he was forgiven? Or was forgiveness something that he had yet to receive? So tell me how will one escape. We escape via godly sorrow working repentance unto salvation. God forgives people AFTER they forsake their rebellion, not before. The law is still needed for the Law breakers, to show then their need for God and is why it is still in place. The ones that do not break the Law, do not need the Law, for the do not break the Law and why is this? Because of their belief and appreciation of God taking away the sin of the world in him for us to have a new life in his Spirit, not flesh by the resurrection. and thus we don't make void the law rather we uphold it. Rom 3:31
Hebrews 2:3 how shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation, which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed to us by those who heard Him,

under the law of Moses, death came to them by two or three witnesses, so how much sorer of punishment do you think one will get if one ignores this great salvation, done by God for us all to believe or not believe
I again gave up my works for God's works as Paul did in Philippians 3
Which is all I have ever tried to say, so whether you see this or you don't, free Choice to us all. I just know what giving up and trusting God in my works place has done and accomplished all praise and glory to the Father forever and ever
And especially thank You JESUS, because without you I could have never been presented
This all sounds well and good but how do you reconcile a position of being forgiven whilst still in rebellion? I completely agree that we give up our own works and submit ourselves to the will of God but such an action requires that the rebellion to God HAS CEASED. It is like James describes, "lay aside all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness and receive with meekness the implanted word that is able to save your souls." It seems to me you are saying "trust that you are forgive, receive the implanted word and THEN you will lay aside all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness."

In other words it does sound like you promote that one comes to God IN THEIR REBELLION and REMAINS IN THEIR REBELLION as they TRUST GOD and THEN SOME TIME LATER the change occurs.

Thus the Prodigal Son is forgiven and restored IN the pig pen and THEN he leaves to go back to the father.

Isn't that how you are presenting it? If you were not presenting it that way then I don't think you would shy away from a teaching that "one has to forsake their rebellion." In Acts they did not go around preaching "trust," instead they preached , "repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance."


Ephesians 2:15 He stopped the fighting between them by His death on the cross. He put an end to the Law. Then He made of the two people one new kind of people like Himself. In this way, He made peace.
Colossians 1:22 But Christ has brought you back to God by His death on the cross. In this way, Christ can bring you to God, holy and pure and without blame. Only if one DIES WITH CHRIST, it is not automatic.
Homwardbound,

I really try to understand where you are coming from yet I cannot find a reason why you are in opposition to the rebellion to God ceasing via a godly sorrow that works a repentance unto salvation BEFORE forgiveness for sin is granted.
 
Mar 3, 2013
858
30
0
Dear “eternally-gratefull”— Referring to previous posts, particularly #258 and #286;
If I may, I would like to help you understand some things, as an older woman who has been around the block a time or two…or three, even. I am not usurping authority over a man by this, simply trying to help a younger person not much older than my children.

Galatians 6:1 (KJV)
[SUP]1 [/SUP]Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.

When someone posts on any of the forums and the post catches your eye, be sure to really read the entire post before making your own post. It is evident that you have a burning desire to make your own point without making sure what the person you are addressing is really saying. (There is a thread called “true humility” that would be good for you to read, and I do mean really read it. As of now, it is very short because it is a very unpopular subject.)

Just-me , in posts #258 and #262 is presenting food for thought, not saying any of us should return to being UNDER the law. So, as the scripture above says, if you want to correct just-me, do it in meekness. James says:
James 1:23-26 (KJV)
[SUP]23 [/SUP]For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass:
[SUP]24 [/SUP]For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was.
[SUP]25 [/SUP]But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
[SUP]26 [/SUP]If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.

As I said in my earlier post (#286)”… no one is advocating going back to living UNDER the law, or claiming it to justify us - the point is to use it to show us how God expects us to live because man's transgression is the reason the law was given in the first place - to show us our sin. It is so ignorant for people to immediately jump to the conclusion that someone is saying we must return to keeping the whole law as given to Moses just because he/she says we should see it as a guide for our behavior toward each other and God. The law is spiritual, and by gum, it never expires!” You see, without really reading all of what another person says and going off in your own direction, especially showing, anger, disgust, irritation, or an attitude of superiority, does nothing but demean what you say. So, if you have something valid to say it is missed by readers because all they see is a confrontational attitude, with a large shot of arrogance thrown in.
Oh, and one last thing: in your post #287, I can give you names of certain churches I have been in and heard with my own ears the things mentioned, but that would amount to slander, which I prefer to avoid. I can tell you that as the women’s Sunday school teacher I was told in front of the entire class that I could not even read 1 Corinthians 5 because the pastor’s son, who was supposedly an ordained preacher in the Baptist church, was bringing his “girlfriend” to church, hugging on her, and putting his hands where they didn’t belong – in church – while he was still married to another woman. You know what the church body said? “We just have to love them.” I resigned. No one is going to tell me I can’t even read certain parts of God’s Word. Then there was the church that literally said, “Don’t teach us what we don’t already know.” Didn’t hang around there either. There are several more examples I could give you, but this is a long enough post as it is. I just wanted you to know, I am “talking out of school” as the saying goes.

Best wishes in your Christian walk.
 
May 24, 2013
682
10
0
its been that way since the begining of time

Those who sin (includes those who know it but don;t care. and those who think they do not do it because of some legalistic system of righteousness)

Those who follow Gods commands, Given power by God by working the law of faith. But understand, they are still sinners, Still unworthy, and will be until the day of their redemption..
God never forces obedience. His people willingly submit to His Authority ( His Laws).

Satan will enforce his law.

So, if God never imposes His law, that makes God a gentleman. Thus He stands at the door of your heart and gently knocks.

Satan, hates God's law. So, I think it's safe to say that Satan won't be enforcing any of Gods 10 Commandments on Mankind.

But,, I have a feeling that Satan will impose a law that will oppose one of Gods Commandments!

Saturday the 7th day or Sunday the 1st day.

Which do you think Satan would impose on mankind?